Talk:Requests for comment/Accelerated Mobile Pages
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by 2404:C805:D00:9A00:21AB:3B7C:76B1:7F56 in topic Link rel
| This page used the Structured Discussions extension to give structured discussions. It has since been converted to wikitext, so the content and history here are only an approximation of what was actually displayed at the time these comments were made. |
Link rel
[edit]I think that AMP is not a good idea for Wikipedia... but can be very useful for small wikis that are written by a couple of people...
Apart from developing the AMP version of the wiki... the only thing that Google ask is to make the following changes in the traditional html code...
I am afraid that I am not good with php code but.... Is there any easy way to add a <link rel..... > like following... ? I think It would be enough for some small and almost static wikis... Of course they should write their own AMP code.
If you have both AMP and non-AMP versions of your pages, include the following links:
- On any non-AMP page, reference the AMP version of the page to let Google and other platforms know about it:
<link rel="amphtml" href="https://www.example.com/url/to/amp-version.html" />Carlos Cristia (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- HI, I would say that AMP sounds like a nice idea in theory, but in practice it's just another proprietary format, and nothing more. AMP isn't the right answer. A better answer would be to work on the things in mediawiki that make page loads slower (such as blocking CSS / scripts), and to support the things that benefits mobile users and makes Googlebot happy too - without having to give up too much. 2404:C805:D00:9A00:21AB:3B7C:76B1:7F56 (talk) 09:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)