Thread:Extension talk:WYSIWYG/Why does the page say that the extension is not actively maintained?

While the instructions and files hosted here haven't been updated in 2 years, the extension has been maintained on github. And most extension pages that *are* actively maintained contain download links to git snapshots and instructions that are far out of date to the version hosted on github, so this actually doesn't seem all that different. Basically, the extension namespace in general is nothing more than a mediawiki github portal filled with broken, out of date instructions these days, so why does this extension get special treatment? Why not slap "not actively maintained" templates on all extensions that have out of date instructions and no development outside github? Doing that would cut Mediawiki's extension count AT LEAST in half.