User talk:Micke

If it´s urgent, please contact me at sv:Användardiskussion:Micke or send me an e-mail.

"Usurpation" of Micke
We don't have a formal policy or any fancy procedure for dealing with such requests on this wiki, but I'm willing to complete it, subject to certain conditions.

First of all, the user has made no edits, and caused no log entries other than the user creation. This is fine. Second, I've emailed the user to inform them of the situation. If I don't hear back from them within one week, then I'll proceed as follows:


 * User:Micke will be renamed to User:Micke (old)
 * User:Micke-sv will be renamed to User:Micke

If the user replies with an objection, or if he or she makes any edits to this wiki within the next week, then I will not continue with the procedure.

I hope this proposal is acceptable to all. robchurch | talk 17:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sounds fine to me! Do you have anything to say about this matter at meta? I have the same situation there... I run my own mediawiki, beside my interest in svwiki, so I thought I´d get a little more involved at the "behind the scenes" wikis as well. -- MiCkE  d b  17:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Nevermind about meta-wiki, I found the correct place to post my request there. -- MiCkE  d b  05:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

suggestion to hide new tabs from users
Hi, I tried your current extension and realized that when I create a new tab (internal link) it cannot bei hidden from a user even when I add the tabs descriptor to hideUser-section

I suggest a simple solution, which already works within my testwiki fine:

I relocated the code section for intLinks (if-block) within DynamicTabs line 72 on top of the function dynamicTabs just before the hideUser -if-block (line 37). The problem was that the function first reads which tab to hide and then it creates the new tab, so from my point of view the order was wrong. So I just switched the order. My example: I created a new tab ToDos (which points to a page with some todo-items) which should only be seen by sysops not by anyone else and it works. --Pianorob 16:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your suggestion, I'll look in to it when I have some more time (currently on vacation). It definitly looks like the way to go. MiCkE 18:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Come to think of it, if you post the code (or a link to it) I could put it up on googlecode more speedily. MiCkE 08:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)