Talk:Mobile wikitext editing

Anonymous mobile editing
This is related to 53069. Is there a specific timeline for these three proposed phases to re-enable anonymous mobile editing? --MZMcBride (talk) 18:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi MZMcBride I've added a rough timeline to the wikipage. Please let us know if you agree on the items that need to be completed and then we can work on getting agreement on timelines. We would further like to expand this conversation over the next two weeks. The next stages that we planned were to release on email lists and then post to village pumps. Do you have any thoughts on this communication plan? Thanks. --KWang (WMF) (talk) 01:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi KWang. I see this edit by an anonymous user that added 2013 dates. Is that what you mean? Assuming 2014, I think this rough timeline is unacceptably long.
 * 53069 (filed in August 2013) is tracking obstacles to enabling anonymous editing, which is my primary focus here. I spoke with Tomasz and everyone seems to be on the same page that enabling anonymous editing via mobile is an important priority, particularly given Wikimedia's founding principles. Speaking from the technical side, I have no idea why it would take more than a month or two to get this resolved.
 * Tomasz seemed a lot more concerned with the social side, though my personal opinion is that these concerns are overblown. I did offer to take a look at the concerns that are purportedly being raised about the idea of anonymous mobile editing. Given that it happens thousands of times every day through the desktop interface, I'm personally not particularly worried.
 * On the other hand, mobile uploading on Commons was apparently problematic, so perhaps there will be reactionary symptoms here. In my view, we should address actual issues when they actually arise. We simply cannot have an interface, mobile or otherwise, that strips out red links and creates a fictitious requirement to sign in to edit, among other zaniness. That's anti-wiki. We need to address this as quickly and as thoughtfully as possible. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * re: MZMcBride Two more technical requirements for anonymous editing are:


 * Ability to notify anonymous mobile editors (e.g. IP block threats, thanking)


 * Ability for anonymous mobile editors to view their talk pages


 * I've recorded this on 53069. I know these issues were brought up previously but let me expand more on this. These features are important because as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Blocking describes:


 * "Administrators must supply a clear and specific block reason that indicates why a user was blocked. Block reasons should avoid the use of jargon as much as possible so that blocked users may better understand them. Administrators should notify users when blocking them by leaving a message on their user talk page. It is often easier to explain the reason for a block at the time than it is to explain a block well after the event."


 * These features must both be built but more importantly an evaluation must be made over time if IP addresses are a reliable enough source for tracking anonymous users on mobile that we can use them for the purposes of notifying and blocking users. On desktop we know about a range of complications in using IP addresses, these issues compound significantly on mobile. The first 2 stages of the rollout focus on this problem and two 3 month stages seems an appropriate length of time for us to make that evaluation while giving time for developers to make appropriate changes to the mobile products, and for the community to make appropriate changes to policy. The third stage which also lasts roughly 3 months is to ensure that we are doing what we need to ensure high quality edits from anonymous mobile editors.


 * Could you provide feedback on:


 * The technical items that must be completed


 * The best way to socialize these changes and get the appropriate engagement from the community to address the IP address question.


 * The best way to avoid backlash similar to what we incurred with the logged out mobile photo CTA


 * I would ask that discussion not directly related to the tracking of technical work continues here and not on 53069.--KWang (WMF) (talk) 23:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)