Help:Extension:Translate/Quality assurance/ja

高い品質というものは、皆が自分の役目を果たした時達成できるものです. 私たちは従うべき最も効率の良い翻訳法をまとめてきました. あなたが翻訳者と翻訳管理者のどちらであっても、Translate Extensionによってあなたはより高い品質の翻訳を作り出すことができます. 私たちは統計と報告の中で、翻訳者がどこで彼らの力が必要とされているのか、翻訳管理者が進行を確認する必要があるのはどこか、を見つけることができるようにする沢山のツールについて説明をしました. このページでは、翻訳者が翻訳を良くしていくために共に活動することを手助けする、技術的な品質管理ツールについて説明します. 翻訳の校正は非常に大事なことですが、提供されるツールでは翻訳の質を上げたり見積もったりすることが可能になります.

翻訳の査読機能
The access to the review tools is controlled by user right. Translate extension by default adds an user group called translation reviewers. In proofreading tasks the reviewers can indicate that they think the translation is correct and good by clicking a button. The reviews are tracked, so reviewers don't need to review messages they have already reviewed again and it's possible detect and reduce abuse. Reviewers can only accept translations they haven't made themselves. Multiple people can accept the same translations.

メッセージのドキュメントも同様にここでは重要な役割を果たします. 査読者は、翻訳の綴りや用語が正しいことだけではなく、文脈に合っていることも確認する必要があります.

翻訳者向け
査読画面では、翻訳を採用した査読者の人数が、その翻訳のメッセージ名の近くに表示されます. (「自分が採用可能なメッセージのみ」は査読者のみに表示されます. )

Of more interest, translators see in their watchlist when any of their translation has been accepted. This is useful because they can see that someone is looking at their work and appreciating it, and that they're not left alone or ignored, so they can be more confident about translating.

(現時点では、) 翻訳査読記録はウォッチリスト、ウォッチリストのメール通知、最近の変更のいずれからも除外できません.

査読者向け
翻訳の査読は Special:Translate で行ないます:「採用」ボタンは、「翻訳を採用」画面と「すべての翻訳を査読」画面 (最近のリリースでは「査読」タブ) に表示されます. 査読者はあらゆるメッセージ群のメッセージを査読できます. メッセージ群「最近の翻訳」を選択して、新しく査読できるようになった翻訳を査読することもできます.

「翻訳の採用」画面には、自分が翻訳したものは表示されません. この画面のメッセージ一覧は、査読者ごとに異なります. 自分の翻訳は、他の人の翻訳すべてとともに「すべての翻訳を査読」画面に列挙されます.

他の査読者向け
Other reviewers benefit from knowing that some messages have already been accepted, and by how many users. In fact, they can choose to focus review efforts on unreviewed translations in the group. Such translations might also have been left unaccepted by an unsure reviewer and require more attention: there's still no way to report an uncertain translation. Also, if they're unsure about a translation but one or more other reviewers accepted it, this can give them some guidance.

最近の翻訳の査読
メッセージ群「最近の翻訳」での「翻訳の採用」作業は、翻訳の査読機能の中では最も便利かもしれません. これは基本的に、特別:最近の更新に取って代わるものです. 特別:言語別翻訳状況からリンクされています.

このページでは、自分が査読できる翻訳のみをすべて閲覧できます. 必要な情報の大部分が表示されます. 残りの情報は、翻訳エディターを開くと表示されます.

It's very fast to mark translations as accepted. When you find a translation you're unsure about, in this view (and only here) you have an additional tool. If you click the message name to bring up the translation editor, there you will see the changes in the last edit highlighted, the name of its author and its edit summary. Now you can either close the editor and mark the translation as accepted or you can immediately correct the translation.

You've saved a lot of time with this feature, so if you make a correction please spend some seconds to enter an edit summary, a simple feature often neglected by which you will help the original translator understand your correction and improve future translations. When you try this feature, you'll notice that you spend less time doing the mere proofreading and more improving messages and giving feedback to other translators.

メッセージ群の初回の査読は、日時順に行うよりも、1 つのメッセージ群に集中して行なう方が好ましいです. 次の節では、未査読を減らすための分割統治の方法を説明します.

Systematic review
翻訳の査読は、メッセージ群全体の質と一貫性を高いレベルに保つ校正という大変な仕事を生み出しますが、それが醍醐味でもあります.

If you know a message group well and want to keep its translations at high quality, you can open it with "review all translations" task and go through it all at once. Now you can check that messages have been correctly interpreted and improve their documentation; ensure that source terms have been translated in the same way everywhere, which is easier because you have both source and translated text of each message. If a translation is ok you only need a click to accept it and you're already on the next; if it isn't or you need more information, you only have to click and use the translation editor to resolve it.

The next time, you'll only have to open the group again and immediately see new translations which need review, i.e. those with "Accept" button enabled; you won't need to follow closely recent changes nor to watchlist all messages, which are respectively too crowded and not practical. The list can be a bit long with all the old and reviewed translations shown along with the new ones, so if you now know the group well and you don't need to have old translations at hand, you can just choose "accept translations" and see only the new ones.

Translation memory can help a little to keep the wording of similar messages consistent. It cannot enforce consistent use of terms in different kinds of messages. There is no technical solution for this problem yet, but you now have a handy tool to impose consistency piece by piece. It's a good achievement to have consistent translations at least across a whole message group, especially if it uses special terms which are hard to understand. In such cases more than usual, different translators might translate the messages, using different terms and resulting in a confusing translation. Moreover, if consistency is improved, the suggestions given by translation memory are more consistent and this should improve consistency among all message groups.

Workflows
The translate extension is designed for publishing translations as soon as possible to show translators the impact of their work. If you want to be sure that translations are of good quality before using them, you can use a more formal process. You can implement a workflow through message group states.

Reviewing of translation does not have any effect on the appearance or usage of translations, so it's a quite different tool than the Flagged revisions extension: the scope of translation reviewing is not to find and provide to its readers the best translation among those available, but to encourage quality work on translations.

Reviewing of translation can be combined with message group workflow states by having a proofreading state which can be used to direct the work done by proofreaders. As explained in more detail in the relevant page, the two features do not interact with each other: they are controlled separately by the users.