User talk:Catrope/Archive 1

If you have questions, comments, complaints about the API, please don't report that here. Instead, find the associated page in the API documentation and report the problem on its talk page. If you're unsure which page is most appropriate, use Talk:API. Preferably, you should report bugs at Bugzilla. If Bugzilla confuses you, it's OK to report bugs on Talk:API instead.

Thanks
Thanks about help at http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:143.107.230.53&redirect=no --143.107.230.53 21:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of pages about the API
I've restored these pages, because "It hasn't been implemented yet" isn't a really good deletion reason. The pages may be useful in the future. Werdna 10:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you say so. You should probably know that I'm gonna rewrite those pages from scratch once those features have been implemented, and that they're not really useful now as they describe an implementation plan that might not even be used. --Catrope 13:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

API probleem
Geen tijd om zelf te uit te zoeken, moet nu gaan. Bryan 18:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Was een regressie van een verandering in Database::select. Gefixt in r34388, zie link voor details. --Catrope 18:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

MediaWiki API bug
I have left a message at Talk:API that might interest you.

By the way, Battlestarwiki only allows users with an account there to leave messages on your talk page there. So you should probably point people to some other talk page, on some Wikimedia project that you visit second most.

--Davidgothberg 12:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I noticed. And yeah, you're right, I'll change the message to say I watch this talk page too. --Catrope 12:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Xml:preserve
Fyi, w:Wikipedia:VPT. ^demon 05:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up; the guy had already come asking about this in #mediawiki after, where I explained the situation to him, but I'll leave a comment there for good measure. --Catrope 08:27, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Tisane/Wikilinks implementing detection and indication of article existence on a remote wiki
Hi Roan, I will be developing Extension:RemotePageExistenceDetectionCentralizedListServer; if you have any suggestions, please let me know. This is my first extension, but hopefully I can borrow some code from similar extensions and synthesize/tweak it to suit my purposes. Thanks, Tisane 00:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I think a generic implementation of remote existence checking in core would be more fruitful. --Catrope 10:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've thought about that, and that might be an easier route. But do you think there would be consensus for it? By the way, the proof of concept is ready. Tisane 08:14, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Tabbar thingy
Hi, you left sooner then I thought (I was typing ;-) I was going to link here: Krinkle 22:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vector#Where_did_the_useful_tabs_go.3F
 * https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22986
 * https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22987

SimpleSearch
Hello, I think it was you who made a pref to disable SimpleSearch (thanks!!), but I can't find where to disable it, can you help me? Manuelt15 08:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I wrote the code, but it's not live yet. It'll hopefully go live some time soon (this week or next). --Catrope 08:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Please advise
Please advise here Huji 22:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Looks pretty lazy to me
Don't you get enough pay? Cheers --kgh 11:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The fact that the example referred to 110 instead of 100 was pointed out on IRC, and I corrected it. It looks like I undid too much, though, so I'll correct that, sorry about that. --Catrope 13:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done . --Catrope 13:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * What I did not like about the revert was that it was done without any commentary. This was the only reason why I did a total revert. Apart from that I kind of expected this "experiment" to change it to a more pragmatical and user-friendly 110 to fail. Thus newbies have to learn it the hard way that it is better to start at 110. However it is idle to put more thoughts into it. Cheers --kgh 14:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about the lack of commentary, that was a mistake on my part. I should've taken the time to do a normal undo and explain. --Catrope 21:52, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok. :-) Heaps of people feel similar like me in such a situation. Perhaps I was a bit to aggressive addressing this. I am sorry for that, too. Cheers --kgh 13:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)