Help:New filters for edit review/Quality and Intent Filters

Predictions are based on ORES review tool. Wikis without those tools will not have access to the predictions.

Using the filters
In general, the more accurate a filter is, the fewer false positives it finds. But there's a tradeoff: stricter filters also find less of the target population than broader, less accurate filters do.

Because some users value accuracy while others require more inclusive results, filters with different levels of both are provided. Note that some of these levels overlap: the "May have problems" filter is the broadest; "Likely have problems" finds a subset of those results; and the narrowest filter, "Very likely have problems," finds a subset of "Likely have problems".

Contribution quality predictions

 * Very likely good
 * Highly accurate at finding almost all problem-free edits. 99% prediction accuracy. Finds 92% of problem-free edits


 * May have problems
 * Finds most flawed or damaging edits but with lower accuracy. 15% prediction accuracy. Finds 90% of flawed or damaging edits.


 * Likely have problems
 * Finds half of flawed or damaging edits with medium accuracy. 40% prediction accuracy. Finds 50% of flawed or damaging edits.


 * Very likely have problems
 * Highly accurate at finding the most obvious 10% of flawed or damaging edits. 80% prediction accuracy. Finds 30% of flawed or damaging edits.

User intent predictions

 * Very likely good faith
 * Highly accurate at finding almost all good-faith edits.


 * May be bad faith
 * Finds most bad-faith edits but with a lower accuracy.


 * Likely bad faith
 * With medium accuracy, finds the most obvious obvious 25% of bad-faith edits.