Thread:Talk:Universal Language Selector/My thoughts/reply

Thanks for your comments.


 * Regarding font support, our idea is to use sensible defaults and provide choice only for the languages where they make sense (languages for which their script has problems). For most users these options won't be shown. The use of "English" as an example languages in the Mock ups was not intended to suggest that font selection will be shown for this specific language.
 * Regarding the accessibility of UI settings, we have observed that the degree in which users need this tools varies depending on their specific language, location and other factors. Access to settings is designed to be hidden under a menu so that users that need these features can find the path to them easily but users who do not need them are not distracted and can just ignore one icon.
 * Thanks for pointing another method for anticipating user languages, it seems an interesting approach but we need to analyze the cost/precision ratio more deeply.
 * It is good that you raised these privacy concerns. For registered users, their edits are being tracked and visible under "my contributions". For anonymous users, some privacy concerns may appear, so hearing from the community and provide the functionality in the most transparent way will be required as you suggest.
 * Regarding searchbox, the idea is to be as flexible as possible including the most variants in which any user can search for their language.
 * Regarding multi-script languages that is our intention.