Edit check/Ideas

Edit Check is an effort to offer people actionable feedback about Wikipedia policies while they are editing. The initial "check" will prompt people to decide whether the new content they are intent on publishing warrants an inline citation.

This page intended to be a gathering place for future "checks" for volunteers and staff to consider implementing.

Place to look

This section contains places to look for additional check ideas:

• Edit notices (e.g. en:Template:Editnotice templates)
• Abuse filters
• Maintenance tags
• Guidance pages
• In-line comments

Check ideas

Scenario	Ticket/Reference	Notes
Display check at the beginning of the editing experience to remind some specific instructions about the article (BLP, ...).
Display check when you edit part of an article that has a large consensus.		"Please do not replace the last "e" in "Beyonce" with the accented "é". Texas birth certificates don't allow accented letters." (source)
Live Edit check when an action is performed on the page you are currently editing (other edit, revert...).
Live Edit check when someone posts a message at your talk page about the article you are currently editing.		The idea is: you edit a page, publish you edit again while you are editing, someone leaves a message about your previous edit at your talk page
Users inserts an external link over a piece of text, instead of creating a footnote.		Example
When someone is creating a new article that they have not yet added to any categories, invite/suggest they do so.	Automatically suggest categories when creating a new article	Via @HappyMihilist
When someone creates a new article that exists within another Wikipedia language version, invite them to link the two.	Autosuggest linking Wikidata item after creating an article	Via@Kwgulden
If someone attempts to cite Wikipedia as a reference using Citoid, prompt them to consider creating a wikilink instead.	T95390	21% of 207 new content edits that included a reference to another wikipedia articles were reverted. Learn more in T346982#9364769.
Prompt people attempting to use emojis, ™ and ® symbols, or similar, in either article text or citations, to consider removing them before publishing an edit per en:WP:MOSTM.		Similar policies exist at the following wikis: es.wiki, tr.wiki, vi.wiki, and zh.wiki.
Prompt people who are pasting text into an article to confirm the content is not at risk of creating a copyright violation.	T359107	This could also be relevant to "Adds a very long quote (likely a summary style violation, if not also a copyright one)"
Person is attempting to link to an external domain that volunteers at a given project have deemed to be spam/vandalistic	T350074	Related:T276857, Wish: Warn when adding a url reference that matches the SpamBlacklist
Person is attempting to add an image that they may not have 1) created or 2) received approval from the creator to publish		See how disproportionate amount of images deleted from Commons originate via cross-wiki uploads
Person is attempting to use title case in a context where sentence case is preferred.		See example edit and subsequence discussion.
Person is attempting to publish a new article without sufficient references, a disproportionally large number of external links in the body, unreliable sources, etc.		Related: Growth/Article creation for new editors, en:WikiProject Articles for creation: Difference between revisions
Person is attempting to cite a source that experienced volunteers/moderators are likely to consider unreliable	T276857
Person is about to break the three-revert rule		Via Samwalton9 (WMF). Note: this intervention would require Edit Check work within source editing interfaces, which it currently does not.
Adds a redlinked entry to a dynamic list
Adds an image lacking alt text to an article related to accessibility, e.g. Blindness
Links to a projectspace page from the mainspace body of an article
Links to a disambiguation page from an article body (already implemented)
Uses a word from a variety of language different from the one the article is tagged as having (British/American English, France/Canada French...)
Uses a word that is likely a typo
Adds a section titled "criticism" or "controversy"
Adds a link to an article that is already linked in that section (very likely a WP:DUPLINK violation)
Adds a reference with the same URL as an existing reference (likely a duplicate)
Uses a relative time word like "recently" in an article body
Use a word or phrase indicating a likely personal attack on a talk page
Adds a reference containing only a bare URL
Adds an external link in an article body
Adds many entries to an external links section (likely a violation of WP:ELNO)
Uses a phrase indicative of likely promotional language (e.g. "mission statement", "award-winning")
Expands a section titled "Plot" beyond, say, 1400 words (recommend max length is 700)
Uses a word or phrase listed at MOS:Words to Watch
Adds a link to a word that is likely an overlink (e.g. a year, or a major country/language/ethnicity/etc.)
Adds an image gallery to an article on an ethnicity (likely a violation of MOS:PEOPLEGALLERY)
Adds a short description longer than 40 characters (see WP:SDSHORT)
Adds a very long quote (likely a summary style violation, if not also a copyright one)
Adds an article to a category when the article is already in a subcategory
Creates a new section on a talk page with the same title as a recent discussion started by the same editor elsewhere (possibly a talk fork))	T337360
Capitalize titles, or add bold to titles.
Link target is changed, but not the label ([[2023]] → [[2022|2023]])		Some wikis have an Abuse Filter for these cases (example).
A new user makes an edit that looks significant, but does not include an edit summary		This could help significantly with improving communication with newcomers , making it less likely for them to have negative experiences.
Edit tries to create a footnote using superscript		Example, where <sup>3</sup> à Lorgues<sup>4</sup><sup>5</sup> was used.