User talk:Mattflaschen-WMF

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Mattflaschen-WMF/Archive 1 on 2015-07-10.

Feature Addition in Extension:StructuredDiscussions a.k.a Flow

2
Summary by AKlapper (WMF)
Falcopragati (talkcontribs)

I want to add a functionality in my wiki so that users can vote other user's replies in SructuredDiscussions .(just like it is in Extension:Comments)

Is it possible ?

please guide me ...

AKlapper (WMF) (talkcontribs)
GoranSM (talkcontribs)

Hi Matthew,

I see that you did some work with the Growth team (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Growth), specifically: https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-GuidedTour/blob/master/extension.json#L4

Here's the thing: I need to reach some data on guided tours for a recent campaign that we've run in WMDE. However, I can't figure out where to look for the data that I need, so I thought it would be the best to reach someone from the Growth team and ask for advise.

Please advise.Regards,

Goran S. Milovanović, PhD

Data Analyst, Software Department

Wikimedia Deutschland

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

@GoranSM Sure. Basically, you need to set shouldLog to true in the tour (if this is false or omitted, no data will be recorded; example with true is here), then you can get data from the relevant EventLogging schemas. See the list of schemas.

If you're not familiar with accessing EventLogging, you can start here.

The tables have names that are the schema, plus underscore, then the ID. E.g. GuidedTourGuiderImpression_8694395 . So basically:

  1. ssh stat1006.eqiad.wmnet
  2. mysql --defaults-file=/etc/mysql/conf.d/research-client.cnf -hanalytics-store.eqiad.wmnet log
  3. SELECT * FROM GuidedTourGuiderImpression_8694395 LIMIT 1;

If one of the first 2 steps fails, you will need to request access on Phabricator. If you have issues, you can ask here, or in #wikimedia-collaboration (if more GuidedTour-focused) or #wikimedia-analytics (if more EventLogging-focused) on Freenode.

GoranSM (talkcontribs)

@Mattflaschen-WMFThank you so much. I have access to production and routinely use MariaDB replicas - I work as contractor Data Analyst for WMDE. Your suggestion on how to track the guided tours data:

"... you need to set shouldLog to true in the tour (if this is false or omitted, no data will be recorded; example with true is here)..."

is exactly what I was looking for.

Again: thank you very much!

Reply to "Guided Tours"
Liuxinyu970226 (talkcontribs)

I'm sorry, so very sorry, that I did an insulting to you in that gerrit patch page, my brain couldn't control my hand in that time. I also promise that in the future, even if such -2 happened again, I either don't pay attention to that, or if that affects my UI experience, I will try to persuade the corresponding developer team(s) on Phabricator or public discussion pages such as VisualEditor/Feedback. I kindly know that unlike Phabricator, anyone's comment on gerrit can't be removed, and may make one untrusted.

Reply to "gerrit:408073 apologize"
The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)

Seriously. It is annoying. We need to talk.

The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)
The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)

If you disagree with some of my improvements then you can discuss them on that talkpage.

The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)
The Quixotic Potato (talkcontribs)

Oh and please delete flow, it is a stupid idea and a waste of money.

Reply to "Are you serious??"

Weigh in on whether to finalize the new version of the "Conflict of interest" section

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

You participated earlier in discussion about the "Conflict of interest" section of the draft Code of Conduct for technical spaces. There was not consensus to approve an earlier version of this section. I'm contacting you to let you know the draft has been updated, and we are now discussing whether to finalize the new version.

Please participate here.

Thank you,

User:Mattflaschen-WMF via

Reply to "Weigh in on whether to finalize the new version of the "Conflict of interest" section"

Please participate again in improving the "Conflict of interest" section

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Please participate again in improving the "Conflict of interest" section"
Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

FULLPAGENAME - Topic:Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

PAGENAME - Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

BASEPAGENAME - Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

SUBPAGENAME - Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

SUBJECTPAGENAME - Topic:Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

ARTICLEPAGENAME - Topic:Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

TALKPAGENAME - :Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

ROOTPAGENAME - Tb72ghabbl04qv3y

Reply to "Test page names"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Unspecified

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

BASEPAGENAME: Tb71u16bxyvryq4m

Reply to "Test"
Platonides (talkcontribs)

Hello Matt

I have seen your edit, as well as the code, and it seems like the Grade C comment section in the code was wrong.

Instead of "Firefox 3+" it probably should be "Firefox <4", or perhaps "Firefox 3.*". Similarly for the others, "Opera 10+" ''would'' include Opera 10.5+…

What do you think?

Mattflaschen-WMF (talkcontribs)

It's intentional. My understanding is it means basically, "The no-JS experience is intended to work and provide essential user actions in Firefox 3+, etc.". It does not mean Firefox 3+ deliberately gets the no-JS experience. It might sometimes get no-JS (e.g. due to a transient network failure), but normally as you note it doesn't. In some cases e.g. IE >= 6 < 9 we do deliberately serve all Grade C browsers of that type no-JS (unless the Grade C is also Grade A), but not for Firefox.

@Krinkle and I discussed this leading up to that edit. This is my understanding from that discussion.

Platonides (talkcontribs)

Ah, I see. The «no-javascript run-time» includes more than simply not loading javascript, so eg. Firefox 10 would usually be Grade A, but if it had javascript disabled, it would get Grade C support, and it should work, too.

Thanks

Reply to "Compatibility"