Talk:RESTBase/Archive

Proposed?
Re: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=RESTBase&diff=1381409&oldid=1381405

If neither related RFC ( and ) has been accepted yet, isn't RESTBase simply proposed? I don't follow the partial revert here. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Max, as I said on wikitech as well, we have discussed RESTBase several times in RFC meetings (see for example RESTBase/Architectural_options_considered) & decided to proceed with it. The RFCs are still up for historical context, but don't describe RESTBase as implemented any more. -- Gabriel Wicke (GWicke) (talk) 06:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry, who's we? RESTBase/Architectural options considered only has your name attached to it, as far as I can tell. Were you the sole author? Who decided to proceed with RESTBase? --MZMcBride (talk) 06:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC)