Topic on Extension talk:AWS

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Is AWS still a valid extension?

Summary by Edward Chernenko

topic archived as non-actual: as of 10 Oct 2018, extension is maintained

Ahancie (talkcontribs)

The latest topics in this discussion are at least a year old.  Does that mean that there is a better solution than using this extension?

Edward Chernenko (talkcontribs)

Do you only need the Amazon S3 part? (to store images in S3)

  1. I have a stable fork of S3-related functionality of Extension:AWS. It has been used in production for more than a year. If you want, I can send you the current state of the code.
  2. I did send patches to Extension:AWS, but some very important bugfixes which make it stable (e.g. ) are sadly not yet merged into Extension:AWS.
  3. Unfortunately, the maintainer seems to be unresponsive, and I can't contact him.

I don't know what to do here. Edward Chernenko (talk) 00:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Edward Chernenko (talkcontribs)
Ahancie (talkcontribs)

Thank you for sharing this with me.

Florianschmidtwelzow (talkcontribs)

@Edward Chernenko Do you probably want to publish the extension/fork on and probably also host it in gerrit (which would bringt the benefit, that core-developers can look for it when removing deprecated code, which may be used by your extension :)

Edward Chernenko (talkcontribs)

Sure, why not.

Will create the page for it (and move it to Gerrit) in a week or so.