Talk:Localisation statistics

Problems
I want to help updating the localisation statistics, but when I run language/transstat.php, I've got two problems: Thank you, SPQRobin 12:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * When the table is created, I can't scroll to the top of the table, I stay below the table.
 * Language names aren't rendering well (UTF-8?)
 * The default output of the transstat.php is to output the details onto the screen. You can redirect the output to another file using redirection such as  php transstat.php > trans.txt , then use the Unicode enabled text editor to open the output file and copy / paste into the stats page. Hope this can help you. :) Shinjiman 00:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * My first problem was resolved with copying it to another file. But about Unicode, I still couldn't view the characters correctly. I copied it to here, and suddenly I saw I could view it here (on a wiki page) correctly. Strange, but it works :-) SPQRobin 17:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Duplicated language code
"yue" and "zh-yue" is the same thing. -- Tomchiukc 15:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, we know, but "yue" is a kind of redirect to "zh-yue". This allows users to use "zh-yue" if they select "yue". Look at MessagesZh_yue.php where you can see $fallback = 'yue'; this means it uses all messages from "yue". SPQRobin 18:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * See Betawiki for more statistics without duplicated languages... Siebrand 11:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It is in the another way, i.e. the "zh-yue" will redirects to "yue", but not "yue" redirects to "zh-yue". Shinjiman 15:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Picard pcd
bojour, can you put pcd (picard) in the statistics;

adé, Geoleplubo

Vepsian language (Vepsän, vep)
Please include vep (Vepsian language) in these statistics.

Thank You, Igor Brodsky (Игорь Бродский)

How many langages are listed?
It could be nice to add that number somewhere. --almaghi 23:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

en-GB and en-CA - notes
I've seen quite a few problems raised at the En.Wikipedia villagepumps, regarding the en/en-GB/en-CA pages going out of sync. Ie. an admin updates one mediawiki message, but forgets to update the en-GB and en-CA messages. Or a deeper Mediawiki-level issue.

Eg. w:Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 104, and w:Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 115, and w:Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 116 in the last 2 months, and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=50&offset=0&redirs=1&ns0=1&ns4=1&ns10=1&ns12=1&search=%22en-gb%22+prefix%3AWikipedia%3AVillage+pump many older]. Also at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22en-gb%22+prefix%3AWikipedia%3AHelp+desk&title=Special%3ASearch w:Help Desk].

[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Preferences&oldid=571628001#User_profile w:Help:Preferences] currently says "Many messages have been customized at the English Wikipedia but usually only for the default "en - English". It is therefore not recommended to select "en-GB - British English" or "en-CA - Canadian English"." I've seen that same advice given numerous times.

I asked on IRC: "Are there any *actual* uses of/for the en-GB and en-CA settings, anywhere in Wikimedia? (The only variable words I can think of, that might crop up in our interfaces, are "centre, color, gray, organisation"). It's always seemed like a good way for tripling the amount of work that has to be done in keeping things updated...  Couldn't we just apply WP:ENGVAR, and remove those 2 options entirely?"

I was helpfully pointed towards: https://git.wikimedia.org/blob/mediawiki%2Fcore.git/26bc9ba9c8bc436c8ef9fda665f0f87470e3044d/languages%2Fmessages%2FMessagesEn_gb.php and https://git.wikimedia.org/blob/mediawiki%2Fcore.git/26bc9ba9c8bc436c8ef9fda665f0f87470e3044d/languages%2Fmessages%2FMessagesEn_ca.php (55 and 20 changes, respectively) which lists the changes (just in core). The words "categorised, colour, licence, metre, kilometre, programme, digitise, cancelled, centre" (plus variations) seem to be the main words that are different. Plus a couple of that/which switches.

I still tentatively believe that the Cons outweigh the Pros, and we should remove these options; However, I know very little about the issues involved, beyond what I've noted here, so I'll just leave these notes for future contemplation. –Quiddity (talk) 22:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)