I just tried to use the Gadget 2.0 design and it is horrible. Description is stored in the Mediawiki namespace. The definition file is stored in the Gadget_definition namespace. The CSS and JS code is stored in the Gadget namespace. Did anybody ever try to actually use this system before implementing it? Why not just leave everything the way it is, but just store all the files in the Gadget namespace, so you have "Gadget:Mygadget Gadget:mygadget.css Gadget:mygadget.js if you need a second file Gadget-mygadget-morejs.js . Inside the Gadget:mygadget, just have a line that says "title" and "description". Then when a person is trying to either copy from an existing Mediawiki or creating their own, they can easily see if a file is missing or existing. Or just copy the templates system of just having mygadget/def or mygadget/json
