Ferramenta de revisão ORES

From mediawiki.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page ORES review tool and the translation is 8% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Türkçe • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎latviešu • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎српски / srpski • ‎العربية • ‎سنڌي • ‎فارسی • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어
Quando está a patrulhar as mudanças recentes com a extensão ORES ativada.
ORES presentation at Wikimania 2016

A extensão ORES é uma ferramenta que integra o serviço ORES e o MediaWiki. ORES é uma ferramenta baseada em inteligência artificial que classifica edições. See ORES' documentation for more information about what types of scoring are available.

The default threshold is deliberately set low to capture almost all vandalism cases (so a number of false positives are also likely to occur). This is in contrast to anti-vandalism bots which set the threshold high to capture only the most obvious vandalism cases (and thus have few false positives). If you do not want to see the flag for most edits, you can simply change ORES sensitivity (see below).

Utilizar a ORES

No seu menu de Recursos Beta, ative o ORES se estiver disponível. The review tool will augment Special:RecentChanges and Special:Watchlist by highlighting and flagging edits (with a red-colored r) that need review, because the ORES prediction model judges them to be "damaging". E ainda que existe uma nova opção denominada "Ocultar boas edições". Ao clicar nessa opção, poderá verificar apenas as edições que são, provavelmente, vandalismos.

Se analisou uma edição e concluiu que não era vandalismo, pode simplesmente marcá-la como patrulhada e não estará mais destacada.

Pode alterar a sensibilidade da ORES nas suas preferências (na aba Mudanças recentes) e tornar "Ocultar boas edições" na sua opção por definição nas mudanças recentes e/ou na sua lista de páginas vigiadas.

Changes that "need review" and may be damaging are highlighted and flagged in Special:RecentChanges.
A "needs review" flag is described in the Special:RecentChanges legend.
Configuration settings are available via Special:Preferences.


How does ORES detect damaging edits?

ORES uses machine learning strategies to "learn" what damaging edits look like, by reviewing examples created by Wikipedians through Wiki labels.

Why use the term "damaging" instead of "vandalism"?

"Vandalism" is just a subset of what we want to catch when we're doing RC Patrolling. The word "vandalism" implies deliberate malicious intent. However, a patroller's job is to look for damaging edits whether the damage was actually intended or not. Therefore, referring to the edits that the review tool flags as "damaging" is more true to the kind of work the system is designed to support.

Note that the ORES service also provides a model that focuses on the good-faith/bad-faith distinction ("goodfaith"). It'll be easier to take advantage of that when we deploy the next major change to filtering on the RC page for the review tool. See the Including new filter interface in ORES review tool topic under discussion.

See ORES#Edit quality for more information about how "edit quality" is evaluated in ORES.