User:Waldyrious

Waldir@meta.wikimedia

Projects

 * MediaWiki documentation (especially reference, index-like ones)
 * MediaWiki skins
 * Potential bugs for hacking sessions
 * Plans/notes of my participation in Wikimedia Hackatons (some of these may be useful for guiding future work)
 * Notes on using Toolforge (previously Toolserver)

Installation

 * ,, (Manual:install.php), Manual:Installation guide,
 * Using maintenance/install.php (todo: test and make sure of the parameters; add some documentation to the file and its Manual entry):
 * note: for now the  parameter needs to be explicitly set for this to work out of the box. 133222 addresses this.
 * todo: allow password not to be set in the command line, and get a prompt instead
 * todo: fix timezone issue w/ installer.php. In both cases the default time zone of the wiki is not correct (it either is set to UTC or doesn't take DST into account), but in the installer.php-generated wiki trying to edit the main page gets an edit conflict because the new edit uses the actual local timezone and the history uses the server timezone (one hour later, in my case). Both LocalSettings.php are identical, however...
 * See also: MediaWiki-Vagrant
 * https://bitnami.com/stack/mediawiki
 * See also: MediaWiki-Vagrant
 * https://bitnami.com/stack/mediawiki

Portable mediawiki
There doesn't seem to be an easy way to make mediawiki self-contained. (update: see Manual:Wiki on a stick)
 * I tried using an sqlite database and put it in the root folder of the wiki, but that has problems if you try to version-control the wiki itself, e.g. with git, to track changes to the configuration files, extensions, skins, images, etc. If you try to include the database in the repo, you start getting edit conflicts (??) if you clone the wiki. This seems to be because the cloned database is owned by the user who performs the cloning, so it isn't writable by the apache user (www-data). This allows the wiki to be readable, but not writable. Worse still, if you try to  the database so it's writable by all, the wiki stops working. Perhaps another way to tweak the database file's permissions will work better, but essentially this means that it will never be plug-and-play (put it in a php-enabled server and you're done).
 * There's also the issue that a wiki content is typically version-controlled, so tracking the database (which contains all the revisions of the wiki's pages) within git does seem redundant; not to mention the added clumsiness if you want to revert some configuration changes (involving, say, several files and/or directories) without reverting the content of the wiki (i.e., excluding the database file from the revert).
 * Alternatives seem to be TiddlyWiki (with the added benefit of being an entirely client-side app -- but how does it handle large amounts of content? all in a single file doesn't scale...), and git-based wikis like Gollum, Gitit or Olelo/Gitwiki (where the wiki content is stored as a git repo -- I need to check how the config is managed, whether they require a web and database server to work, and whether they can work in a plug-and-play fashion)
 * See also: OrganicDesign.co.nz/MediaWikiLite, phpdesktop ("for developing native desktop GUI applications using web technologies such as PHP, HTML5, JavaScript and SQLite.")

Useful stuff

 * Writing an extension for deployment
 * http://shorturls.redwerks.org (see Manual:Short URL)
 * Manual:JS/API/UI Extension Developer Library
 * Git/TLDR and PHPunit/TLDR
 * investigate withJS url param (possibly only enabled in commons, i.e. not a mediawiki feature)
 * Lua: slideshow, tutorial
 * Check commons:MediaWiki:Gadget-Hotcatcheck.js (also Cat-a-lot) for direct, non-refresh, no-edit-view editing
 * patch that enabled direct linking to diffs: 63395
 * Help:CirrusSearch for documentation on search operators/prefixes.
 * for searching in wikicode rather than rendered text
 * Subscribe to patches in Gerrit to review: Git/Reviewers
 * Customizing the WikiEditor toolbar: adding new buttons (Krinkle's more convenient alternative)
 * Parameters for URL address bar:
 * to load the page without gadgets/common.css/common.js (src)
 * to load the page using the given language as the MediaWiki interface. Use the special value  to display the name of the interface messages instead.

API + JavaScript (client-side apps)

 * API:Client code (JsMwApi looks interesting)
 * API:Data formats and Manual:Ajax
 * Bug 20814 (fixed) - Enable $wgCrossSiteAJAXdomains for wikimedia sites (only WMF wikis allowed to make AJAX requests to each other)
 * 19907 -- "For non-credentialed requests, we can send Allow-Origin: *" -- i.e., for actions that don't require login, allow third-party apps
 * Could Cross-document messaging help here?
 * Thread:Talk:Requests for comment/API Future/CORS and third-party web apps
 * bug 62807 - Create TODO list for best MediaWiki API client library in JavaScript
 * Getting HTML fragments via the API
 * The old API does not support HTML as a response format. It supports, and even allows adding e.g.   to get only the contents of the third section of the page, but the output is an HTML string wrapped in a JSON object.
 * The new REST API does HTML responses, but apparently only for entire pages (docs), not for e.g. individual sections.
 * This might allow using HTMX (which expects HTML responses, and does so out of principle) to build low-js apps.

Developers

 * Developers/Accounts
 * Special:Code/MediaWiki/author
 * http://toolserver.org/~krinkle/TSUsers.php
 * http://toolserver.org/~krinkle/wikimedia-svn-users.php
 * http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/contributors.html
 * Gerrit watchlist:

Misc.

 * WikiOverflow (deleted), Wikis@SE (deleted), MediaWiki IdeaTorrent (deleted; thread 1, thread 2). Also, according to my analysis at w:Talk:OSQA, a potential platform for this sort of thing could be Askbot.
 * Pitch wysihtml5 (also check for similar stuff?) against VisualEditor and suggest improvements to both
 * It could be interesting to make diffs flattrable. See Extension:Flattr.
 * For code review in gerrit, it would be nice to have a query url that shows only changes that haven't been reviewed before (in the "my changes" view, the CR column is often empty but there's already been a lot of discussion before, but a new patch reset the CR scores). Something like https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/reviewer:self+status:open+-is:reviewed,n,z should work, but according to the docs it covers both Code-Review and Verified scores, and the latter is pretty much always there as it's added by Jenkins, so the query shows nothing. One can build a query to show specifically patchsets with no Code-Review score, but that still doesn't fix the "previous discussion" issue above, which would enable one to find patchsets that haven't received any external feedback since being submitted. As an alternative to find unloved patches, one can amend that search query to show patchsets whithout CR that are over a year old (there are four such ones at the time of writing). Another approach is to limit to those who don't have a +2'er in the reviwers, by using -reviewerin:mediawiki in the query (the docs say reviewerin matches changes that have been, or need to be, reviewed by a user in the specified group).
 * Update: Krinkle on IRC says: the gerrit query command line API over ssh might have a way to filter for such things. Ask hashar or Reedy maybe next time they're on.
 * History of MediaWiki version control (see also MediaWiki history and Git/Conversion). Commits graph @ Ohloh. Commits graph @ GitHub (empty before 2009-11-14 although the graph does go all the way back to 2003-04-13, how come?).
 * It would be nice to remove the site subtitle (by default) from the html page title, as well as use use  to enclose the site name, e.g. "Foo [Wikipedia]" instead of "Foo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". This would make titles shorter, and would indicate the site name more intuitively. The fact that the square brackets aren't allowed in page titles also helps ensure no ambiguity is present.