Talk:Documentation/Library Documentation Template
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by APaskulin (WMF) in topic Feedback and questions
| This page used the Structured Discussions extension to give structured discussions. It has since been converted to wikitext, so the content and history here are only an approximation of what was actually displayed at the time these comments were made. |
Feedback and questions
[edit]Hi @Gbahdeyboh! Here are a few pieces of feedback and a few questions:
- When you mentioned the "scrapy documentation", include a citation link.
- What do you mean by "For this template, a title is not needed."? APaskulin (WMF) (talk) 19:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- The citation has been added.
- For other templates, I specified that a title should be sufficient to give some context regarding what the document is about following the English Wikipedia Manual of Style.
- A library name can be a word or phrase that has no relation to what the library does, hence, it won't meet the naming criteria for titles stated above.
- This is why I specified that the name be written in bold at the top, In context, that is also the title. Will changing that to "The title should be the name of the Library" make it look less confusing? Gbahdeyboh (talk) 15:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yes! I agree that changing to "The title should be the name of the Library" will make it less confusing. APaskulin (WMF) (talk) 17:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)