Extension:MultimediaViewer/Design review

A page for design review on MultimediaViewer.

Use the lightbox demo on the Multimedia alpha instance to test. Remember you'll need to have an account and enable the BetaFeatures preference if you want to test the lightbox.

Feedback from EXAMPLENAME

 * The white is too white, can you make it less white?
 * Helpful feedback #2
 * On a screen with 5x5 resolution, the title is not visible.
 * The font should be Wingdings - legal assures us licensing is not an issue

Feedback from Legoktm

 * Need some kind of loading screen if the image is large / user has slow internet
 * https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56266 --MarkTraceur (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * But could also include a loading image...or instead? Will ask PDM. --MarkTraceur (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I can no longer see the article...would be nice if it was still in the background, maybe a bit faded out.
 * It's at 90% opacity right now. Any more transparent actually looks really weird. Direct from the designers' mouths.--MarkTraceur (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The author info at the top seems weird to me. I'd rather see it at the bottom. Dunno if I'm biased that the existing file description pages have the image on top and info/description underneath it.
 * Might be. We have some redesign sketches around that flip it, but we can evaluate this later. --MarkTraceur (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * For images with a caption, the caption should be displayed somewhere in the viewer.
 * It may not be as useful a concept when the image is being viewed in isolation, but I could add this to our backlog. Thanks! --MarkTraceur (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)