Extension talk:Awesomeness

From mediawiki.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A very useful extension! --Frantik 18:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

If the list of words that are highlighted would be configurable, it'd be a more awesome extension. Maybe i'll hack it quickly. Beta M 09:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Never mind, the code is funny, but horrible. It's not worth it. Beta M 09:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
What's horrible about it? You need to add a single line and modify another to add a word. Settings up more generic handling is not worth the effort. --Jeroen De Dauw 11:50, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Was this an exercise in obfuscation? You named every variable and function awesomeness; and to make it worse, they are all crammed into single, inline statements, which makes it impossible to figure out what the hell is going on without rewriting it in a more sane manner first. Sigh. -- 22:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

How to Use it[edit]

I do not understand the ways of this extension working. Please give some instructions. --Simonlsw (talk) 14:27, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh man[edit]

Worst extension ever! Actually, no. SecureHTML is worse.

Yea, really. I forgive the author though. He made other useful extensions. --Choshi 14:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


Shouldn't awesome links be colored awesome (aka Crayola Awesome)? Or maybe even awesome beaver? Tisane 15:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Gone on Jeroen's wiki[edit]

I removed the link to http://wiki.bn2vs.com as that wiki no longer uses the extension. Then I realized it's the site of one of the authors! Maybe you intend to bring it back, since the site home page says "My awesome personal wiki" :-) -- S Page (WMF) (talk) 22:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

"Awesome wikis" section[edit]

When I click both links, it takes me to one of those online surveys that 9 times out of 10 will take and resell personal info such as email address to advertisers. Should that section just be removed since it's not really any good? --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Well, there is no awesomeness in this links any longer. I will remove this section. Cheers --[[kgh]] (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)