Talk:Sandbox

Jump to: navigation, search

About this discussion

Here you can test flow and look at this kitten!


By clicking "Add topic", you agree to our Terms of Use and agree to irrevocably release your text under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and GFDL

used to be ugly, this flow

11
Summary last edited by Tar Lócesilion 22:32, 28 July 2015 1 day ago

This is some summary. A bold one at that. One I could even edit in wikicode editor - if I wanted to. Which I don't.

In this thread...

Felis domestica (talkcontribs)

... and still is. There was no list of topics for a quick look, it hasn't got one. I believe we should be thankful it hasn't got an worse last few months.

Tar Lócesilion (talkcontribs)
  • @Felis domestica, you posted in sandbox. I suppose you intended to write on the feedback page, Talk:Flow.
  • There is a list of topics, just click on "Browse topics". Click boldly in sandbox.
  • As for aesthetics, can you please describe more precisely, what you don't like? some typography or design rules were broken?
Tar Lócesilion (talkcontribs)

OK, I cannot move this topic, because this function hasn't been provided yet: task T88140. A little facepalm, we'll wait, then. LOL - editing other's words is wiki but in discussions it is a bit strange... Well.. but it at least shows clearly who edited this as a last person...

Polimerek (talkcontribs)

I reply to myself :-) then, I will thank myself :-) And it all goes under Tar account :-)

Polimerek (talkcontribs)

Mhmmm...

Tar Lócesilion (talkcontribs)

It did! :) To be honest, editing other's words in classic discussions has always been a bit strange. Laissez parler! Now, the software supports this oddity and I like it :)

¿De verdad?

@Halibutt, you wanna play with me? huh, dude? ]:>

Polimerek (talkcontribs)

Just testing. .. don't take it seriously. IMHO the icon "</>" is not intuitive. The strange thing is, I can edit other's entires...

Hmm... testing, testing.

Tomasz Raburski (talkcontribs)

testing:

żąćźńół

This comment was hidden by Tomasz Raburski (history)
Tomasz Raburski (talkcontribs)

d@Tomasz Raburski

Tomasz Raburski (talkcontribs)

Reply to "used to be ugly, this flow"
Eman235 (talkcontribs)

flow w:Awesome

192.249.39.3 (talkcontribs)

Test reply

2601:47:4100:32EA:AB9B:ABAB:931C:5A36 (talkcontribs)

Test reply

Reply to "blah blah"
BIG RizZ (talkcontribs)

testtext

2601:47:4100:32EA:AB9B:ABAB:931C:5A36 (talkcontribs)

Another test reply

Reply to "test"
Toughpigs (talkcontribs)

dg

Roan Kattouw (WMF) (talkcontribs)

SI

Roan Kattouw (WMF) (talkcontribs)

YES

Reply to "si, Mexico?"
209.87.254.18 (talkcontribs)

I am testinf this extension to see how it works.

209.87.254.18 (talkcontribs)

I am replying to this topic.

Roan Kattouw (WMF) (talkcontribs)

I'm replying to your test topic

69.196.158.191 (talkcontribs)

And why not?

Reply to "Test Topic"
Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

Subst is inside this word.

Reply to "Subst"
AmazingTrans (talkcontribs)

Orange os ui,,y

AmazingTrans (talkcontribs)

Durian more yummy

Reply to "Fruits"
DannyH (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Bananas

DannyH (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Carrots

17.149.232.135 (talkcontribs)

Test

Reply to "Apples"
85.29.123.185 (talkcontribs)

testing this new editor

85.29.123.185 (talkcontribs)

hehe

193.167.124.158 (talkcontribs)

asdf

193.167.124.158 (talkcontribs)

asdasd

Quiddity (WMF) (talkcontribs)

test!

Reply to "new test"