Project talk:Sandbox/Structured Discussions test

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

This is a sandbox/test page. Please bring feedback (bug-reports or feature-requests) to either phabricator or Talk:Structured Discussions for further discussion. Thanks!

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

@Llywrch, have you ever used this yourself?

Llywrch (talkcontribs)

Nope. Wasn't even aware it existed.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)

IMO it's not bad, as long as you don't expect much from it. I wanted something that wouldn't require ArbCom to manually tally vote counts. I got something that will auto-notify you of a reply in this thread. It's a start.

Llywrch (talkcontribs)

Uh, were you referring to this site, or to the function "ping"? I'm confused.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Ping"

Test templates and such

17
Summary last edited by JosefAssad 21:44, 10 March 2015 4 years ago

[[category:test]] = (and here's a direct link to confirm that it is indeed working: Category:test (red-link, but populated))

Quiddity (WMF) (talkcontribs)

<math>\ f'(t) = \frac{df(t)}{dt}</math> = \ f'(t) = \frac{df(t)}{dt}


{{note|Foo}} =

Foo

<div class="mw-content-rtl">זוהי טיוטה פרטית שלך. ניתן לעבוד כאן על ערך חדש לפני העברתו למרחב הערכים.</div> =

זוהי טיוטה פרטית שלך. ניתן לעבוד כאן על ערך חדש לפני העברתו למרחב הערכים.

{{TNT|MediaWiki Introduction}} =

MediaWiki Flower

Fundamental Introduction to MediaWiki

test edit

50.245.140.101 (talkcontribs)

beep boop bop this is a reply i care a lot about how things work come on guys why wasn't i consulted before this breaking change to the social heirarchy around these parts

206.169.213.106 (talkcontribs)

another test reply - testing anonymous

Quiddity (talkcontribs)

test for highlight bug

1997kB (talkcontribs)

test

This post was hidden by 1997kB (history)
BEANS X2 (talkcontribs)

Indent test

BEANS X2 (talkcontribs)

Reply to a reply

213.171.206.26 (talkcontribs)

Reply to a reply to a reply.

173.70.134.32 (talkcontribs)

Timetime

Funny

We're going on a trip in our favorite rocket ship


TEST

Reply to "Test templates and such"
177.63.251.61 (talkcontribs)

Teste

Reply to "Contra quem?"
Omegatron (talkcontribs)

I can put stuff in here, including Links just like VisualEditor? How about

  1. numbered list
  2. of
  3. things?

Yes that works, too. And how about @Omegatron: templates? Seems fine. And I can switch to plain wikicode editing? Cool.

Oh I guess you don't need to sign things because it's in the thing already.

Omegatron (talkcontribs)

Reply to that

Omegatron (talkcontribs)

Reply to that thing

Reply to "Here is a new topic"
93.157.83.98 (talkcontribs)

test111111

93.157.83.98 (talkcontribs)

replay

Elitematterman (talkcontribs)

false


190.199.136.42 (talkcontribs)

test

Reply to "test"
This post was hidden by 37.201.185.243 (history)
37.201.185.243 (talkcontribs)

another test

This post was hidden by 37.201.185.243 (history)
37.201.185.243 (talkcontribs)

more testing

Reply to "sannyas"
Loic.tessier (talkcontribs)

post message about new topic

Loic.tessier (talkcontribs)

reply to my first post

Reply to "Starting a new topic"

New Topic Woot Woot

5
Summary by 2600:1700:B670:7231:57BB:A541:EAFF:680C

IDK, jury is out

2600:1700:B670:7231:57BB:A541:EAFF:680C (talkcontribs)

Initial blurb.

2600:1700:B670:7231:57BB:A541:EAFF:680C (talkcontribs)

Reply to blurb.

2600:1700:B670:7231:57BB:A541:EAFF:680C (talkcontribs)

base reply

Reply to "New Topic Woot Woot"
Nuriengincatak (talkcontribs)

hello

This post was hidden by 185.46.212.168 (history)
Black Spaceship (talkcontribs)

hello, it's me

2600:1700:B670:7231:57BB:A541:EAFF:680C (talkcontribs)

test reply

some more text

2600:1700:B670:7231:57BB:A541:EAFF:680C (talkcontribs)

does it indent further, like Reddit, or just one reply level to initial comments like Facebook?

2600:1700:B670:7231:57BB:A541:EAFF:680C (talkcontribs)

Re: "does it"

I suppose inculcating a habit of using permalinks might help compensate. Still seems things could get jumbled and confusing if multiple folks are doing so under a single parent comment though. Hmm, a convention of forking to a fresh parent might help, but then it might just end up obfuscating on a page level instead. Hmm.


p.s.—Well, seems external links are toggled off here as a link to a preceding entry's permalink yielded "⧼abusefilter-warning-linkspam⧽". Tried to make Re: "does it" into a hyperlink to hache-tee-tee-pee-esss(colon)-slash-slash-www(dot)mediawiki(dot)org/w/index.php?title=Topic:Ve46gm6l8uah7z3f&topic_showPostId=vff6l2ynvgct60uh#flow-post-vff6l2ynvgct60uh


2600:1700:B670:7231:57BB:A541:EAFF:680C (talkcontribs)

Alas, just the one.

Nuriengincatak (talkcontribs)

hello again

Nuriengincatak (talkcontribs)
Reply to "new test topic"
91.222.249.225 (talkcontribs)

Answer?

91.222.249.225 (talkcontribs)

question

Reply to "Test time"