Thread:User talk:Qgil/Outreach Program for Women

Hi Quim.

Regarding this edit, you should never use rollback on a non-vandalistic edit. It's seen as a "slap across the face" on nearly any MediaWiki or Wikimedia wiki. From rollback:

Rolling back a good-faith edit, without explanation, may be misinterpreted as "I think your edit was no better than vandalism and reverting it doesn't need an explanation". Some editors are sensitive to such perceived slights; if you use the rollback feature other than for vandalism (for example, because undo is impractical due to the large page size), it is courteous to leave an explanation on the article's talk page or on the talk page of the user, whose edit(s) you have reverted.

Your actions here were particularly egregious as you not only used rollback on a non-vandalistic edit, you also broke the Wikimedia Engineering page and didn't bother leaving a talk page note on my talk page or Talk:Outreach Program for Women.

BRD is an old wiki principle and I'd be happy to discuss my edits, however your behavior here has been simply unacceptable and I can flatly guarantee that if you continue to use rollback in this manner, you'll very quickly no longer be able to use rollback at all.

I've partially re-reverted your edit in this edit to fix Wikimedia Engineering. If there's some issue with the infobox (it's now being hidden with CSS), please explain the issue somewhere so that it can be discussed. Blindly reverting (particularly using rollback) is just about the fastest way to piss people off in a collaborative wiki environment.