Thread:Talk:Bug management/How to triage/Better way of marking bugs as "accepted"/reply

Personally I don't like that a bug that nobody works on should be called "ASSIGNED" (maybe also because the "ASSIGNED" status was renamed to "IN_PROGRESS" in upstream in the meantime) but different teams have different workflows so I don't want to challenge this. :) For avoiding cookie-licking I prefer #3. I'm not a fan of default human/individual assignees for bug reports when that human assignee does not plan to work on the specific ticket, plus you cannot differentiate anymore which bugs you yourself *really* plan to work on. I assume that's why the default "Nobody" assignee was introduced at some point, which is more or less already #3.