Talk:Readers/Release timeline
Add topic| This page used the Structured Discussions extension to give structured discussions. It has since been converted to wikitext, so the content and history here are only an approximation of what was actually displayed at the time these comments were made. |
Can we flip the order?
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The deployment archive, for example, is listed from most recent to least. I feel like "What were the most recent releases of interest" is a question that could page could/should answer. Phuedx (WMF) (talk) 14:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Go for it. No problem here. Jdlrobson (talk) 15:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Should we include the associated Gerrit changes and deploy times too?
[edit]Firstly, this is a great first pass!
Certainly when trying to answer questions like "Did the new mobile header treatment break the search experience?" (or better phrase "break the search instrumentation?"), digging through the comments on the associated tasks can be a little cumbersome. Doing that work upfront may pay off or would it be too much? Phuedx (WMF) (talk) 14:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- It may do but I'd advise doing it for new changes. Let's see if we use it and if it's helpful. Is there any other information we would need on gerrit aside from the date? Jdlrobson (talk) 15:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- The branch that it was included in is sometimes useful. Phuedx (WMF) (talk) 09:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)