Extension talk:Page Schemas

Change allowed values
If I change the names of the allowed values (e.g. to correct a typo) I get the message "[new name] is not in the list of the allowed values of the ... property". Is it possible to change the spelling of the allowed values?


 * The ReplaceText extension may help with this, if I understand the issue correctly. Yaron Koren (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Customise templates
This is similar to a query back in 2014 but I wondered if anything had changed. I would like to add some custom information to the template, but each time I edit the Schema and generate pages, this is lost. (In my case I'd like to add a Cargo query which displays a location on a map.) Is this possible, without having to manually cut and paste each time? Thanks. Jonathan3 (talk) 23:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Still no. There's a lot that could be improved in Page Schemas - it's not that popular an extension, I don't think, so it hasn't gotten a lot of attention. Yaron Koren (talk) 03:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * That's a shame, as the ability easily to change the data structure and the associated template/form pages seems invaluable. I found it very useful at the start when working things out. Jonathan3 (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

tooltips in page forms using Cargo
--138.232.124.69 12:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Since switching to Cargo from SMW the tooltips I have on my forms don't display as tooltips. They're just text on the page, even though the schema generator has this notation in it "Show description as pop-up tooltip"


 * I'm guessing that the template is calling #info. That's no longer working because #info is defined by SMW (strangely, SMW includes its own tooltip functionality). I would recommend installing the SimpleTooltip extension - then, if you recreate the template from the schema, the #info calls will hopefully get changed to #tip-text calls. Yaron Koren (talk) 14:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


 * that does it! The new class is actually:  #tip-info  cheers --Anrake (talk) 14:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Jobs not running
I've had several Page Schemas jobs in the queue for over 3 days. I'm adding a new category and want to use it to scaffold the template, form and new semantic properties. I've tried all the tricks I can find to force them to run including changing job_attempts to 0, various combinations of $wgJobRunRate and $wgRunJobsAsync but nothing seems to work. Tonight I tried to delete the jobs and run Generate Pages again, but they still got stuck. I even ran update.php and rebuilt the Semantic index. The last time I used Page Schemas was probably last July. Are there any ideas to force these to run?

MediaWiki 1.28.0 PHP 5.6.33 (cgi-fcgi) MySQL 5.6.38-83.0 Semantic MediaWiki 2.5.5 Page Schemas 0.4.6

--Anrake (talk) 11:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Have you tried calling runJobs.php? Yaron Koren (talk) 14:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * yeah, many times. --Anrake (talk) 14:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * And what happens? Yaron Koren (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * nothing, there's no output, as though the jobs don't exist. Other jobs run, if they exist, but not anything from "pageSchemasCreatePage". showJobs.php outputs 0. --Anrake (talk) 21:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Unregistered users may see only certain fields
Is it possible to configure Page Schemas/MediaWiki so that unregistered users are able to see only certain fields?


 * No. Yaron Koren (talk) 00:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


 * To bad. Is a woraround possible? --138.232.124.69 12:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Could you explain what the need is? Yaron Koren (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm using Mediawiki in combination with PageSchemas to create a DB. Until now the DB is only a working tool, but we plan to go online in a few weeks.

Since it is for the moment a private DB there are some fields in our schemas containing notes that are supposed to be only private notes for the contributors.

Is it possible to cofigure MediaWiki/PageSchemas in such a way, that certain fields may not bee seen by unregistered users? --93.70.101.215 07:45, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Oh, I see - you mean actual data fields; I thought you meant fields within the Special:EditSchema form. In either case, the answer is no. If there's data that you don't want certain users to see, the best solution is to keep it out of the wiki altogether - and it may make sense to create a separate, more restricted wiki to contain just that data. Yaron Koren (talk) 18:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)