Talk:Analytics

Only Wikipedia?
From analytics: "A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics. If you enjoy counting stuff on / about Wikipedia and you have a question then please sign up and the Analytics Team will try to help you as best as it can". Only Wikipedia? Usually research/data questions go to wiki-research-l and I've not seen them on this list yet, isn't the list rather about WMF infrastructure for analytics and research? --Nemo 09:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It's mostly about infrastructure and software for analytics but I would like to be inclusive when it comes to the topics. Drdee (talk) 20:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Question
I was wondering if it would be hard to get a table with all the languages that these 80 articles are written in (en:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Translation_task_force/Popular_pages) with the current page views per day? Are there tutorials for non-software-engineers available on how to do this? --Tobias1984 (talk) 20:26, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Or would it be possible to track all the articles that use a WikiProjects template? There would be some interest from WikiProject Medicine to track all their marked articles and also see how many views they get in different languages. --Tobias1984 (talk) 21:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Another question
This page is infrequently updated. Does that mean that this project is in limbo? Or just that the team are volunteers and haven't had time to work on it? 69.125.134.86 22:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * it means that I am not receiving alerts :(, please come to us on IRC #wikimedia-analytics Drdee (talk) 20:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Changes
I've made some fairly wholesale changes to the site in preparation for our quarterly review later this month.

All of the engineering resources have been moved to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Engineering

New Report Card - request for earlier data
Hey all,

The New Report Card is really great. Is there any chance you can get it to show data all the way back to the beginning rather than just 2011? I'm interested in looking at our whole history of active editor numbers, and would also like to be able to compare active, medium-active and very-active editor levels.

Thanks, —  Scott  •  talk  13:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)