Help:Extension:GWToolset

Introduction
You’re probably reading this because you are considering or planning to make a large amount of content available for reuse by publishing it on Wikimedia Commons. This manual will guide you through the necessary steps.

Proces overview
The image below is a process diagram that gives an overview of the steps to use the toolset. This manual is structured according to this process diagram.

Username & user rights
To use the toolset you need to:
 * 1) Be registered user.
 * 2) Be granted access rights to the toolset.

Registering a user name
Please follow these steps if you aren't a user of Wikimedia Commons, Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia project:
 * 1) Read these guidelines for choosing a username.
 * 2) Go to the signup page to register.

Introduce yourself on your user page
After signing up you can log in. You'll see your username in red on the top of the wiki page.

Asking for user rights
We recommend that you do all testing on the Commons Beta server and only once you feel that the tool is giving you the results you want, use it on the Production server. Because these are two separate environments, you will need to have a user account on each and request access on each. The best way to do this:
 * 1) Commons Production server: leave a message on the Commons notice board to request rights for the GWtoolset. Please introduce yourself and motivate your request.
 * 2) Commons Beta server: contact a developer or bureaucrat on beta to request the rights for the GWToolset user group on beta. You can ask in the commons IRC channel or contact them from these lists:
 * 3) Bureaucrats
 * 4) Developers

Technical compatibility analyses
The Toolset has been developed to be used by the most common way GLAMs have organised their content. This means that the Toolset is easy to work with for most organisations, but that some will have to take extra measures before they can use it. The diagram in this paragraph can be used to determine how compatible the Toolset is for your organisation. Every question in the diagram is explained underneath.

Is the XML in flat format?
There are several standards that are currently used by organisations to organise their metadata, for example OAI-PMH, EDM, MARC and Lido. The GLAMwiki Toolset accepts all forms of metadata as long as the data complies to the following requirements.

What is flat format?
The metadata of individual objects have to be on the same level of hierarchy in the XML file, that's what 'flat' revers to. Metadata in a deeper level, further in the hierarchy, is not recognised by the Toolset.

The use of attributes
Attributes of declarations are also not recognised with one exception: the language attribute. This attribute can be used to recognise the descriptions of objects in different languages.

For example , is recognised as a description in English.
 * This is a description

Will be seen by the Toolset as The PhotoID in this example will not be read. Information in attributes can cause loss of information.
 * www.example.org
 * www.example.org

Multiple descriptions in one metadata field
Some metadata fields are mentioned more than once, for example . Currently there is no option to include this individually but the data in these fields will be merged, separated with a pipe symbol ( | ). In some cases an object has several descriptions, like "vehicle", "flamethrower" and "combat vehicle". All of these descriptions will be added to the object when they are included in the XML with the  field. It is advised to separate metadata fields as much as possible, this way they will be shown on commons in the right way.

Can the XML be transformed in flat format?
do you need help to convert your XML to a 'flat' XML file? Then consider these options:
 * 1) Hire a specialist to write a script to convert your XML file
 * 2) Use XSLT: http://www.w3schools.com/xsl/
 * 3) Choose a standard that publishes the XML as a 'flat' file, like OAI-PMH and - to a certain extend - the Europeana API
 * 4) Look into Google Refine and/or Open Refine

Selecting content
Not all content is suited to be published. File formats, copyright restrictions, organisational restrictions, etc. determine if a work can be published on commons. These variables also determine if a content upload can be done in one batch or if it is better to separate the content into separate batches.

Content types
Every type of content needs a different metadata template. It is not possible to upload photos and sound files in one batch, these need to be separated in a batch of photos and a batch of sound files.

License Types
It is not possible to upload content with different licenses in one batch. Let's say you want to upload files that are available under a CC BY and files with a CC BY-SA license, then you'd have to separate the uploads in a batch for every license.

Permissions
Content that was created hater 1923 probably needs a notice that you have permission form the creator to release these files under one of the accepted licenses for Wikimedia Commons. It is not possible to upload files of different creators in one batch because you need an OTRS ticket number for every creator.

Content donation strategies
There have been several large content donations already. All of these were mass donations: one single event where all the content was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. This is not the only way to do a donation. This chapter discusses different strategies for content donations.

One time mass donation
This is the classic way of donating content: a large scale donation of the content that can be selected with the available sources.

Advantages:

Theme based
Some GLAMs are currently considering theme based uploads. A theme can be an exhibition. This means that selecting the content that will be uploaded to commons can become a part of the process of preparing an exhibition.

Advantages:
 * Ongoing process of uploads, every new upload gains interest
 * Lessons learned from past upload can be

Advantages

Metadata templates
Wikimedia Commons uses templates to map metadata. The amount of metadata that will be displayed on Commons is therefor limited to the fields that are present in the metadata template that is chosen for the upload.

There are several templates available. Some of the templates that are available are: Note: This list is not yet complete
 * Art_Photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Art_Photo
 * Artwork: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Artwork
 * Book https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Book
 * Musical work https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Musical_work

There is currently no template available for video content. It's not possible (yet) to use a template you created yourself.

The type of work that you want to upload determines the template you ought to use. This also me ands that it is not possible to upload multiple types of content that require different templates. E.g.: if you want to upload photos and sound files you should separate these uploads and XML files in an upload (and XML file) of the photos and an upload (and XML file) of the sound files. It is not possible to upload both file types in one batch.

License template and other metadata sub-templates
Some metadata fields also use templates. An example is the metadata field for the license of a mediafile. A Creative Commons license will be recognised by the Toolset and results in the display of the corresponding banner with the license. It is possible to create your own template. This is useful when you've cleared permission to use the content and received an OTRS ticket to include with the files. See this example of an OTRS ticket in a license template. If the text in the license field is not referring to a template, this information will be shown as plain text.

Note: the Wikimedia Commons community is very strict when it comes to permission of files usage. The content is most likely deleted when there is any doubt about copyright infringement or other restrictions that do not permit the use of the file on the Wikimedia platforms. This is why a good license template is an absolute must.

Institution Template
An institution template is used to show what institution donated and/or uploaded the file to commons. The template makes it possible to add more information about your institution than only the name of the institution. An example of an institutional template is this template of the Amsterdam Museum. Usefull information to include in this template is: This template is not required, but highly recommended to include with your uploads.
 * The logo of your organisation
 * A photo of the building of your organisation
 * The location (City, country, etc)
 * The coordinates
 * The URL to your website

An institution template will be recognised by the Toolset. The template mentioned above will be included by the Toolset if the source tag in the XML file has the same name as the template, in this case: Amsterdam Museum.

Source template
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Source_templates

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:British_Library_image

Validating your xml
You can validate your xml file by using the form at http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_validator.asp.

Ampersand and less than ( & < > )
Use of "&" within fields in your xml file can cause unpredictable results. These may be interpreted (correctly) as html encodings of characters, for example "&amp;amp;" will display as "&" on a Commons image page. Floating ampersands in your text like " & " or text that looks like an html encoding but may be abbreviations in English like "&c." for etcetera, are likely to cause the GWT to fail at that record. It is worth searching out and replacing these with "and" or similar, depending on the templates these are going to be used within.

xml relies on to wrap fields. If you are using these in your text you may have to convert them to "&amp;lt;" and "&amp;gt;" or standard brackets to avoid your xml being misinterpreted.

Double-dash ( -- )
The use of double dashes may be unpredictable as these can be interpreted as part of xml comment fields. These are unlikely to be an issue in most cases, but worth changing to single dashes in title fields.

Equals, pipe symbol, question mark, forward slash ( = | ? / )
There are a number of characters that are either not allowed in Commons file names or may (or may not) give problems when used in some templates. For example, to use an equals sign in some templates, you would have to wrap them in double curly brackets, i.e. "=" becomes " = ". It is worth testing out an example in a sandbox if you are going to have to use these in url references, or checking for these if your upload unexpectedly halts.

Bad characters
The xml file read by the GWT is expected to be in UTF-8 character standard format. Most text editors can handle these, but if you are exporting and importing your metadata these may get oddly converted along the way and show in your uploads as invisible or strangely displayed characters. Standard free editors like the open source JEdit or Google spreadsheets have been used to create useable xml files. Ensure that your process for exporting and editing your metadata provides valid UTF-8 or the simpler ASCII standard output on a small sample, before running your whole batch.

Screencast
The following screencast gives you a quick overview of how to use the extension. You can follow along by going to Special:GWToolset and following the wizard instructions. Note: you will need to be a member of the “gwtoolset” group in order to use the extension. Contact a Wikimedia Commons admin to be added to the group.