Topic on Project talk:Sandbox/Structured Discussions test

Jump to navigation Jump to search

used to be ugly, this flow

Summary last edited by Tar Lócesilion 22:32, 28 July 2015 4 years ago

This is some summary. A bold one at that. One I could even edit in wikicode editor - if I wanted to. Which I don't.

In this thread...

Felis domestica (talkcontribs)

... and still is. There was no list of topics for a quick look, it hasn't got one. I believe we should be thankful it hasn't got an worse last few months.

Tar Lócesilion (talkcontribs)
  • @Felis domestica, you posted in sandbox. I suppose you intended to write on the feedback page, Talk:Flow.
  • There is a list of topics, just click on "Browse topics". Click boldly in sandbox.
  • As for aesthetics, can you please describe more precisely, what you don't like? some typography or design rules were broken?
Tar Lócesilion (talkcontribs)

OK, I cannot move this topic, because this function hasn't been provided yet: task T88140. A little facepalm, we'll wait, then. LOL - editing other's words is wiki but in discussions it is a bit strange... Well.. but it at least shows clearly who edited this as a last person...

Polimerek (talkcontribs)

I reply to myself :-) then, I will thank myself :-) And it all goes under Tar account :-)

Polimerek (talkcontribs)


Tar Lócesilion (talkcontribs)

It did! :) To be honest, editing other's words in classic discussions has always been a bit strange. Laissez parler! Now, the software supports this oddity and I like it :)

¿De verdad?

@Halibutt, you wanna play with me? huh, dude? ]:>

Polimerek (talkcontribs)

Just testing. .. don't take it seriously. IMHO the icon "</>" is not intuitive. The strange thing is, I can edit other's entires...

Hmm... testing, testing.

Tomasz Raburski (talkcontribs)



This post was hidden by Tomasz Raburski (history)
Tomasz Raburski (talkcontribs)
Tomasz Raburski (talkcontribs)

Maire (talkcontribs)
Halibutt (talkcontribs)
Dschwen (talkcontribs)

I see a list of topics, and I don't think it is ugly at all. The problem with sandbox pages like this one is that they are not very representative of actual discussion pages. People write a few words at most. Very few posts here contain the amount of text a real discussion post would contain.

Reply to "used to be ugly, this flow"