Thread:Talk:Article feedback/AFT Calls to action: review and future directions/reply (3)

Why are there no completion rates for the Join CTA?

Well, one of the problems is that it is not "highly unlikely" that rating distracts people from editing, see here and here. Therefore the hypothesis is incorrect, and assuming that you have caused an increase in edits by 2.7% is just boasting without data to back up that claim.

What you need to prove that theory is a 2.7% overall increase in edits when the full deployment is finished.

Risker mentioned that 4 FA-level writers stated they will stop participating in the project because of the AFT.

I know WikiSense, it is unable to determine who the top 5 contributors to an article are. Its just a piece of software, it is unable to read and understand English. If person X adds an infobox to an article (s)he adds a lot of bytes, even if (s)he does not fill in all the parameters. If person Y doublechecks all the sources and corrects a couple of important mistakes its possible that (s)he adds (or even removes) just a couple of bytes. According to WikiSense person X would be a top contributor, but person Y would not.