Talk pages consultation 2019/参加グループの登録

Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Talk pages consultation 2019/Participant group sign-up and the translation is 48% complete.
Other languages:
English • ‎Türkçe • ‎français • ‎polski • ‎português do Brasil • ‎suomi • ‎العربية • ‎سنڌي • ‎ไทย • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어

参加グループは2019年トークページの協議にとって「ハブアンドスポーク環境」のかなめとも言える存在です。このウィキつまり に置く中心のプロジェクトページが「ハブ」として全プロセスの中枢になります。ウィキの議論の環境について話し合うなら、皆さんが使いやすい環境でいつもしゃべっている言語で進めてもらい、さまざまなタイプのウィキメディアンの皆さんから意見を集めたいと考えています。

正式名でも略称でも、参加グループの呼び名を決めます。既存の名前 (国別協会やウィキプロジェクトの名前) を流用してもいいし、この協議限定で命名しても大丈夫です。
グループのサイズは大きくても小さくても問題ありませんが、代表者として1グループに必ずひとり (あるいは2人) 選んでください。代表者はご自分たちのグループと、この にある協議の中枢ページとの調整役をお願いします。
あるグループにはいつも活動するウィキが便利で、別のグループには外部ウェブサイトのほうが使いやすいかもしれませんし (たとえば SNS を利用するコミュニティは多いです) 、たとえばエディタソンみたいに直接会ってしゃべりたいグループもあるかもしれません。
ウィキ上で会話をかわした場合は、話し合いをしたページへのリンクを教えてください。特設ページを (いちばん大きな) ウィキに設定すると、すべてのフィードバックを追跡するのに便利かもしれません。会話の場がオフウィキだったら、話し合いの内容を文章に要約し、保存先へのリンクを教えてください。お好きな言語で書いてもらえばよいので、翻訳の手配はあとからこちらで手配する予定です。

Phase 2

Community Noun project 2280 white.svg Click to read the Phase 1 report!
In its second phase, the consultation is focusing on conversation around trade-offs. Community summaries for Phase 2 are due by June 24, 2019. Each participant of the group gives individual feedback related to the below questions:
  1. What do you think of the proposed product direction?
    Context: The Wikimedia Foundation proposes building a new, clearer design on top of existing wikitext talk pages. It will offer simpler tools for replying, indentation and signatures. You could continue to use wikitext on talk pages, if you prefer that. It should also be possible to participate in a discussion without using wikitext.
    Question: What do you think of this product direction?
  2. Marking separate discussions
    Context: People want to watch individual sections on the talk page. They want better notifications, archiving, and search. To do any of this, we may need to create a more structured definition of what counts as a single discussion. This may mean making changes to the wikitext conventions on a talk page. For example, we may create a new way that discussion headings look in wikitext, or a new link that you need to use to create, rename or split a thread.
    Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of that approach?
  3. Helping newcomers find the talk pages
    Context: Newcomers have difficulty finding talk pages. During user tests, only one person out of ten found the 議論 tab. Most testers looked for a 議論 tab on the opposite side of the page, where all of the other tabs and links are. Many people also expected to see links to discussions about specific sections in the article. We may want to move the link to the talk page to the opposite side of the article page. We might add discussion functionality connected to individual sections.
    Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of making the connection between article content and discussions more visible?
  4. Where to show discussion tools
    Context: Currently, many wikis have community discussion spaces in the project namespace (Project or Wikipedia:), rather than in a talk namespace (Project talk or Wikipedia talk:). The project namespace is often used for village pumps/cafés, noticeboards, and some workflows, such as Articles for deletion. The system will need to know where discussions happen, so that it can display the new tools in those discussions, and not display them on other pages. There are several potential ways to do this. One of them is to move all discussions to a talk namespace.
    Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing that?
  5. History tradeoffs
    Context: Sometimes, you need to see the history of the entire page. Other times, it would be more helpful to see the history of only a single discussion thread. It would be ideal if we could provide both, but we're not sure how to do that.
    Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a complete page history or a specific thread history?
  6. Metadata location
    Context: Some wikis place templates at the top of article talk pages. These may show instructions, warnings, or FAQs. They may hold page quality information, link to relevant WikiProjects, or identify past activities. Many new users are confused by finding non-discussion material at the top of an article talk page. It would be helpful to move some or all of that content somewhere else on the page, or under a different tab.
    Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of that approach? Which templates are crucial for the proper use of a discussion page, and which could be moved somewhere else?

Every participant gives others the opportunity to express themselves: we're collecting feedback, so this is not a vote or a decision process. At the end, all of the feedback will be documented.

Participant groups

Community summaries for Phase 2 have been posted!

Note for volunteer coordinators: please add your wiki to the lists below:

  • The first table lists pages that are ready to receive feedback. A banner will be displayed to logged-in users on your wiki, using the provided page.
  • The second table is for pages that are still under construction. When ready, please move the page to the first table, so that the link can be used in the banner.

Confirmed participant groups
What is the name of the participant group? Which language? How will you consult your group? Access the discussions Which user will be the primary contact? Notes
中国語版ウィキペディア 中国語 On-wiki, Facebook, Telegram 中国語 Taiwania Justo
英語版ウィキソース 英語 On-wiki 英語 Beleg Tâl
英語版ウィキペディア 英語 On-wiki 英語 Jc86035
フランス語版ウィキペディア フランス語 On-wiki フランス語 Lofhi
Russian, all wikis ロシア語 On-wiki ロシア語 Sunpriat
ドイツ語版ウィキペディア ドイツ語 On-wiki ドイツ語 MBq
オランダ語版ウィキペディア オランダ語 On-wiki オランダ語 Ad Huikeshoven
Wikidata 英語 On-wiki 英語 Jc86035
Polish ポーランド語 On-wiki ポーランド語
タイ語版ウィキペディア タイ語 On-wiki タイ語 Tris T7
チェコ語版ウィキペディア チェコ語 On-wiki チェコ語 Dvorapa

Under construction groups

To be confirmed groups
What is the name of the participant group? Which language? How will you consult your group? Access the discussions Which user will be the primary contact? Notes
日本語版ウィキペディア 日本語 On-wiki 日本語 Bletilla

This second table is for groups that are under creation. If your group is ready to receive feedback, please move it to the first table.

You can also participate by leaving a comment on the report's talk page.

Phase 1