User talk:Clump

My changes to highlight specific terms used in Extension:EasyTimeline/syntax were reverted. (Thanks for rescuing the missing word change after the change was reverted.) I thought that using italics to highlight the items made the article easier to read, faster to understand. But perhaps I am unaware of a standard way to highlight such items -- is there one? Or perhaps the standard is to not highlight them, hence the revert?

Thanks much.

Hi. Sorry about that---the revert was accidental, and I undid it right after.

Manual:Administrators/nqo - not a translation. Thanks much :)

Thanks (would require translation admin, but someone else got to it already anyway).

Thanks :)

1. Admins have the ability to grant themselves the translation admin via Special:UserRights
2. This could have been deleted without translation admin rights by mass deleting pages created by the user who created the page (which was yourself during an earlier mass deletion in this case).

this - crosswiki vandalism. Thanks

Ignore. Already Globally locked.

Deleted

How to contribute/udm empty translation. Thanks.

https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=How_to_contribute/udm&action=history is all nonsense. 0% translated.

Done

Thanks

I agreed that undeletion isn't needed per @DannyS712's comment.

Hello, can you please undelete Extension:PreferencesList? I have to work on the documentation of this extension, and I saw that you deleted page. I would like to you undelete it, so I can easily work without breaking of history of changes. :)

Best regards,

Zoran.

(talk page stalker) there was only 1 deleted edit, and the content was "Reserved for a future extension" - not sure that it would be of much help

No, I've thinked that on page are already templates and etc. In this case, undeleting isn't needed, I will start from zero.

Thank you for very fast respond!

You deleted this as "off-topic", but I don't see how it's off-topic. It's a request to create a page in mainspace (which the poster couldn't create themselves due to an abuse filter), which seems to belong at Project:Current issues.

The abuse filter (#83) does allow creation of redirects. In any case, I am not in favour of creating redirects for random misspellings, but yes, it should be open to discussion.

Already done by DannyS712.

Hello, you have deleted page Manual:Administrators/sk. But it was somehow created. Can you delete it again? Thanks much!

Restored/copied out/deleted again.

Hey, I wrote a post for a school assigment and you deleted it. I would appreciate if somehow I could get a copy of what I wrote,

Thanks in advance.

Hello. Please let your school know that such posts are inappropriate here. I restored it temporarily; please copy it out promptly and let me know when you are done.

I already copied it, thanks. Ahi te partan el ojal

I'm really tempted to nuke the contribs of and block Special:Contributions/BetterMediaFactor without talk page access for using MediaWiki.org as their own personal microblogging service (edit: especially after Topic:Vrgakmntyxqeihac), but I'd like a second opinion first since it's not obvious vandalism or spamming. Can you take a look and see if you'd agree with those actions?

I agree very much.

Hi! I see that you have deleted my sandbox. Is it passible to get a copy of what i wrote or to restore the revision for a short time? I'm planning on using some of it on OAuth/For Developers.

Sure; I've restored temporarily. (But what does spotify have to do with it?)

Thanks, I wrote something similar for Spotify.