User:DWalden (WMF)/Test2wiki k8s migration/Search

From mediawiki.org
Feature Need testing? What are the risks? Does it have dependencies? Existing regression or smoke testing strategy? Does the regression/smoke testing strategy cover the dependencies? Can it be tested on test2wiki? Feasible to make it testable on test2wiki?


CirrusSearch[edit]

What possible risks are posed to this feature by the k8s migration?[edit]

Not clear

What are the dependencies?[edit]

job queues, systemd timers (aka cron jobs). It's not clear if those are moving to k8s as part of this, or if they will continue through the existing infrastructure until a later date.

Other mediawiki extensions:

  • TimedMediaHandler
  • PdfHandler
  • SiteMatrix
  • PoolCounter
  • GeoData
  • Interwiki
  • WikimediaEvents

Also requires ability to make api requests from one wiki to another wiki.

Does it use any external services?[edit]

Elasticsearch

Is there any back-end processing?[edit]

Some through systemd timers that run daily. Lots of jobs. The remainder talks to elasticsearch directly and shouldn't be impacted.

Does it use external binaries?[edit]

Not directly. Depends on external binaries invoked during wikitext parsing through TimedMediaHandler, PdfHandler, maybe others.

Does it read or write files on the filesystem?[edit]

Not inside mediawiki.

Is there a regression or smoke testing strategy?[edit]

Sort-of, the @smoke tag of CirrusSearch tests/integration/ does very minimal checks, but it mostly amounts to "this thing isn't 100% broken" and typically fails due to UI changes made outside CirrusSearch. See selenium-daily-beta-CirrusSearch in jenkins.

At the least, we need to test autocompletion and run the two maintenance scripts on test2wiki (SaneitizeJobs.php and UpdateSuggesterIndex.php).

Does it cover the dependencies mentioned above?[edit]

No

Can it be tested on test2wiki?[edit]

Top level functionality can be tested. Most cross-wiki integration is likely hard to test.

Is it feasible to make it testable on test2wiki?[edit]

Not clear. test2wiki would need sister wikis (wiktionary, wikipedia, wikiquote, etc.)

<Feature>[edit]

What possible risks are posed to this feature by the k8s migration?[edit]

What are the dependencies?[edit]

Does it use any external services?[edit]

Is there any back-end processing?[edit]

Does it use external binaries?[edit]

Does it read or write files on the filesystem?[edit]

Is there a regression or smoke testing strategy?[edit]

Does it cover the dependencies mentioned above?[edit]

Can it be tested on test2wiki?[edit]

Is it feasible to make it testable on test2wiki?[edit]

What features do not need testing on test2wiki?[edit]

Definitions[edit]

test2wiki
https://test2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. An environment hosted on production servers but with test data, so is appropriate for testing. The code it is running is updated every Tuesday.
To find a list of extensions already installed on test2wiki, see https://test2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Version.
Need testing?
Features may not need testing. For example, this might be because:
  • it is not hosted on Production
  • it is mainly a UI feature
  • it is considered low-risk
External services?
  • Inside our ecosystem like database, APIs, Parsoid
  • Outside our ecosystem like third-party APIs
Back-end processing?
Including DeferredUpdates, job queue. See How_to#Find_out_if_my_feature/extension_does_back-end_processing.
External binaries?
See How_to#Find_out_if_my_feature/extension_uses_external_binaries.
Existing regression or smoke testing strategy?
This could include: