Thread:Talk:Continuous integration/Task management/Proposal for continuous integration 2012/reply (6)

Thanks the the input!


 * I'd support having integration.mediawiki.org be linked to a (yet to be created) WMF Labs instance instead of running it in the production cluster. That would solve the concern of executing code server side
 * SauceLabs (from quick first impression), however, doesn't look like an alternative for TestSwarm but as an alternative for BrowserStack. TestSwarm distributes test suites to connected clients and aggregates results from unit tests. We can simply set up TestSwarm to only accept BrowserStack clients (or SauceLabs clients). That solves two problems: Firstly no longer a problem to have arbitrary JS, secondly it would avoid issues like the the situation we had last year where someone would join the swarm with an unsupported browser that has a user agent that looks like a supported browser and messing up the build reports.