Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Irrelevant/reply (37)

''I think it's been made abundantly clear the level of intellect we're dealing with here. They've basically admitted they've never written a single Wikiepdia article and their desperately flawed logic defending the tool shows they don't know the first thing about how to improve the encyclopedia.''

I know it is frustrating when other editors don't accept your viewpoint prima facie and actually ask you to extend your logic beyond the small scope that you want to deal with. It is tough when people look behind the curtain and question while we should limit our focus and attention to only <1% of the screen and ignore the colossal mountain of OTHER articles, OTHER experiences and OTHER viewpoints when most of your argument is based on them only seeing what you want them to see.

But it is healthy to have civil discourse, though truthfully, it becomes increasingly less civil when folks start dismissing the "intellectual level" of people who simply disagree with them and start assuming omniscience over their editing history and experience.