Project:Current issues

Jump to: navigation, search

About this board

This page is for discussing issues related to MediaWiki.org site. To get help with MediaWiki software, ask on Project:Support desk.
Archives 

Current issues archive overview

By clicking "Add topic", you agree to our Terms of Use and agree to irrevocably release your text under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and GFDL
Shirishshrivas (talkcontribs)

Hi, I need help as I am planning to use media wiki commercially and installed in our premises. Before making live wanted to check few things

  1. As this is open source code and installed at our premises. Do we need to take care any copyrights things?
  2. All published content by me will have copyrights with us only. is this correct? there any no claim from media wiki on published contents.

Thanks for your help

Ciencia Al Poder (talkcontribs)

Yes, you can use MediaWiki with any purpose. MediaWiki is free software, however you can choose the license terms of the content you add to the wiki, so the content can be copyrighted. During the installation process you can choose from some licenses but you can tune it up setting $wgRightsText variable and others.

Shirishshrivas (talkcontribs)

Thanks for response, So if I publish my content in our mediawiki (wiki.abc.com) that will be copyrighted to my company only. is this correct? (if yes then can you please share any link which i can present to my company) also can you please help me to select the proper copyright and license options?

Thanks for you help

Koavf (talkcontribs)

How exactly copyrights work varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and context to context. For instance, your employer may have some kind of agreement with you that they own the copyright on works that you create while performing your job or if you are creating a work for the United States government it will almost always be in the public domain, etc. Either way, using MediaWiki is free softwarewe do not in any way own or control what you do with the software or create with it. No one here can tell you how to use this or what you are allowed to do other than misrepresenting the trademarks of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Koavf (talkcontribs)

You may want to look over Project:General_disclaimer, Download, and wmf:Terms_of_Use. But the short version is: no one here (me, the Wikimedia Foundation, Jimmy Wales) in any way owns anything you create with this software or has any control over it once you decide to run it.

This comment was hidden by Ciencia Al Poder (history)
Koavf (talkcontribs)

Good point.

Reply to "Can we use Media Wiki Commercially ?"
Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

We've been using the translate extension for a while now on this wiki, which definitely needs more multilingual support, so I think we should greatly expand its usage, by deciding where to start. The aim is to reach more MediaWiki users (rather than developers); benefits have to be balanced by costs, and in some areas the extension is easier to use than in others (or even easier than continuing with {{Languages}} and so on). Some ideas:

  1. Most viewed pages: I've done some, but they often need an update/revamp in English too.
  2. Configuration variables: hundreds of them have the corresponding Manual: page translated and can be assumed of interest. The pages use a common pattern and most important info is in the template, so – in principle – translations can be moved to the new system (semi)automatically.
  3. Help pages would be the most useful in theory, but those we have here are very specific and limited. It makes no sense to translate most of them, because the "real help pages" and their translations are in fact on Meta or scattered among Wikipedias (or other Wikimedia projects.
Leucosticte (talkcontribs)

About #3: What about the users of non-WMF wikis? Wouldn't translated help pages be helpful for them?

Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

Yes but one should first move the up-to-date and complete English pages here from Meta and other wikis (finding a solution for licensing problems and also convincing them not to keep outdated copies around), which is not going to happen.

Leucosticte (talkcontribs)

You may be right. I think it was a mistake to insist on public domain Help pages, and that we are reaping the harmful consequences of that decision. But to fix it would require acknowledging that a mistake was made, and sometimes people are resistant to that.

HappyDog (talkcontribs)

I disagree - PD help pages are a very good idea. However, it is a mistake to think they will be of any real use until we provide a workable method of distibuting them. I think it is a fairly safe assumption that if there was an easy way to import the default help pages into your local wiki, in the appropriate language(s), then that would be sufficient encouragement for the current pages to be tidied up (if, indeed, that is necessary - I haven't looked at them for a while) and, more importantly, widely translated.

I don't think think the solution here is to import existing non-English help content from elsewhere, or to try and encourage a translation drive for the help content, without having an export process in place.

Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

Seems we can all agree on this, so we're left with #1 and #2 for now.

Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

So... no interest/ideas/suggestions on those two points (priority pages and manual pages)?

Leucosticte (talkcontribs)

I'm afraid translation isn't my area of expertise. It's been noted that "English is the working language of the Internet", though, and my attitude toward those who seek to administer websites tends to be, learn English or GTFO. But you seem to be on the right track as far as prioritization is concerned; focus on the most-viewed pages first.

Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

Configuration settings summaries have over 23 thousands translations for the Configure extension; it would be nice to find a way to use them on wiki. I've opened bugzilla:43380 to see what's technically feasible.

Qgil-WMF (talkcontribs)

I'm not familiar with the Translate extension, although I'm looking for an excuse to finally give it a try.  :) Is it possible to promote a set of pages where translation is prioritized? Using a category, for instance.

Trying to translate the whole mediawiki.org is pointless and actually counterproductive, but there is a bunch of pages that would really welcome more translations, and a formal request to be translated. It would be useful for the project and for translator to identify those, and if possible get those nice stats telling that Japanese is 100% up to date, Italian is 83%, Arabic is 12% and so on.

There are two types of translatable pages based on motivation:

  1. Promotion: local languages are good to reach out to new users and contributors. Homepage, the hubs, How to contribute, the local Groups (mainly in their respective native languages)...
  2. Support: essential pages for users of MediaWiki and our technical infrastructure. The most basic and required pages of the manual, how bugzilla works how to get developer access...

Maybe it's worth having both translatable categories separate? Maybe some languages make total sense for Promotion but less so for Support (no specific examples, although I can imagine Indic or Latin languages speakers needing those translations more for Promotion than Support, since the average sysadmin / developer of those languages is used to deal with English documentation).

It is clear that the deeper you get into both categories the clearer is the need to manage some English, at least in our current reality. We could probably define a VERY LIMITED set of pages translatable here and now in both categories and then consider the addition of new pages based on actual need.

And I agree with Nemo that those pages need a review in the canonical English version before making big calls for translation. But maybe this is a feature? It forces us to go through identified pages, mark them as translatable progressively and giving more time to translators to deal with new content. For instance, we could start focusing in How to contribute and Help:Formatting, and do a first test with these pages.

This post was posted by Qgil-WMF, but signed as Qgil.

Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

Yes, it's possible to "categorize" requests for translations, see for instance m:Special:AggregateGroups. It's also possible to define priority languages and even to disable translations in some languages, but this makes little sense on this wiki. In general, people will always translate what they're interested in, not what you'd most like to have translated, therefore if something would use translations it should be translatable, while for focused translation recruitement you can have a specific priority group of translatable pages.

In short, I don't like that "very limited" in all caps, unless you consider (like me) that e.g. 600 configuration settings pages (out of ten thousands content pages) would be a "very limited" set of translatable pages. ;-) Specific pages ready for translation should made translatable immediately: I'll comment on those two on talk.

Qgil-WMF (talkcontribs)

Ok, got your point. I just find useful to have a set of pages identified for volunteer translators without own itch or agenda. "I want to start translating MediaWiki content to Catalan: where should I start? Thank you."

This post was posted by Qgil-WMF, but signed as Qgil.

Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

http://stats.grok.se/www.w/top was updated; the Help: and Manual: pages in the top-1000 list should probably be made translatable. Who's willing to help me?

Qgil-WMF (talkcontribs)

Thank you for this useful link!

This post was posted by Qgil-WMF, but signed as Qgil.

This comment was hidden by Elitre (WMF) (history)
Vetonhaxhi (talkcontribs)

DJVU files not displaying after upload ?

92.251.65.75 (talkcontribs)

djvu files not display

Reply to "Translate extension"

Using watchlist notice for Code of Conduct calls for feedback

11
Qgil-WMF (talkcontribs)

At Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Wider_participation.2C_still there is a discussion about how to announce calls for feedback about the proposed Code of Conduct for technical spaces to mediawiki.org contributors. The idea of a watchlist notice has been suggested. As far as I am aware, we haven't used this feature in mw.o before. I guess this is a good place to ask for feedback about using this feature for this purpose.

Technically, this seems to be done by editing MediaWiki:Watchlist-details. Questions:

  • Is this use of watchlist notice OK or not?
  • Should we do it by editing MediaWiki:Watchlist-details or is there another way?
  • Should we use plain text with links or i.e. a Template:Notice?
  • How often and how long should these notices be kept, i.e. One week every time that there is a major call for feedback or more often?
Jdforrester (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Personally, I really dislike the abuse of that part of the interface for important messages, but I understand that some wikis think it's OK. We've never done it here, and I'd be sad to see it start.

More objectively, however, I also think it would be a waste of time for this wiki; very few people are active on MediaWiki.org in the way that editors of other wikis are, because a lot of the "action" occurs off-wiki, in tasks (Phabricator), in code (gerrit/GitHub/etc.), or for third party users of MediaWiki in particular, on their local systems, and so the use of the watchlist as the key place people see is not likely to work. The people who use their watchlists on this wiki (like me) are mostly wiki gnomes rather than the key people to involve. A logged-in-only sitenotice would probably have a much better effect at reaching the useful people for this work.

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

I have no objection to using a watchlist notice, though I agree with James a lot of contributors don't use the wiki that often, and probably use the watchlist even less. I also think the site notice is a good idea, but we probably want to limit it to text approvals (rather than "please help discuss this"). We don't want to be too intrusive, and the site notice appears on every page.

Ciencia Al Poder (talkcontribs)

I personally find CentralNotice banners way more obtrusive than a one-line text on the sitenotice. CentralNotice banners appear for me several days on a week, with images, even if I dismiss them, while the sitenotice can be dismissed once and forever (until someone updates the sitenotice ID)

Qgil-WMF (talkcontribs)

I propose to try something, be ready to pull back if there are justified complaints, and then fine tune next actions based on feedback.

A logged-in-only sitenotice looks like a good candidate for a first try, indeed. How is that requested and implemented? I propose to figure out these details and prepare a sitenotice for the approval of the Cases page, expected to start in a couple of weeks, after the call for feedback started yesterday by Matt has settled and remaining issues have been identified.

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

It may be just one week before starting the approval discussion, depending on how much feedback on Cases there is.

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

I agree a simple dismissable text sentence is fine. No need for an image.

The documentation is at Manual:Interface/Sitenotice , but I'm not entirely clear from that how it interacts with CentralNotice. Someone from Fundraising Tech probably knows.

@AGreen (WMF), how would we configure it if we want a dismissable text notice here and on wikitech.wikimedia.org?

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

Talked to @Awight (WMF) and @AGreen (WMF)

Looks like CentralNotice is the best option here. It doesn't yet support wikitech.wikimedia.org (phab:T147036), but I don't think that's a deal-breaker. I would guess most users of wikitech.wikimedia.org will either see it on MediaWiki.org or have heard about it already.

That will allow a banner that is:

  • text (CentralNotice supports HTML, but a text-only HTML banner is not a problem)
  • Logged-in only (just don't check "Anonymous users")
  • Dismissable (need to add the "Close button" explicitly when drafting the banner, but then it will just work).

Awight said the SiteNotice would probably be problematic for caching. This looks to be the case. Not only does it show to anons (which we don't want), it will be cached for 30 days.

Qgil-WMF (talkcontribs)

+1

This comment was hidden by Ciencia Al Poder (history)
Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

@Seddon (WMF) @Qgil-WMF @AGreen (WMF) @Awight (WMF) Do you know who we can work with on this? I don't think I have the permissions to create a banner.

I saw meta:CentralNotice/Request , but it says it needs to be "10 days in advance of any campaign". We will have to update it frequently, and I would prefer not to have a 10-day lead time each time.

Reply to "Using watchlist notice for Code of Conduct calls for feedback"

How can a change the default formatting of Headers/Layers?

2
80.228.12.89 (talkcontribs)

hey!

i've been trying to change the default style of my headers. in my opinion, the third, fourth, fifth, (...) layer are to "thick". they are way "better to see" than the second layer (== layer 2 ==). where can i change the formatting of the layers??

best regards

Wargo (talkcontribs)

Manual:CSS

Reply to "How can a change the default formatting of Headers/Layers?"

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

2
Trizek (WMF) (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)

Hello!

An increasing number of communities now use Flow (like Mediawiki.org) or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey, which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Nghiem419ddt (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey"

Sidebar localisation request (pt)

8
Summary by Hamilton Abreu

Done.

Hamilton Abreu (talkcontribs)

Hi everyone, may I ask an admin to perform the following sidebar localisation updates:

Create:

Update:

Koavf (talkcontribs)

Is this not done at https://translatewiki.net/?

Hamilton Abreu (talkcontribs)

Some of the links in the sidebar come from standard MediaWiki, and are localised in translatewiki.net, others are site specific and can only be localised here. The "update" ones were localised in the past and are now outdated, the "create" ones are new since I last localised the sidebar for pt, way back when.

Ciencia Al Poder (talkcontribs)

I speak Spanish and I have a very basic understanding of Portuguese, so I've implemented the changes.

However, this is probably not accurate enough: MediaWiki:Mw-wikimedia-engineering/pt = "Engenharia", which in English is Wikimedia engineering. I think "Wikimedia" should appear somewhere.

Hamilton Abreu (talkcontribs)

Point taken on the Wikimedia thing, thanks, let me think about it. The update to MediaWiki:Phpdoc/pt was missed.

Ciencia Al Poder (talkcontribs)

I also wasn't sure about that one, since English version also says "code docs", since it's documentation about code and not MediaWiki. Why do you think removing "código" is better here?

Hamilton Abreu (talkcontribs)

The objective is to keep the sidebar neat, preventing strings from wrapping, which makes it clumsy. This is achieved in English by the abbreviation "docs", which doesn't translate.

So, the section is named "Development". We thus have it implied in:

  • "Development" Bugs
  • "Development" Repository
  • "Development" Documentation
  • "Development" Statistics
  • "Development" Engineering
Ciencia Al Poder (talkcontribs)

Ok, seems reasonable. Done

GeoffreyT2000 (talkcontribs)

Currently, deletion log entries on this wiki say "User (talk | contribs) deleted Title", but I think that MediaWiki:Logentry-delete-delete should itself be deleted to restore the default message.

Jdforrester (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Done.

How to test MediaWiki api with action="edit"?

7
Nghiem419ddt (talkcontribs)

I want to add some links into "External links" section of some wikipedia pages, so I write an application using mediawiki api with "action=edit" to do this.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php)

Do I have permission to do this? If yes, could you please tell me how to update this section using mediawiki api and how to test this api? Because I cannot post a request to update an existing wikipedia page.

Thank you very much.

Best regards,

Kevin

Mainframe98 (talkcontribs)

Wikipedia also has the test.wikipedia and the test2.wikipedia domains, which are for this exact purpose.

Nghiem419ddt (talkcontribs)

Hi,

I can get the content of "External links", the content is the string as below

==External links==
*[http://tellurideskiresort.com/ Telluride Ski Resort]
*[http://www.coloradoskihistory.com/areahistory/telluride.html ColoradoSkiHistory.com - Telluride Ski Area]
*[http://www.weatherunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=81435 Telluride Weather Forecast - WeatherUnderground.com]
*[http://www.visittelluride.com/ Telluride Tourism Board Official Site]
*[http://www.3dskimaps.com/index.php?path=telluride 3dSkiMap of Telluride Ski Resort]

[[Category:Ski areas and resorts in Colorado]]
[[Category:Buildings and structures in San Miguel County, Colorado]]
[[Category:Visitor attractions in San Miguel County, Colorado]]

And then I using a method to update this string to

==External links==
*[http://www.mydomain.com/ My website]
*[http://tellurideskiresort.com/ Telluride Ski Resort]
*[http://www.coloradoskihistory.com/areahistory/telluride.html ColoradoSkiHistory.com - Telluride Ski Area]
*[http://www.weatherunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=81435 Telluride Weather Forecast - WeatherUnderground.com]
*[http://www.visittelluride.com/ Telluride Tourism Board Official Site]
*[http://www.3dskimaps.com/index.php?path=telluride 3dSkiMap of Telluride Ski Resort]

[[Category:Ski areas and resorts in Colorado]]
[[Category:Buildings and structures in San Miguel County, Colorado]]
[[Category:Visitor attractions in San Miguel County, Colorado]]

And then I call this api "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php" to post with the json

{
	"action":"edit",
	"contentformat":"text/x-wiki",
	"token":"8ecd52629cc8a27469fa65f9b8ecc0b2580900bb%2B%5C",
	"title":"Telluride_Ski_Resort",
	"section":"17",
	"text":"==External links==\n*[http://www.mydomain.com/ My website]\r\n*[http://tellurideskiresort.com/ Telluride Ski Resort]\n*[http://www.coloradoskihistory.com/areahistory/telluride.html ColoradoSkiHistory.com - Telluride Ski Area]\n*[http://www.weatherunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=81435 Telluride Weather Forecast - WeatherUnderground.com]\n*[http://www.visittelluride.com/ Telluride Tourism Board Official Site]\n*[http://www.3dskimaps.com/index.php?path=telluride 3dSkiMap of Telluride Ski Resort]\n\n[[Category:Ski areas and resorts in Colorado]]\n[[Category:Buildings and structures in San Miguel County, Colorado]]\n[[Category:Visitor attractions in San Miguel County, Colorado]]",
	"format":"json",
	"assert":"user"
}

Is it correct? Thank you very much.

Best regards,

Kevin

Mainframe98 (talkcontribs)

I believe the contenttype should reflect the way you are presenting the POST request, so it should be application/x-www-form-urlencoded according to API:Edit. I never got it working with contenttype set to json, so I can't offer any insight into that.

Nghiem419ddt (talkcontribs)

If I use application/x-www-form-urlencoded, I cannot post a long and complicated string in "text" parameter

Legoktm (talkcontribs)

To be clear, posting JSON to the API will not work - you need to post a form basically with the values, and you should be able to post as long of a string as you want in the text parameter.

Additionally, if you want to run a script on the English Wikipedia, you need to have it approved first. You should read their guidelines and policies about bots first.

Nghiem419ddt (talkcontribs)

Thanks Legoktm

Reply to "How to test MediaWiki api with action="edit"?"
Yolo33s (talkcontribs)

After installing PdfExport Extension (v3.2.0) for mediawiki 1.27.0, I have the following error message :

Fatal error: Call to undefined method Article::preSaveTransform() in /var/www/wiki/extensions/PdfExport/converters/HtmlDocPdfConverter.php on line 151

This comment was hidden by Seb35 (history)
This comment was hidden by Seb35 (history)
Seb35 (talkcontribs)

@Yolo33s: This extension is hardly maintained since some time. In fact the line you pointed probably didn’t work since MediaWiki 1.18. I just solved a number of issues I experimented when launching this extension with MediaWiki 1.28alpha, PHP 7.0 and Dompdf 0.7 (installed with Composer), whose this issue. Finally it worked with Dompdf – I didn’t tested other backends. When the change I04eda179bab689e29b9f26caf10807f4136afa3f will be merged, it should work, but you will have to install the very last version (it will be available on ).

62.102.229.98 (talkcontribs)

@Seb35: Thanks for support. I first tried to install dompdf 0.7 with composer but as I don't master it I was not sure about what I was doing. The unzipped dompdf folder is in /usr/bin/dompdf. In LocalSettings.php, I added "require_once '/usr/bin/dompdf/autoload.inc.php';" but when I try to print a page, I get an error message saying that no pdf converter software has been found.

Is it good to place the require_once in LocalSettings.php ? I also tried in index.php. More precisions on how to install dompdf would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Seb35 (talkcontribs)

I tested the following commands (probably you did some of these):

  1. Download Dompdf 0.7 from GitHub
  2. Unzip it in the MediaWiki directory, next to LocalSettings.php, the subdirectory is named "dompdf"
  3. Add require_once __DIR__ . '/dompdf/autoload.inc.php'; in your LocalSettings.php
  4. Download the patched version of PdfExport from my website (when the change above will be merged, it will be available in the "official" version on )
  5. Unzip it as usual in extensions/ (if you had a previous extensions/PdfExport move it to another location or delete it)
  6. It should work

I guess you are under Linux, right? If so, the path /usr/bin is reserved for general commands, but not for librairies (as is Dompdf); I said above to put it in the MediaWiki directory, it is probably a good place; else web applications sometimes have a subdirectory "lib" where are the external librairies (MW doesn’t have this subdirectory, external librairies are in the subdirectory "vendor" managed by Composer -- prepared by the release manager in the case of the tarball).

62.102.229.98 (talkcontribs)

Thank you for the tips @Seb35. I did everything listed above. Now it is installed but when I print an article I get an error message Exception encountered, of type "Dompdf\Exception" without more informations. This is a blank page. I checked that all requirements are OK (Dom extension, GD extension, MBString, php-font-lib, php-svg-lib) and they are, then I restarted apache...

Do you have any idea about this error message. I read some posts about Dompdf Exception but generally the error message is more precise than just "Dompdf\Exception".

For information, I'm on Ubuntu 16.04 with PHP 5.6 and I run a 1.27.0 version of MW.

Regards

Seb35 (talkcontribs)

Great! At least the MW part seems to work. I didn’t have this exception myself – different config: Debian+PHP7, but yours seems to be quite good also. Can you add ini_set( 'display_errors', 1 ); on the top of your LocalSettings.php? It could display a more detailled information about the exception (you will have to remove it in production).

Yolo33s (talkcontribs)

Yes I also thought to display errors but unfortunately it is not more verbose...Only a strict standard warning unrelated to PdfExport or Dompdf. I wonder if an installation with composer would be safer but I do not feel comfortable with that.

Seb35 (talkcontribs)

If you feel comfortable with command line (quick guide: directories are separated by a slash "/", the main commands are "cd the-directory-you-want-go-to" and "ls" to display the content of the directory), you can install Composer inside the main MediaWiki directory (instructions), then add Dompdf as dependency by creating the file composer.local.json in MediaWiki directory (next to LocalSettings.php) with the content:

{
   "require": {
      "dompdf/dompdf": "*"
   }
}

and executing (in command line in MediaWiki directory) "composer update --no-dev". If you install it with Composer, remove the require_once from LocalSettings.php (else it could be installed two times). There is a guide for Composer on Composer/For extensions. Thanks for your perseverance!

62.102.229.98 (talkcontribs)

And thank you very much for your help @Seb35, I really need to make this extension work. When running "composer update --no-dev" it seems that this is mbstring and gd extension the problem. It is missing. What I don't understand is that I'm using php 5.6 and it requires mbstring and gd extension for php7...Strange. Anyway, it is installed but I still have the same exact error message. Note that in my mediawiki installation folder, the .json file is named composer.json and not composer.local.json. But if dompdf had not been installed, I would have had another error message.

Ma persévérance atteint ses limites.

Seb35 (talkcontribs)

Don’t you have some sysadmin or a geeky person near you? It becomes difficult to follow remotely. For Composer I guess there are dependency issues, probably because some dependencies require PHP7, so probably a bad idea to try in this direction, stay with your downloaded version 0.7 of dompdf. And it is absolutely required for PdfExport, so you (or anybody who could help you) have to make Dompdf work to make PdfExport work. Perhaps add also ini_set('error_reporting', E_ALL); in your LocalSettings.php.

If it cannot work, I tried to install Extension:Collection but, as I was afraid of, it is horribly difficult to install. And an external solution but functionning without any burden for the MW admin is to use the link 'Printable version' in the sidebar section Tools, then use the Print feature of the browser and select 'Print in file'. Depending on the browser, it will save in a Postscript file and/or PDF file. With this way to export PDF, the result can be different from a brower to another (e.g. I was surprised of a document where the font size was about the double between Firefox and Chrome -- it was quite small with Chrome and quite big with Firefox).

62.102.229.98 (talkcontribs)

Yes I already tried collection, and I already add ini_set('error_reporting', E_ALL); in LocalSettings.php. I think dompdf is installed because wether I install it through composer or simple folder, I had the same error message at the end. I will wait for the return of a sysadmin to debug this issue. Anyway thanks a lot for support.

62.102.229.98 (talkcontribs)

@Seb35 I did it ! I found on the general support someone with a completely different problem who needed to run the "jobs". After a php maintenance/runJobs.php, I could print articles to pdf.

I'm still convinced that the mediawiki documentation needs drastic improvements.

Seb35 (talkcontribs)

Ok, I didn’t know it could have an influence, but it’s great! Happy the problem was solved! (and aggree about documentation, it’s a lot of work, you’re welcome if you want to add something, but this thread will probably help other people also :)

Edrimon (talkcontribs)

Hi, Thank you for your valuable information. I installed as instructed in this document, but I get the following output for Greek in my wiki in UTF-8.

Any ideas? its common UTF-8 , should n't it work?

Reply to "PdfExport does not work on 1.27.0"

Phantom notifications coming from MediaWiki.org

2
Koavf (talkcontribs)

I watch Project:Current issues and when a spam subject gets deleted, my Special:Notifications page across all WMF projects has a little "1" for days and days. No matter how many times I mark them as read across all 850 projects, it still shows up for a week until it magically disappears. Can anyone tell me how to get rid of this? Is there by chance a Phabricator ticket related to it? ~~~~

Krenair (talkcontribs)

I think I also have this.

Reply to "Phantom notifications coming from MediaWiki.org"