Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements/Frequently asked questions/fr





Comment activer ou désactiver Vector 2022


Comment puis-je le désactiver au niveau individuel, sur un o tous les wikis ?
Tout d'abord, vérifiez d'être connecté. Les utilisateurs non connectés ne peuvent pas changer d'habillage.

Voir aussi :
 * Pourquoi les appelez-vous Vector 2022 et Vector Legacy ?



Pourquoi le lien de désactivation n'est-il pas disponible pour les utilisateurs déconnectés ?
Cela est dû à la capacité limitée de nos serveurs. Les utilisateurs non connectés peuvent utiliser des extensions du navigateur qui leur permettent de personnaliser leur interface, ou ils peuvent se créer un compte.

Voir aussi


 * Pourquoi les utilisateurs non connectés n'ont pas de préférences ?



Comment Vector 2022 peut devenir par défaut pour tous sur mon wiki Wikimédia de référence ?
Contactez nous. Nous présenterons le projet à votre communauté et entamerons une discussion.



Comment puis-je l'activer sur mon propre wiki personnel ?
Si vous voulez voir nos changements,


 * 1) Assurez-vous d'avoir téléchargé
 * 2) Ajoutez les lignes suivantes dans votre  :

Nous sommes heureux d'apprendre que vous appréciez nos améliorations !



Comment personnaliser Vector 2022 ?


Pourquoi ne donnez-vous pas le choix entre différentes versions des fonctionnalités ?
Ce serait trop compliqué à développer et entretenir.

Chaque préférence est comme un carrefour où les utilisateurs peuvent choisir entre des options. Plusieurs choix comportent plusieurs combinaisons. Les préférences nous engageraient pour toutes les combinaisons. Nous aurions à les maintenir, et aussi, dans le cas de nouvelles fonctionnalités, à vérifier si les fonctionnalités seraient compatibles avec chaque combinaison. Nous ne pouvons pas prendre en charge tout ça.

Au lieu de cela, nous donnons aux communautés la possibilité de créer des gadgets, des scripts utilisateur et des configurations personnalisées. Comme toujours, nous fournissons un environnement propice à la créativité ascendante, et nous aidons les utilisateurs aux compétences techniques à entretenir leur code.

Voir aussi : 
 * Faites-en une préférence utilisateur

Pourquoi les utilisateurs anonymes n'ont pas de préférences ?
Les préférences pour les utilisateurs anonymes rendrait le chargement des pages trop lent.

La plupart du trafic est généré par des utilisateurs non connectés. Pour gérer cela, nous disposons de quelques « serveurs de mise en cache » qui ne font que sauvegarder et envoyer des « instantanés » des pages web. Ces « instantanés » qui datent de 7 jours au maximum remplacent les pages web générées et elles sont les mêmes pour tous les utilisateurs non connectés. Cela nous permet de donner accès aux pages rapidement.

Les préférences demanderaient de générer différentes versions des pages web. Faire cela pour les utilisateurs non connectés surchargerait nos serveurs. Nous ne voulons pas le faire aussi parce que nous avons besoin de réduire la fragmentation de la mémoire cache.

L'unique façon de fournir des Préférences pour les utilisateurs non connectés actuellement serait de faire en sorte que les paramètres se chargent toujours après la page. Cela prendrait beaucoup plus de temps à télécharger et paraîtrait bizarre. Par exemple, si un utilisateur non connecté voulait utiliser le mode sombre, immédiatement après le chargement de chaque page il verrait d'abord l'interface claire pendant un bref instant et seulement après l'interface deviendrait sombre.

Pour donner du contexte : l'unique raison pour laquelle nous avons les préférences pour les utilisateurs connectés est que nous ne leur fournissons pas des « instantanés ». Et cela est possible car le trafic en provenance des utilisateurs connectés est faible.

Voir aussi :


 * How a new data center in Singapore is helping people access Wikipedia around the globe
 * Building DReaMeRS : How and why we opened a datacenter in France
 * Why performance matters



Que faites-vous pour les éditeurs qui ont besoin d'outils et fonctionnalités spécifiques ?

 * Nous contactons des bénévoles qui ont des compétences techniques pour assurer la rétrocompatibilité. Nous leur demandons de vérifier le code qu'ils ont écrit, et nous leur proposons de les aider si le code doit être modifié.
 * Nous permettons de configurer et de personnaliser nos changements. Nous sommes ravis de collaborer avec les bénévoles qui ont des compétences techniques qui veulent créer des nouveaux gadgets et scripts utilisateur.
 * Nous ne remplaçons pas le travail des bénévoles ayant des compétences techniques. A priori, nous ne modifions pas les modèles et ne créons pas de nouveaux gadgets, mais nous pouvons donner des conseils au besoin.



Réparez-vous les gadgets qui ne fonctionnent plus avec vos changements ?
Ça dépend.

Nous aidons les bénévoles qui corrigent les gadgets et les scripts utilisateur. Parfois, nous les réparons nous-même. Mais, en général, nous travaillons sur le MediaWiki lui-même. Les gadgets et les scripts utilisateur sont écrit et maintenus par des bénévoles. Par leur nature, ceux-ci sont toujours moins stables et prévisibles.

Si vous n'êtes pas sûr de comment réparer un gadget ou un script – contactez-nous ! Nous ferons de notre mieux pour vous donner des conseils sur les solutions possibles.

Voir aussi :


 * Tech sur Meta-Wiki – là aussi vous pouvez demander du support technique
 * User:Jdlrobson/Extension:Gadget/Policy – une proposition de policy sur les rôles et les responsabilités liées aux gadgets et aux scripts utilisateurs



Quelles classes CSS convient-il d'utiliser pour personnaliser le Vector 2022 ?

 * pour les deux habillages
 * pour Legacy Vector (l'ancien Vctor)
 * pour Vector 2022



Comment rétablir la pleine largeur ?
Voir aussi :


 * Modifications de Vector 2022 : nouveau gadgets et scripts utilisateur

How to disable the sticky elements?
Ajoutez le code CSS suivant à votre global.css :


 * Entête – ajoutez
 * Sommaire – ajoutez



Comment rétablir l'ancien sommaire ?
Utilisez le code JavaScript suivant : 

Comment faire apparaître le bouton avec les liens interlangues en haut de la page d'accueil ?

 * 1) Demandez à votre communauté son accord pour mettre en place le titre de la page d'accueil. (Voir notre explication des raisons pour lesquelles c'est une bonne idée).
 * 2) Le titre s'affichera sur Vector 2010, Minerva, Timeless et Vector 2022. Ne sera pas visible sur Monobook.
 * 3) Le titre peut être configuré en modifiant MediaWiki:Mainpage-title-loggedin pour les utilisateurs connectés et MediaWiki:Mainpage-title pour les utilisateurs non connectés. Pour les utilisateurs connectés sur mobile, modifier MediaWiki:wikimedia-mobile-mainpage-title-loggedin. Voir les détails qui concernent les paramètres de la page d'accueil.
 * 4) Testez à quoi ressemble la page d'accueil et comment elle fonctionne avec le bouton en haut de la page, en ajoutant le paramètre   à la fin de l'URL. Voir l'exemple de la Wikipédia en islandais. Remarquez que la Wikipédia en islandais n'a pas de titre configuré, donc seul le bouton apparaît.
 * 5) Contactez-nous et demandez nous de déplacer le bouton vers le haut.
 * 6) Nous modifierons les paramètres de votre wiki.
 * 7) À ce moment là, le bouton sera visible en haut de la page avec Vector 2022. Avec d'autres habillages, la liste des liens des langues s'affichera à l'emplacement par défaut, qui est différent pour chaque habillage.



Comment rétablir l'ancien menu utilisateur ?
Actuellement cela n'est pas possible.

<span id="How_to_change_the_logo_to_a_temporary_one?">

Comment remplacer le logo avec un logo temporaire ?
Le logo de Vector 2022 est composé de trois éléments, chacun d'entre eux peut être remplacé avec CSS.
 * Pour substituer l'image icône (p.e. le globe de Wikipédia) :
 * Pour substituer le logotype typographique (p.e. le mot "Wikipédia")
 * Pour substituer la tagline (p.e. les mots "L'encyclopédie libre")

Contactez-nous
<span id="How_can_I_contact_your_team?">

Comment puis-je vous contacter ?
Veuillez choisir l'une des options suivantes :
 * Talk page of the main page of the project (you can write in any language)
 * Phabricator task with the Desktop Improvements project tag
 * Contact our Community Relations Specialist: SGrabarczuk (WMF) sgrabarczuk@wikimedia.org
 * Contact one of our ambassadors:
 * French and Italian ambassador: Patafisik (WMF) patafisik-ctr@wikimedia.org
 * Spanish ambassador: Zapipedia (WMF) izapico-ctr@wikimedia.org
 * Vietnamese ambassador: Bluetpp (WMF) ppham-ctr@wikimedia.org
 * Farsi ambassador Mehran (WMF) mehran@wikimedia.org

How can I follow your activities?

 * Subscribe to our newsletter. Instead of messages on your talk page, you will be receiving notifications about the updates.
 * Watch our Updates and Talk to Web pages.

Do you host or attend online meetings?
Yes!

We organize open online meetings for the communities (office hours). At these meetings, Olga (our product manager) makes presentations about the recent developments. Next, community members can ask any questions about the project.

We are also open to invitation to any community event online. These may be local, country-wide, or international meetings.



Is this a redesign?
No.

A redesign would be a single major change which affects how the site works. In the case of this project we have made a series of individual changes. Each feature was a separate small project. At the end, these features were joined together by a cohesive visual design.

What is the timeline of this project?
We have been working on Vector 2022 (originally known as modern Vector) since 2019. Between early 2020 and mid-2022, we were building and releasing different features on "early adopter" wikis. (You can read more about that in the answer to the question below, points 2–4.)

We have finished that part. Vector 2022 isn't "beta" anymore. Currently, we inform about our intention to introduce Vector 2022 on more wikis. By the end of March 2023, we hope that Vector 2022 would be the default skin across almost all Wikimedia wikis.

Why do you use the word Improvements?
Because we have data indicating that the changes are for the better: See also:
 * 1) We identified problems through research with both readers and editors. During this phase, in 2019, we studied the way people used the sites and identified the largest usability issues. We also identified issues to exploring the site further, becoming more engaged with reading or editing. We did this by interviewing readers and editors across multiple countries, locations, and languages. See: Research and design: Phase 1, Research and design: Phase 2.
 * 2) We built and tested prototypes. We built out the ideas of each feature and began showing them to the users. Each feature was tested with readers and editors through interviews and wider rounds of prototype testing. For testing with editors, we used central notice banners. We displayed them across multiple language and Wikimedia projects so that we can get a wide and diverse audience. Each prototype was tested by approximately 200 editors on average. (Example)
 * 3) We refined and built our features. We took the feedback from the prototype testing and refined or changed the prototypes accordingly. In some cases, we asked for additional feedback to ensure we're making the right decisions.
 * 4) We contacted various wikis asking to join the early adopters ("pilot wikis"). This was the "beta" phase. On these wikis, we performed quantitative tests for whether each feature worked as expected.
 * 5) We performed A/B testing on logged-in users. Unfortunately, we are not able to perform these on logged-out users. This is why we make before and after comparisons.
 * 6) When we had the test results, we compared the results with the criteria of success we had previously defined. When we got negative results from our test, we changed the feature and test again.
 * 7) Since this phase, we have also monitored usage across all wikis, where many account holders have already been using Vector 2022.
 * An encyclopedic article: Iterative and incremental development
 * A blog post: The iterative design of the Vector interface: the case of moving interlingual links

On which wikis have you tested these changes?
The pilot wikis where we have been testing Vector 2022 have been:

Ainsi que :
 * Office Wiki
 * 
 * MediaWiki wiki
 * Wikimedia Foundation Governance wiki
 * Collab wiki
 * Strategy wiki

Why do you use this naming: Vector 2022 and legacy Vector?
The new skin is a continuation of many of the ideas in the original Vector skin. It is being built using the code the Vector skin uses. We wanted to maintain functional and visual continuity. Everything built and meant for legacy Vector should be working with our changes, or can be configured to do so fairly easily.

The version built in 2010 and developed until 2019 has been frozen. In other words, we will keep and maintain it, but will not be building new features for it.

We use the name Vector 2022 for purely technical reasons. This name marks when the new Vector was available to third-party wikis as a new skin. (Third parties mean those who install MediaWiki).

On each wiki, the skin name can be overriden by changing MediaWiki:Skinname-vector-2022. However, this may cause confusion since it won't change the associated skin key that is used for site and user styles.

See also:
 * What CSS classes should be used?

Will you remove legacy Vector?
No.

Legacy Vector will continue to be available as an option in Preferences, similar to other skins that have been default in the past, such as Monobook.



Are these changes made for readers, and not for editors?
Not exactly.

Our team (Web) works on the reading (viewing) experience on desktop and mobile browsers. Those who both view and edit, and those who view but do not edit, are one large group of the interface users. We work for all of them, bearing in mind that new and advanced editors have specific needs.

The goal of this project is to improve the reading experience on desktop without making editing more difficult.

That said, our movement strategy recommendations implore us to improve our user experience in an inclusive manner. In this spirit, the project has a specific goal of ensuring the free knowledge grows equitably in the future. When building, we made sure to collect the voices of readers from different demographics and geographies. We also want to make their opinions a focus when defining what we were to work on, and evaluating whether a given idea was able to satisfy their needs.

See also:
 * What do you do to ensure that the change is not half-finished?
 * What do you do for editors who need specific tools and features?
 * Past projects of the Web team

What tools are the Foundation building for editors?
At the Foundation, there are other teams working on projects dedicated specifically to editors. Among them, there are:
 * Community Tech – working on projects selected by the communities during the Community Wishlist Survey
 * Editing – working on the discussion tools
 * Growth – working on the Newcomer experience project
 * Moderator Tools – focusing on the moderation needs of medium-sized Wikimedia projects
 * Anti-Harassment Tools – working on tools for administrators, anti-vandalism patrollers

Do your changes have a negative effect on the editing statistics?
No.

We collect statistics of the editing activity on all wikis. Compared to wikis with Vector legacy (2010) as the default, on wikis with Vector 2022 as the default, there are no negative differences.

Do your changes make it more difficult to explore the community side of the wikis?
No.

Readers and new editors are intimidated by large numbers of links, options, and ways of exploring the editing (in other words, the community) side of the Wikimedia projects. This is a finding of our research.

We want more users to join the communities. We do this by limiting the number of the unhidden links, and bringing additional focus on the most relevant ones. All this is done in collaboration with the Growth and Editing teams.

See also:
 * Core Experiences
 * UX Myth #12: More choices and features result in higher satisfaction

Are you focused on Wikipedia articles?
Yes.

Wikipedia articles, as a whole, have the most part of the viewership and readership compared to other namespaces on Wikipedia or any other projects. We also make adjustments to pages from other namespaces and special pages. Pages which we have made special adjustments and configurations for include: main pages, pages specific to some sister projects, special pages, the 2010 wikitext editor, the 2017 wikitext editor, and the Visual Editor.

We have also been working with the Editing team to ensure that the work they are doing for talk pages aligns with our work, and that special configurations for talk pages are put in place.

Have you been mindful of sister projects?
Yes!

We aim to change the basic elements of the interface. Most features work on the sister projects just as well as they improve Wikipedia. We have made sure to test and build for different sister projects from the beginning of the project. We still make adjustments to the default features where necessary.

Non-Wikipedia projects, such as French Wiktionary, were also a part of our partner communities since 2020. We ensured we have had direct communication and feedback from them.

Regarding the adjustments, for example, on Wikisource, the limited width does not apply to the Page namespace provided by the Proofread Page extension.

Are you focused on English Wikipedia?
No.

We take into account the needs of various communities and test our changes across 30+ languages. We are also inspired by the interface and gadgets built on various wikis, for example Korean and Vietnamese Wikipedias.

What do you do to ensure that the change would work on my wiki?

 * Research we make is relevant to all wikis and includes voices from many different languages and projects.
 * We gather and incorporate feedback from the communities. Most issues are relevant to all wikis.
 * How we adjust our changes to sister projects – go to "Do you remember about sister projects?"
 * What is our approach to gadgets – go "What do you do for editors who need specific tools and features?"

What do you do to ensure that the change is not half-finished?
We make tweaks both before and after we introduce the changes on wikis to make sure they are up to the needs for individual communities. If you think your community would benefit from more adjustments and gadgets, see:


 * What do you do for editors who need specific tools and features?
 * How to customize Vector 2022?

After making these changes on all wikis, we will work on projects related to Desktop Improvements.

Have your changes been tested on users with disabilities?
Yes. We are working with the American Foundation for the Blind. We are asking various questions related to the accessibility of Vector 2022. See more on Phabricator.

Will the wikis be less accessible for users with slow Internet connection?
No.

We want to keep the new skin similarly code-heavy to legacy Vector.

See also:


 * How can I get both the old and the new table of contents?

Are the changes inspired by mobile design?
No.

These changes are created specifically for desktop interfaces. All research and testing done for this project has been focused on desktop users only. We have, however, considered the experiences of people who use desktop in narrower screens (for example, if you have two tabs open side by side).

At this time, we do not have plans to merge the desktop and mobile experiences.

Will the new interface be responsive?
We've been working towards that goal, but it's not an official goal of the project.

If you want to make the interface responsive now and you're using Wikimedia wikis, add

to your global.js.

If your community would like this to be the default, please start a conversation on your wiki, and contact us when consensus is reached. We can then make the change.

Will you build a dedicated setting for high resolutions?
We don't have plans to build a specific setting at this time. We want the experience to be optimized for the majority of users, while still providing the tools necessary at all resolutions. We believe the current version of the new skin does this successfully. That said, we encourage personal customization!

See also:


 * What do you do for editors who need specific tools and features?



Why have you replaced the area used for content by an empty space?
Reading efficiently is crucial to most people using our projects. Our goal here is to improve the readability of the content. There are several factors that affect it – i.e. font size, contrast, font, line length, and empty space.


 * Shorter lines
 * 1) When reading short lines, readers don't move their eyes too much, use the eye's muscles less intensively, thus avoiding eye strain.
 * 2) Narrow paragraphs allow readers to memorize new information better.
 * 3) On websites, there should be between 35 and 100 characters per line. Numbers closer to the smaller end are preferred.
 * 4) The overwhelming number of major websites have similar limitations on content width. For example: academic journals like Nature, news websites like The New York Times, government and intergovernmental websites like the United Nations, academic documents like LaTeX, and word processors like Google Docs and Etherpad.


 * Empty (white) space


 * 1) White space is used for the eyes' resting spots. It helps readers focus on content and increases content comprehension by 20%.
 * 2) People are able to focus more easily without the distraction of sidebars or other elements.
 * 3) We are using some of this space for other functionality. We have made the sidebar sticky, and have placed the table of contents next to the content. Also, limiting the content area gives us new options for the more distant future. Community members have suggested to put infoboxes, images, or references there. As a separate project, we will consider ways of using this space.

See also:


 * UX Myth #28: White space is wasted space

Why can’t we leave it for readers to narrow their browser windows down?
Most users don't resize their browser windows or use browser plugins to improve the design of the websites they view. Wikis should be good-looking immediately, in their basic form.

Some tables and templates don’t fit within the limited width
We should make sure that all of our content is as responsive as possible to accommodate all visitors. A large percentage of our users, who don’t have large screens and are accessing Wikipedia from their laptops, already had issues with tables and templates even before the change.

Why don’t you just make it a setting?
We want it to be default. We are building a common experience that is shared between editors and readers. This could be helpful to editors when making decisions about page layouts*. Currently an editor might be editing a page at a width of 1500px, while a reader reads it at a width of 1200px. By implementing a limited width, we don’t remove this discrepancy (because there would still be variation below the max-width, for people with narrower screens), however we would be greatly limiting the range of variation.

[{note|1= Note: 1024px is mentioned as a minimum size to consider in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style, though that’s not quite the same thing. }}

Why couldn't the list of language links stay in the sidebar?
Because from the readers' perspective, the sidebar is not a place for useful links. Most readers focus on the content area. Links in the sidebar are practically hidden from their sight.

Also, we need to promote the variety of language versions of Wikimedia projects.

For more than 15 years, the list has been displayed in the sidebar. The most active users have developed muscle memory to look for that list in that place. This is why in the sidebar, we have placed a box with information about the language button being displayed in a new place.

Will the Wikidata links be closer to the list of language links?
Yes.

"", "", and "" will eventually be part of the menu activated by the language switching button ("language menu"). This is a task for the Language engineering team.

How to fix the coordinates displaying incorrectly near the languages button?
Consider pages which use page status indicators, pages which have banners or site notices, and the look of the pages at lower resolutions.

<span id="Why_the_button_with_language_links_doesn&#039;t_appear_at_the_top_of_the_main_page?">

Pourquoi le bouton des langues n'apparaît pas en haut de la page d'accueil ?
Nous avons découvert que les lecteurs se concentrent sur le contenu de la page tout en ignorant la barre latérale. Avec le bouton contenant les liens vers les langues apparaît en haut de la page, à côté du titre, ils seront plus portés à passer d'une langue à l'autre.

Sur la plupart des wikis, le titre de la page d'accueil est caché. C'est la raison pour laquelle le bouton des langues ne s'affiche pas à son côté. Au lieu de cela, il se trouve tout en bas de la page d'accueil. Cependant, il est possible de le faire apparaître tout en haut.

Voir aussi :
 * Comment faire apparaître le bouton avec les liens des langues en haut de la page d'accueil ?

Why doesn't the table of contents work well on my mobile device or when I resize the browser?
Users on mobile and resized browsers account for a small fraction of page traffic. Because of this, we chose to build the feature for the majority of our users first. For narrow screens we plan to make the table of contents available as a sticky interface element that's accessible from anywhere in the page.

Note what is displayed to mobile devices differs from what you see when you resize your browser. On mobile devices, the site is currently presented as a zoomed out version of the desktop site.

Why doesn't it appear when I complete an edit?
The feature is still in development (T307251). This will be fixed before we make Vector 2022 the default on more wikis.

Is it possible to change the label indicating the top of the page? ("")
Yes.

This label should be distinct from the content headings. To do that, wikis written in different scripts (for example, Latin and Japanese) and different Wikimedia projects (Wikipedia and Wiktionary) may need to use different words and/or punctuation marks in this label. It is possible for each community to set up a label that would work just for them. This may be done by editing the page MediaWiki:Vector-toc-beginning.

How can I get both the old and the new table of contents?
This isn't possible.

We intentionally do not add the old table of contents in addition to the new sidebar location. It's a trade off. We have taken it to reduce the work involved maintaining the code and keeping the site work as good as possible. The old table of contents displayed in addition to the new one would have important technical disadvantages. It would increase the overall size of HTML, increase the storage requirement for our parser cache, and require additional CSS to render.

See also:


 * How to restore the old table of contents?

<span id="How_do_magic_words_work_with_this_feature?">

Comment fonctionnent les mots magiques avec cette fonctionnalité ?
Le mots magiques  et   ne fonctionneront pas car le sommaire est toujours dans la barre latérale et cela ne peut pas être modifié.

Cependant, les mots magiques concernant la présence du sommaire, tels que, marcheront encore. Les modèles utilisés pour substituer le sommaire fonctionneront également. Par exemple, un article pourra désactiver le sommaire par défaut et afficher son propre sommaire à sa place là ou il le faut.

Tous les mots magiques continueront à fonctionner avec les autres habillages qui affichent le sommaire dans l'article.

I can't see the table of contents when the sidebar is open
This is a known problem.

This issue should only impact logged in users who have opened the sidebar. In the long term, we plan to reduce the size of this menu, and make the sidebar overlay content. Details and a prototype of how that will look can be found in T302073. This change is planned in the latter part of the year (October-December 2022). Further information can be found on the page about Page tools.

<span id="What_is_the_scope_of_the_project?"> Quel est le but de ce projet ?

<span id="Are_you_changing_Monobook_or_Timeless?"> Est-ce que Monobook ou Timeless seront affectés ?

No.

These changes are applied to Vector only. Vector has been the default interface on Wikimedia wikis since 2010. Any other skins such as Monobook, Timeless, Minerva or Modern are not be changed at all.

While working on Desktop Improvements, we did clean up the old skins' code, though. We made it easier to roll out new changes to old skins, removed never used options, and removed 75% of the PHP code of these skins. All this had no effect on the side users interact with.

See also:


 * How and why we moved our skins to Mustache

<span id="Are_you_improving_charts,_maps,_a-/f-/o-/tmboxes,_infoboxes,_navboxes,_and_other_templates?"> Améliorerez-vous les graphiques, cartes, les boîtes de type a-/f-/o-/tm, les boîtes d'information, de navigation et autres modèles ?

No.

We do not change anything within the light gray article content area (except for the table of contents):

Are you building the dark mode?
No, not this time.

The Desktop Improvements project provides the architectural changes needed to build dark mode. Building it would be a separate project, though. This is because that project would require significant work with the communities. Now, many templates are not compatible with dark mode. We have learned that while working on the mobile apps.

Initially, our dark mode would be based on the user's operating system preferences. We would not plan to add an in-browser toggle. The reason is we currently do not have a system in place for anonymous user preferences. This could be added at a later date, though.

<span id="What_are_the_features&#039;_success_metrics?"> Quels sont les indicateurs de succès pour ces fonctionnalités ?

Augmenter l'utilisation par notre audience actuelle, ce qui sera mesuré via :


 * Interactions
 * Augmenter les recherches par session de 5% sur la durée du projet
 * Augmenter les basculements inter-langues de 5% sur la durée du projet


 * Affinité
 * Augmenter les impressions positives envers le site (via des enquêtes et des tests utilisateur)
 * Augmenter le sentiment de confiance et de crédibilité (mesuré via des enquêtes et des tests utilisateur)

À mesure que nous définirons plus précisément les changements à mettre en oeuvre, nous étendrons et améliorerons cette liste.

Références