Thread:Talk:Article feedback/The future of AFT/reply (6)

My replies were very constructive in case you followed the whole discussion page. It's the way this tool was pushed live and how it's defended by people like WhatAmIDoingWrong and others that made me (and others) lose all hope for AFT.
 * It's misunderstood and used wrong by half of the people (by judging the object, not the article).
 * Most votes are fan/hate votes.
 * The rest are abusers who like this as a tool to fool around.
 * It works so bad it's even abused by WMF staff to neutrealize abuse votes. WTF?
 * It's not wanted at all by the community? I only see negative feedback. Where are the "Yay hurray, finally!" posts please by the editors who are asked to improve articles based on AFT ratings?
 * AFT has not improved anything yet. Proof me wrong please.