Talk:Requests for comment/Scoped language converter

What if rules conflict
If a page import a number of category rules, rules is imported category by category. Correct me if I got it wrong.

But there may exists rules conflicting with each other, is there any metarule about import order or ruleset priority?


 * DON'T WORRY, we can connect with Chinese Wikipedia (from here) and ask for help.--Great Brightstar (talk) 16:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

To be discussed on April 2nd
We're going to be talking about this RfC in an architecture review meeting on 2 April, in IRC. Schedule & link coming soon. Sharihareswara (WMF) (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments
Liangent (talk) 08:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * "If multiple rules apply to the same text", longest-keys-preferred is a must, instead of "the last-specified one is applied"
 * When there're multiple keys with the same length, using the last as a tie-breaker is fine.
 * Definition of text source
 * "Foo {{see also|Bar}}" => "Foo See Also: Bar": Foo and Bar should be in the same context (scope) but See Also shouldn't.
 * Definition of position of conversion markup
 * Markups combined from different wikitext source not allowed anymore? => -{ {{echo|blah}} }-
 * Evaluation of affected templates needed, especially {{地区用词}}, {{cite *}} etc.