Manual:Creating a bot/de

MediaWiki-Roboter oder einfach Bots sind automatische Prozesse, die mit Wikipedia (und anderen Wikimedia-Projekten) interagieren, als wären sie menschliche Bearbeiter. Diese Seite versucht zu erklären, wie man die Entwicklung eines Bots zur Verwendung in Wikimedia-Projekten durchführt, und vieles davon ist auf andere Wikis übertragbar, die auf MediaWiki basieren. Die Erklärung richtet sich vor allem an diejenigen, die bereits etwas Programmiererfahrung haben, jedoch unsicher sind, wie sie dieses Wissen bei der Erstellung eines MediaWiki-Bots anwenden können.



Warum sollte ich einen Bot erstellen?
Bots können Aufgaben automatisieren und sie viel schneller ausführen als Menschen. If you have a simple task that you need to perform lots of times (an example might be to add a template to all pages in a category with 1000 pages), then this is a task better suited to a bot than a human.



Reuse existing bots
Oft ist es viel einfacher, einen Bot-Job von einem bestehenden Bot anzufordern. Wenn du nur gelegentlich Anfragen hast oder dich mit dem Programmieren nicht auskennst, ist das meist die beste Lösung. Einige Wikis haben eine spezielle Seite, auf der solche Anfragen gestellt werden können. Darüber hinaus existiert eine Reihe von Hilfsmitteln, die jedem zur Verfügung stehen. Die meisten davon haben die Form von erweiterten Webbrowsern mit MediaWiki-spezifischen Funktionen. The most popular of these is AutoWikiBrowser (AWB), a browser specifically designed to assist with editing on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Eine vollständige Liste der Werkzeuge findest du unter w:Wikipedia:Werkzeuge/Editierwerkzeuge auf der englischen Wikipedia. Tools wie AWB können oft mit wenig oder gar keinen Programmierkenntnissen bedient werden.

Reuse codebase
Wenn du beschließt, dass du aufgrund der Häufigkeit oder Neuartigkeit deiner Anforderungen einen eigenen Bot brauchst, musst du ihn nicht von Grund auf neu schreiben. Viele Bots veröffentlichen ihren Quellcode, der manchmal mit wenig zusätzlicher Entwicklungszeit wiederverwendet werden kann Es stehen auch eine Reihe von Standard-Bot-Frameworks zum Download zur Verfügung. Diese Frameworks umfassen die überwiegende Mehrheit des Codes eines Bots. Da diese Bot-Frameworks allgemein verwendet werden und die komplexe Codierung von anderen erstellt und ausgiebig getestet wurde, ist es viel einfacher, Bots basierend auf diesen Frameworks zur Verwendung zugelassen zu bekommen. The most popular and common of these frameworks is (PWB), a bot framework written in Python. It is thoroughly documented and tested and many standardized Pywikibot scripts (bot instructions) are already available. Weitere Beispiele für Bot-Frameworks findest du unten. Bei einigen dieser Bot-Frameworks, wie z.B. PWB, reicht eine allgemeine Vertrautheit mit Skripten aus, um den Bot erfolgreich auszuführen (es ist wichtig, diese Frameworks regelmäßig zu aktualisieren).

Important questions
Das Schreiben eines neuen Bots erfordert erhebliche Programmierkenntnisse. Ein komplett neuer Bot muss umfangreiche Tests durchlaufen, bevor er für den regulären Betrieb zugelassen wird. Die Planung ist entscheidend, um ein fehlerfreies, effizientes und effektives Programm zu erhalten. Folgende Vorüberlegungen sind wichtig:


 * Wird der Bot manuell unterstützt oder vollständig automatisiert?
 * Wirst du den Bot allein oder mit Hilfe anderer Programmierer erstellen?
 * In welcher Sprache wird der Bot implementiert?
 * Werden Anfragen, Bearbeitungen oder andere Aktionen des Bots protokolliert? Wenn ja, werden die Protokolle auf lokalen Medien oder auf Wiki-Seiten gespeichert?
 * Wird der Bot in einem Webbrowser ausgeführt (z. B. in JavaScript geschrieben) oder handelt es sich um ein eigenständiges Programm?
 * If the bot is a standalone program, will it run on your local computer, or on a remote server such as the Toolforge?
 * Wenn der Bot auf einem Remote-Server läuft, können andere Bearbeiter den Bot bedienen oder zum Laufen bringen?



Wie funktioniert ein MediaWiki-Bot?


Betriebsübersicht
Genau wie ein menschlicher Bearbeiter liest ein Mediawiki-Bot Wiki-Seiten und nimmt Änderungen vor, bei denen Änderungen vorgenommen werden müssen. Der Unterschied ist, dass Bots zwar schneller und weniger anfällig für Ermüdung sind als Menschen, aber sie sind bei weitem nicht so intelligent wie wir. Bots sind gut für sich wiederholende Aufgaben, die leicht definierte Muster haben und bei denen nur wenige Entscheidungen getroffen werden müssen.

Im typischsten Fall loggt sich ein Bot in seinen eigenen Account ein und ruft Seiten aus dem Wiki auf ähnliche Weise wie ein Browser auf - allerdings zeigt er die Seite nicht auf dem Bildschirm an, sondern bearbeitet sie im Speicher - und prüft dann programmatisch den Seitencode, um zu sehen, ob Änderungen vorgenommen werden müssen. Dann tut er die Änderungen, für die er gedacht ist, und schickt sie ab, ähnlich wie ein Browser.

Da Bots auf die gleiche Weise auf Seiten zugreifen wie Menschen, können Bots auf die gleichen Schwierigkeiten stoßen wie menschliche Nutzer. Sie können in Bearbeitungskonflikte geraten, Zeitüberschreitungen erleiden oder auf andere unerwartete Komplikationen stoßen, wenn sie Seiten abrufen oder bearbeiten. Da das Arbeitsvolumen, das ein Bot tut, größer ist als das einer lebenden Person, ist es wahrscheinlicher, dass der Bot auf diese Probleme stößt. Deshalb ist es wichtig, diese Situationen beim Schreiben eines Bots zu berücksichtigen.



APIs für Bots
Um Änderungen an Wiki-Seiten vorzunehmen, muss ein Bot zwangsläufig Seiten aus dem Wiki abrufen und Änderungen zurücksenden. Zu diesem Zweck existieren mehrere Anwendungsprogrammierschnittstellen (APIs).


 * MediaWiki Action API (api.php). Dieser Webservice wurde speziell dafür geschrieben, dass automatisierte Prozesse wie Bots Abfragen stellen und Änderungen vornehmen können. Die Daten werden im JSON-Format zurückgegeben (siehe Ausgabeformate für weitere Details).
 * Status: Eingebaute Funktion von MediaWiki, verfügbar auf allen Wikimedia-Servern. Andere Nicht-Wikimedia-Wikis können den Schreibzugriff deaktivieren oder einschränken.
 * Es existiert auch eine API-Sandbox für diejenigen, die die Funktionen von api.php testen wollen.
 * Special:Export can be used to obtain bulk export of page content in XML form. See Manual:Parameters to Special:Export for arguments;
 * Status: Eingebaute Funktion von MediaWiki, verfügbar auf allen Wikimedia-Servern.
 * Raw (Wikitext) page processing: sending a  or a   GET request to index.php will give the unprocessed wikitext source code of a page. For example:  . An API query with   or   is roughly equivalent, and allows for retrieving additional information.
 * Status: Eingebaute Funktion von MediaWiki, verfügbar auf allen Wikimedia-Servern.

Einige Webserver sind so konfiguriert, dass sie Anfragen für komprimierte (gzip) Inhalte zulassen. Das kannst du tun, indem du eine Zeile "Accept-Encoding: gzip" in den HTTP-Request-Header einfügst; wenn der HTTP-Reply-Header "Content-Encoding: gzip" enthält, liegt das Dokument im gzip-Format vor, andernfalls in der normalen, unkomprimierten Form. Beachte, dass dies spezifisch für den Webserver ist und nicht für die MediaWiki-Software. Andere Websites, die MediaWiki verwenden, haben diese Funktion möglicherweise nicht. Wenn du ein bestehendes Bot-Framework verwendest, sollte es Low-Level-Operationen wie diese beherrschen.

Logging in
Approved bots need to be logged in to make edits. Although a bot can make read requests without logging in, bots that have completed testing should log in for all activities. Bots logged in from an account with the bot flag (see #Bot Flag below) can obtain more results per query from the Mediawiki API (api.php). Most bot frameworks should handle login and cookies automatically, but if you are not using an existing framework, you will need to follow these steps.

For security, login data must be passed using the HTTP POST method. Because parameters of HTTP GET requests are easily visible in URL, logins via GET are disabled.

To log a bot in using the MediaWiki API, 2 POST requests are needed:

Request 1 – this is a GET request to obtain a login token
 * URL:

This will return a "logintoken" parameter in JSON form, as documented at API:Login. Other output formats are available. It will also return HTTP cookies as described below.

Request 2 – this is a POST to complete the login where TOKEN is the token from the previous result. The HTTP cookies from the previous request must also be passed with the second request.
 * URL:
 * POST parameters:

A successful login attempt will result in the Wikimedia server setting several HTTP cookies. The bot must save these cookies and send them back every time it makes a request (this is particularly crucial for editing). On the English Wikipedia, the following cookies should be used: enwikiUserID, enwikiToken, and enwikiUserName. The enwikisession cookie is required to actually send an edit or commit some change, otherwise the MediaWiki:Session fail preview error message will be returned.

Main-account login via  is deprecated and may stop working without warning. To continue using bot code which logs in with, see Special:BotPasswords.

Editing; edit tokens
MediaWiki uses a system of edit tokens for making edits to MediaWiki pages, as well as other operations that modify existing content such as rollback. The token looks like a long hexadecimal number followed by '+\', for example:


 * d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e+\

The role of edit tokens is to prevent "edit hijacking", where users are tricked into making an edit by clicking a single link.

The editing process involves two HTTP requests. First, a request for an edit token must be made. Then, a second HTTP request must be made that sends the new content of the page along with the edit token just obtained. It is not possible to make an edit in a single HTTP request. An edit token remains the same for the duration of a logged-in session, so the edit token needs to be retrieved only once and can be used for all subsequent edits.

To obtain an edit token, follow these steps:

 MediaWiki API (api.php). Make a request with the following parameters (see API:Edit - Create&Edit pages).       The token will be returned in the  attribute of the response.  

If the edit token the bot receives does not have the hexadecimal string (i.e., the edit token is just '+\') then the bot most likely is not logged in. This might be due to a number of factors: failure in authentication with the server, a dropped connection, a timeout of some sort, or an error in storing or returning the correct cookies. If it is not because of a programming error, just log in again to refresh the login cookies. The bots must use assertion to make sure that they are logged in.



Bearbeitungskonflikte
Edit conflicts occur when multiple, overlapping edit attempts are made on the same page. Almost every bot will eventually get caught in an edit conflict of one sort or another, and should include some mechanism to test for and accommodate these issues.

Bots that use the Mediawiki API (api.php) should retrieve the edit token, along with the  and the last revision "base" timestamp, before loading the page text in preparation for the edit;   can be used to retrieve both the token and page contents in one query ( |revisions&inprop=&intoken=edit&rvprop=timestamp|content example ). When submitting the edit, set the  and   attributes, and check the server responses for indications of errors. For more details, see API:Edit - Create&Edit pages.

Generally speaking, if an edit fails to complete the bot should check the page again before trying to make a new edit, to make sure the edit is still appropriate. Further, if a bot rechecks a page to resubmit a change, it should be careful to avoid any behavior that could lead to an infinite loop and any behavior that could even resemble edit warring.

Overview of the process of developing a bot
Actually, coding or writing a bot is only one part of developing a bot.

The development cycle below is a recommendation from English Wikipedia.

On Wikimedia wikis, ensure that your bot follows any potential bot policies of the wiki.

Idee

 * The first task in creating a MediaWiki bot is extracting the requirements or coming up with an idea.
 * Make sure an existing bot isn't already doing what you think your bot should do.

Specification

 * Specification is the task of precisely describing the software to be written, possibly in a rigorous way. You should come up with a detailed proposal of what you want it to do. Try to discuss this proposal with some editors and refine it based on feedback. Even a great idea can be made better by incorporating ideas from other editors.
 * In the most basic form, your specified bot must meet the following criteria:
 * The bot is harmless (it must not make edits that could be considered disruptive to the smooth running of the wiki)
 * The bot is useful (it provides a useful service more effectively than a human editor could)
 * The bot does not waste server resources.

<span id="Software_architecture">

Software-Architektur

 * Think about how you might create it and which programming language(s) and tools you would use. Architecture is concerned with making sure the software system will meet the requirements of the product as well as ensuring that future requirements can be addressed. Certain programming languages are better suited to some tasks than others, for more details see the section on programming languages below.

Implementierung
Implementation (or coding) involves turning design and planning into code. It may be the most obvious part of the software engineering job, but it is not necessarily the largest portion. In the implementation stage you should:


 * Create an account for your bot. Go to the sign up page when logged in to create the account, linking it to yours. (If you do not create the bot account while logged in, it might be blocked on some wikis according to their policies)
 * Erstelle eine Benutzerseite für deinen Bot. Your bot's edits must not be made under your own account. Your bot will need its own account with its own username and password.
 * Add the same information to the user page of the bot. It would be a good idea to add a link to the approval page (whether approved or not) for each function.
 * Code your bot in your chosen programming language.

Testing
A good way of testing your bot as you are developing is to have it show the changes (if any) it would have made to a page, rather than actually editing the live wiki. Some bot frameworks (such as pywikibot) have pre-coded methods for showing diffs.

Dokumentation
An important (and often overlooked) task is documenting the internal design of your bot for the purpose of future maintenance and enhancement. This is especially important if you are going to allow clones of your bot. Ideally, you should post the source code of your bot on its userpage or in a revision control system (see #Open-source bots) if you want others to be able to run clones of it. This code should be well documented (usually using comments) for ease of use.

Queries/Complaints
You should be ready to respond to queries about or objections to your bot on your user talk page, especially if it is operating in a potentially sensitive area.

Wartung
Maintaining and enhancing your bot to cope with newly discovered bugs or new requirements can take far more time than the initial development of the software. Not only may it be necessary to add code that does not fit the original design, but just determining how software works at some point after it is completed may require significant effort (this is another reason to document your code as you go along).

General guidelines for running a bot
In addition to the official bot policy, which covers the main points to consider when developing your bot, there are a number of more general advisory points to consider when developing your bot.

Bot best practices

 * Set a custom User-Agent header for your bot (per the Wikimedia User-Agent policy, if your bot will be operating on Wikimedia wikis). If you don't, your bot may encounter errors and may end up blocked at the server level.
 * Use the maxlag parameter with a maximum lag of 5 seconds. This will enable the bot to run quickly when server load is low, and throttle the bot when server load is high.
 * If writing a bot in a framework that does not support maxlag, limit the total requests (read and write requests together) to no more than 10/minute.
 * Use the MediaWiki API whenever possible, and set the query limits to the largest values that the server permits, to minimize the total number of requests that must be made.
 * Edit (write) requests are more expensive in server time than read requests. Be edit-light and design your code to keep edits to a minimum.
 * Try to consolidate edits. One single large edit is better than 10 smaller ones.
 * Enable HTTP persistent connections and compression in your HTTP client library, if possible.
 * Do not make multi-threaded requests. Wait for one server request to complete before beginning another
 * Back off upon receiving errors from the server. Errors such as timeouts are often an indication of heavy server load. Use a sequence of increasingly longer delays between repeated requests.
 * Make use of assertion to ensure your bot is logged in.
 * Test your code thoroughly before making large automated runs. Individually examine all edits on trial runs to verify they are perfect.

Manual assistance
If your bot is doing anything that requires judgment or evaluation of context (e.g., correcting spelling) then you should consider making your bot manually-assisted, which means that a human verifies all edits before they are saved. This significantly reduces the bot's speed, but it also significantly reduces errors.

Disabling the bot
It is good bot policy to have a feature to disable the bot's operation if it is requested. Remember that if your bot goes bad, it is your responsibility to clean up after it! You could have the bot refuse to run if a message has been left on its talk page, on the assumption that the message may be a complaint against its activities; this can be checked using the API  query (example on English Wikipedia). Or you could have a page that will turn the bot off if text on the page is changed (e.g. require the page be empty, contain only the word "True", or something similar); this can be checked by loading the page contents before each edit.

Signature
Just like a human, if your bot makes edits to a talk page in MediaWiki, it should sign its post with four tildes (~). Signatures usually belong only on talk namespaces.

Bot Flag
A bot's edits will be visible at Special:RecentChanges, unless the edits are set to indicate a bot. Once the bot has been approved and given its bot flag permission, one can add the "bot-True" to the API call - see API:Edit in order to hide the bot's edits in Special:RecentChanges. In Python, using either mwclient or wikitools, then adding  to the edit/save command will set the edit as a bot edit - e.g. PageObject.edit(text=pagetext, bot=True, summary=pagesummary)

Monitoring the bot status
If the bot is fully automated and performs regular edits, you should periodically check it runs as specified, and its behavior has not been altered by software changes.

<span id="Open-source_bots">

Quelloffene Bots
Many bot operators choose to make their code open source, and occasionally it may be required before approval for particularly complex bots. Making your code open source has several advantages:


 * It allows others to review your code for potential bugs. As with prose, it is often difficult for the author of code to adequately review it.
 * Others can use your code to build their own bots. A user new to bot writing may be able to use your code as an example or a template for their own bots.
 * It encourages good security practices, rather than security through obscurity.
 * If you leave the project, it allows other users to run your bot tasks without having to write new code.

Open-source code, while rarely required, is typically encouraged in keeping with the open and transparent nature of wikis, though there are some cases when code should not be made public. For example, the open proxy-finding code of ProcseeBot could be used for malicious purposes on other sites.

Making code open source can add some extra work to coding. One has to make sure that sensitive information such as passwords is separated into a file that isn't made public.

There are several options available for users wishing to make their code open. Some users choose to put the code in a subpage of the bot's userspace, although this can be a hassle to maintain if not automated and results in the code being multi-licensed under the wiki's licensing terms in addition to any other terms you may specify. Another solution is to use a revision control system such as SVN, Git, or Mercurial. Wikipedia has articles comparing the different software options and websites for code hosting, many of which have no cost. Wikimedia also offers Git code repository hosting for its users and running Wikimedia related software tools via Wikimedia Cloud Services.

<span id="Programming_languages_and_libraries">

Programmiersprachen und Bibliotheken

 * See also: API:Client code

Bots können in fast jeder Programmiersprache geschrieben werden. The choice of a language often depends on the experience of the bot writer (which languages are familiar) or on the availability of pre-developed libraries to perform the desired task. The following list includes some languages that have libraries to assist with bot tasks.

Awk

 * Framework and libraries: BotWikiAwk
 * Example bots in the GitHub account of User:GreenC at GitHub

Perl
If located on a webserver, you can start your program running and interface with your program while it is running via the Common Gateway Interface from your browser. If your internet service provider provides you with webspace, the chances are good that you have access to a perl build on the webserver from which you can run your Perl programs.

Bibliotheken:
 * MediaWiki::API – Basic interface to the API, allowing scripts to automate editing and extraction of data from MediaWiki driven sites.
 * MediaWiki::Bot – A fairly complete MediaWiki bot framework written in Perl. Provides a higher level of abstraction than MediaWiki::API. Plugins provide administrator and steward functionality. Currently unsupported.

PHP
PHP kann auch verwendet werden, um Bots zu programmieren. MediaWiki-Entwickler sind bereits mit PHP vertraut, da dies die Sprache ist, in der MediaWiki und seine Erweiterungen geschrieben sind. PHP is an especially good choice if you wish to provide a webform-based interface to your bot. For example, suppose you wanted to create a bot for renaming categories. You could create an HTML form into which you will type the current and desired names of a category. When the form is submitted, your bot could read these inputs, then edit all the articles in the current category and move them to the desired category. (Obviously, any bot with a form interface would need to be secured somehow from random web surfers.)

The PHP bot functions table on English Wikipedia may provide some insight into the capabilities of the major bot frameworks.

Python
Python ist eine beliebte interpretierte Sprache mit objektorientierte Funktionen.


 * Libraries
 * Please help update this table.

Microsoft .NET
Microsoft .NET is a set of languages including C#, C++/CLI, Visual Basic .NET, J#, JScript .NET, IronPython, and Windows PowerShell. The Microsoft Visual Studio integrated development environment is often used, or the free Microsoft Visual Studio Express versions. Using Mono Project, .NET programs can also run on Linux, Unix, BSD, Solaris and Mac OS X as well as under Windows.

Bibliotheken:
 * DotNetWikiBot Framework – a full-featured client API on .NET, that allows to build programs and web robots easily to manage information on MediaWiki-powered sites. Now translated to several languages. Detailed compiled documentation is available in English.
 * WikiFunctions .NET library – Bundled with AWB, is a library of stuff useful for bots, such as generating lists, loading/editing articles, connecting to the recent changes IRC channel and more.

Java
Java programs are generally developed with an IDE, such as Eclipse or NetBeans; development using a command line console (with the javac and java programs) is also an option.

Bibliotheken:
 * Java Wiki Bot Framework – A Java wiki bot framework
 * wiki-java – A Java wiki bot framework that is only one file
 * WPCleaner – The library used by the WPCleaner tool
 * jwiki – A simple and easy-to-use Java wiki bot framework

JavaScript (Node.js)
JavaScript is a scripting language used mainly on web pages, such as for user scripts added to your vector.js or your monobook.js pages. Using Node.js it is possible to use JavaScript server-side, such as for developing bots.


 * Please help to update this table.

Ruby
Ruby is a popular dynamic, object-oriented programming language.

Bibliotheken:
 * MediaWiki::Butt - Ruby framework for the API in active development. Tested with versions as up-to-date as CurseGamepedia is.
 * mediawiki/ruby/api, Ruby API client library. Last updated December 2017, no longer maintained, but still works.
 * MediaWiki::Gateway – Ruby framework for the API. Last updated January 2016. No longer in active development, tested up to MediaWiki 1.22, compatible with Wikimedia wikis. Unknown if still works.
 * wikipedia-client - Ruby framework using the API. Last updated March 2018. Unknown if still works.

Common Lisp

 * CL-MediaWiki implements MediaWiki API as a Common Lisp package. Is planned to use JSON as a query data format. Supports maxlag and assertion.

Haskell

 * https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mediawiki

VBScript
VBScript is a scripting language based on the Visual Basic programming language. There are no published bot frameworks for VBScript, but some examples of bots that use it can be seen below:

Beispiele:
 * w:User:Smallman12q/Scripts/cleanuplistingtowiki (2013) - Login and give preview of edit
 * w:User:Smallman12q/VBS/Savewatchlist (2012) - Login, get raw watchlist, save to file, logout, close IE
 * w:Commons:User:Smallbot - Several scripts showing the usage of VBScript (JavaScript, XMLHTTP, MSHTML, XMLDOM, COM) for batch uploads.

Bash
Bash ist eine Unix-Shell.
 * See API:Client_code/Bash. Requires cURL package.