User:Qgil-WMF/Sandbox

Good practices

 * Common understanding
 * We are a community with a foundation, not a foundation with a community.
 * All documentation in mediawiki.org - including value proposition and user documentation.
 * Easier to maintain, promote and watch.
 * OSS development context clear. Links to/from Bugzilla etc are natural.
 * Simplified, adapted intros can be created in Wikimedia projects when deployment comes.
 * Calls for feedback point to a central point in mediawiki.org.
 * Criticism happens next to the core docs and it's easier to integrate.
 * Less risk of Wikipedia-centrism. Neutral field for all Wikimedia projects and 3rd parties.
 * Less risk of duplicated discussions in different places.

Wikimania

 * Submission no.


 * Title of the submission:

The Wikimedia open source project and you


 * Type of submission (discussion, hot seat, panel, presentation, tutorial, workshop):

Presentation


 * Author of the submission:

Quim Gil


 * E-mail address:

qgil@undefinedwikimedia.org


 * Username:

Qgil


 * Country of origin:

Catalonia (Spain)


 * Affiliation, if any (organisation, company etc.):

Wikimedia Foundation


 * Personal homepage or blog:

http:// tbd


 * Abstract (at least 300 words to describe your proposal):

Join this session to learn and discuss how tech and non-tech Wikimedia contributors can collaborate more effectively, fighting less, enjoying the ride together. Learn how we the Wikimedia movement could connect better mediawiki.org, beta features, tech ambassadors, Tech News, Village Pumps, Bugzilla, Wikitech, hackathons, editathons, wikiprojects, chapters, user groups, grants, donations, universities, education programs, technical internships, and some of our neighbors in the open knowledge and free software communities. Where are you in this map? How can you become a better technical contributor?

Wikimedians consider Wikimedia a free culture movement. When Wikimedians think of free culture, most of us tend to think in free texts, free media, and just recently also free data. Many understand that free software – open source software – is needed to pursue our movement goals. That understanding, though, frequently suffers from the old and perverse dichotomy opposing Humanities versus Technology: problems with content belong to us editors; technical problems belong to someone else, paid to deliver the features and fixes we need. This is a replication of the old-school paradigm of the publisher owning a site and hiring a webmaster. As an Internet movement, we can do better than this.

Let's look at the Wikimedia movement from a technical perspective, as a free software project. In fact, Wikimedia is one of the biggest, most diverse and most mature free software projects out there, although only just a few know, or even think of us as a software project.

Just like any word in Wikipedia is also a string of bits, any Wikimedia editor is also a technical contributor. Open knowledge contributors and free software developers share many motivations but, just like different fraction within a same party, they can disagree and misunderstand each other like total opposites. The good news is that we have all the pieces needed to turn this tech / non-tech divide into an integrated tech-friendly community working together for everybody's own benefit. We just need to connect these pieces in the right order.


 * Track:


 * Technology, Interface & Infrastructure


 * Length of session (if other than 30 minutes, specify how long):

30 minutes


 * Will you attend Wikimania if your submission is not accepted?:

Yes


 * Slides or further information (optional):


 * Special requests:

Interested attendees
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with a hash and four tildes. ( # ~ ).'''


 * 1) Add your username here.