User talk:Jeblad
Add topicThis page used the Structured Discussions extension to give structured discussions. It has since been converted to wikitext, so the content and history here are only an approximation of what was actually displayed at the time these comments were made. |
Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Jeblad/Archive 1 on 27 March 2016.
Foo
[edit]RESOLVED | |
Testing from the Norwegian community. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This is scary! Jeblad (talk) 13:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Who, me? Jeblad (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi you! Jeblad (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Or me? Jeblad (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Just testing
[edit]RESOLVED | |
Thread used by the Norwegian community (nowiki) for testing purposes. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Hei Jeblad. Er frekk nok til å teste litt mer her hos deg, sånn at det blir synlig hvordan det fungerer. Nå skal jeg prøve å lenke til ei ekstern side. Det ser ut til å gå enkelt. Kan jeg lage kursiv? Å jøss, og jammen lå ikke utheva under der også. Nå skal jeg pinge deg, @Jeblad. Snart er jeg ferdig, sånn at jeg får se hvordan det blir med en ny tråd. Hilsen GAD (men hvor er signaturknappen?) GAD (talk) 14:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Du trenger ikke pinge den som er eier av diskusjonssiden, den kommer opp av seg selv i meldinger. Det er blema til høyre i toppen. Den andre er for varsler. Jeblad (talk) 14:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Testing: Prøver å lenke til en annen diskusjon: Project talk:Sandbox/Structured Discussions test/2016#h-Lille_trille_lå_på_hylle-2016-03-22T13:15:00.000Z
- Noen som vet hvordan man kan lenke til et spesifikt innlegg i en diskusjon?
- Hilsen Kjetil Kjetil_r 19:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ah! Trengte ikke knapp. Det signeres i overkant automatisk! GAD (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ja, at en ikke trenger signere er et «problem». De fire tildene sitter så i fingrene at jeg har vanskelig for å la være...
- Vanlige svar i «redigeringsruta» havner under alle de foregående svarene. Hvis en bruker «svar»-lenka så får en innrykk. Jeblad (talk) 14:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Meh, ikke innrykk på den nederste svar-lenka, men det gjør vel ikke noe. En kan sette maksgrense på innrykk. Kommer det flere innrykk vil svarene bli klappet sammen. Idéen er at svar med innrykk er avsporinger, og kommer den langt nok avgårde så har det ikke noe med opprinnelig tråd å gjøre.
- Det er også lurt å sjekke klammene nede til høyre, de lar en skifte mellom wikitekst og visual edit. Har lagt merke til at jeg som oftest bruker visual edit i flowtråder, og ofte langt mer enn visual edit på artikkelsider. Litt snålt igrunnen. Jeblad (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Jeg la også merke til at man ikke får innrykk på nederste svar. Er sikkert en bevisst designavgjørelse, og er vel bare en vanesak – dette vender man seg til. Kjetil_r 19:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Jeg likte måten man kan legge til bilder på. Praktisk. Kjetil_r 19:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Kjetil r: Please do not insert pornographic picture here, that's a violation of Code of Conduct as per Code of Conduct : "Gratuitous or off-topic use of sexual language or imagery." Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- I assume your comment was humorous, but just for the record: The photo is of one of Norway's most famous sculptures, “Angry Boy” in The Vigeland Installation. It should be a pretty non-controversial example image, and no one would ever interpret it as sexual. Best regards, Kjetil_r Kjetil_r 06:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- For å presisere hva jeg mente i innlegget over: Man bare drar et bilde over fra en mappe på sin lokale maskin inn i redigeringsvinduet her, og to klikk senere er det lastet opp til Commons. Det var faktisk mye enklere enn "vanlig" Commons-opplasting. Kjetil_r 19:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Tror jeg så noe om at en kan gjøre det flere steder, men hvor.... Jeblad (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, it is possible to drag an image into VisualEditor and doing an upload on the fly. Jeblad (talk) 20:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Dette må da prøves?
[edit]RESOLVED | |
Testing from the Norwegian community. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Å teste noe nytt er morsomt, men det bør ikke ha alt for mange barnesykdommer og det bør kunne lett rulles tilbake der det settes opp. ~ Nsaa (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ja det er lett å skifte frem og tilbake, eneste som skjer er at det opprettes arkiver med wikitekst. Jeblad (talk) 19:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Extension talk:TagContent pingback
[edit]RESOLVED | |
Request about updating a rarely used extension. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Dear John,
Any idea if the 'TagContent' extension can still be downloaded and used?
Best, Cav Cavila 13:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Pickle Glossary
[edit]RESOLVED | |
Gratitude about existence of a glossary for the Pickle extension. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for the glossary at Help:Pickle/Glossary. It's really handy when translating! —Mainframe98 talk 16:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! I believe a glossary helps make the translations, and documentation, consistent. It takes a lot of work though, especially if you discover that others projects use terms that are inconsistent! ;) Jeblad (talk) 18:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Blokkert bot
[edit]RESOLVED | |
Everlasting disagreements from nowiki. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Jeg har blokkert botkkøringen din på nowp. Redegjørelse finnes på Tinget. 4ing (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Some news about hosting the Talk pages consultation
[edit]Hello
You have volunteered to be a coordinator for the Talk pages consultation 2019. Thank you!
We want to share with you some important information, so as some advice. All of this is based on feedback, observations and some decisions taken around phase 1 of the consultation.
Can you ask for details?
On the already started consultations, we have noticed that some people explain what they wish to have, and they express what they like or dislike about talk pages. However, they don't explain the reasons why.
Explaining why is very important: it allows us to find the common needs between users. Can you please review the feedback already received, and ask for details and "why"?
Reaching at other projects
Most of the consultation pages are hosted on Wikipedia, on several languages. We also need to get the feedback from people who contribute to other projects. Don't forget to invite them to participate (or setup their own consultation page). The more feedback we have, the better.
Reaching at newcomers
Most feedback received so far has come from experienced users. It is unfortunately not representative of all the users who use talk pages. Please consider to send an invite to some active newcomers. Again, the more feedback we have, the better.
To find some newcomers to contact, you can replace the RecentChanges link on your wiki with the following set of filters: Special:RecentChanges?userExpLevel=learner&hidebots=1&translations=filter&hidecategorization=1&hideWikibase=1&namespace=1%3B3%3B5&limit=500&days=30&urlversion=2
. It will show the list of users who have made less than 500 edits, and some edits on discussion pages. You can also invite people who left messages on your local Help desk.
Due date is now known!
Community summaries are due by April 6, 2019. We advise communities, especially the ones that would have had collected a lot of replies, to end the conversation by March 31. That way, volunteers will have enough time to wrap up the discussions.
How to close the conversations?
We have seen that some of the coordinators have started the conversations using the usual places to have conversations on their wikis. It is an easy way to reach people. However, since the consultation is based on a different consultation process than the usual ones, those rules regarding how to close conversations may not need to be applied. It is up to you to decide!
And again, thank you for your help!
Trizek (WMF) 17:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Bot on metawiki
[edit]RESOLVED | |
I'm not going to apply for bot flag on meta. (I'm throttling down the activity) |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Please see m:User talk:Jeblad (bot)#Approval DannyS712 (talk) 08:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Oversettelsesvarsel: Phabricator/Help
[edit]RESOLVED | |
I'm not a translator. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hei John Erling Blad,
Du mottar dette varselet fordi du er påmeldt som oversetter til norsk, norsk bokmål og norsk nynorsk på MediaWiki. Siden Phabricator/Help er tilgjengelig for oversettelse. Du kan oversette den her:
Denne siden har middels prioritet.
Din hjelp er høyt verdsatt. Oversettere som deg hjelper MediaWiki med å fungere som et virkelig flerspråklig fellesskap.
Du kan endre varselsinnstillingene dine om du ønsker.
Takk!
MediaWikis oversettelsesadministratorer, 05:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)