User talk:Reach Out to the Truth

From mediawiki.org
Latest comment: 10 months ago by MarcoAurelio in topic Important: Admin activity review (2022)
MediaWiki.svg

Dear Reach Out to the Truth, Welcome to MediaWiki.org!

Yes, Welcome! This site is dedicated to the documentation of the MediaWiki software, the software behind many wikis, including that of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation projects.
Please, take a look at the following pages. They might prove useful to you as a newcomer here:

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and find this site a beneficial documentation of the MediaWiki software.

Thanks, and regards, Tisane 05:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was here before you. :P Reach Out to the Truth 01:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

XML feed[edit]

So I take it there is no XML RecentChanges feed available at this time? I know pages can be exported through Special:Export, but what I really want to do is mirror a wiki in real time by reading a continuous feed of XML-formatted recent changes. IIRC, revisions are in some sort of space-saving format that only stores the diff rather than the two different versions in their entirety. Might not XML be done the same way, and thereby save on data transfer costs? I want to propose an extension and begin work on it, if someone hasn't already implemented this functionality. Thanks, Tisane 17:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would have thought it possible to get a diff from the API, but I can't seem to figure it out. Although not ideal, I suppose it is possible to use the RecentChanges feed for replication purposes. You'd have to parse the provided description to extract a usable diff out of it, but it should at least be possible. Reach Out to the Truth 13:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah. I submitted bug 23001 on this issue, and hopefully I got across well enough what I'm trying to accomplish. I think using XML is probably the best long-term solution. I'm not sure why OAI-PMH was too expensive. Wikimedia seems to make a fair chunk of change by selling access to its feeds (see the question on "program income") but it seems like they don't care as much about it as they used to and may not even offer it anymore; Kul didn't return my email inquiring about it. This extension looks like it's going to be a major project; I better inquire further into what happened with OAI-PMH before starting. Tisane 14:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

page move[edit]

Whoooaa! Thanks for my user page move - I didn't put User namespace in my signature and clicked on red link - fixed! --Marooned 16:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Adminship[edit]

You've been doing some excellent gnoming and support work. Would you like me to make you an administrator? —Emufarmers(T|C) 05:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, that sounds acceptable. :)Reach Out to the Truth 05:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 16:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support desk[edit]

You helped me with an explanation to understand the function of a token. However, nobody could help to solve the problem of the watchlist error yet. Could you have a look at this again or forward the question to someone who could help? Thanks a lot in advance, --ThT (talk) 15:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Important: Admin activity review (2022)[edit]

Hello,

I hope that this message finds you well. I am writing to inform you that you may lose your advanced permissions on mediawiki.org because of inactivity.

A policy regarding the removal of advanced permissions (e.g.: administrator, bureaucrat, interface-admin, etc.) was adopted by community consensus in 2013. While initially that policy did not apply to this site, the mediawiki.org community decided in August 2020 to opt-in.

You are being notified because we have identified that your account meets the inactivity criteria stated in the policy: no edits and no administrative log actions for the last 2 years.

  • If you want to keep your advanced permissions, you should inform the community (at Project:Village Pump) about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. A community notice about this process has been also posted on said page. If the community has a discussion about it and supports your continued access to advanced permissions, please contact the stewards at the stewards noticeboard with a link to the discussion.
  • If you wish to resign your advanced permissions, you may do so by filing a request for removal of permissions on Meta-Wiki.
  • If there is no response at all after this notification, the stewards will proceed to remove your advanced permissions without further notice after one month.

In ambiguous cases, stewards will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review.

If you have any questions, please let me know or feel free to message us at the stewards' noticeboard. If you feel we've made a mistake and your account is active, we'd also appreciate to let us know, and please accept our apologies.

Best regards,
--MarcoAurelio (talk) (via MassMessage) 16:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]