API:Client code/Evaluations/Pywikibot

Pywikibot is a full-featured API client framework geared towards power users who want to edit wikis: wiki maintainers, bot-runners, and others who want to automate work on MediaWiki sites.

Particularly useful or notable features of pywikibot include:
 * makes wikidata API accessible
 * good and consistent code style, readable code
 * handles deprecated methods/branches
 * has very good unit test coverage
 * very comprehensive and targeted to its intended usecase, running bots.

=In-depth evaluation=

Easy to install
The clearest and simplest installation and configuration instructions are in the slides from the 2013 Pywikipediabot/Hackathon 2013. There are also installation instructions at Manual:Pywikibot/Installation, which are extensive and may be confusing to the casual user. It is possible to install through pip using the instructions in this bug report. However, even when pywikibot is installed in a virtual environment (using ), it still requires a copy of   in the home directory before   will run without error.
 * Installation instructions are correct and easy to find
 * Library is packaged for installation through appropriate package library (PyPI, CPAN, npm, Maven, rubygems, etc.)
 * Platinum standard: library is packaged for and made available through Linux distributions

Easy to understand
The lowest-level functions to access the API can be found in api.py. https://github.com/wikimedia/pywikibot-core/blob/master/pywikibot/data/wikidataquery.py
 * Well designed--makes all intended API calls available with the intended level of abstraction with no redundancies
 * Platinum standard: makes the Wikidata API available
 * Well documented:
 * Code is commented and readable
 * Clear coding with a consistent style. Docstrings are present classes and functions and are generally clearly written and helpful. Pywikibot's Development guidelines are being followed.


 * Documentation is comprehensive, accurate, and easy to find
 * Many of the issues with Pywikibot's documentation are summarized in Pywikibot/Documentation RFC. In general, the easily findable documentation is aimed at running bots using the scripts available with pywikibot, not at writing new scripts. |README-conversion.txt has some information for script-writers.


 * Deprecated functions are clearly marked as such
 * Pywikibot has been rewritten to use the API, and the rewritten version is the new "core" branch. There is some debate on deprecation of "compat": http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/pywikipedia-l/2014-June/008764.html. Additionally,  has deprecated methods: "deprecated

methods still work, but print a warning message in debug mode" (from README-conversion.txt).
 * Platinum standard: Documentation is understandable by a novice programmer
 * Documentation assumes considerable expertise with MediaWiki. There is also little easily available documentation aimed at enabling users to write new scripts.


 * Code uses idioms appropriate to the language the library is written in

Easy to use

 * Has functioning, simple, and well-written code samples for common tasks
 * Demonstrates queries


 * Demonstrates edits
 * There are a number of available scripts. Simpler examples would help.


 * Handles API complications or idiosyncrasies so the user doesn't have to:
 * Login/logout


 * Cookies


 * Tokens


 * Query continuations using the new "continue" and not "query-continue"
 * Handles continuations using the old  parameter.


 * Requests via https, including certificate validation


 * Courteous API usage is promoted through code samples and smart defaults
 * gzip compression is used by default


 * Examples show how to create and use a meaningful and unique user-agent header (as in https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User-agent_policy)


 * Platinum standard: generates a unique user-agent string given name/email address/repository location


 * Efficient usage of API calls
 * Pywikibot generally fetches a list of pages meeting given criteria, then retrieves/acts on each page individually.

Python 3 support is currently being implemented in Core.
 * Can be used with the most recent stable version of the language it is written in (e.g. Python 3 compatible)

Easy to debug

 * Contains unit tests for the longest and most frequently modified functions in the library


 * Platinum standard: Unit tests for many code paths exist and are maintained


 * Terrible hacks/instances of extreme cleverness are clearly marked as such in comments
 * Documentation links to the relevant section/subpage of the API documentation

Easy to improve
Much interaction takes place on pywikipedia-l, which can be contentious and which tends to assume expertise.
 * Library maintainers are responsive and courteous, and foster a thoughtful and inclusive community of developers and users
 * Platinum standard: Project sets clear expectations for conduct for spaces where project-related interactions occur (mailing list, IRC, repository, issue tracker). It should:
 * State desired attitudes and behaviors
 * Provide examples of unwelcome and harassing behavior
 * Specify how these expectations will be enforced

A start for setting community expectations for behavior can be found in the IRC channel: "Don't ask to ask, ask. Please be patient for an answer. Do not private message unless asked."


 * Pull requests are either accepted or rejected with reason within 3 weeks (Platinum standard: 3 business days)

Replies are faster on the mailing list than on the bug tracker.
 * Issues/bugs are responded to in some manner within 3 weeks (Platinum standard: 3 business days) (but not necessarily fixed)


 * The library is updated and a new version is released within 3 weeks (Platinum standard: 3 business days) when breaking changes are made to the API


 * Platinum standard: library maintainers contact MediaWiki API maintainers with feedback on the API's design and function

MIT License
 * Library specifies the license it is released under

= Suggested TODOs =
 * Use  and not   for query continuations
 * Use gzip compression by default
 * Make it easy to add a user-agent header and give examples of a good one
 * Create more centralized and updated documentation, including:
 * Easier-to-find and more intuitive installation instructions
 * Code samples for common tasks, including queries and edits
 * Documentation for people who aren't running bots with existing scripts (particularly researchers and beginning/intermediate bot writers)
 * Links in method documentation to the corresponding API subpages
 * Foster a hospitable attitude on pywikipedia-l, especially to new and/or inexperienced users
 * Streamline or add more resources to the patch review process to reduce the backlog of unreviewed patches
 * Add Python 3 compatibility (this is in progress for the  branch)
 * Package pywikibot for installation from PyPI via pip and obviously document the installation process
 * Make initial installation lighter-weight; make it possible to install into a virtualenv without putting a config file in the home directory and to run  without having to log in

Other issues for your consideration:
 * Iterating over a list and calling the API for each item is inefficient; if a structural redesign is in the works, consider making this more efficient by combining API calls as much as possible (e.g. using generators and combining results ). It may be possible to take advantage of the database-like structure of the MediaWiki API and help users save bandwidth.

Pywikibot appears too specialized to easily meet the gold standard. However, collecting a lightweight subset of the available modules and documenting for usage for queries and not just edits could be very useful, particularly the portion of the code that deals with the wikibase API modules.