Wikimedia Security Team/Goals 201516

From MediaWiki.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Goals[edit]

All goals are in addition to training, reviews, security bug work, static and dynamic application scanning, and vulnerability scanning.

Q1 (July-Sept 2015)[edit]

1. Automated dynamic scanning of MediaWiki in beta. This is an area where the WMF trails industry practice. In addition to finding flaws before malicious users do, integrating dynamic scanning (along with static analysis) into the development process should allow teams to take more ownership of the security of their code and ensure security is not a blocker for teams to "deliver on-time and on-budget". Additionally, dynamic scanning will give the Security Team quantitative measurements related to the security of code produced by different teams, which may be useful in identifying trends over time. During this quarter, we will:

  • Pick tool to implement
  • Configure weekly automated scanning from labs of beta (coordinated with RelEng - task T72181)
  • Record baseline scan results for core and one extension

2. Document and report initial metrics for security bug handling. The security team currently operates without defined KPI's. Since security bug handling is a core process for the team, we will define metrics that may measure the health of this process.

The team will also support other teams in the following initiatives

  1. Support legal during rollout of email encryption initiative
  2. Support privacy for Analytics initiatives
  3. Support Reader Infrastructure in deploying AuthManager
  4. Support Fundraising Tech for PCI

Q2 (Oct-Dec 2015)[edit]

1. Automated security static analysis of MediaWiki (depends on budget request)

  1. Evaluate Checkmarx, Veracode, Pfff
  2. Setup weekly static scans of mediawiki core, critical extensions, and services (depends on 1.1)

2. Expand developer training

  1. Present secure code and secure SDL training for community and staff
  2. (stretch) Develop and present security training materials for DevOps and Mobile (potentially outsource)

3. (stretch) Document and report initial metrics for security review process

The Team will also support other teams in the following initiatives

  1. Support privacy for Analytics projects (Wikistats, Uniques)
  2. Support security and privacy for Services' event propagation
  3. Support security initiatives by Ops (Authn, logging)
  4. Support Auth improvements by Reading Infrastructure
  5. Anticipated Security reviews:
    1. Revscoring and Link Recommendations for Research
    2. Article Placeholder for Wikidata

Q3 (Jan-Mar 2016)[edit]

  1. Allow two-factor authentication for CentralAuth wiki accounts

The Team will also support other teams in the following initiatives

  1. Support Legal's implementation of Privacy by Design principles and training
  2. Support 3rd party security audit for Privacy
  3. Support Reading Infrastructure to deploy AuthManager in January
  4. Support FrTech finishing their PCI work
  5. Support Ops on codfw switch, Horizon
  6. Support OIT rollout of two-step authentication for google apps
  7. Support Analytics RfC on Unique Identifiers

Anticipated Security reviews:

  1. Reading - MobileFrontend / loading (client, maybe restbase work) (phab:T120341)
  2. Reading - Hovercard+popups gadget merge (later in the quarter) (or alternative)
  3. Reading Infrastructure - AuthManager (continued)
  4. Reading Infrastructure - GPGMail (phab:T114341)
  5. Discovery - Kartographer (phab:T120922)
  6. ORES extension (phab:T120922)
  7. Community Tech - "2 wishlist items"

Q4 (Apr-Jun 2016)[edit]

CentralAuth password authentication service. Reduce the impact of a security breach by isolating password hashes into a smaller, more well-defended cluster of servers. In a single quarter, it's likely we could get a PoC service written, and begin setting up a cluster within the production cluster to run the service and databases. This would require significant support from Ops, and some support from the Services team.

The Team will also support other teams in the following initiatives:

  1. FrTech - PCI completion
  2. Legal - PbD implementation

Anticipated Security Reviews:

  1. Newsletter
  2. Indigo-depict (T66548)
  3. Reading - new service
  4. Reading - Hovercards
  5. Editing - ImageTweaks (T126492)
  6. Editing - UploadsLink (T129609)
  7. Editing - Romanian diacritics (T129584)
  8. Discovery - DOMPurify (T125382)
  9. Discovery - json schema (T129426)

Context & References[edit]

Strategy[edit]

WMF Strategy Preview

Specific things called out that effect the Security Team:

  • The WMF can become a "Thought-lead on Privacy, Accessibility" (slide 56)
  • To "improve the core", there is emphasis on metrics for each department, specifically: (slide 61)
    • Score cards & KPIs
    • Outcome-based budgeting
    • Improved, clear success criteria for projects

2015 Call to Action[edit]

Strengthen Technology & Execution

  • We will define our commitments -- and deliver on-time and on-budget.
  • We will make our decisions based on data.
  • We will improve our process for community input and allocate dedicated technical resources to community requests.
  • We will update legacy architectures and deliver mobile-ready infrastructure and services to support structured data, user security, and a simplified user experience.

Focus on Community & Knowledge

  • We will integrate across community engagement functions to improve communication and results.
  • We will create a central, multilingual hub for community support.
  • We will have a working plan to support emerging users and communities.
  • We will improve our measures of community health and content quality, and fund effective community and content initiatives.

Experimentation & New Knowledge

  • We will integrate, consolidate, and pause or stop stalled initiatives.
  • We will create spaces for future community-led innovations and new knowledge creation.
  • We will facilitate and support new models and structures for knowledge curation.
  • We will strengthen partnerships with organizations that use or contribute free content, or are aligned with the WMF in the free-knowledge movement.