I see you don't approve of my proposition for categories of extensions. Let me epxlain my rationale to you:
Before my intervention, the category:Random page contained an amalgamation of topics about "randomness" and extensions that selected/presented random pages.
What I'm trying to do is group extensions that select pages randomly under category:random page extensions, which already existed but was not comprehensive, as well as cross-referencing this category with category:Random content extensions.
I think this is more logical and structured. Don't you think so?