User talk:Ricordisamoa

Latest comment: 7 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text

#REDIRECTm:User talk:Ricordisamoa
This page is a soft redirect.

Re: Template:Extension[edit]

Sorry, I didn't have time to investigate further in that moment. The table was simply not parsed as such; I can't reproduce either, now. Please do reapply the edit if/when you have time to check the effect on that page and others, or let me know if you prefer me to do so. --Nemo 08:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think Template:ExtensionLicense should be changed to output SPDX acronyms. This way, all the extensions using EL will automatically be in compliance with {{Extension}} as well. --Nemo 17:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nemo bis: I found that a significant part of extension pages, including those using {{ExtensionLicense}}, have incorrect license information. Having them tracked in Category:Extensions with unknown license is helpful to me. I will go through them one-by-one and search the code for the actual license. --Ricordisamoa 08:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: SVG validation[edit]

Volevo commentare ma non hai messo nessun link. È solitamente utile avere una pagina qui per l'estensione, in cui elaborare e raccogliere idee, anche solo incollare il testo della spiegazione mailarchive:wikitech-l/2015-January/080194.html è utile. Puoi scrivere nel template Extension che il codice è in via di pubblicazione. --Nemo 08:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nemo bis: Non so ancora se specializzarmi solo sui file SVG o anche sulle normali pagine HTML (mailarchive:wikitech-l/2014-December/079857.html). Appena avrò deciso (con qualche aiuto...) sceglierò il nome e richiederò la creazione del repository. --Ricordisamoa 19:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ma la pagina dell'estensione si può spostare facilmente, finché non c'è il repo. --Nemo 08:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nemo bis: Non scrivo nulla finché l'ambito non è definito. Secondo te, sarebbe utile validare anche il codice HTML (non necessariamente sui siti WMF)? --Ricordisamoa 11:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Non so bene a chi potrebbe interessare. L'utente non deve mai avere a che fare con problemi di validità dell'HTML delle pagina, quello è il compito del wiki (vedi c2:WikiDesignPrinciples). --Nemo 16:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nemo bis: Neanche la validità degli SVG interessa all'utente medio. Poiché alcune pagine, specialmente template, usano ancora attributi come "align" ecc., pensavo potesse essere utile sottoporre anch'esse automaticamente al validator. Se secondo te non lo è, procedo con il repo solo per le immagini. --Ricordisamoa 08:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Non parlo di utente medio, ma di utente proprio. L'utente medio non carica affatto SVG, per esempio. bugzilla:40607 richiede una tracking category per Tidy: penso che fare qualcosa del genere sarebbe accettabile perché non sarebbe "in the way"/fra i piedi dell'utente. --Nemo 06:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nemo bis: Però HTML Tidy "risolve" solo una minima parte degli errori possibili. --Ricordisamoa 16:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: ExtensionCredits stats[edit]

Niente di speciale, semplice grep.

nemobis@tools-login:/shared/mediawiki/extensions$ ack-grep -n  */*php | grep -c ExtensionCredits
nemobis@tools-login:/shared/mediawiki/extensions$ ack-grep -n -A 30 ExtensionCredits */*php | grep -c license-name

--Nemo 17:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nemo bis: Lo sospettavo... --Ricordisamoa 08:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Se/quando servono numeri piú precisi, posso fare di meglio. ;) --Nemo 08:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Starting conversion of LiquidThreads to Flow at[edit]

(Hi Ricordisamoa. I know that you already know, so I'm just adding this here for completism, and for any of your page-watchers. :)

Hello. I'm sending this to you, because you've been one of the top 50 users of LQT on over the last 360 days,[1] and I wanted to make sure that you'd seen the announcement at Starting conversion of LiquidThreads to Flow at There are links in the topic-summary at the top, for other discussions (wikitech-l and Project:Current_issues), and a link to the planned process and timeline (scheduled to begin April 6, with smaller conversions at first). Please do test Flow out at Talk:Sandbox if you haven't tried it recently, and give any feedback/suggestions/requests at that main discussion location. Much thanks, Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Ciao, ho visto una crescita nel tuo lavoro di code review e non solo; hai pensato di proporti come manutentore o apprendista manutentore di qualche componente? La lista è Developers/Maintainers. --Nemo 11:09, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nemo bis: Ho già abbastanza problemi coi miei di codici, figuriamoci con quelli degli altri... --Ricordisamoa 16:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Allora core è perfetto, perché non è di nessuno! --Nemo 16:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nemo bis: Intendi pywikibot, vero? Potrei considerarmene un "manutentore" da qualche tempo ormai. --Ricordisamoa 17:03, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Intendo MediaWiki core, che è perlopiú abbandonato. pywikibot lo davo per scontato, ma in effetti non c'è in quella pagina; potresti aggiungerlo, se ti va. --Nemo 17:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LOL, ancora una volta ti ho suggerito come reviewer per qualcosa e vedendo Developers/Maintainers mi sono detto che dovresti essere presente in almeno una o due righe. :) Nemo 13:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please provide feedback on suggested improvements to the Code of Conduct[edit]

Thanks to everyone who’s helped work on the Code of Conduct so far.

People have brought up issues they feel were missed when working on "Unacceptable behavior" and "Report a problem". Consultants have also suggested changes in these same sections.

These are important sections, so please take a look at the proposed changes. I apologize that this feedback arrived later than planned, but I think this will create a better document.

If you prefer to give your opinion privately, feedback via e-mail is welcome at

Thanks. Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes Done --Ricordisamoa 04:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please participate in discussion on updated "Marginalized and underrepresented groups" text[edit]

Thanks for participating in the earlier discussion on Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Marginalized and underrepresented groups. There was some support and some issues were raised. I've attempted to propose a better draft to address the issues.

Please participate at Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#New proposed wording. Thanks. User:Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text[edit]

Thanks for participating in the earlier discussion on Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Enforcement issues. There was strong support for the first two points, so they have been closed. Most people either supported the third at least in principle, or were neutral. However, there are some suggested wording changes (partly by Smalyshev (WMF), and partly by me).

Please participate again at Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#New proposed wording. Thanks. User:Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text[edit]

Sorry, the correct link for the discussion about wording re Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Enforcement issues is Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Circumvention text new wording. Thanks. I apologize for the double-message. User:Mattflaschen-WMF via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]