Toolserver:Labs-Moving-Survey

The following survey should show how eager the tool-authors are of moving to (Tool-)Labs. You are allowed to vote if you have or had a toolserver-account. This survey will start at 2. May 0:00 UTC and will end at 16. May 24:00 UTC.

Survey
I plan to…


 * …move as soon as possible.
 * 1) Siebrand (CommonsDelinker)


 * …move somewhen this year.
 * 1) grphack (aka halfak || EpochFail || Aaron Halfaker)
 * 2) Euku (with SpBot, not included projects wppb and dewpmp)
 * 3) ACC (at the Amsterdam Hackathon)
 * 4) apper, as soon as I have some time to do so, but not before there is at least some useful documentation (I hope this didn't mean stay as long as possible)
 * 5) MZMcBride # Assuming Labs is more stable.


 * …stay as long as possible.
 * 1) MF-Warburg
 * 2) Svick
 * 3) AleXXw, perhaps next option (let's see how laboriously the moving is...)
 * 4) --Krd 06:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * …not move at all.
 * 1) Mono - I don't have time to mess with the never-ending maze of instances and projects on labs unless someone at the WMF or WMDE does it for me.
 * 2) Hydriz - I am already using Labs a lot, but I rather have two "Toolserver"s so that users can have an option to use either one.


 * I have already moved
 * 1) addshore (with tools and addbot)
 * 2) cyberpower678 (for the most part).  I didn't want to but, from what I gathered, it toolserver was going to die no matter what.  Both sides have advantages.  To server has replication and ease of setup while labs allows you ton install MediaWiki.  I needed MediaWiki for some of my work.  After considering all of this, I thought to move because it was either now or when toolserver supposedly dies.  I still have all of my stuff idling on toolserver and am willing to stay if it does stay alive. —cyberpower  ChatHello! 01:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC)