Talk:Semantic Bundle/LQT Archive 1

Just thinking...
Nice stuff. How about getting the 'missing' extensions into the MediaWiki SVN also, and possibly stuff all of them in a subfolder 'SemanticMediaWiki' or 'SemanticBundle', instead of having them all at the top level of trunk/extensions/? siebrand 00:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for looking into this. By the 'missing' extensions, do you mean the ones that aren't in SVN at all, or the ones that don't have a tag in SVN, or both? And what's the advantage of grouping them into one place? Yaron Koren 13:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * By missing I mean the extensions that are not yet in svn.wikimedia.org. The advantage of having them all in that svn repo is that all extensions can be (a) supported by translatewiki.net, so have more than excellent localisation, and (b) there are a lot of MediaWiki developer eyes on that svn, which may have a positive effect on the number of Semantic* developers. Grouping them into one place will give the bundle more profile, IMO - aside from allowing developers to check out the trunk for the bundle at once, instead of having to grab the latest versions from wherever they reside. Last but not least: all developers on the Semantic bundle can join forces and all work on the complete bundle. Cheers! siebrand 17:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)