User:Qgil-WMF/Sandbox

In muddy discussions, a Q&A section helps
In lengthy, complex, or ugly conversations, address questions and concerns with the support of a Q&A section. Otherwise great answers might be missed or manipulated in the middle of the discussions.

Old, to be reviewed

 * Common understanding
 * We are a community with a foundation, not a foundation with a community.
 * All documentation in mediawiki.org - including value proposition and user documentation.
 * Easier to maintain, promote and watch.
 * OSS development context clear. Links to/from Bugzilla etc are natural.
 * Simplified, adapted intros can be created in Wikimedia projects when deployment comes.
 * Calls for feedback point to a central point in mediawiki.org.
 * Criticism happens next to the core docs and it's easier to integrate.
 * Less risk of Wikipedia-centrism. Neutral field for all Wikimedia projects and 3rd parties.
 * Less risk of duplicated discussions in different places.