Help talk:Extension:AdvancedSearch

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Feedback and discussion page for the AdvancedSearch feature.

2601:603:4A7F:B9E8:8104:3041:4EA9:807A (talkcontribs)

I feel that information was more formatted in the old version; but made it easier because the format was so similar on all location I just feel lost....

Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

Hi, can you describe which part of the search page do you mean?

Reply to "Prefer the old version"

New Interface Not as Helpful as Before

2600:8800:2900:C56:689F:AB67:5E25:BF89 (talkcontribs)

Can't find what I want in new way.

Reply to "New Interface Not as Helpful as Before"

hard to find parish and farm names

2 (talkcontribs)

In the old version, I put the name of a parish in the search engine and a number of choices would appear and I could easily figure out which was the appropriate one for my use. Also, if I didn't know the name of the parish a farm was found in, I would get a listing of parishes that had that farm name in it and could go from there.

Today I was trying this and all I got was that there wasn't anything available for the names I was seeking.

Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

Hi, we didn't change anything about that behavior. That bug must be an independent issue. Can you try with another Browser and examples?

Reply to "hard to find parish and farm names"

Searching just Sweden Genealogy on the wiki

1 (talkcontribs)

Is there any way to just search the Sweden Genealogy portion of the wiki instead of the entire FamilySearch wiki?

Reply to "Searching just Sweden Genealogy on the wiki"
YBG (talkcontribs)

it is really hard to select namespaces. Two ideas for improvement:

  1. Put the [x] box on the left hand side of the namespace. That way, if you want to delete a consecutive bunch of namespaces, it is just a matter of clicking multiple times in the same position.
  2. Change the drop-down into a two-column table format so that all of the talk pages are on the same line as their non-talk partner. Then you could scan the list much easier.

Thanks for considering!

Gryllida (talkcontribs)

I like the second idea. It is really helpful.

MichaelSchoenitzer (talkcontribs)

I realised this by adding the following CSS to my common.css:

.mw-advancedSearch-ui-itemMenuOptionWidget {
    display: inline-block;
    width: 46%;
    border-top: none;
    border-bottom: 1px solid #c8ccd1;
Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

Thank you for this feedback – it's very valuable for us! We will investigate possible improvements of the namespace-selector. Are there some combinations of namespaces that you use very often?

YBG (talkcontribs)

Can't think of any namespace combos. But I did think of another feature - it would be really nice to be able to exclude subpages, either in all selected namespaces or perhaps on a namespace-by-namespace basis. There may be a way to do it now, but I haven't been able to figure out how.

Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

I think it's currently not possible to exclude subpages. You can propose this to the Wikimedia Search Platform. They build the search, we just build the user-interface.

Reply to "Hard to select namespaces"

Issue:Temporary flash of search text

1 (talkcontribs)


It seems the advancedsearch temporarily stores its search text in the text area and then quickly removes it. This creates a jarring experience.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Go to


Note that just before it loads the advanced search interface it shows "bots intitle:test" temporarily. Then a few seconds later the intitle part is hidden. See, .


It just shows "bots" within the input box.


This may yet be another drawback of not implementing a critical interface using html, and building it using javascript. Aside from the "jumpy" nature of the loading, it also feels as if pushes the text from the input box to the "advanced parameters" area.

Reply to "Issue:Temporary flash of search text"

I like the older Advanced Search feature better

George Ho (talkcontribs)

I see that the newer Advanced Search feature will become default to many other wikis on November 28. However, 18,000+ enwiki users enabling the feature is not tremendous as another Beta Feature enabled by 80,000+ enwiki users. Also, the namespace selection window in the newer version is very small, making the scrolling more time-consuming than the older one. Moreover, I can simply type any -word OR something NOT anything, so I guess I'm a bit more advanced user than others probably.

Can the "Hide the improved version of the Advanced Search" be made please? Or what about asking the communities whether to enable the feature by default?

TheDJ (talkcontribs)

You can organise a vote in advance and create a ticket linking to consensus that you dont want it. As always.

George Ho (talkcontribs)

At en-WP's Village Pump, right? Or what about meta-wiki's central forum? Or where else?

Wargo (talkcontribs)

If for one wiki only - locally.

George Ho (talkcontribs)

However, the change would affect most users of all of the local wikis, so I was thinking every wiki.

Wargo (talkcontribs)

If you want to start discussion to affect only on enwiki you can start it on enwiki.

Wargo (talkcontribs)

Yes, communities will kill developers after they notice the change! And what Tech Ambassadors should say then? Will be possible to restore old interface in individual preferences?

Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

Hi George Ho! Thank you for your feedback to this extension. The feature can be very useful for new or not so tech-savvy users, which is something that test with users and feedback has shown repeatedly. But we understand that some more experienced users would prefer the previous interface. That’s why there will be an option to allow every user to disable the feature in their settings. Beside that the new interface also allows to use keywords in the main search-bar as before.

George Ho (talkcontribs)

I see the option "Don’t show the Advanced Search interface". I find it somewhat confusing or misleading; there is the "Advanced" button when the feature is opted-out. Can it be rephrased or something?

Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

We are considering alternative names for the option, but are not sure yet about what it could be called. If you have ideas feel free to share with us.

George Ho (talkcontribs)

How about either "Hide the improved version of the Advanced Search interface" (similar to other "Hide the improved version of..." options) or "Revert back to old version of the Advanced Search interface"?

Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

I created a phabricator-task for that: T213274 – this way it's on our radar.

Reply to "I like the older Advanced Search feature better"
Summary by Michael Schönitzer (WMDE)

Hi, thank you for the proposal. I created a phabricator-task for it, so that we have all proposed improvements in one place:

Wargo (talkcontribs)

Add possibility to clear namespace selection to start selecting from scratch. Current method: click "All" to select all, then again to select none.

Issue: Exact this search does not match exact string

5 (talkcontribs)


Searching for "exact this text" doesn't find only the exact string

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Search for "brand of popcorn in North America" ->
  2. Search it using advanced search :


Step 2 above matches step 1, e.g. it only finds words that exactly contain "brand of popcorn in North America". Exactly in that order.


It currently also finds strings like:

Popcorn (popped corn, popcorns or pop-corn) is a variety of corn kernel, which expands and puffs up when heated. A popcorn kernel's strong hull contains

Proposed solution:

  1. Either make the "exact text" match the string exactly with no further words, e.g. step 1 above;
  2. Or create a separate input box for an "exact match" if it is working as expected. (talkcontribs)

Basically it seems to be doing an OR search, e.g. "brand" OR "of" OR "popcorn" OR "in" OR "North America", which is unexpected. (talkcontribs)

Hmm, just noticed that the tooltip help claims that it must always have quotations marks. This makes no sense whatsoever. If the user has to add quotation marks, then they can just type directly in the main search box, rather than use "advanced search".

Having also tried the suggested syntax, it also doesn't seem remotely sensible, .

It finds the page, probably because the search string contains a comma.

TheDJ (talkcontribs)

I agree that this seems unintuitive

Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

Hey, thanks to both of you for your input! The usability of this field turned out to be more tricky than one might think. Our tests confirm that while the current version works better than previous attempts it still is not very intuitive. So we are aware that it's still not great yet. There's also a ticket about this.

Reply to "Issue: Exact this search does not match exact string"
اميرة الضلال (talkcontribs)

ان الواجهة الجديدة جميلة جدا

Michael Schönitzer (WMDE) (talkcontribs)