Talk:Analytics/Wikistats/DumpReports/Future per report

Calculation vs. presentation
As I asked: the code has two parts, the part which parses the dumps to produce the data and the part which produces the reports. We are discussing by report, because that's what users understand, but I suspect that there is an intersection between the various reports, i.e. the underlying metric which may exist or not. Nemo 06:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I also want to raise the same point per Ijon's arguments: are we discussing just calculation or both calculation and presentation? Personally I answered presuming that calculation part will remain the same but presentation will be changed. If calculation part will evolve as well, I would support making sure that all reports are appropriately calculated before starting work on improving presentation — NickK (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The problem is, all this exercise is about redoing things from scratch because people don't want to work on Perl script. So there is no way to ask them to only work on the calculation side. Nemo 10:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikisource stats
There are few additional NS in all wikisource like Index and Page. Are there any plan to represent those stats in next version? there are one example our wikisource stats here, https://tools.wmflabs.org/phetools/statistics.php. Jayantanth (talk) 18:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * yes indeed, that's why the first local project I want to show this discussion is the wikisource in my mother tongue; on many occasion we agreed we needed or we used additional stats than those in the current platform.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Circulating information
here I rquested to show this page on the meta main page. I leave some messages in some local village pumps too, unless you are not planning some mass delivery message...--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello! What is the deadline to vote or comment on this? --Lsanabria (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)