Talk:Sandbox

Jump to: navigation, search
Edit header
  • Small view
  • Collapsed view
  • Full view

flow test......

6 hours ago 21:04, 17 April 2014

3

66.194.104.5 (talk)

no thanks

5 days ago 16:42, 12 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
24.217.142.75 (talk)

Testing testing. Let's see if I can link to an EN page: . Or something with a one-word title: . --~~~~

Nope, guess not!

1 day ago 16:27, 16 April 2014

Reply
S Page (WMF) (talk | contribs)

Should work fine. w:Steganography

1 day ago 22:14, 16 April 2014

Reply
S Page (WMF) (talk | contribs)

Test reply no-JavaScript

1 day ago 22:16, 16 April 2014

Reply
S Page (WMF) (talk | contribs)

Another test edit.

6 hours ago 21:04, 17 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)
24.217.142.75 (talk)

Or how about a diff:

Nope, that didn't work. How about a straight URL:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hhhippo/Flow&diff=prev&oldid=599372849

Yup, that worked. But awfully long...

1 day ago 16:28, 16 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
24.217.142.75 (talk)

Hmm, diff did not show in preview, but *did* show in save?

diff test

That shows up in preview...

EN link test:

1 day ago 16:29, 16 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)

Apparently, I have to put a title...

5 days ago 14:10, 12 April 2014

2

Orlodrim (talk | contribs)

Hello! This is a whole new topic!

9 days ago 20:21, 8 April 2014

Reply
Orlodrim (talk | contribs)

Test without javascript.

9 days ago 21:11, 8 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)
90.20.199.67 (talk)

It works.

5 days ago 14:10, 12 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)

test

8 days ago 00:21, 10 April 2014

3

50.16.65.168 (talk)

Test

9 days ago 20:18, 8 April 2014

  • 2620:62:C000:149:51B6:7D0F:991A:530D and Orlodrim
  • 4 comments

2

2620:62:c000:149:51b6:7d0f:991a:530d (talk)

test test

10 days ago 18:26, 7 April 2014

Reply
Orlodrim (talk | contribs)

2620:62:C000:149:51B6:7D0F:991A:530D: Maybe I can also make a new answer to the first message.

9 days ago 20:18, 8 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)
Orlodrim (talk | contribs)

My answer is: Abcd.

Show changes
Last modified by Orlodrim

9 days ago 20:16, 8 April 2014

Reply
Orlodrim (talk | contribs)

Orlodrim: I answer to myself.

9 days ago 20:17, 8 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)

Test

10 days ago 20:24, 7 April 2014

  • 212.203.64.130, 24.69.102.56 and Thesquirrelsareattackingagain
  • 3 comments

3

212.203.64.130 (talk)

Test

10 days ago 15:09, 7 April 2014

Reply
Thesquirrelsareattackingagain (talk | contribs)

test

10 days ago 20:12, 7 April 2014

Reply
24.69.102.56 (talk)

test

10 days ago 20:24, 7 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)

Hello.

12 days ago 04:58, 5 April 2014

1

50.16.65.168 (talk)

What is the problem

9 days ago 19:46, 8 April 2014

  • S Page (WMF), 2620:62:C000:149:137:32F0:4990:778A, 88.71.240.225 and 1 other
  • 7 comments

4

S Page (WMF) (talk | contribs)

Hello

13 days ago 00:54, 5 April 2014

Reply
S Page (WMF) (talk | contribs)

WFM

13 days ago 00:55, 5 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
76.14.58.232 (talk)

It's all good?

13 days ago 00:57, 5 April 2014

Reply
88.71.240.225 (talk)

Is there formated text? Then yes, it's all good.

12 days ago 12:55, 5 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
76.14.58.232 (talk)

Maryana thought it was broken, but??

Show changes
Last modified by S Page (WMF)

13 days ago 00:59, 5 April 2014

Reply
S Page (WMF) (talk | contribs)

I had a display glitch on Sunday May 6 where the post actions [Reply] [Edit] were big buttons, maybe the revert back to 1.23wmf20.

9 days ago 19:37, 8 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)
2620:62:c000:149:137:32f0:4990:778a (talk)

adsfasdfasdf

13 days ago 01:02, 5 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)

The presentation kinda sucks (edit: actually not so much)

Show changes
Last modified by Quadrige

10 days ago 20:57, 7 April 2014

2

Quadrige (talk | contribs)

Not fan of the left border style. Also line height and font size are really huge.

13 days ago 15:51, 4 April 2014

Reply
Quiddity (WMF) (talk | contribs)

Quadrige: The typography will match that which is used in the rest of the sites, once the ongoing Flow front-end overhaul is complete. Many things will be changing in that, and many more things will continue to change over the months ahead. Suggestions welcome, now and always. :)

Re: left border style, I assume you mean the dotted vertical line that indicates an indented reply? (Or possibly you mean the blue-highlight in the text-editing box, or the green-highlight when we visit a permalink?) Specific feedback and suggestions on this, are also welcome. :)

13 days ago 20:39, 4 April 2014

Reply
Quadrige (talk | contribs)

Quiddity (WMF): Thanks for your answer! Yes I was talking about the vertical line for indented replies. I think it is less clear than the current indentation model, but I may just need some time to get used to it. The blue and green highlight animation are really nice. Some other things:

  • I know line height may change, and that good because I think it seriously needs to be decreased.
  • It may be nice to have "Reply", "thank" and the timestamp on a unique line, just after the username for example. Would that make sense? Maybe the "reply" button needs to be on the right to be more visible.
  • I'd suggest to display the "talk" link by default: it's an essential part of the community aspect, and should not be hidden that way.
  • Btw Why not small incons for this, reply and thanks? That would be very facebook-like, I know, but this type of interaction makes a lot of sense to most people. Clicking a little heart may be pleasant for people who are used to "likes", and would increase the recognition of people's work.
  • The cancel link is not a button like "preview" and "submit": why is that? I thinks it lacks consistency.
  • Is wikicode live preview planned? Or is the editor specifically for article pages?
  • I really don't like the grey background for topic titles. It's really dull. Also the font size is really huge.
  • The "..." symbol is not really clear, and I think icons would make sense here too: they're already perfect as they are, so maybe just show them on mouseover?
Show changes
Last modified by Quadrige

12 days ago 15:12, 5 April 2014

Reply
Quiddity (WMF) (talk | contribs)

Quadrige: Thanks for the details. :) Lots of good thoughts in there, that I'll make sure the front-end developer sees these (and many of which have fixes underway).

Re: the "..." icon not being clear, a few editors have commented on that, and I believe the designers are thinking about alternatives already. (possibly going with a downarrow, at least initially.)

Re: "wikicode live preview" - do you mean VisualEditor integration? That is planned, and the whole system is based on Parsoid so it should be a relatively simple addition, but they wanted to get it all working with wikimarkup first, as that's what us powerusers are used to.

10 days ago 20:01, 7 April 2014

Reply
Quadrige (talk | contribs)

Quiddity (WMF): Yes I meant VisualEditor. Great news!

10 days ago 20:57, 7 April 2014

Reply
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)
50.16.65.168 (talk)