Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Is AFT specifically on ENWP because of temporary technical limitations?/reply (6)

">90% of users [...] think the tool is useful"
 * What users are you talking about? All editors/readers on Wikipedia or just the subsection editors/readers that use the AFT? If the latter, I'm not surprised. If you like something you use it. If not, you don't. Why not add a "vote to remove this tool"-link to AFT and see what happens.

"If there was actually no consensus to use this tool, then people would not use it. Every person who uses the tool is another indication that the community actually wants to use this tool."
 * When I look at the article Nineteen Eighty-Four, there are 20-25 votes total. Looking at the article traffic statistics the article is read some 5000 times per day. So if, by your argument, every person using AFT is an indication that the community wants the tool, does it not also mean that those not using it is an indication that it does not want it?