This is a test.
User talk:Quiddity (WMF)
Why didn't this reproduce my error?
Hi Quiddity, Hope all's well,
The talkpage page jumped and I've ended up marking Talk:Echo (Notifications) as resolved, I think I've fixed it but I have absolutely no idea so could you check please ?,
I'm really sorry!, Thanks, ~~~~
No problem! Yup, you fixed it, all is well. I'm glad you were looking at it, and feedback is welcome. :-)
What's going on?
What's going on with quotations marks in Flow titles? I posted a new thread at Talk:Phabricator/Help, and the straight single quotation mark was percent-encoded upon saving. When I refreshed, it displayed correctly. Is this a known bug?
Not a known bug. Please file, if you can still reproduce.
I tried to reproduce at Topic:Sv06400aub9lyi0w but all 4 types display the same after refresh, and without any percent encoding.
Can someone transwiki the page metawikimedia:Help:Transwiki to Help:Transwiki and any other helpful pages discussing the Wikimedia transwiki protocol to the MediaWiki wiki? Thanks! Please move this post to an appropriate discussion page if necessary, I was not sure where to post it on the MediaWiki site. Nicole Sharp (talk) 02:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
I've added a softredirect to that meta page. AFAIK, a single location is preferred, so that translators don't have to do the work twice, and to prevent slow content-divergences. Also, the meta location is preferred for most wikimedia-specific documentation, whereas Mediawiki.org is for documentation that applies to all re-users of the MediaWiki software. (Though inconsistently, because there are ambiguous areas and edge-cases, plus not everyone agrees. There are various proposals/ideas for fixing (or at least improving) this situation in the long-term.)
Also, just in case, you might also be looking for M:Help:Import.
I wanted to thank you for adding a 'Discussion moving to' summary link to the closed discussion. It is greatly appreciated.
P.S. I ran into a Unable to parse content due to a Parsoid failure while writing to you. I then started testing to replicate the problem, and I accidentally clicked save on a test post. Flow won't let me actually delete my botched save (I pointed out the no-delete design flaw before). So I edited this undeleteable post, and edited the "test" title, to turn it back into my original message.
I spent quite a while testing, but I couldn't figure out exactly what I did to trigger the Unable to parse content due to a Parsoid failure error. I'll give you as much of a report as I can. It started out with this text:
I wanted to thank you for adding a 'Discussion moving to' summary link to the closed discussion. It is ''greatly appreciated.
Note the '' before the word greatly, where I tried to add italics in visual mode. I then switched to Wiki mode, and I thought it odd that Flow put the nowiki tag starting at the apostrophy before the word Discussion. So I made a randomish edit... no clear plan in mind.... I don't recall exactly what I did.... it's possible I left an un-paired nowiki tag. I just wanted to see what Flow would do when I flipped back and forth between Visual and Wiki modes. Each time I flipped to visual and back, Flow re-wrote it differently each time. Flow was applying an unstable round-trip transformation. After about 4 round trips it crapped out with Unable to parse content due to a Parsoid failure.
It's a serious design flaw that Flow constantly translates and translates the content, with no underlying "fixed reality". This is why it keeps mangling stuff. With Talk pages, wikitext is the fixed reality, and it simply gets rendered.
Thanks for these notes, and the new topic at Talk:Collaboration/Workflows. I'm going to be away for the next few days, but will get back to it a.s.a.p.
- Hello, I cannot add a hyperlink to my homepage or my homewiki on my MediaWiki userpage. I receive an error message stating to contact an administrator or my account will be blocked :-o. ~~~~
- Accidental duplicate convo at [user talk:Jasper Deng]. ~~~~
Ah, it looks like Jasper left the note on your talkpage, 2 years ago. You should be fine, given that you're not a spambot!
I'm not sure what error you're encountering, exactly, but it might just be "warning" you, and not actually "stopping" you. Please try to save the edit twice. If that doesn't work (i.e. if the filter is actually "stopping" you from saving the edit), come back here and paste what you'd like added, without the "http" s, and I'll add it for you.
I would also strongly recommend removing the direct email link, that you've currently got there (and at English Wikipedia). You've already got it in your Special:Preferences, hence any editor will be able to use the "Email this user" link in the sidebar, to contact you (that link only appears when editors have a verified email address in their preferences). Otherwise, if you leave it as plaintext, spammers are likely to eventually find the plaintext version and add it to their lists.
Hope that helps.
p.s. this new type of discussion page (an extension named Flow) doesn't require signatures. Let me know if you have any feedback about it - it's part of what I'm working on improving. :-)
I was very confused on the editing format, yes. Very sorry to tell you, but my feedback is that I absolutely hate it. It is confusing, awkward, and next-to-impossible for me to use, sorry :-(. It makes it extremely difficult to copy and paste text from outside sources/wikis and jars my thinking since I like to edit everything in plaintext. ~~~~
I didn't see the date on Jasper's comment. The antispambot must still be preventing users from adding homepage links then. I just tried it again, and it worked this time, no warning, thanks. My e-mail address is already public as plaintext on ICANN WHOIS to spammers so it doesn't really matter where I post it online. Also, I like to have the e-mail link public so if a user is having technical problems or doesn't have a Wikimedia account, they can still e-mail me without needing the MediaWiki interface. ~~~~
Detailed feedback is always helpful, thank you again. :-)
I should add that it is aggravating enough that if it was implemented on all Wikimedia sites, I probably would avoid posting on talkpages altogether.... It should be an option on/off in preferences, with default option off. The beauty of wikimarkup is that it is very easy to archive and crosspost between wikis and it improves the information flow of hypertext (and thus new avenues of thought), whereas rich text defeats that and undermines the purpose of wikitext. ~~~~
If you click the
[] icon in the bottom corner of the text box, it will change into wikimarkup mode, for us people who prefer that. :-) It will also remember the last edit-mode (wikimarkup, or visual editor) that you used to change any text.
Being able to cross-post topics between pages (currently possible with transclusion, but awkwardly), and between wikis (not possible with standard wiki pages), is part of the plan.
There are many things that need to be added/improved/tweaked, and it will hopefully change a lot over time.
Hope that helps, and thanks again.