Editing team/Community Conversations

Welcome! The Editing Team is using this page to collect the research and references that help us to understand the needs and challenges people experience contributing to Wikipedia.

Active Research
In the 2022-2023 fiscal year, the Editing Team will be working on a set of improvements for the visual editor to help new volunteers from within Sub-Saharan Africa understand and apply the policies and guidelines necessary to publish changes they are proud of and projects consider useful.

We are using this page to expand and refine how we understand the needs and challenges people experience when contributing to Wikipedia so that we can ensure the people we are centering in this work benefit from the solutions we are working on.

Patterns
''This section will contain patterns that relate the salient pieces of information gathered in the "Notes" section below. Where "patterns" in this context means hypotheses, assumptions, needs, etc.''

Community Conversation: 28 October 2022

 * Attendees
 * Notes

Community Conversation: 19 September 2022
Attendees Notes
 * Nicola Ayoub, Mohammed Bachounda, Imelda Brazal, Ilana Fried, Georges Fodouop, Peter Pelberg, and Liam Wyatt.
 * Challenges newcomers face:
 * The editing interfaces newcomers use lack education which lead to the problems shown in the slides we shared,
 * Add content by copying and pasting it directly from a source or adding content without citing a reliable source,
 * Newcomers mistakenly think that they EITHER need to copy the content from a source directly OR paraphrase content from the source without citing it (by fear of plagiarism).


 * Motivations for contributing to Wikipedia:
 * Correct information I considered to be false/incorrect about a topic I’m familiar with,
 * Ensure my/peoples' perspectives/experiences/culture/traditions/customs/food/dress/etc. are accurately represented within the wiki,
 * Experience the joy/satisfaction with adding information for the rest of humanity to see.


 * Challenges with sourcing knowledge
 * The knowledge does not exist digitally
 * The knowledge is not represented in, what mature/Western wikis consider to be, reliable sources of information (e.g. non-written knowledge for instance)


 * Things that Nico, Peter, and the Editing Team ought to remember:
 * Over time, "learning by doing" seems to be a more effective method for teaching newcomers how to contribute to Wikipedia
 * Over time, experienced volunteers at mature wikis have come to expect that every edit be "correct." Gone are the days of adding some text and someone else coming along to add a source to verify it. Newcomers have a high bar to meet.
 * Newcomers who are contributing to Wikipedia by way of participating in a campaign are likely to have different motivations/experiences than people who are arriving to edit by themselves.
 * The checks should not prevent people from contributing content…there is some information that simply cannot be sourced in a way the policies, as they are currently written, consider acceptable. We should not discourage contributions of this sort.

Talk Pages Consultation
A global consultation that took place between February to June 2019, to bring Wikimedians and wiki-minded people together to define better tools for wiki communication. This effort brought volunteers from 20 wikis together with staff from the Wikimedia Foundation to define a product direction for building better tools for on-wiki communication. This product direction was documented in Phase 2 of the Talk Pages Consultation and provided the basis for what would become the Talk Pages Project.