Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Three requests for Fabrice (new project lead)/reply (2)


 * Since the tool is only asking for reviewd from the readers (not editors)


 * Unlike some of our self-identified editors, the WMF believes (based on data, by the way) that most of our editors (especially occasional editors) are also legitimate readers, and your proposal doesn't make sense for people who do both. Power users can figure out how to turn it off manually, but these occasional folks are much less likely to be able to figure out how to turn it on.
 * In my spot-check, about 3% of the ratings are from logged-in users, which I suspect is a response rate higher than these logged-in users' reading rates. This higher level of use indicates that editors are accepting of the tool being visible.
 * If the tool needs improvements, and you hide it from the people most willing and able to identify and squawk about those needed improvements, then how will we learn what isn't working for people?