VisualEditor/Usability

Usability of VisualEditor

This page shows the status of the usability of VisualEditor, based on tests with people who have never edited Wikipedia. The purpose of these tests is to determine if common editing tasks are possible for anyone to complete. (These tests assume that a user wants to make an edit and can find the edit button. See the design research page for more about the overall experience of editing.)

Priorities for improvement

Based on the status below, the highest priority to improve is creating a link.

Basic editing tasks - high priority

More advanced editing tasks - lower priority

VisualEditor on mobile tablet

Below are more details about testing each of these tasks.

Entering text
2 - Minor usability problem: fixing this should be given low priority

Positive Feedback  Most users felt comfortable adding or editing text. "It looks like a word document."

Test 1 + Test 2

Finding things in the toolbar
2 - Minor usability problem: fixing this should be given low priority

Positive Feedback  Most users found the right tool immediately or looked through toolbar menus from left to right.

Negative Feedback  When 1 user couldn't find something they looked to the left sidebar under tools, which has nothing to do with editing the article.

Test 1 + Test 2

Create new sections
0 - Not a usability problem

Positive Feedback  All users tested had no problems creating new headings or subheadings.

Test 1 + Test 2

Creating a link
3 - Major usability problem: important to fix, so should be given high priority

Summary Users don't realize that the link's search results are actual pages on Wikipedia.

Negative Feedback When asked to make a simple link (to a title with exactly the same text as the link) some users were able to complete the task. But they were not sure that they had completed successfully.

"I was expecting something like a page. I guess this is already a link? But I'll just click Done."

"I don't know wether this is functional link because it doesn't have a page connect, it needs to be connected to some other page, but it seems for the sake of the test to have worked..."

Negative Feedback  When asked to make a more complicated link (to a different title from the link text) only 2 out of 5 tested were able to complete the task. Only 1 of those 2 were sure that the completed successfully.

Recommendations  Give users more information about the page they will be linking to. Design for links

Test 3

Creating an external link
4 - Catastrophic usability problem: imperative to fix before product can be released.

Summary There is no clear place to enter an external link.

Negative Feedback 0 of 5 users were able to complete this task. Most didn't realize that you could paste a URL into the link search field. Many looked all over the toolbar, and even the left sidebar and top navigation for some way to add an external link.

Recommendations  Give users explicit interface to add an external link. Design for links

Test 3

Creating a citation
2 - Minor usability problem: fixing this should be given low priority

Positive Feedback  Most users found the way to add a citation with no trouble. It is a long process but all were able to complete the task.

Test 2

Editing an existing citation – *Updated, needs testing*
3 - Major usability problem: important to fix, so should be given high priority

Summary Users don't know how to find existing citations.

Negative Feedback Users scrolled back and forth from references at bottom to citations in article, tried to do Find on this page, and were confused by citation tooltips.

Recommendations  Show more information about the citation in tooltip. Design resolved

Test 2

Adding an image
2 - Minor usability problem: fixing this should be given low priority

Positive Feedback  Most users, after some searching were able to find a way to add a picture. Once a user had added a picture, some they weren't sure that they had successfully added it to the correct place.

Test 1

Saving
1 - Cosmetic problem only: need not be fixed unless extra time is available on project

Positive Feedback  Most users saved easily and felt they had done it right. One user wanted to fill out a detailed edit summary and struggled to remember what she had changed.

Recommendations Allow user to see their changes more easily

Test 1

Creating a table
*Needs additional testing* (Has been casually tested)

3 - Major usability problem: important to fix, so should be given high priority

Summary Creating a simple table is easy. A user gets a 4x4 table with a header row at the top, and it is easy to enter content. But if the user doesn't want a header, it is very difficult to remove.

Negative Feedback 0/4 users could find the way to change the header.

Editing existing table
*Needs additional testing*

2 - Minor usability problem: fixing this should be given low priority

Summary If a table is set up correctly, it is very easy to edit content.

Negative Feedback 0/4 users could find the way to change the header.

Creating a template
*Needs testing*

Editing existing template
*Needs testing*

Lists
*Needs testing*

2 - Minor usability problem: fixing this should be given low priority

Negative Feedback 2/5 users had trouble creating a new bullet in a list. In a test asking users to add a link to the external link section of an article, they were hesitant to click into the section and add a new bullet. "I don't want to delete the text here." 

Test 3

VisualEditor on mobile tablet
*Needs testing*

Currently VisualEditor on mobile is broken and unable to be tested.

Testing methods
Nielsen’s Heuristic Ratings are assigned to each task based on the design research team's observations of the user, and the number of users able to complete the task.