Thread:Project:Support desk/How powerful is MediaWiki for the following listed uses...? (2)

I am working on a collaborative project and our work will be mainly creating a lot of pages, with questions and answering them one by one. You can, for the purposes of understanding, say that we are making a Schhaumm's 3000 Solved Problems in... Series out of certain topics. (However, what we are aiming at is completely different.)

Anyways, the following are the tasks that I suppose will need to be done:


 * 1) 1) Importing scanned notes and their OCR, each onto separate pages, on the wiki. (Will do this perhaps using macros and bots?)
 * 2) 2) Tagging and untagging different pages for the purposes of keeping a check on quality as well as task management.
 * 3) 3) Using autobots to make changes to articles, Discussion pages and User Talks, and to notify everyone of the change.
 * 4) 4) Tagging sections, again for the purposes of categories and task management : for example, tagging sections that need a diagram or the ones that require copyediting and so on.

I feel mediawiki is very powerful here. And I can definitely go ahead with mediawiki. However, what I want to know is, with all different sorts of wikihosts available that provide administrative functionalities, is mediawiki really the choice or can I manage my task with something else?

I should note the intense dependence on task management and division amongst contributors.