Talk:VisualEditor/Beta Features/Formulae

This is a page for discussion about the Formula editing plug-in for VisualEditor, released as part of the Beta Features programme.

What do you like about the current formulae editing tool?

 * Instant update as-you-type

I think this makes it really clear exactly how the formula will show when saved, without having to do slow trial-and-error page previews. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 06:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)


 * More!

Your comments here.

What would you change about the current formulae editing tool?

 * Label

I don't think "LaTeX" is a great label for this - perhaps "Formula" instead? Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 06:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Proper visual editor

In time, I'd really like us to provide a proper visual editor for formulae, rather than requiring users to know LaTeX - possibly a drag-and-drop box of MathJax icons? Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 06:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I was just coming here to suggest something like this. MathJax iconography FTW.  Sj (talk) 00:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree. As alternative to the drag-and-drop box of MathJax icons it could be good to have a collection of LaTeX syntax in the bottom of the box. It could be great if we can have both tools, so the users that don't know LaTeX simply use the drag-and-drop icons, instead the people that know LaTeX can use the LaTeX syntax "links". --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 07:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Make dialog movable and resizeabl

The popup dialog box is too small for some equations. It needs to be resizable so you can read the full source of a large equation. It also needs to be movable so it does not hide the formula you are editing.--Salix alba (talk) 08:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * It is really to small. Helder 14:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * More!

Your suggestions here.

Bugs & compatibility issues

 * Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'update' of null

When I start to type  in the tool on the Sandbox, the error above appears in the console. Helder 14:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, we should avoid round-tripping  when that's the only input. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 00:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Your issue

Give details of your issues here.