Jump to content

Extension:DiscussionTools/Comparison

From mediawiki.org

Various extensions and tools have emerged over the years to improve the support MediaWiki offers people to communicate with one another on-wiki: Structured Discussions (Flow), LiquidThreads , DiscussionTools and Convenient Discussions.

This page offers an overview of these various extensions and how the features they offer compare to one another.

Comparative Review

[edit]

Main characteristics

[edit]

Status of each tool, and their integration to the wiki's key features.

LiquidThreads Structured Discussions DiscussionTools Convenient Discussions
Type of tool MediaWiki extension Gadget/Userscript based on DiscussionTools
Release status Unmaintained Maintained (Wikimedia Foundation) Maintained (Volunteers)
Activation Pending removal[1] Deployed on all wikis as the default discussion system.[2] User configurable (including opting-out). User opt-in and configurable
Visual editing No Yes Yes No
Backwards-compatibility with wikitext No No Yes Yes
Templates support Yes Yes Partial – Tables, templates and parser tags aren't allowed in replies in visual mode Yes
Full history integration with the rest of the wiki Yes No Yes Yes
Mobile web support No Yes Yes No
Mobile app support No No Yes No
Permalink to a given comment Yes Yes Yes – if the signature of the comment is not altered.[3]

Discussion features

[edit]

Interaction with talk pages and other comments.

LiquidThreads Structured Discussions DiscussionTools Convenient Discussions
Dedicated workflow for starting a new topic Yes Yes Yes Yes
Topic and contents preload Yes Yes Yes Yes
Indication of new comments when you read a topic No No Yes Yes
Indication of edited comments when you read a topic Yes Yes No Yes
Each conversation has a permalink Yes Yes – Each topic is a different page. Yes – By linking to the topic heading, or by using the first comment's permalink.[3] Yes[3]
Move topics between pages Yes No – planned but not implemented Yes – via wikitext editing; title and signature mustn't be altered during the move.[3] Yes
Include discussions on another page and reply to them there No No – planned, including cross-wiki transclusion , but not implemented Yes – via transclusion
Editing comments Yes Yes Partial – via wikitext editing the whole page or section. See T242562 and T245225 for the editing of individual comments. Yes
Thank a comment from within the talk page Partial – via Page history Yes Partial – via Thanks in Page history.
In progress In progress – Work on supporting "Thanking" from the DiscussionTools UI is being tracked.
Yes
Sort topics by recent comment Yes Yes No No
Sort topics by start date Yes Yes No No
Summarize a discussion at the top of it Yes Yes Partial – by editing opening comment.
Mark a message as read or unread Yes No No No
Show/hide (collapse) subthreads Yes No No Yes

Notifications and interactivity

[edit]
LiquidThreads Structured Discussions DiscussionTools Convenient Discussions
Highlight a set of unread comments No Yes Yes – only when subscribed to a topic and using links from notifications Yes
Subscribe to be notified about new comments to a topic Yes – via Watchlist Yes – via Echo Yes – via Echo or itself
Be notified when a new topic is started on a talk page
Auto-subscription to a topic you created Yes – default
Highlight a quoted comment No – can link to comments but only as standalone pages Yes Yes Yes
Notification of edited comments Partial – only on your own comments Yes No No

Maintenance and moderation

[edit]
LiquidThreads Structured Discussions DiscussionTools Convenient Discussions
Direct access to user talkpage, contribs and more Partial – if linked in the signature Yes Partial – if linked in the signature
Hide (moderate) a comment Partial – no undelete UI Yes Partial – via undo/rollback (requires searching for edit in edit history) or archival templates, not included and requires editing wikitext Yes
Hide or delete a topic Yes Partial – same as DiscussionTools
Archiving discussions Not needed Not needed No – see T337293
  • Requires 3rd party bots for automatic archival
  • Requires wikitext editing or 3rd party gadgets for manual archival
No – Same as DiscussionTools, though moving topics can be used for manual archival.
Report an inappropriate comment No No In progress In progress[4] No

References

[edit]
  1. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T332022
  2. A few wikis have Flow as the default discussion system.
  3. T339247 – Create entry points for the Incident Report dialog with DiscussionTools