Flow/Architecture/API

Current API
Flow has an extensive API that's heavily exercised by one client – the JavaScript on Flow boards – as you can see if you interact with a Flow board with JavaScript enabled and watch the API requests in your browser's developer tools > Network tab.

You can drive the API from Special:ApiSandbox.

Write API
The write API consists of submodules of, you can see them on the API page  [//www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php].

Read API
JS in the browser calls the API to
 * paginate in the next 10 topics
 * get the wikitext for

Currently
, query

In 1.24: Query  API to determine if Flow is enabled on a page, see.

Sketch of write API
In a reply you're replying to a particular post in a workflow (a topic). See Flow/Nomenclature for an explanation of the terms. Flow objects are identified by UUIDs see Flow/Architecture.

To reply to a topic action=flow submodule=reply format=json repreplyTo=050fed5dc6bd5085237590b11c2fa805 repcontent=My reply, with wikitext.
 * you'll need a token. Flow recently switched to using the regular 'edit' token for most operations, so you can use  to get the editing token if it hasn't been cached yet in the session. it's cached.
 * Issue a  API request with , identifying the topic workflow. The parameters for a reply include the topic and the post.

render=true token=43a71deb105e7c0be7e8eeab4bdff4f7+\ workflow=050f698e3f6e5624fa1590b11c27932f
 * Set  if you want the server to respond with the "fully-decorated" HTML to interact with the new post (preview buttons, actions, etc.).
 * UUID format will soon change to be more compact, using 88-bit represented as alphadecimal.
 * Obviously you get the topic and post to respond by making API queries, rather than hardcoding these numbers.

Note that a wiki may store Flow content with  'html' or 'wikitext', but in any edit submission you must (?) submit wikitext.

If successful, the server responds with the  of the new post, and the HTML to insert into the DOM.

Note this API request doesn't name the page on which the topic appears. Users interact with topics on a Flow board with a wiki page name, but a topic might (eventually) appear on multiple pages, e.g. a user's "subscription feed".

On WMF wikis, Flow stores post content as HTML with embedded Parsoid markup so that the original wikitext can be reconstituted for editing. This will not be the case on all wikis, others might store as wikitext.

Future API changes
Eventually move to a service-oriented architecture. Might look like proposed Content API.

Other API issues

 * Should existing API calls to edit to a page "just work" on a Flow-enabled "page"?
 * What should happen to regular page API requests made to a Flow-enabled page,.
 * This will change somewhat when a Flow board becomes a content type.


 * post editing rights for bots.
 * ordinarily only the poster can edit his or her reply, unlike a regular wiki page.

Missing APIs?

 * Do people need an API to enumerate pages / namespaces that are using Flow?
 * currently, would just return values of  and  . When a Flow board becomes a content type, the former could be replaced by a query for pages with the   contentmodel, though there does not seem to be a generator for this.


 * API to generate a link to a post/topic/board given a UUID
 * Options: wiki link or URL; show standalone topic or show Flow board paginated to topic
 * must caller be aware of whether the UUID is a workflow (topic) or post or header?
 * note redirector functionality (e.g. Special:Flow/workflow/ru0aehx63b43khdl and Special:Flow/post/ru22c9f18csotjs7) is in release 1.24wmf4.

Use cases

 * please update, especially with links to bots

Bots patrolling new content

 * ? have to watch for changes
 * ask for new and changed topics and posts

Bots making edits

 * Adding topics (and/or posts)
 * Correcting old posts
 * Modifying talkpage headers
 * Checking if the bot has already made a particular post to a particular page
 * Often implemented by a subject line check, or a check for a particular.
 * Ability for users to remove or otherwise signal that the bot-raised issue is taken care of, so the bot can know to repost it if it recurs.
 * Opting out of bot messages (eg. Enwiki's template:nobots).

Tools showing count of edits

 * Contributions with Flow at some wiki aren't included in X!'s Edit Counter for that wiki, maybe because Flow is in a separate database. See, though this is more a DB tool than a bot.

Non-issues
No need to check for unsigned edits, replies are known.