Talk:Article feedback/Extended review

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

APS reviews

Aaron Halfaker has written a JS script to support the review/rating system for the APS initiative. --DarTar 16:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

approval of and comments on credentials

  • Do we need a approval process for credentials?
  • Or are they just accepted until someone finds something wrong/some issue about it?
  • Where is one supposed to post these issues? Is there an editable part of the credentials page?
  • Or is this just put on the user's discussion page?

-- Achimbode 11:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Tony1 (talkcontribs)

What I find surprising, even this early in the operation of the tool, is the skew towards the upper end of the ratings. It appears that readers hand out 3s, 4s and 5s (particularly 4s, I suspect) without much thought. It's surprising to find stubs that receive average ratings of 3.5+ for completeness.

I'm unsure how to encourage readers to use a bigger range of ratings (1–5) and to be more demanding. Or is it that in interpreting the scores, we should regard the difference between an average of 3 and of 4 to be critical? (That is, 3 bad; 4 good.) Should there be an implicit aim to reach 4+ in all four aspects? tony 12:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC) (talkcontribs)

some cases of kids who offered their body to the teachers to make some money!! what does it realy mean?!-feedback on the article about Summerhill school in England. pls. email me: thanks. Nancy

Reach Out to the Truth (talkcontribs)

Probably prostitution. It's not mentioned later in the article and it's probably untrue, so I removed that paragraph.

Reply to "Comments"
There are no older topics