User talk:Platonides

 Dear, Welcome to MediaWiki.org !

Yes, Welcome! This site is dedicated to the documentation of the MediaWiki software, the software behind many wikis, including that of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation projects.

Please, take a look at the following pages. They might prove useful to you as a newcomer here:
 * Project:About
 * How does MediaWiki work?
 * Help:Editing pages
 * Help:Navigation
 * Manual:FAQ

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and find this site a beneficial documentation of the MediaWiki software. Thanks, and regards, – Innv | d | s: 12:44, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Documentation summit
Platonides:

Did you know about the Doc Camp this October?

"Individuals with a passion for free documentation about free software may apply to attend by filling out the application form and submitting before 5 August, 2011.... Accommodation and food will be covered by the GSoC Doc Camp. Part or complete travel costs can also be applied for as part of the application process."

I'm going to send a proposal to get MediaWiki into the Doc Camp and to have us do a Quick Sprint to improve MediaWiki's documentation. Please let me know if you know people I should include in my proposal.

best, Sumanah 17:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC) Volunteer Development Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation

cite.php - Extension to references
Hello Platonides, on wikipedia-de and elsewhere there have been discussion on extending the syntax of the -Tags, as in de:Frank Zappa. Some authors repeat the complete reference (including author, title, editor, year etc.) together with the individual page numbers in each footnote. There is also the possibility to use the template, but this is disputed because it gets quite tedious to go back and forth in order to get the complete information about a reference. Moreover, it seems not to be very common to give the pagenumber along the footnote number in the text (at least not in non-English publications).

Ideally, the syntax of the ref-Tags would be extended in a way that page-numbers could be supplied within the -Tags as a parameter. There is a bug for that (as Raymond pointed out to me), that proposes that kind of extension: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13127. There, a patch has been proposed, too. If I understand the code and especially Raymond right, the changes are quite big and this might be the reason that the code has not been reviewed and implemented yet. (cf. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6286&action=diff)

Btw, it might be completely sufficient not to group the footnotes by the page parameter too but to just pass it to the text in the footnote, i. e:

The code with will yield the footnote

1. ↑ Bar, p. 42-43

Here, also the writing of page or p. is left to the author, thus eleminating the need for local adaption (and translating page in all languages of the wikimedia projects).

Sorry, this has become longer than I intended... I would be very thankful if you could give me your opinion on how difficult it would be to implement such a extension (either the code described in the bugzilla-entry or the here proposed more simple version).

Thank you very much for any comment!

Best regards --Hei ber 18:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

WSC change
Sorry, thought they were number of supporters rather than priority. WereSpielChequers (talk) 11:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Extension:ArticleComments needs updating
Hi, Platonides. While answering a question about the ArticleComments extension on Stack Overflow, I noticed that you've apparently been maintaining it on SVN. The extension page here on mw.org, however, appears to only link to the old, outdated version 0.4.3 everywhere except in one part of the infobox. Would you happen to have some time to do something about that?

I suppose I could just try to fix it myself, but I thought I'd ask you first / as well, since you're probably more familiar with the extension than I am. I'll also try to contact Jimbojw, the original maintainer, and ask if he could update the pages on his own wiki.

Anyway, thanks for all the work you've done with this extension! --Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Password strength -> Requests for comment/Password strength
MZMcBride has converted Password strength (a page you started a while back) to an RFC, Requests for comment/Password strength. He did the same on a page I worked on without consulting me, so I'm giving you a heads up in case you want to revert. Superm401 - Talk 04:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)