Article feedback/Public Policy Pilot/Additional Pages

We are compiling a list of 50 additional articles to apply the Article Feedback Tool on. The objective of putting the tool on these pages is to see the before/after ratings for articles that undergo significant changes and/or spikes in readership. The first and foremost question we're trying to answer is: Do reader ratings (in aggregate or segmented) reflect useful observations of quality, or are they too superficial to be useful? These pages should therefore meet the following criteria:


 * 1) Articles where we know there will be a significant amount of edit activity in the coming 1-2 months.
 * 2) Are not yet substantially written.

For example:
 * True Grit (2010 film) is a good candidate since the movie which will be release in December, yet the article is still short.
 * Tron: Legacy is not a good candidate. Even though the movie will be released shortly, the article is already pretty long.

Please add articles to this list:


 * True Grit (2010 film)
 * Black Friday
 * Based on last year, we can expect a reasonable amount of good-faith and bad-faith edits. There was no substantial expansion, so we shouldn't count on a measurable increase in quality. It would be interesting to observe how vandalized revisions are rated.
 * Egyptian Parliamentary Election, 2010
 * Kosovon Parliamentary Election, 2010
 * Haitian General Election, 2010
 * 98th Grey Cup
 * Other sports articles would be interesting, too, as they typically undergo fairly dramatic expansion during the event.