Extension talk:Cargo

Order by with format category produces unexpected results
When using the category format and having a list of names, I ordered by the surname (which is set as a separate field). The pages all end up ordered by surname but letter headers are created for the first letter of the page name not based on order by surname. So it ends up with something like this.
 * K
 * Katya Alkaev


 * R
 * Raine Almasy


 * N
 * Nicholas Bevans


 * M
 * Maiko Biladeau-Yukawa


 * A
 * Alexandra Carstairs


 * V
 * Virgil Carstairs


 * A
 * Aisling Cooper

If the category format was able to use the default sort key that would at least help but it doesnt seem like it should be this way either.--Cody3647 (talk) 02:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah, that's true. I just added a new parameter for the "category" format, called "header field", that takes in the name of an alternate field to get the header letter from. If you try it out, please let me know how it works for you. Yaron Koren (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Still having the problem, http://absitomen.com/lexicon/Portal:Characters --Cody3647 (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * It looks like it's doing the right thing - you just need to also order by that field. Yaron Koren (talk) 05:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah, yep that fixed it. Thanks --Cody3647 (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Gallery Format Options
The gallery format with SMW/SRF had the ability to set the image caption based on a property. Is there a way to do similar with a cargo field used for the caption? And also to set the heights and widths, and turn off the file names and file size.--Cody3647 (talk) 02:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Forgot that I asked about this here, but I uploaded a patch with the gerrit patch uploader to add the gallery parameters to the query format. --Cody3647 (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, I saw - sorry; it's on my to-do list to look into this. Yaron Koren (talk) 19:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem, just saw this when writing up another question.--Cody3647 (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

$wgCargoAllowedSQLFunctions in LocalSettings Not Working
I have RAND, GROUP_CONCAT,IN added to $wgCargoAllowedSQLFunctions in LocalSettings and I'm getting the error "the SQL function "RAND" is not allowed." I just pulled the latest version of Cargo from git and Im running MW 1.25.5. --Cody3647 (talk) 01:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * What does the #cargo_query call look like? Yaron Koren (talk) 05:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * , I was able to fix it by adding the functions straight into the array in Cargo.hooks.php.--Cody3647 (talk) 06:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Aha - that was due to a bug in your MediaWiki version's handling of extension.json. I just added what I think is a workaround to the Cargo code. Yaron Koren (talk) 16:58, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

A big table — a big problem
I can not save the full amount of data. Action "recreatedata" and cargoRecreateData.php don't help. The problem is clearly in time-outs, as the number of rows after each regeneration turns different. Pages are big, some contain about a thousand queries. The table is simple, it is less than ten fields. My wiki includes about 800 pages with the table queries to create 17 thousand rows. It created about 13 thousand. What should I do? --StasR (talk) 09:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * By "queries", I assume you mean "template calls". I can see the problem: when it does its batching, the web interface assumes that each page contains an average of one or two calls to #cargo_store - not hundreds or thousands. The batching definitely needs to take that into account, if that's possible. In the meantime, have you tried calling the command-line script? That seems like it should still work. Yaron Koren (talk) 13:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, I mean "template calls". I wrote: Action "recreatedata" and cargoRecreateData.php don't help; script created ~13,000 rows vs 10-11K on "recreatedata".  --StasR (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh, right. Did the script crash? Have you tried running it more than once? Yaron Koren (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * When the interactive performance, all the job are seen in the job queu? I made a long pause and run the script again. I did it twice, and the results are identical :-) The number of entries is still different from the expected. Do you allow one page to create two identical rows in the table? --StasR (talk) 15:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I didn't understand the first question, but the script doesn't use jobs - only the web interface does. The fact that the results are identical is actually a good sign - it means that the problem is not with the size of the data, but with something else. Yes, you can have identical rows from one page (they won't be fully identical, since they'll have different _rowID values). Is there any way you can run some analytical queries on the data set that was generated, using "group by" or something, to try to figure out if there's a pattern to the data that's missing? Did certain pages not get stored at all, or maybe the issue is rows with certain values? Yaron Koren (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * First question was: can be invisible remnants of the interactive 'recreatedata'? (The job queu was empty, but I ran the script immediately after 'recreatedata'.) I'm looking for errors, and is found only one, with two identical calls on the same page. --StasR (talk) 16:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Identical calls are wiki Scribunto problem, not Cargo. Direct template calls work properly. --StasR (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh, I see. Yes, it's certainly possible that the jobs created by the web interface could be interfering with the script. I would just delete everything from the job queue, if you want to "cancel" the recreatedata action. Yaron Koren (talk) 17:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * It seems to be on the theme: (MediaWiki_1.24/wmf8) - Add PPFrame::isVolatile and PPFrame::setVolatile  --StasR (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand the connection to those MW issues. Yaron Koren (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Combination Outline and Template Formats
So I'm trying to get the function of the outline format to display a series of events and articles with more information and with formatting that is beyond just a simple list. I could use just the template format but that would end up listing the dates, since events and articles often have the same date, over and over again, hence wanting to use the outline. I tried using concat but that quickly got weird and confusing.

I also tried creating a new format but my php skill level especially with classes has made it difficult without repeating a lot of code. Would it be possible to create a new format that combines the two formats? Or other suggestions for getting the same result?--Cody3647 (talk) 19:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Would adding a 'template=' parameter to the 'outline' format solve this problem? Yaron Koren (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Probably yes. To replace the list/parenthetical list output of the remaining fields. --Cody3647 (talk) 21:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I did figure out a way to do it with one level using the template format and the variables extension. --Cody3647 (talk) 22:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Alright - it does seem like adding a "template" parameter would allow for an easier solution. Yaron Koren (talk) 04:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Line breaks in wikitext format
I have a field that is setup as Wikitext. I have a block of text that has a line break in it (empty line line break not a hardcoded line break) and when getting the field via a query the line break is gone. I double checked in the database itself and the line break is still in the saved version. --Cody3647 (talk) 03:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Is it a single line break, or a double line break? Because single line breaks are ignored by the MediaWiki parser. Yaron Koren (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Double line break, but I think I figured it out. I had it in a div, but moved it into a blockquote and now the line break shows up.  --Cody3647 (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Dashes in field value in WHERE clause
gives Error in "where" parameter: the string "--" cannot be used within #cargo_query. Why? --StasR (talk) 15:08, 17 January 2016 (UTC)


 * It's because "--" is used for comments, and comments can be used for SQL injection. Though I think "--" within quotes doesn't pose a threat, so that should be fixed. On the other hand - why do you have that format for the value? I didn't expect many values to contain this string. Yaron Koren (talk) 03:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Random Question Marks appended to File Name
I have a SF field that takes a file name, it is saved to a cargo field that is defined as for a File.

13 of the 780 pages that have saved a file name in that field, have had random ? added to the end of the file name in the database. Some have had multiple ? (up to three in a row at the moment) added. Some are png, jpg, jpeg. The question marks are not showing up in the field/or wikitext (the image does display in the image preview).--Cody3647 (talk) 17:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Very strange. Is there any pattern to when they show up? Are some of the characters in the file names non-ASCII? Yaron Koren (talk) 03:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * None that I can tell. These are the names of the files as they show up in the database:   The other 750+ are just fine and are in the same format, entered in the same way.  I tried editing the question marks out in the database, but its back on the next save.--Cody3647 (talk) 04:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Not sure how but on closer inspection of the source when on the edit source page, somehow the html entity for left to right marks were added, sometimes multiple times in the cases of the multiple question marks.--Cody3647 (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh, interesting. Could it be these left-to-right marks also exist in the page source, but are not visible in the browser? Yaron Koren (talk) 04:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * They were, Ive removed them all now, no idea how they got there. --Cody3647 (talk) 13:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)