Talk:Talk pages project/Replying

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

The team would value any thoughts and/or questions you have about this new tool for Replying to specific comments on talk pages.

Preocupante (talkcontribs)

Hi, I don't know if this is the place to report the issue, but there's a small problem with the Spanish translation. It shows the following when replying:

Al hacer clic en «Responder» aceptas de manera pura y simple nuestros términos de uso y aceptas, irrevocablemente, liberar tu texto {{PLURALunder the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and GFDL.

Note the {{PLURAL and English text. This appears under the edit summary input box when replying to a comment. This issue is happening right now at the Spanish Wikipedia.

Ciencia Al Poder (talkcontribs)
PPelberg (WMF) (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Spanish translation error"

Reply tool duplicated block indent template used above it

Summary by Whatamidoing (WMF)
Gonnym (talkcontribs)

I replied to a post which had a block indent template and it duplicated that template. See dif

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

It sounds like a fix is on the way, but I'm not sure exactly when it will reach the wikis.

Matma Rex (talkcontribs)

Thanks for the report. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the fix for T289873, which I'm already working on, should fix this problem as well. (They don't obviously seem alike, but it's actually a similar structure on the page, where a comment is partially generated by a transclusion.) I'll post some details on the task and ensure that we test this case afterwards.

Reply to "Reply tool duplicated block indent template used above it"

Does not work well with {{outdent}} and other templates

ExcarnateSojourner (talkcontribs)

On Wiktionary I tried to reply to the first comment in a deep thread. Another editor had used the outdent template part way through the thread to push future replies to the left side. My reply was placed immediately before the template (diff), rather than at the end where I had intended. (Correction diff for clarity.) I have found a similar problem with Wiktionary's look template.

I don't know how possible this would be to fix, but it was a problem I noticed.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Thank you for the note, and especially for the "correction diff". It made clear what should have happened.

Do you remember which of the many [reply] buttons you clicked in that section? (If you remember, then giving me the time/date closest to it is probably the most efficient way to identify it.)

ExcarnateSojourner (talkcontribs)

Yes, I clicked the very first one in the section (2021-10-05T11:39).

Reply to "Does not work well with {{outdent}} and other templates"

Tenplate:Outdent breaks Reply tool

Summary by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh

Seems that reloading the page helps. Nevermind.

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talkcontribs)

Hi, it seems that putting this template at the start of comments cause Reply tool to malfunction. Please fix it. Thanks in advance.

Jeff G. (talkcontribs)

This feature is eating my pasted-in nowiki tags, making me look idiotic, and forcing me to compensate with edits like this. Please stop it from doing so.

Billinghurst (talkcontribs)

nowiki is so ugly anyway, you can always change your practice to use c:template:tlx

Ottawahitech (talkcontribs)

Template:Yo Using a template is OK if one never posts at a different wmf-wiki. However, if you ever trry to use the same template on a different wiki, it will most likely end with an error. Just a thought.

Jeff G. (talkcontribs)

I was trying to quote exactly.

Matma Rex (talkcontribs)

Can you provide more detail on how that edit happened, or even better, instructions to reproduce it? (e.g. where you copy-pasted it from, and did you switch editing mode at any point?) It should not be eating anything pasted-in, and especially not in the source mode.

Jeff G. (talkcontribs)

I drafted in my Clipboard app, pasted (like normal in source editing mode in Puffin Browser Pro) into a reply, tapped "Reply", and the nowikis were gone, so I had to replace them in source editing mode.

Ottawahitech (talkcontribs)

Just some feedback to the developers:

I just used nowiki tags on a talkpage at commons, and it seemed to work! The problem for me is moving from wiki to wiki with a totally different framework of talkpage behaviours. i feel like a guinea pig and it slows down my volunteer efforts to addto content.

For example: Here I do not have a Preview whereas the tool I just used on commons allowed me to preview before publishing

Ottawahitech (talkcontribs)

Another problem I have with using this talk tool (does it have a name? is it Pages project?) is that my comments do not show up on my Global contributions. I have noticed this strange behaviour months ago, but could not figure out who or where to provide feedback, and by the time I visit this wmf-wiki again, i'll probably forget about this posting.

I hope someone can make sense of my garbled feedback.

Reply to "nowiki tags"

Reply tool now at German-language Wikipedia

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Copied from the project page:

Where can I read about the conversation with German users? The tool is running in the German-language wikipedia already, but does not work and is not really needed on all pages by default. How can I remove that from my site? --Maimaid (talk) 13:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Grüß dich, @Maimaid.

The Reply tool ("[antworten]") was enabled for all editors at the German-language Wikipedia on Monday. The Reply tool is one result of the Talk pages consultation 2019. It has been discussed many times at the German-language Wikipedia. Today, the active conversations are at Wikipedia Diskussion:Kurier and Wikipedia:Fragen zur Wikipedia.

If you don't want to use it, you can turn it off. Just go to w:de:Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion and turn off "Schnelles Antworten aktivieren".

Maimaid (talkcontribs)

Oh, I didn't know that it has been discussed at the German-language WP. As to me, it was a complete surprise, which I don't need. There was no "warning" before and there is no explanation about the functions to be found. And on some pages it does not even work properly. Nevertheless, thank you for your kind words and explanation. Best regards, Maimaid

Lustiger seth (talkcontribs)

gudn tach! (hi)
this feature is soo great! i instantaneously loved it! whoever wrote it: thanks a lot! :-)
I guess and hope that it will help especially new users and lower the barrier to entry. -- seth (talk) 23:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Grüß dich, Lustiger seth. Es freut mich, dass es dir gefällt.

Reply to "Reply tool now at German-language Wikipedia"

User search improvements

Summary by Whatamidoing (WMF)
Sdkb (talkcontribs)

When mentioning a user, the tool makes it quite easy to find a user who has commented earlier in the discussion, but every so often I want to mention someone else, and the search suggestions returned for that are quite poor. It'd be nice if active users on the project were given priority over a doppelganger account blocked in 2010.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

The Editing team was talking about this recently. I think several suggestions have been made, including:

  • Unblocked users > blocked users
  • Active users > inactive users
  • People who previously edited that talk page > people who have never edited that talk page

It might also be possible to use the search algorithms, which I believe emphasize the more popular pages (so if you type "Robin", you get suggestions of Robin, Robin Williams, and Robin Hood, rather than a purely alphabetical list).

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Some of the potential problems are discussed in phab:T277357.

Reply to "User search improvements"
LittleGun (talkcontribs)

Minor bug or strange behaviour reported at Swedish Wikipedia, [1]:

When using <div>..</div> for formatting an entrance, also [answer] is formatted.

When using simplified formatting, such as '', [answer] is not formatted.

Maybe "bug" is a strong word. Some discrepancy anyway.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Minor formating bug"

Detecting section titles

Summary by Whatamidoing (WMF)
Strainu (talkcontribs)

Just like you don't duplicate the signatures, it would be useful to detect if the text begins with a section title and drop the warning about adding a title.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Are you thinking of the editors who edit an existing ==Section==, and then create a new section (with the old section's name in the edit summary)?

Strainu (talkcontribs)

No, I don't think your scenario would get you that warning. I am thinking about users using the new section link then either:

  • copy-paste a section, including section title
  • substitute a warning template which contains a section title, such as ro:Template:au-test1

Both cases will have a warning appear, which urges the user to include a section title. The warning will only go away if something is introduced in the title field.

Reply to "Detecting section titles"

Magic word to disable [ reply ] link

Summary by Whatamidoing (WMF)
Labdajiwa (talkcontribs)

A magic word might be needed to disable [ reply ] link on archived talk pages. By having [ reply ] links available on archived talk pages, users can easily reply to archived discussions that should not be edited further. I see some users using __NOEDITSECTION__ on their archived talk pages, I'd love to have the __NOREPLYLINK__, too. Thanks!

MBq (talkcontribs)

+1, I would use this on voting pages. Comments and discussions on other peoples‘ votes are commonly directed to the talk page.

Strainu (talkcontribs)


Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

The Editing team talked about this today, and we will probably get our wish (maybe even in the next couple of weeks).

Reply to "Magic word to disable [ reply ] link"