User talk:4nn1l2

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Jdx in topic Understanding the STV result

Please remove the translate tag.[edit]

Hello. Your experiment page is displayed in the translation list (Special:PageTranslation). Please remove the translate tag in User:4nn1l2/Sandbox.--タバコはマーダー (talk) 02:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello タバコはマーダー, done. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This has been a full time job of hell battling git and all the scams. Who has accessibility access[edit]

I want beginners answers even though it’s been going on for years. No one believed me. It’s caused me more pain and unnecciscary dark times Bwikn (talk) 13:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I cannot understand you. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Understanding the STV result[edit]

Regarding this edit to Understanding the STV result - why did you change it to "3.75 votes" when the formula above shows the total as "4 votes" ?

Also please check my edit. Shenme (talk) 05:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And why the heck are there two copies of this description, one at and one at ? Argh! I'll go fix the droop quota formula the other place, and after checking my 3.75 query, please you go fix that also at the other place. Shenme (talk) 05:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Shenme: Because 0.25 votes (belonging to the Voter 6) gets wasted (exhausted) and does not get counted. In this picture, it should be clear. Please focus on the blue bar, and see how a fraction of the vote by Voter 6 turns into the white color in the last count, because it cannot be transferred to any other candidate.
I fixed all three (!) pages. 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, but now the equation 2 + 0.25 + 0.25 + 1.5 = 3.75 is veeery confusing. Perhaps the exhausted part of the vote should be somehow marked (e.g. in different color) as should be also marked appropriate part of the description below the equation. It took me a while to understand WTF is going on. --jdx Re: 08:51, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]