Topic on Talk:Core Platform Team/Initiatives/Authority

Extension devs

It seems as though for a first version we would want to not be disruptive of extension devs. Either we can target a first version that leads to changes in specific extensions managed by WMF or, likely better, we reserve that for a second phase.

Security

Part of the intention here is to protect developers from easily making mistakes related to permissions, we should include security team once we get to the design doc phase but I think they should be listed as a stakeholder

Performance

Should be included for the same reason as security team.

Quality and test engineering

Since this is aligned with code health objectives we should included Quality and Test as a stakeholder.

Thanks Will. You are right. I was mainly thinking of groups who will benefit from the new structure. And extension devs are of course on of the groups. I'll update the stakeholder list.