User talk:Mattflaschen-WMF

Jump to: navigation, search

About this board

Edit description

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Mattflaschen-WMF/Archive 1 on 2015-07-10.

By clicking "Add topic", you agree to our Terms of Use and agree to irrevocably release your text under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and GFDL
The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)

Seriously. It is annoying. We need to talk.

The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)

Please read what I wrote on my talkpage and over at User talk:MSchottlender-WMF

The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)

If you disagree with some of my improvements then you can discuss them on that talkpage.

The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)

https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft&diff=prev&oldid=2402196

Please apologize to everyone involved and never try to do something like that again. Thank you. ~~~~

The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)

Oh and please delete flow, it is a stupid idea and a waste of money.

Reply to "Are you serious??"

Weigh in on whether to finalize the new version of the "Conflict of interest" section

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

You participated earlier in discussion about the "Conflict of interest" section of the draft Code of Conduct for technical spaces. There was not consensus to approve an earlier version of this section. I'm contacting you to let you know the draft has been updated, and we are now discussing whether to finalize the new version.

Please participate here.

Thank you,

User:Mattflaschen-WMF via

Reply to "Weigh in on whether to finalize the new version of the "Conflict of interest" section"

Please participate again in improving the "Conflict of interest" section

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

The "Conflict of interest" section was not approved earlier.

There has been further discussion on it, aiming to solve those issues. Please participate in the sub-sections of Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Finalize "Conflict of interest" section? and make sure your concerns are being addressed.

Thanks.

User:Mattflaschen-WMF 03:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply to "Please participate again in improving the "Conflict of interest" section"
Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

FULLPAGENAME - Topic:Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

PAGENAME - Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

BASEPAGENAME - Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

SUBPAGENAME - Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

SUBJECTPAGENAME - Topic:Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

ARTICLEPAGENAME - Topic:Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

TALKPAGENAME - :Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

ROOTPAGENAME - Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

Reply to "Test page names"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Unspecified

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

BASEPAGENAME: Tb71u16bxyvryq4m

Reply to "Test"
Platonides (talkcontribs)

Hello Matt

I have seen your edit, as well as the code, and it seems like the Grade C comment section in the code was wrong.

Instead of "Firefox 3+" it probably should be "Firefox <4", or perhaps "Firefox 3.*". Similarly for the others, "Opera 10+" ''would'' include Opera 10.5+…

What do you think?

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

It's intentional. My understanding is it means basically, "The no-JS experience is intended to work and provide essential user actions in Firefox 3+, etc.". It does not mean Firefox 3+ deliberately gets the no-JS experience. It might sometimes get no-JS (e.g. due to a transient network failure), but normally as you note it doesn't. In some cases e.g. IE >= 6 < 9 we do deliberately serve all Grade C browsers of that type no-JS (unless the Grade C is also Grade A), but not for Firefox.

@Krinkle and I discussed this leading up to that edit. This is my understanding from that discussion.

Platonides (talkcontribs)

Ah, I see. The «no-javascript run-time» includes more than simply not loading javascript, so eg. Firefox 10 would usually be Grade A, but if it had javascript disabled, it would get Grade C support, and it should work, too.

Thanks

Reply to "Compatibility"
The Discoverer (talkcontribs)

Hello Mattflaschen, we've had some instances of vandalism/spam on Flow pages on gomwiki, such as this:

https://gom.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic:T5crnav4dljy4wo2

I've deleted the topic, but the text in the subject, which can be still be seen, even by non-logged in users, is quite offensive. How can I make this topic title hidden (as an admin)? I'm looking for something like a revision delete for the Flow page history or a page delete for the topic.

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

@The Discoverer

You need to suppress it. It doesn't look like anyone in gomwiki has suppress (see https://gom.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B6:ListUsers&group=oversight and https://gom.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B6:ListUsers&group=suppress ).

You can ask a steward. If it's urgent, you can use !steward in #wikimedia-stewards on Freenode. If it's slightly less urgent, you can use Meta:Vandalism reports.

In the future, you may want to ask about getting a local oversighter for your wiki.

This is analogous to how deleting a page does not hide the page name (it's still in Special:Log/delete).

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

The suppressor can actually do the action at https://gom.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%AF:T5crnav4dljy4wo2&action=history (it should show 'suppress' in parentheses).

The Discoverer (talkcontribs)

Thanks for your advice, Matt. I have requested for suppression.

The Discoverer (talkcontribs)

...and that led to this: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T137288

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

Sorry, if you suppress the topic directly, it works fine. But it turns out there is a problem if the topic is first deleted, then later suppressed. I'm working on it.

Reply to "Deletion of Flow topic/comment"

Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Sorry, the correct link for the discussion about wording re Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Enforcement issues is Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Circumvention text new wording. Thanks. I apologize for the double-message. User:Mattflaschen-WMF via

Reply to "Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text"

Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Thanks for participating in the earlier discussion on Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#Enforcement issues. There was strong support for the first two points, so they have been closed. Most people either supported the third at least in principle, or were neutral. However, there are some suggested wording changes (partly by Smalyshev (WMF), and partly by me).

Please participate again at Talk:Code of Conduct/Draft#New proposed wording. Thanks. User:Mattflaschen-WMF via

Reply to "Please participate in discussion on updated "Enforcement issues" text"