Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Hiding ArticleFeedback on the English Wikipedia/reply (15)

Ironic. I find the WMF roll-out hostile and non-constructive.

I was trying to get a point across: Claiming that a ratio of editors opting out of viewing the tool is any kind of indicator of its acceptance in the community and then frenetically waiving the "we got the data to support it"-flag without anything supporting that claim is a much lower standard than I expect from the foundation.

If the WMF, at some point, assumed they had strong community support for this tool, then this ensuing discussion is a good indicator that it might be a good idea to reevaluate that assumption and actually ask the community what it wants.