The ranking procedure can be applied for proposals, and scholarship applications.The idea is really simple :
First the admin assigns reviewers for the conference(Only these people will have the right to rank proposals).
Secondly , each reviewer will rank a proposal on the basis of different criteria. For example, in case of scholarship applications the criterion would be :-
- 'nationality' ,
- 'validity'(meaning if the proposal is valid for even being considered),
- 'onpresence' (the contribution towards the project hosting this conference),
- 'outpresence' (the contribution towards projects other than this one),
- 'future' (commitments to be fulfilled in future by this applicant),
- 'representation'(which firm or company the applicant represents)
Similarly criteria like 'affiliation', 'content','idea' can be applied for the proposals submitted by speakers. Changes in Data Storage :-
- 1. Ranking page(wiki page)
content : criterion | rank | time
page_props :
+-----------------------+---------------------+----------------+ | pp_page | pp_propname | pp_value | +-----------------------+---------------------+----------------+ | ranking_id | application_reviewer| reviewer_id | | tr_reg_id | application | application_id | +-----------------------+---------------------+----------------+
- 2. Reviewer page(wiki page)
content : empty
page_props :
+-----------------------+---------------------+----------------+ | pp_page | pp_propname | pp_value | +-----------------------+---------------------+----------------+ | reviewer_id | reviewer-user | user_id | | reviewer_id | reviewer-conf | conference_id | +-----------------------+---------------------+----------------+
So above changes imply that per application per reviewer one or more than one ranking pages can exist.