I think that it would be useful if the latest revision filter also showed revisions that would be the latest if it didn't count edits from the same user as being the latest revision. The point would be so that vandals couldn't make a random useful edit to make it harder for people to find their vandalism.
Talk:Edit Review Improvements/New filters for edit review
If there is, how do you use it, and if there is not one yet, I think it would be useful and should be around.
Help:New filters for edit review may help you.
No, Help:New filters for edit review has nothing in there about blocking out user creation logs. Jidanni (talk) 11:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
https://abj.miraheze.org/w/api.php?action=help&modules=feedrecentchanges is also helpless against User creation logs. Jidanni (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
What's precisely the problem?
Steps to reproduce:
- Set up a custom filter with a few edits, say unpatrolled, newcomers, #mw-reverted.
- Pause Live updates.
- Make a change on one of the listed pages (say patrol an edit).
- Resume Live updates.
The view will not change to reflect the change, and API responses to update requests will be empty (HTTP 204). Example request on hrwiki.
Hello, and thank you for reporting it.
How do you patrol the edit? You use a gadget to patrol it on RecentChanges, or do you open the link in a different tab, patrol the edit and close the tab?
No gadgets, I open the diff in a new tab and patrol it normally.
hello
I checked on this and I can't reproduce it. Which browser do you use?
@Trizek (WMF) I use MS Edge 95.0 x64.
I'm still able to reproduce the bug. Here's a screenshot of browser network activity: https://i.imgur.com/UDbLxOT.png The URL in question is this one. Active filters: Unregistered and unpatrolled. I patrolled a single edit, enabled live updates and nothing changes, all the requests still return 204 No Response.
The Filter "Logged Actions" needs better granularity / subpoints: 1) user creation log 2) block log 3) all the rest. So that I can disable 1) and/or 2) with 3) still being displayed. ~~~~
It seems that Special:Log covers these needs.
Can i alert admin of this error. It happens when clicking on view messages.
Wie kann ich das machen?
[übersetzt mit einer Übersetzungsmaschine]
Im Moment ist es nicht möglich, Bearbeitungen zu filtern, die von einem bestimmten Konto (Benutzer oder Bot) oder von einer bestimmten IP vorgenommen wurden.
At the moment, it is not possible to filter edits done by a specific account (user or bot), or by a given IP.
This widget, like others implemented with OOUI, is painful to style for wiki admins who maintain a custom theme but only have interface admin access. As far as I understand, the "correct" method for styling OOUI is described in OOUI/Themes and would require access to the server.
I think you would have better chances to have a reply if posting on the OOUI talk page.
Thanks for pointing me to the right direction. I'll give it a go.
Would be great if we could have a filter to exclude redirects. It would be breat to see only new creations with meaningful content on them. ElectricRay (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Is there a way to see only pages that have been deleted?
The Logged actions filter will show you deletions and more.
Unintuitive in the extreme
No idea how the filters are supposed to work
Changes page shows a mass of changes that are unlinked to -- no idea what they even refer to
Being rude won't help there.