User talk:PlavorSeol

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

This is PlavorSeol's talk page.

-revi (talkcontribs)

You have been told multiple times on this wiki and other wikis including Korean Wikipedia, Meta, and other projects not to engage in edit warring, and engage in civil discussions. You consistently failed to comply, and this is the final warning on this wiki that you will be indefinitely blocked if you fail to engage in civil manner.

-revi (talkcontribs)

You have been indefinitely blocked.

PlavorSeol (talkcontribs)

No... Oh no... This should not really happen... I still need to ask for support...

Is it final? Is there a way to get unblocked?

MarioJump83 (talkcontribs)

It's final. Since you are globally banned there's no way unless you are globally unbanned.

Reply to "One, final warning"

Notification of global ban proposal on your account (귀하의 계정에 대한 전역 추방 논의 안내)

MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Notification of global ban proposal on your account (귀하의 계정에 대한 전역 추방 논의 안내)"
AKlapper (WMF) (talkcontribs)
AKlapper (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Hi @PlavorSeol, as this and other requests were not successful I've disabled your Phabricator account for the time being. Thanks for your understanding.

Reply to "Phabricator activity"
Kghbln (talkcontribs)

After your edits the page looks like a total mess. I am not sure if it is the VisualEditor or so however I would appreciate if you do not repeat this. Thanks a lot.

PlavorSeol (talkcontribs)

What happened to that page? I used 2017 source editor (New wikitext mode) and it looks OK to me like this when I saved it.

Kghbln (talkcontribs)

Yeah, that's totally messed up. Code formatting etc. is all borked. Probably one should not use the new wikitext mode while it is experimental.

Kghbln (talkcontribs)

I added the changes you intended to do to the page for fluff. Should be fine now.

PlavorSeol (talkcontribs)

Thanks for that, but I still don't understand what and how messed up that page.

RobinHood70 (talkcontribs)

If I'm understanding correctly, it's not the appearance of the article text he's commenting on, it's the appearance of the wikitext...things like the spacing around parameter names and things like that.

Kghbln (talkcontribs)

Yeah, most importantly the stuff between the syntaxhighlight tags. However in retrospect I should have just fixed this rather than reverting. It was a pretty dirty diff so this probably made me act like this but I should have done better. I am sorry for this. Anyways thank for your effort.

There are no older topics