Talk:Development policy

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Code Stewardship policy(?)

1
Summary by Krinkle

Page was likely named that way by accident. It's been renamed since.

Tgr (WMF) (talkcontribs)
Tgr (WMF) (talkcontribs)
Jynus (talkcontribs)

Yeah, parts of that definitely shouldn't be a policy or specifically a development, just a guide- People shouldn't approve or vote against how DBAs work or what tickets are preferred :-D, but people should have a way to know how to request schema changes. Maybe substitute the old Schema change ?


On the other side, thing like "All tables should have a primary key" were actually voted and approved at RFCs/architecture committees/office hours: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112637 / Architecture meetings/RFC review 2015-09-16 and while I personally don't need it to be a development policy (and may need review), we need somewhere written on this wiki to say "don't merge, doesn't have a primary key" to back such rejections.

JCrespo (WMF) (talkcontribs)

I think the intentions with the blanking were good "let's review all this old stuff", but sadly some people has taking the blanking as "everything goes", and this is causing issues on production.

Reply to "Links to old policy page"
There are no older topics