Talk:Markup spec/ANTLR/draft

Extension Tags
Missing the &lt;source&gt; tag from the spec is not your fault - nor any surprise. Due to MediaWiki's modularity, any extension can register any (unclaimed) tag and implement its own semantic meaning. Even acceptable HTML tags like &lt;div&gt; can be hijacked.

I noticed that you included the tags belonging to the Cite extension in the draft. This leads to the question of whether the grammar is meant to address native, vanilla MediaWiki, or whether a certain set of extensions are to be considered canonical. The former means that the grammar will not encompass all of the markup in say, the English Wikipedia, while the latter means that the grammar will not correctly reflect a pristine MW install. --Jimbojw (talk | blog) 17:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)