Extension talk:TransformChanges

Improvements
Can this work for histories too? That's a more commonly referenced/visited page than recent changes and a watch list... Also, a sortable table would be nice... -Eep² 22:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * See Lists -> tables for more suggestions. -Eep² 03:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't work
I have MediaWiki 1.9.3 and this does't work at all--not even the CSS classes are showing up on the page. The extension shows up on Special:Version so I know it's installed correctly. -Eep² 22:37, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The row CSS styles don't work either. I tried overriding the ones on Organic Design but it had no effect, and analyzing the CSS revealed the table has an ID of "TABLE_2"... -Eep² 22:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, this extension won't work if "enhanced recent changes" is enabled in Special:Preferences. —Eep² 14:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

empty recentchanges
After installing the SemanticMediaWiki extension, this extension appears to be suppressing the content of Special:Recentchanges as long as the viewer is logged in. Any ideas why or how to fix this? --Alxndr 02:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know what might be wrong there, I'm using SMW with this extension on a number of wiki's of various versions with no trouble. Can you give me an URL to the site with the problem or is it intranet? --Nad 05:06, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It's Oberwiki, but I currently have it disabled so everyone can see RC when logged in. Do you use Jabber or AIM? If we can coordinate a time I can flick switches on the server and show you what I was talking about. --Alxndr 17:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Silly me. My logged-in preferences show the last 500 edits, which maxed out pcre.callback_limit, which made one of the preg_replace_callbacks return NULL, so it wasn't happening when I was logged out. Nothing to do with SemanticMediaWiki. --Alxndr 23:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info, I'll see if I can think of a simple way to stop it relying on that pcre.callback_limit, maybe by breaking the content up with a split first or something. --Nad 05:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)