Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Gaming the system, is there a way to have both useful ratings and conversion of readers to editors?/reply (5)

I think you're really onto something with the "work list" as this is (potentially) valuable input that meets both the points of engaging the reader to contribute (a bit, hopefully more) and also providing actionable information for the existing community. You're right that "review" tab isn't necessarily part of the tool and it would be difficult to implement policy-wise because it would introduce a whole new workflow for the editing community. Nevertheless, the implication of having the AFT is that reviews will be made available somewhere and there are disadvantages to having them "dumped" on the talkpage just as there are disadvantages to creating a new "review" space.

I terms of "suggestions to Fabrice"... I've got three things, but I'll put them in a new thread, as you suggest :-)