Architecture committee/2016-03-16

(private notes/meeting prep)

Agenda timeline

 * Agenda bashing and action item check 21:00 (5 minutes)
 * Last week+this week’s RfC office hour 21:05 (5 minutes)
 * RfC inbox triage 21:10 (10 minutes)
 * Shepherd assignments 21:20 (5 minutes)
 * Queue for future RfC office hours 21:25 (5 minutes)
 * Other business 21:30 (10 minutes)
 * Next week’s ArchCom agenda 21:40 (10 minutes)

Agenda details/Meeting summary

 * This section equates to the "meeting summary" section in the meeting note template. It's collaboratively edited during the meeting and serves as the official public notes of the meeting.  Attendees: Fill in the important details in this section, but try to keep this concise and NPOV (easy way: use questions).  Put any prep information in this section if appropriate


 * Stuff to slot in (schedule TBD)
 * Architecture committee/Team practices
 * Code of Conduct
 * Action items
 * Gabriel and RobLa - Discuss how to communicate priorities from ArchCom + real-time note conversations
 * Gabriel and RobLa discussed this after the 2016-03-09 meeting; we have some incremental improvements we try
 * David Strine in TPG is helping us figure this out.  He’s going to document his observations of our existing process, and update [[Architecture_committee/Team_practices]]
 * David Strine and RobLa-WMF discussed/edited on Friday.
 * Should we have Rust-style working groups (T123606)?
 * Groups under discussion: Media, API
 * Relationship between Moderation working group (T126605) and Code of Conduct
 * Last week+this week’s RfC office hour
 * Last week: E66/25
 * This week: E66/26
 * Weekly shepherding checkin
 * See latest comments on T125865
 * RfC triage + meeting scheduling
 * MediaWiki-RfCs board “Inbox” column
 * Queue for future RfC office hours:
 * xxxfixme-next week
 * xxxfixme-following week
 * Other business 0:30 (10 minutes)
 * Next week’s ArchCom agenda 0:40 (10 minutes)
 * Next week’s ArchCom agenda 0:40 (10 minutes)

''Note from RobLa: I'm transitioning to a regime where more of the agenda/notes prep can happen on mediawiki.org. Per Good meetings#Note taking, it can be really difficult for a thorough note taker to redact something that wasn't intended for the public minutes, and the transcript is probably less useful for everyone than the summary. The summary takes a little post-meeting time to prepare.''