Parsing/Replacing Tidy/FAQ/es

¿Qué es Tidy?
Tidy («ordenado» en inglés) es una biblioteca que MediaWiki utiliza para arreglar algunos errores que se encuentran en páginas wiki. Es común que las páginas wiki tengan marcado mal formado cuando los editores emplean etiquetas HTML en plantillas y en la propia página. (Por ejemplo, son comunes las etiquetas HTML no cerradas, como un  sin un  .) En algunos casos, es el propio MediaWiki el que genera HTML erróneo. Tidy arregla estos errores de marcado, pero también realiza otras tareas de «limpieza» que no son necesarias para que el código sea correcto. Por ejemplo, elimina elementos vacíos y añade espacios en blanco entre etiquetas HTML que a veces pueden cambiar la presentación. Como Tidy se basa en la semántica de HTML4 y la web ha migrado a HTML5, también hace algunas modificaciones incorrectas para «arreglar» cosas que no solían funcionar; por ejemplo, Tidy podrá sacar una lista con viñetas de una tabla a pesar de que es HTML válido.

¿Por qué se está reemplazando? ¿Y con qué?
La tecnología de Tidy data de los años 90, cuando los navegadores web no estaban estandarizados. El comportamiento de Tidy se basa más o menos en la semántica de HTML4, pero no coincide con el de ningún navegador actual. Tras años sin mantenimiento activo, se ha revivido Tidy como «tidy-html5», con un comportamiento muy diferente. Ya no se empaqueta el Tidy antiguo. Como se ha dicho antes, Tidy realiza tareas de limpieza HTML no relacionadas con la corrección de errores. Todos estos asuntos han conllevado que se registraran muchas incidencias en Phabricator, y se ha reclamado la sustitución de la herramienta al menos desde 2013. En la actualidad, HTML5 es el estándar web, y el algoritmo de análisis de HTML5 tiene las especificaciones claramente definidas, lo que ha supuesto el desarrollo de implementaciones compatibles para distintos navegadores y otras bibliotecas. Este algoritmo también especifica claramente de qué manera se debe arreglar el marcado roto. En este panorama tecnológico, es necesario de verdad reemplazar Tidy con un analizador HTML5 que arregle el marcado roto y genere marcado HTML válido y bien formado de la manera estándar. Sin embargo, los wikis de Wikimedia cuentan con un enorme corpus de páginas cuyo marcado depende de las correcciones de Tidy. Reemplazar directamente Tidy sin más dilación no es factible, ya que una herramienta basada en HTML5 repararía parte del marcado de otra manera y eso podría estropear la presentación de las páginas. Así, estamos reemplazando Tidy con nuestra propia herramienta basada en la especificación de HTML5, pero que también añade algo de retrocompatibilidad para minimizar su impacto. Tras experimentar con tres soluciones diferentes, nos hemos decidido por RemexHTML, un analizador HTML5 basado en PHP sobre el cual hemos programado algunas condiciones de retrocompatibilidad para replicar cierto comportamiento de Tidy que necesitamos proporcionar de momento. En el futuro, también se podría utilizar RemexHTML para habilitar nuevas características en el núcleo de MediaWiki, como una edición más robusta de secciones de páginas, un soporte más equilibrado de plantillas y una actualización más eficiente de páginas una vez se han editado las plantillas que contienen. Para quienes se lo estén preguntando, nótese que utilizar tidy-html5 no nos eximiría de tener que ocuparnos con la corrección de errores de marcado, ya que parte de la limpieza requerida se debe al cambio de la semántica de HTML4 a la de HTML5. Hay otros motivos relacionados con la gestión de cambios para preferir una herramienta propia, incluyendo la posibilidad de habilitar otras características como se ha mencionado anteriormente.

Si tienes interés en saber más desde el punto de vista técnico, puedes consultar https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89331 o Reemplazar Tidy.

Which tests have you performed so far?
To identify the impact of replacing Tidy with a HTML5 based tool, we have utilized a testing strategy (using a tool called "VisualDiff") that compares the pixel-by-pixel output image of MediaWiki with Tidy enabled, with the pixel-by-pixel output image of its replacement. Early on, we found that a common difference was minor vertical whitespace changes. In the belief that these would either not be noticeable or would be tolerable, we wrote a tool called "UprightDiff" which is able to identify vertical motion within an image and to discount such motion for the purposes of automated testing. This also let us assign a numeric score to differences and readily identify the most egregious differences. We exported a subset of about 64,000 articles (some from the recent changes stream, and rest selected randomly) from various Wikimedia wikis (40 wikis from Wikipedia, Wikisource, Wiktionary, and Wikivoyage), and rendered them with Tidy and with RemexHTML, then used "UprightDiff" to analyse the result. This takes a lot of cpu cycles, memory, and disk space, and it takes 2 days for one round of testing to complete. This limits the size of the testing corpus but we believe 64K is a sizeable sample to figure out the kind of fixes necessary.

To minimize the differences and reduce the impact of fixes that would be needed from editors, we added some additional Tidy-compatibility fixups. Since we found that self-closing tags were extremely common on wikimedia wikis, we added a compatibility fix to treat them as empty tags (i.e.  is treated as  ). We added some other compatibility passes as well. After all these fixes were in place and we repeated our tests, we found that 93.4% of pages had no changes in rendering. And, 96.9% of pages had either no pixel diffs (93.4%) or insignificant vertical whitespace shifts only (3.5% = 96.9 - 93.4). The remaining 3.1% pages (100 - 96.9) showed pixel differences that had other reasons.

Based on these tests, we identified several classes of markup errors that will render differently between the two. For one class of markup errors (self-closing tags that aren't valid in HTML5), we added a maintenance category that editors have already been using to fix up templates and pages. But, the other classes of markup errors are not easy to detect automatically at this time and editors' assistance is necessary to identify and fix them up.

What will happen? When will these changes happen?
As noted earlier, we cannot yet do a drop-in replacement of Tidy with a HTML5-based tool. We have added a maintenance category for one class of markup errors, which will help editors fix them up. To help editors identify and fix up other markup errors, we also built a ParserMigration extension that helps them compare output in production and fix markup errors. Separately, we have also built the Linter extension to to identify some of the fixes that are needed.

As of end March 2017, we deployed the ParserMigration extensions to all wikis. As of June 20, 2017, Linter has been deployed to all large wikis. Via these extensions, we hope to enable editors fix up pages for actually replacing Tidy in 2017. Once enough fixes are made and we are satisfied that the impact on editors and readers will be minor and tolerable, we will go ahead and replace Tidy But, we would also not like to drag this on indefinitely. So, it would be ideal if the high-priority issues identified by the Linter extension are prioritized by editors.

Separately, the Tidy-compatibility fixups (mentioned in the previous section) are meant to be in place till we replace Tidy. After that, we will start replacing these fixups gradually while relying on similar testing and tooling support.

What will editors need to do?
The Linter extension has been deployed to all wikis. As indicated on the help page, please fix wikitext patterns and templates identified in the high priority categories on the Special:LintErrors page of your wiki. Every item in that category has a help page with examples indicating what needs fixing. See simplified instuctions below.

To assist editors in migrating wikitext to verify the fixes they make, we have deployed the ParserMigration extension. If you enable "ParserMigration" in your preferences, a link will be added to the toolbox of all articles, which can show the current (Tidy) and expected (RemexHTML) output side-by-side. You can preview article text changes in the same side-by-side view and see how your edits changes / fixes rendering.

What is the impact on my wiki?
Please see the wikitext deprecation tool for this information. Note that in several cases the count refers to pages affected, but that includes template-generated issues. In other words, once a given template is fixed, all the pages featuring that template will disappear from the list. So it's highly likely that you won't have to fix thousands or millions pages, but a handful of templates. We are working to make this even more clear. You can also see some progress on Parsing/Replacing Tidy/Linter/Stats/July31, and the results of visual differences tests on a sample of ~73K articles from 60 wikis at http://mw-expt-tests.wmflabs.org/.

Simplified instructions for fixing pages
Here are some simplified instructions for handling all the high-priority linter categories. Some of the linked help pages may contain instructions to use assisting tools such as WPCleaner.

Delete OR fix badly nested tables
In this example, Tidy will delete Table 2 above. But, RemexHTML will not delete that table. This can change how pages look. To prevent this, editors should fix the wikitext and remove Table 2. While the following row-tag need not be removed, we recommend removing it. Since the closing table tag is no longer needed, it should be removed as well.

Alternatively, add an explicit  cell on the row started by the previous line before the start of Table 2 if you need nested tables. What is the correct fix depends on the page. But, in most cases deletion as above is going to be the right fix.


 * Help:Extension:Linter/deletable-table-tag

Work around a parser bug for paragraph wrapping
On most wikis, it looks like the biggest generator of these linter warnings are the nowrap or nowrap begin templates. The simplest fix that will handle the vast majority of these linter cases is to add a newline before the opening &lt;span&gt; tag in the template source of these templates.

In all other cases, when wikitext has a span next to a div/td (and other such "block" tags) and has a  CSS property, please add a newline after the div tag.


 * Help:Extension:Linter/pwrap-bug-workaround

Fix invalid self-closing tags
Self-closing tags like &lt;div/>, &lt;span/>, &lt;b/>, etc are not valid in HTML5. They need to be fixed according to what the editor intent might have been. In some cases, it is a typo where a &lt;/b> is intended. In other cases, they need to be deleted. In some other cases, they need to be replaced with a &lt;nowiki/>. Please see the detailed help page for this category.


 * Help:Extension:Linter/self-closed-tag

Caveats

 * We don't yet know how to automatically determine all affected pages and templates, but we expect that the list of templates and suggestions will get more complete as we learn about problems that were not caught before. Community Liaisons will reach out to template experts, regulars at technical village pumps, etc. to make sure they become aware of the necessary changes and of resources that may help them.
 * We are thinking about other easy, sustainable ways in which we may support "gnomes" and all the Wikimedians willing to help with this effort.

Other FAQs
Q: What happens to  and similar tags if they are used in self-closed form?

A: As noted in T134423, the only valid self-closed HTML tags are:,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,. Non-HTML self-closing tags (like  and  ) are not affected by this change. is a special case because while it is a HTML tag, MediaWiki treats it like an extension tag and hence remains unaffected. All other self-closing HTML tags should be fixed (and are already being fixed by editors at this time).

Since this usage is found in a lot of pages in our testing, in order to prevent unexpected rendering effects (e.g.  being treated as    and causing more text being bolded than intended), we added a fix to the parser to convert them to an empty tag (eg.   will be converted to  ). But, we don't intend to retain this fix indefinitely. So, we would like for editors to continue fixing this deprecated usage.

Q: What were the results of tests on languages other than English, or on sister projects?

A: There is nothing in what Tidy, RemexHTML do that is specific to Wikipedia or English. This project is primarily about a change from HTML4 to HTML5 semantics and getting rid of some Tidy cleanups of HTML. These changes affects all projects and languages equally, except if some projects and languages tend to have more markup errors or use more self-closed tags than others.

Q: What other changes are editors likely to see, after this replacement?

A: The effect of this replacement is primarily going to affect readers, as they may notice that the page doesn't look right (for example, excessively wide navboxes without line breaks or wrapping). However, if anything, this might lead to the rendering seen in VisualEditor to match the rendering seen outside it much more than before, since Parsoid's output has been HTML5-compliant since the beginning, and we are now moving the read output to HTML5. We do not expect any impact on VisualEditor edits, but we will promptly address any bugs reported with respect to dirty diffs. In addition, we do not plan to add any error messages or warnings displayed on pages if the markup errors are not fixed.

Q: How does the replacement relate to other projects you are working on?

A: By enabling the move to HTML5 semantics, this is one of the steps evolving markup in our corpus to keep up with web standard. We also expect to leverage this tool to support well-balanced template output. Separately, but relatedly, this will also make the output of the PHP parser (used for reads) and the output of Parsoid (used for edits in VE, Content Translation) more consistent since Parsoid already uses HTML5 semantics. One of our goals is to make the two outputs fully consistent with each other and use one parser for both reads and edits.

--The Parsing Team

Volunteers available to support this effort
''Community Liaisons invite interested Wikimedians to please add their name in the sections below and support their community engagement efforts. Thank you. As with similar past initiatives, signing up is optional.'' Please see Parsing/Get_involved, and add it to your bookmarks, as future requests for assistance will go through that page!
 * 1) Estoy disponible para hacer pruebas con la herramienta ParserMigration.
 * 2) (añade tu firma aquí)
 * 3) Estoy disponible para arreglar plantillas.
 * 4) Jonesey95 (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 5) Samuele2002 (talk)
 * 6) TheDragonFire (talk)
 * 7) Stryn (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 8) Estoy disponible para estudiar y discutir sobre correcciones para las plantillas.
 * 9) Jonesey95 (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 10) Estoy disponible para difundir la información a mi comunidad.
 * 11) (See this page) --Sannita (talk) 18:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 12) See this page. Stryn (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) (See this page) --Sannita (talk) 18:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) See this page. Stryn (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)