Topic on User talk:Peachey88

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Qgil-WMF (talkcontribs)

Hi, about a month ago I spent a bunch of hours sorting out the Git/Gerrit in order to declare this bug fixed. One of the things I proposed and nobody opposed was to get rid of the Git and Gerrit template. If you have good reasons to bring it back please discuss at Template talk:Git and Gerrit. Otherwise it would be great if you could revert your changes. I didn't delete just because I thought it would be ok to leave some time until the pages still using it could clean it up, but maybe it will be good to remove it altogether to avoid confusion and extra work. Thank you!

This post was posted by Qgil-WMF, but signed as Qgil.

Peachey88 (talkcontribs)

1. Having a logical template (which has the same links as the Gerrit page) personally seems to be a-lot more logical then having a large context-less gerrit logo (Which in most cases linked to the Gerrit page, Although at least once linked Externally to the Gerrit interface) and personally I would view that as helping resolve #36437.


2. Almost all of the terms on that template are directly linked from the Gerrit page anyway and most of those are or will be useful to those that want to look at and learn about Gerrit.

Reply to "Git and Gerrit template"