Core Platform Team/Initiatives/Adding Multiple Identity Providers to PluggableAuth

Poll
Team members are invited to voice support or opposition, and give their reasoning.
 * Better support for different authentication models and exercise of alternate code paths, and increases the familiarity on Platform Engineering Team with the authentication code that we are responsible for. CCicalese (WMF) (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * While the functionality proposed here isn't super important to WMF, familiarity with the authentication code is crucial in case something breaks. This project would provide an opportunity to build that familiarity. We should do it. -- DKinzler (WMF) (talk) 18:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree that the idea has merit, but personally I have no interest in working on this. PPchelko (WMF) (talk) 19:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Standardized auth methods are preferred. Not sure I would make this a high priority project
 * Seems like both useful functionality for third parties, and a good vehicle for exploring the authentication code. I would be happy to work on it if priorities allow. BPirkle (WMF) (talk) 15:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed with other sentiments as a great opportunity for familiarity with auth code, but not necessarily highest priority since its my understanding we should be prioritizing WMF-specific projects over community-supporting projects. But happy to help and learn about auth. NNikkhoui (WMF) (talk)

Please use the polling templates, for example: