Project talk:Sandbox/Structured Discussions test/2018

This is a sandbox/test page. Please bring feedback (bug-reports or feature-requests) to either phabricator or Talk:Structured Discussions for further discussion. Thanks!

This is the beta version of mediawiki official structured discussions?

This is a very cool and nice structured discussions which we would love to have in all of our wikimedia wiki discussion page! Can this be installed used now directly? Would be great if this discussion can be automatically activated for all pages on discussion tabs! Ljianyih (talk) 15:36, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

It stated needed the consultation from the team. Can this be used on http://list.wiki/ ? It's fairly new so installation will be seamless if it supports mediawiki 1.28 (upgrading seems troublesome, hopefully there is also paid upgradable service for mediawiki software) Ljianyih (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Okay, yes, this looks cool.

I don't need to remember how to sign, I don't need to know wiki formatting, I can just write, WYSIWYG. Perfect. I wish editing pages was this simple. Calion (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

And replies are the easiest thing in the world. You auto-favorite a thread. However, can you favorite the entire Talk page? Calion (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes, there's a star at the top of the screen. Sweet.

Oh, you can use wiki markup if you want! Awesome? Why do people hate this?? Calion (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

There's no TOC?

Maybe I missed it 68.181.88.1 (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

It's kind of hidden. The TOC for the discussion board pops up when you click the "Browse topics" button at the upper left of the "start a new topic" input field. BDavis (WMF) (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Trying Structured Discussions test, loos nice Xinbenlv (talk) 22:29, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Leaving a comment so that I can edit it from another account

What does it look like when other users edit this comment?

Edit edit edit!!

Editing again Harej (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

test prf

Lorem Ipsum Sid amed.

vcxvxvxvxvxv 109.169.250.109 (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

cvxvxvxvvxc 109.169.250.109 (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

cevap 78.179.81.169 (talk) 13:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

wwww 213.115.193.20 (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

koala 2A02:810D:813F:DAB8:80FB:9460:D0FD:9B0C (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

So how does this extension works

Just curious, would be interesting to see on my wiki www.youtube.com 213.81.164.217 (talk) 12:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

I think it looks way better than the standard discusssion system, init? 213.81.164.217 (talk) 12:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

yes yes sure 213.81.164.217 (talk) 12:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

why can't i locate my cmpign?

hello,

I just created a structured campaign however, when I finally concluded and went to proceed to the saving button, all of it disappeared and it placed me right back at question 1. can someone please either guide me how to find my content, or explain to me what it may be that I could be doing wrong. thank you in advance Ladibapes (talk) 12:23, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

xzxzx 115.113.69.206 (talk) 15:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Test One (by Hip)

This is a test of the Structured Discussions 91.125.89.41 (talk) 19:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

This is a title.

This is a reply. Nick Lancer (talk) 07:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Formatting: Nick is trying out StructuredDiscussions, which looks very similar to Wikipedia's post-2016 layout. (Distraction: 2016⁵ equals over 33 quadrillion. Interesting but irrelevant :P)_subscript wikipedia sucks I do not yet know computer code, but I will be learning soon, which hopefully goes well. Hopefully. This line of text is slightly bigger than the others. This one is slightly smaller. And now we're back to normal size.

Sweet! Nick Lancer (talk) 07:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Can topic title include a link test

n/t Alsee (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Annoying little bugs 213.127.160.19 (talk) 11:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

To be clear, I wasn't suggesting that links in topic titles were a bug. We sometimes find it helpful to include links in section titles, and I was just checking if it worked in Flow too. Alsee (talk) 07:54, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

testing test t

Lots of nonsense

omg 186.141.201.178 (talk) 22:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

no way 186.141.201.178 (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

yes way! Zenhaus (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

testing test? OMG! NO WAY! 84.199.255.188 (talk) 07:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)