Template talk:MWReleases

From mediawiki.org

Template:MW quick download[edit]

It would be nice to include some of the links of Template:MW quick download here, or at least the name of the last 1.x.y release for each 1.x recent release. --Nemo 09:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Could someone please mark this for translation? LegoFan4000 (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LTS documented inconsistently.[edit]

According to the Version_lifecycle, MW version 1.27 is still the active LTS release. With the MW release 1.29, 1.28 is not being displayed as the LTS release by this template. Has their been a policy change, or is something simply broken with templates/LUA scripting this sidebar uses?

This template was borked somehow. Just fixed it. Thanks for the note. Cheers --[[kgh]] (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MW 1.31[edit]

MW 1.31 is missing, only 1.30 and 1.32 is shown. Should there be a beta or release candidate entry? -- 13:12, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{MWReleases}} and {{MWReleases/en}}[edit]

In {{MWReleases/en}}, the box says that 1.32 is the LTS version. I think it remains from when 1.31 was the stable one. The strange things is that I cannot modify because it is said to be a translation of {{MWReleases}}. Can someone help me ? Thank you, Jona (talk) 08:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After editing {{MWReleases}}, the page should be marked for translation by a translation administrator. Then the system updates all translation pages like {{MWReleases/ja}}, {{MWReleases/en}}, etc. --Shirayuki (talk) 11:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Future version[edit]

At the moment, in the infobox, we have :

  • MediaWiki 1.31 (LTS)
  • MediaWiki 1.32 (stable)
  • MediaWiki 1.34 (alpha; git master)

MediaWiki 1.33 is missing (and should be there IMHO). In the template we load the LTS, the stable and the alpha version but 1.33 is the beta version. Although we can just replace the alpha by the beta, it don't think it's a future-proof solution. Maybe we have to compare the stable, the beta and the alpha to decide which one should be shown. Any remark is welcome. Jona (talk) 09:41, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jona: Good idea. Done. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jdforrester: Waouw, what a reactivity ! Thank you :-) Jona (talk) 08:15, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]