VisualEditor/Portal/Why/fr

Les chiffres
Le graphe ci dessus montre le taux de captation des nouveaux éditeurs à travers le temps, et le nombre de personne qui éditent activement. Comme vous pouvez le voir, ce n'est pas positif. Wikipédia fait face à une crise du nombre d'éditeurs. Nous éloignons trop de nouveaux, et nous perdons l'essence et la sève de n'importe quel projet collaboratif: les contributeurs.

Cela signifie que nous n'avons pas assez de personne pour faire le travail que nous devons effectuer. Les retards de traitements ne cessent d'augmenter, avec de moins en moins de personnes pour gérer la tache titanesque de Special:NewPages ou pour maintenir les biographies des personnes vivantes (BLPs)

La labellisation des articles stagne à cause du fait que nous n'avons non seulement pas suffisament de main d'oeuvre pour écrire les article, mais aussi pour les relire et les maintenir. Tout le monde connait une histoire d'un domaine sur lequel il a travaillé pour lequel il n'y a pas assez de monde pour faire le travail.

Explications
We've got a problem, and there are many reasons why. Some people go away because they don't want to contribute productively, which is fine. Others go away because they find the community too hostile, or because they can't work out where to find help.

But ultimately, a lot of people leave because editing is just too complex. Back in 2001, when Wikipedia was founded, a lot of big sites expected users to write in markup of various forms, and we were one of them. Writing markup was a common skill in people who worked on the internet, whether that was BBCode, wikimarkup or even straight HTML.

The problem is that it's now 2015, and we are, if not the only major site still using markup, definitely the only one using markup of this complexity.

S'éloigner du wikicode
In 2015, people don't expect to have to learn markup to write something on a website. They're surprised when they come here and do, and most are not enthused by the experience. (We received some confirmation of that in a user test we conducted prior to the launch of VE.)

Many new users don't start off trying to make big changes; they start off trying to make small ones, and yet have to learn markup anyway just to be able to read the editing panel. They get intimidated, and they leave, as our user tests demonstrate.

This need for a better way to edit is something the community has recognized again and again, as early as 2004. We're building the VisualEditor in response; because people have asked for it, and more importantly because people need it.

Wikimarkup is already intimidating to newcomers, and the level of intimidation will only increase as other websites move forward. We're building it because if we don't, that graph is going to look a lot worse in five years.

We're not expecting everyone to use it (the source editor will still be around), and we're not expecting everyone to be convinced. But we're determined to do a good job and determined to demonstrate the impact this software can have.