Jump to navigation Jump to search

Licensing decision rationale[edit]

Licensing it under both GPL and MIT seems to be little funny, as MIT is more permissive than other? Why can't it be just one the more permissive license MIT?--Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Multi-licensing is a common thing, it costs nothing and makes things easier. Almost all MediaWiki code is GPL, so it makes sense to keep that license too. --Nemo 10:25, 3 September 2013 (UTC)