User:Quiddity/Tree of knowledge

I would love to get a visualization of the entire Tree of Knowledge
 * I.e. Use Wikidata to generate a cross between
 * The simple/classic tree of knowledge, or a game skill tree
 * The complex wikigalaxy
 * Using Wikigalaxy's thematic clustering system, but Wikidata's complete corpus.

Adding optional layers, that highlight areas which:
 * I’ve edited. (automatic)
 * I've watchlisted. (automatic)
 * I'm an expert in. (manual)
 * I want to read. (manual)
 * and other more rigid ontologies, E.g.
 * The curriculum of [Country's] 12th grade high-school science class.
 * The articles relevant to a biochemistry bachelor’s degree.
 * etc

To elaborate
I adore maps and infographics. Anything from software maps: To page-navigation maps, e.g. Wikimedia/MediaWiki:
 * https://cdn-standard.discourse.org/uploads/safenetwork/917/b7e2f74b5ca44e7c.png
 * https://kshwetabh.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/ubuntufeatures.png
 * http://keithcu.com/bookimages/wordpress_html_mdabc9bc.png
 * c:File:Main Page Usability.png
 * c:File:Map of the English Wikipedia's help pages - small cropped.png

I'd like more maps, for our content.

But I want additional filters / overlays / highlights.

As a user-story
As an editor who is active in WikiProject Antarctica, I'd like to be able to visualize all its articles (w:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Antarctica), and also... These would help me to:
 * to highlight the articles I've edited
 * to highlight the articles I've created
 * to highlight the articles I have/have not watchlisted
 * to highlight the articles that are new (last n days)
 * to highlight the articles in relation to all n million articles. (wikigalaxy-style)
 * to see the clusterings given by categories, and category-intersections
 * to see the clusterings given by navboxes
 * to highlight the articles by their "importance-rating" and "quality-rating"
 * etc
 * detect some of the patterns of how biographies / geographies / etc are prioritized, or missing
 * deepen our understanding of how much there is to know
 * to compare my own highlights, to the highlights of my friends and peers
 * (I imagine professors comparing their maps... "Ooo, what's the node over there? I haven't seen an Antarctica highlight in the veterinary science region before!")
 * share memetic ideas
 * feel more connected
 * want to return to the sites, to improve and expand my understanding of it all, and improve the articles