Topic on Talk:Structured Discussions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Uncomfortable path to linking to a topic

Gryllida (talkcontribs)

Can't find my past topic... so here it goes, a little again. I browse this board and decide to link someone to a thread. Currently:

  1. click ...
  2. click permalink
  3. copy the topic:lalalala bit from urlbar or from the page
  4. switch tab
  5. type [[
  6. paste
  7. type |
  8. switch tab
  9. copy topic title
  10. switch tab
  11. paste
  12. type ]]

...a long path. :-) Now, it is the same with old way, except that it doesn't take me to single-thread view to perform all these operations. This perhaps makes it easier to link to multiple threads at once.

Also, when linking to a thread before (with classic wiki markup pages), it was one of many on a page. It was not a single thread.

Perhaps steal design from here: -- move mouse over the headlines and watch what changes :-) (it used to even highlight a currently selected header with yellow background, but no longer does).

He7d3r (talkcontribs)
Gryllida (talkcontribs)

Done but I don't see it

Quiddity (WMF) (talkcontribs)

There's a similar gadget available on that I use - Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and called "HeadAnchor" - that one adds a hover-effect to all levels of ==headers== which makes a sideways "§" appear to the left of the heading. That § is a link to the heading. (So I can either: click it to change the URL in the addressbar (and then copy the bit I want from there), or right-click copy the entire thing as an external link directly)

I like the hidden-until-needed visual aspect of the gadget on mw. However, I really like the options that the frwiki gadget adds - and that's sort of what we were talking about at and meetings and in other threads onwiki, but putting those 2 options in the actionmenu. Thanks for pointing it out. :)

He7d3r (talkcontribs)

Sorry for the confusion. This is the syntax you should use to import the gadget from French Wikipedia:

mw.loader.load( '//' );

Gryllida (talkcontribs)
SPage (WMF) (talkcontribs)

That doesn't work once the topic is pushed below the initial load of N topics by other activity. We could hack it for JavaScript users but then it's not universal. There's a need to load a Flow board starting at a certain topic, but it'll be query string parameter(s) that work for no-JS.

DannyH (WMF) (talkcontribs)

I agree that we need a better way to link threads. It's not super high on the list right now, but I'm not happy with the long list of steps either.

Reply to "Uncomfortable path to linking to a topic"