Extension talk:Media Viewer/About

Why does Media Viewer appear again?
I do not know how often I've disabled the Media Viewer. It appears regularly even though I do not delete cookies. Please provide a means to deactivate it permanently. It's really annoying.


 * Agreed. Every few days the Media Viewer is back. I don't delete cookies, I don't mess with my browser or switch browsers, but every few days the Media Viewer feature is back. Either your server doesn't recognize its own cookies or it's on purpose to try to make the media viewer look more popular than it is. This is precisely why it should be opt-in only. I don't want it yet you're always forcing it on me. 5:15 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Me too. I hate the media viewer. The old way was much better. Don't even get me started on how bad the mobile interface for images is. 199.66.183.2 18:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Bad code protected by someone in Wikipedia for others who get paid to manage this mess. Run it and suddenly your browser 'back' button doesn't work correctly anymore. Why? Because, contrary to with every other media viewer out there, the geniuses behind this software design nightmare treat a media view not as a popup (which it truly is) but as a new page (which is ridiculous). This is very embarrassing for Wikipedia.


 * Doubly agreed, the old way was much more efficient and wasn't plagued with bugs. I too have to constantly disable the Media Viewer. It used to be every few weeks now it's been every other day. I had to create this account and then sign up with their internal software development board just to report this bug, since there was no other way to let them know that this was an issue. Which means they have no idea if there's only a handful of users with this issue or if it's tens of thousands, because only a rare few would jump through the multiple hoops to get there to report the bug. If that wasn't bad enough they expected me to debug it for them. I am not a programmer, I know nothing about how to do that, and it's not my problem. Tthe development team should be tracking down the bugs. I gave them all the particulars, they know the OS and browser, and all that, they have all they need to reproduce the bug.
 * ...You know, given how buggy it is, making the default for the viewer as "On" was a terrible mistake. It should default to off. You should have to opt in/enable it to use the media viewer. --Ikaruseijin 03:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ...You know, given how buggy it is, making the default for the viewer as "On" was a terrible mistake. It should default to off. You should have to opt in/enable it to use the media viewer. --Ikaruseijin 03:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

What is the Media Viewer?
My Browser can show, enlarge, and download Media. Why wasting time and money for a Media Viewer?
 * Ah that's easy to explain. There are some people in the Wikipedia organisation who have friends outside the organisation, they're all essentially without talent, but they were in need in a major way of additional funding. Does that answer your question?

In addition, the functions mentioned not bring the desired result. If I were a part of the image from an image viewer Meida magnify covers. It it a shame when a tool deteriorates the normal functions of the browser.
 * Unbelievable. After all this time, after all the documented complaints, bugs, etc, this 'piece of work' is still around. When I click on 'More details' it goes back to Wikimedia's standard image display and file summary. Sort of like a 5th wheel, put there by a couple of apparent petty dictator types at the Foundation who insist on putting their 'pet project' in everyone's face in complete defiance of editors (without whom Wikipedia overall would not exist) and in total disregard of all the bugs that have been brought to their attention, repeatedly. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

More details button
"More details about this file" or German "Weitere Einzelheiten" is not the correct text for the user searching for the commons page - this is the link for the people who whishes the more comlicated and more informative page and who will understand the file description pages, therefore some more text is nessesary for this kind of user.

If someone is not satisfied with the things, the Mediaviewer shows him, this is a guy who hates pages with the Mediaviewer design! It is a user who likes pages containing much information and much written text.

I know that many people simply don't understand file description pages. But in fact I don't understand this, as to me the first time I read such a page I understood everything whithout thinking about it.

If I am a new user, I hate pages containing some symbols to click on, but no text explaining what the symbols are for - you have to try each button, as no text is given. Additionally I read a file description page in some seconds, but need a minute to get the same information with the Media Viewer, as everything I may need is some clicks away or will move when I touch it. And usually I am searching for the bit of information the normal user never thinks of. If I search for something special on a file description page I usually see it in the very moment I look first on the page, one look and I have it. With the Mediaviever - twenty clicks and I know it is not there and I need the file description page.

Therefore at the end of the page, where most people don't look, there should be a line starting with the Symbol and "More details about this file" or German "Weitere Einzelheiten" and than explaining that you find a editable file description page, with more information and categories containing similar images and gallery pages. This is a link that should have some text, as the ones searching for this link are the readers and they are not the clickers! They don't need bigger buttons they need more text.

--Kersti (talk) 10:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

I hate the About | Discussion | Help links
They look like they go to some page related to the image, like the image description and talk page. But instead they go to the Media Viewer pages and that's extremely counter-intuitive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Kumamoto_earthquakes#/media/File:Topographic_northern_kyushu.png
I don't understand this map--it doesn't look like the earth.--193.163.223.128 18:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Protein_translation.gif#/media/File:Protein_translation.gif
Does that one protein have to be so phallic?

Hi
Is Everyone still alive?
 * I've got bad news: No. Even you are going to die eventually (although I believe some who are alived will be raptured to the Heavens).--193.163.223.128 18:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm still alive, but I gave up arguing about this unsatisfactory piece of software ages ago. I disabled it so long ago that I had virtually forgotten that it ever existed. LynwoodF (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Wrong transcription
The colophon shown is from the Sachsenspiegel. However, what is given as "the text reads" is not a transcription of the colophon shown but obviously of the one of Formulare und deutsch rhetorica.

Transcription of the colophon shown:

Chye endet sich der sachsenspiegel mitt ordnung des rechten den der erwirdig in got vater und herr Theodoricus von bockßdorf bischof zu neünburg säliger gecorrigieret hat. Gedruckt und volendt von Anna Rügerin in der keyserlichen stat Augspurg am oftermontag nächst vor Johannis do man zalt nach Cristi gepurt MCCClxxxiiii jar

Media viewer is clunky
How do I look at pictures the normal way? When I clicked on one of the small pictures in an article my first impression was that I had left wikipedia. When I click on "More details" it takes you right back to the normal wikipedia image. Why is this viewer even here? Can I disable it?
 * #How can I turn off this feature? --Tacsipacsi (talk) 15:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Don't offer to "Open in Media Viewer" for unsupported types
Hi there, thanks for a great extension. I understand that PDF, MP3 file types are not supported yet. If so, I would suggest to *not* offer the "Open in Media Viewer" button in the file page for such unsupported files, because at the moment all I see is a rather confusing error message: Sorry, the file cannot be displayed There seems to be a technical issue. You can retry or report the issue if it persists. Error: File does not exist: File:Fileicon-pdf.png Note that the file I was trying to open has a completely different name, so the file does exist (I can download it), but the error is bogus. Thanks. 91.125.85.186 12:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Can you show a specific example? The button does not show up for me on unsupported file types (e.g. here). --Tgr (WMF) (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Uhm... it's a private wiki, but I took a screenshot. How do I upload a file here please? I tried to create an account, but no luck... Thanks. Hopefully Acceptable Username (talk) 18:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

You can file a bug in our bug tracker and upload it there, that's less trouble. --Tgr (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * OK thanks, it's here. Thanks. Hopefully Acceptable Username (talk) 20:03, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Transparency in SVG images
It might better fit the Media Viewer's function if the background of transparent parts of SVG files was displayed in white or the same light grey background that is displayed for SVG transclusions on pages. Has there been a deliberate decision against that? --Marsupium (talk) 19:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The transparent parts on pages are really transparent – the thumbnail box itself is grey. Of course, a black background wouldn’t be good. The checked background is from the file description pages and I think it’s absolutely OK. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 21:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The checkered background was added to address T59620. (There was more discussion but I don't remember where exactly.) Commons uses the same background FWIW. --Tgr (WMF) (talk) 07:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I see. --Marsupium (talk) 15:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Not touch screen enabled ?
Had to disable this because trying to two finger zoom on my touch screen just increases the browser font size and does not zoom the image. Unless this was a fault on my end ?

Italian Language in Istria County
Italian language is in official use trough all the Istria County, not only in west part of the peninsula: https://www.istra-istria.hr/index.php?id=587 --87.0.140.134 15:51, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

selamun aleykum
Lokman Suresi 19. Ayet ve Hucurat Suresi 2. Ayetten 7. Ayete kadar,

Lokman Suresi 12'den 20. Ayete kadar, Hucurat 1'den 13. Ayete kadar, Humeze Suresi tamamı, Kalem Suresi 10'dan 17. Ayete kadar, Maide Suresi 3, 90-91-92-93-94 Bakara 159'dan 178'e kadar, 219, 254, 260'tan 286'ya kadar, Al İ İmran 19, 39, 103'den 107'ye kadar ve 186*187. Ayetler, Nisa Suresi 29, 48, 78-79, 85-86-87, 110, 123, 148-149 ve 160-161. Ayetler, Nahl Suresi 115, Enam Suresi 115, 145, Rad Suresi 13'den 17'ye kadar, İsra Suresi 18'den 40'a kadar ve 53, Tevbe Suresi 30 öncesi ve sonrası 34-35, 60, 84, İbrahim Suresi ilk 4 ayet

- Bakara Suresi 159'dan 178'e kadar, 190'dan 195'e kadar, 219,275-282. Ayete Kadar,

- Al-i İmran Suresi 19, 39, 103'den 107. Ayete kadar, 130-134 Arası Ayetler, 186/187. Ayet,

- Rum Suresi 20'den 31. Ayete kadar, 39. ve 41. Ayetler,

- Nur Suresi 1. Ayetten 35. Ayete Kadar,

- Muhammed Suresi 15. Ayet,

- Mutaffifin Suresi 24-28 Arası Ayetler,

- İsra Suresi 18. Ayetten 40. Ayete Kadar, 53. Ayet,

- Lokman Suresi 12. Ayetten 20. Ayete Kadar,

- Furkan Suresi 68. Ayetten 72. Ayete Kadar,

- Hucurat Suresi 1. Ayetten 12. Ayete Kadar,

- Hümeze Suresi (Tamamı),

- Kalem Suresi 10. Ayetten 17. Ayete Kadar,

- Nisa 1,2,3 29, 48, 78/79, 116, 148/149, 160-161. Ayetler...

Kuranın tüm Ayetleri de tabii ki önemli...

SURAH (sure) verses (ayetler) MAIDE 3, 32, 90, 91, 92 and 116-117.

SURAH NISA verses 29, 78-79, 148, 149 160, 161,

SURAH MUHAMMED verses 4, 15,

SURAH ENFAL verse 42, 67,

SURAH AL-I IMRAN verses 50-51-.......-60, 103...-107, 186-187,

SURAH TAHA verses (all)

SURAH BAKARA verses 159...-178, 190...-195, 219, 254 verses

SURAH NUR verses 1-2-3...-35

SURAH ISRA verses 18-.(32-33)..-40, 53,

SURAH FURKAN verses 68-69-70-71

SURAH AHZAB verses 57-58-59-60

SURAH KEHF verses 23-24, SURAH LOKMAN verses 12-...-19...-20,

SURAH HUCURAT verses 1-...13 (11-12),

SURAH SAD verses 21-...27

SURAH HUMEZE verses (All), SURAH KALEM verses 10...-17, READ QURAN.

SURAH TEVBE verses (All) verses 34-35 60, SURAH NECM verse 39, SURAH HADID verse 20, (16...-23) Please search for Jesus is Nebi and Rasul. Not GOD. God is one. ALLAH. Please search for sneeze (Hadiths)

english: http://www.islamandquran.org/

turkish:

http://meal.ihya.org/kurandan-ayetler/kuranda-gecen-savas-ile-ilgili-ayetler.html,

http://meal.ihya.org/kurandan-ayetler/kuranda-gecen-adam-oldurmek-ile-ilgili-ayetler.html

http://www.mumsema.org/misafir-sorulari/230463-sozunde-durmak-ile-ilgili-ayet-ve-hadisler.html Görmek, İşitmek, Kalp, Akıl, Tefekkür, selam verme, alma, Tedebbür, Kıraat, ile ilgili ayetlere veya ilgili ayetler var mı şeklinde bunları arama motoruna aratın. Şirk/ Müşrik, küfür/inkar eden/görmezlik eden/ gizleyen/ örten/ nankör, fısk/fasıklık münafıklık, büyük günahlar, körlük, sağırlık, bilenler, bilmeyenler, ile ilgili ayetlere bkz.