Manual talk:$wgMaxArticleSize

From MediaWiki.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WMF configuration[edit]

Configured as follows in WMF InitialiseSettings.php:

'wgMaxArticleSize' => array(
	# Increased from 1024 to 2000 to alleviate problems with template expansion
	# limits in AfD archives -- TS
	'default' => 2000,
),

Leucosticte (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Updated info on WMF config[edit]

Wikimedia uses MediaWiki's default value (as of Sept 2018, this is 2048). -- ArielGlenn (talk) 12:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

truncated article is not as big as it should be[edit]

Hi,

We are getting "WARNING: template omitted, post-expand include size too large" comments on a large article on our corporate Wiki, which is supposed to be indicative of post-expand page size larger than $wgMaxArticleSize.

This setting is currently defined in our DefaultSettings.php to $wgMaxArticleSize = 2048; and has not been overridden in LocalSettings.php.

I have, however, copy-pasted the HTML source of such rendered page on a text file and, to my surprise, the resulting file is only 564 kb - only about 25% of the max size!

Do the rendered images count when checking the page size against $wgMaxArticleSize?

There are no images on the article, except multiple (697, to be accurate) repetitions of the same fontawesome folder_open icon, as exemplified by the image below:

Annotation 2019-04-22 172250.png

How exactly is the page size calculated and how can I optimize the page to use less space in such a case?

Thanks in advance