Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Irrelevant/reply (20)

Lol.. I have to admit I've been tempted to do that myself, but I decided not to based on principal. Not because it's "wrong", but because I made a decision when the tool first showed up (and obvious vandalism ratings started soon after) that I wouldn't vote on ANY article I'd had a significant hand in writing (aside from minor cleanup - correcting typos, redirecting backlinks, etc). I wanted to give the tool some time to see how I liked it, how it worked, etc (I honestly didn't have any opinion about it one way or the other when it was first implemented). If I was "rigging" the votes then I wouldn't be able to do that, so I decided I'd wait to see how things played out before I came here because I wanted to be able to be 100% impartial. What irks me about this page is how obnoxious a couple of the people here are - implying our hard work, observations and experiences are "infinitesimal" to the value of Wikipedia, etc. I think they know what they can do with their new "tool", so I won't even bother lowering myself to their level.