Thread:Extension talk:Translate/noinclude?

Our wiki uses a lot of transcluded content. Until we found a way to work around this, it had the unfortunate side-effect of creating nested translate tags (which show up in the page's output pages). We've found that we can prevent this by surrounding every &lt;translate> and &lt;/translate> tag with &lt;noinclude> and &lt;/noinclude> tags. Though that solves the problem, it is somewhat cumbersome, and the &lt;/noinclude> tag always shows up at the beginning of the translation editor page as something that ought to be translated (as does the &lt;noinclude> tag at the end). I am hard pressed to think of a reason the translate tags should ever be included in a transcluded page - shouldn't this be the way it behaves by default?