I support this and see it as very uncontroversial. The question for me is one of priority--is interactive media going to drive the most value for our readers compared to other potential features, and at what cost. Interactive constellations might make pages about astronomy phenomenal, but I would like to invest in projects that apply to a large set of topics. Our recent "map" feature is amazing and potentially impacts 17% of pages, but roughly 4% of pageviews. I would like to have a similar level of understanding if we are going to work on something that is not universally applicable.