Provided the understanding I currently have of this document accurately represents how it's been intended , I – as a new member of the Foundation and the Foundation's product team – would find it helpful for this document 1) to link to some of the thinking that supports these assertions  to speak to how we understand our relationship with our communities. What words do we use to describe our relationship(s)? "We" and "with" "for" and "them", "community" and "communities," etc. Although, maybe "2)" is better reserved for Product Principles/Process? cc @Whatamidoing (WMF)
(The above is a response to a question that came up during 4-Feb-2019's Community Relations Specialists/Audiences/Meetings with Product and discussed during 11-Feb-2019's, that resembled, "As someone who is new to the Foundation (that's me, Peter) what do you think of this document?" Posting here for posterity.)
1. I understand this document as an effort to establish shared expectations and understanding among Foundation and community members about how we, together, develop products.
2. Assertion: "...strategy's assessment that we play a vital but poorly understood role in the knowledge ecosystem"