Wikimedia Research/Formal collaborations
- 1 Formal Collaborations
- 1.1 What is a formal research collaboration?
- 1.2 What commitments are made under a formal collaboration agreement?
- 1.3 How are formal research collaborations created?
- 1.4 What's the role of the point of contact at Wikimedia?
- 1.5 When is the right time to pitch a formal collaboration and how long does it take to set one up?
- 2 Current collaborations
- 3 Past collaborations
Collaboration with researchers inside and outside of the Wikimedia Foundation – be it from academia or industry – is what keeps our research environment vibrant. The Wikimedia Foundation's Research department is part of a broader community of scholars and students of Wikimedia projects and online collaboration in general: Wikipedia research would not exist without the joint effort of the academic community, our volunteers and contributors, and the Wikimedia Foundation.
Although at the Foundation we engage in several informal research collaborations, there are times when we see a need for a more formal process to ensure that each party is committed and empowered to work on a mutually agreed problem. Below, we explain when we enter formal research collaborations, what they entail, and the process around them.
What is a formal research collaboration?
A formal research collaboration is a collaboration agreement between researchers from within and without the Wikimedia Foundation. A formal collaboration typically involves support from the Research department or the Wikimedia Foundation in the form of:
- letters of endorsement
- equipment, hosting or office space
- access to non-public data or special API privileges for research purposes
- other forms of support under an agreement between researchers and the Research team.
What commitments are made under a formal collaboration agreement?
All formal collaborations are subject to the Wikimedia Foundation's Open Access policy: a policy ensuring that the output of the collaboration be made available and released in the open without restrictions to the benefit of our volunteer community and other researchers. The policy also covers practical aspects such as the coverage of APCs to meet the open access requirements and other related questions that are addressed in detail in our FAQs. When entering a formal collaboration, the Foundation commits to supporting their collaborators by providing resources and support needed to achieve the goals of the collaboration, as described in the proposal. Depending on the nature and effort required, a formal collaboration may be captured as one of the department's quarterly goals.
How are formal research collaborations created?
Formal research collaborations are created when one or more members of the Wikimedia Research department work with other researchers to identify common areas of interests aligning with the priorities of the department and the strategic directions of the organization. If such common areas of interests are identified, the parties involved work jointly to scope a short proposal enumerating the expected deliverables and describe the type of support requested from the Foundation. From this point on the following steps should be followed:
- A research project page on Metawiki is created. The page includes an overview of the project, the list of researchers who will be participating in the project and any other collaborator.
- A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is signed by the researcher, the member of the Wikimedia Research department acting as the main point of contact (POC) for this proposal, and a C-level manager at the Wikimedia Foundation.
- A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is signed between the researcher and the Foundation, with an added signature by the POC in the Research department, limited to those proposals requiring access to non-public data.
- Based on the nature of the request, an additional volunteer agreement form may need to be signed by the researcher and the C-level manager who signs the MOU and NDA.
As of the time of this writing, all formal collaborations are valid for six months. They can be extended if the parties see the need and are interested in continuing the research.
What's the role of the point of contact at Wikimedia?
Each collaboration designates a point of contact who's the person responsible for the the project on Wikimedia's end. The point of contact is named on the MOU, on the project page, and on the list of collaborations below. They are responsible for:
- providing the specific type of support the collaboration is about (access to data, a letter of support, technical advice etc.)
- shaping the research collaboration proposal with the collaborators in a way that aligns with the organization's existing goals and priorities
- ensuring that the reporting of the project on-wiki happens in a timely and accurate way
- facilitating communication with other WMF teams, volunteers or movement affiliates
- ensuring that the researchers understand the terms of the open access policy and making sure its requirements are met
When is the right time to pitch a formal collaboration and how long does it take to set one up?
At Wikimedia Research we establish our goals on an annual basis (see the Wikimedia Foundation's annual plan) as well quarterly (see our quarterly goals). Your research collaboration pitch will have the highest chance of succeeding if it aligns with projects we're already working (or committed to work) on. Collaborations that become part of our official goals and require substantial involvement of the team are typically reviewed and planned on a quarterly basis. We do, however, receive several requests for other types of support (letters of endorsement, technical advice, access to private data), which we review outside of our quarterly cycle. Please be aware that due to the number of requests we receive and the process involved (a formal collaboration requires Legal and Privacy/Security audits as well as approvals from an executive) we are not in a position to respond to requests that need to be completed in less than 15 calendar days.
|Adrian Bielefeldt||Dresden University of Technology||Y||Leila Zia|
|Michele Catasta||EPFL||Y||Leila Zia|
|Ciro Cattuto||Institute for Scientific Interchange||Y||Dario Taraborelli|
|Justin Clark||Harvard University||Y||Zhou Zhou|
|Sebastian Diaz||Harvard University||Y||Zhou Zhou|
|Lucas Dixon||Jigsaw||N||Ellery Wulczyn|
|Rob Faris||Harvard University||Y||Zhou Zhou|
|Anna Filippova||Carnegie Mellon University||N||Dario Taraborelli, Jonathan Morgan|
|Julius Gonsior||Dresden University of Technology||Y||Leila Zia|
|Brent Hecht||Northwestern University||N||Aaron Halfaker|
|Gary Hsieh||University of Washington||Y||Dario Taraborelli|
|Isaac Johnson||Northwestern University||Y||Aaron Halfaker|
|Alexander Krause||Dresden University of Technology||Y||Leila Zia|
|Markus Krötzsch||Dresden University of Technology||Y||Leila Zia|
|Florian Lemmerich||GESIS||Y||Leila Zia|
|Jure Leskovec||Stanford University||Y||Leila Zia|
|Tomáš Masopust||Dresden University of Technology||N||Leila Zia|
|David McDonald||University of Washington||Y||Dario Taraborelli|
|André Panisson||Institute for Scientific Interchange||Y||Dario Taraborelli|
|Daniela Paolotti||Institute for Scientific Interchange||Y||Dario Taraborelli|
|Tiziano Piccardi||EPFL||Y||Leila Zia|
|Amir Sarabadani||Wikimedia Germany||Y||Aaron Halfaker|
|Saiph Savage||West Virginia University||N||Dario Taraborelli|
|Philipp Singer||GESIS||Y||Leila Zia|
|Markus Strohmaier||GESIS||Y||Leila Zia|
|Nithum Thain||Jigsaw||N||Ellery Wulczyn|
|Michele Tizzoni||Institute for Scientific Interchange||Y||Dario Taraborelli|
|Hannes Voigt||Dresden University of Technology||N||Leila Zia|
|Morten Warncke-Wang||University of Minnesota||Y||Aaron Halfaker|
|Robert West||EPFL||Y||Leila Zia|
|Fabian Flöck||GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences||N||Aaron Halfaker|
|Srijan Kumar||University of Maryland, College Park||Y||Leila Zia|
|Jure Leskovec||Stanford University||N||Leila Zia|
|Ashwin Paranjape||Stanford University||Y||Leila Zia|
|Robert West||Stanford University||Y||Leila Zia|