Talk pages consultation 2019/Phase 1 report/Survey/ja

Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Talk pages consultation 2019/Phase 1 report/Survey and the translation is 39% complete.
Other languages:
Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Nederlands • ‎español • ‎français • ‎polski • ‎suomi • ‎čeština • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎עברית • ‎العربية • ‎中文 • ‎日本語


協議では、ウィキメディアのコミュニティの可能な限り広い範囲からインプットを募集したいと願っており – プロジェクト群の別や言語版、また視点もさまざまになると望ましい – 製品のコミュニケーション用機能関連の方向性を見つけ、製品チームが次の会計年度に取り組めるようにすることが狙いです。

第1フェーズのレポートを公開しました! We are currently collecting responses to the Phase 2 trade-off questions. The end date for feedback is June 15.

Copyright licensing and privacy statement

  1. 提案された製品の方向性について、どう思いますか?
    The Wikimedia Foundation proposes building a new, clearer design on top of existing wikitext talk pages. It will offer simpler tools for replying, indentation and signatures. You could continue to use wikitext on talk pages, if you prefer that. It should also be possible to participate in a discussion without using wikitext.
    設問: この製品の方向性についてどう思いますか?
  2. 別々の議論を区別する
    People want to watch individual sections on the talk page. They want better notifications, archiving, and search. To do any of this, we may need to create a more structured definition of what counts as a single discussion. This may mean making changes to the wikitext conventions on a talk page. For example, we may create a new way that discussion headings look in wikitext, or a new link that you need to use to create, rename or split a thread.
    設問: そのアプローチの優位な点と不利な点はなんですか?
  3. 編集初心者がトークページを見つけやすくする
    Newcomers have difficulty finding talk pages. During user tests, only one person out of ten found the 議論 tab. Most testers looked for a 議論 tab on the opposite side of the page, where all of the other tabs and links are. Many people also expected to see links to discussions about specific sections in the article. We may want to move the link to the talk page to the opposite side of the article page. We might add discussion functionality connected to individual sections.
    設問: 記事の内容と議論の結びつきをもっと明白に示した場合、有利な点と不利な点はそれぞれなんですか?
  4. 協議用ツールの表示位置
    Currently, many wikis have community discussion spaces in the project namespace (Project: or Wikipedia:), rather than in a talk namespace (Project talk: or Wikipedia talk:). The project namespace is often used for village pumps/cafés, noticeboards, and some workflows, such as Articles for deletion. The system will need to know where discussions happen, so that it can display the new tools in those discussions, and not display them on other pages. There are several potential ways to do this. One of them is to move all discussions to a talk namespace.
    設問: それを実行すると、有利な点と不利な点はそれぞれなんですか?
  5. 履歴表示の矛盾
    Sometimes, you need to see the history of the entire page. Other times, it would be more helpful to see the history of only a single discussion thread. It would be ideal if we could provide both, but we're not sure how to do that.
    設問: ページの完璧な履歴と特定のスレッドの履歴には、それぞれどんな利点と不利点がありますか?
  6. メタデータの表示位置
    Some wikis place templates at the top of article talk pages. These may show instructions, warnings, or FAQs. They may hold page quality information, link to relevant WikiProjects, or identify past activities. Many new users are confused by finding non-discussion material at the top of an article talk page. It would be helpful to move some or all of that content somewhere else on the page, or under a different tab.
    質問: そのアプローチの長所と短所は何だと思いますか? テンプレートのうち、ディスカッションページの適切な使用に非常に重要なのはどれで、別のページへ移すほうがよいのはどれですか。
  7. What is your home project or community?
    • ウィキペディア
    • ウィキメディア・コモンズ
    • ウィキデータ
    • ウィクショナリー
    • ウィキソース
    • ウィキボヤージュ
    • その他、具体的にご記入ください:
  8. もっともよく編集する言語版はどれですか。
    • English
    • French
    • German
    • Spanish
    • Japanese
    • Russian
    • Italian
    • Chinese
    • Portuguese
    • Persian
    • Arabic
    • Polish
    • Dutch
    • Ukrainian
    • Hebrew
    • Swedish
    • Indonesian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Other (please specify):
  9. Which of the following best describes you?
    • I have never edited Wikipedia or contributed content at any Wikimedia project.
    • I'm a newcomer to Wikipedia and the Wikimedia projects.
    • I'm an occasional contributor.
    • I'm an active, experienced contributor.
  10. Have you previously answered some or all of these questions online?