Extension talk:AddScript/Archive 1

XSS Vulnerability Description
Version 1.1 is vulnerable to XSS attacks. Consider the following: Hopefully the above will help the author correct this very serious problem. --Jimbojw 19:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Malicious user creates a page called "EvilScript" and fills it with evil JavaScript (perhaps adding another   tag to the DOM, etc).
 * 2) Malicious user creates a page containing the following: &lt;addscript src='../index.php?title=EvilScript&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'/&gt;
 * Note: This could even be the same page (for example in a JS comment), so an admin going there for the first time to check it out/delete it could be hit immediately!
 * 1) This becomes the following in the document HEAD: &lt;script src="/wikiroot/jsscripts/../index.php?title=EvilScript...
 * Note: Modern browsers will intelligently strip ' ' along with the parent dir when found in fetched URLs.
 * 1) Innocent visitor visits the containing page, which loads EvilScript - user's account is compromised.


 * So, is the fix for this sort of vulnerability to remove the ' ' in the user provided string? Is this 'good enough' since any other URL must be part of the sysop controlled 'jsscripts' path? Jean-Lou Dupont 12:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Disallowing the patterns '/./' and '/../' in the URL might be good enough - I'm not sure. If you intend for all the scripts to be directly under the 'jsscripts' directory (ie no subdirectories), then it might be sufficient to strip out all forward slashes.


 * As a side note, if you continue allowing users to specify information that's to become part of a URL, you should really  the input.  As it stands now, even if you solved the '/../' problem, people could still specify a double-quote to escape the   attribute, then specify other attributes within the   tag.  I'm not sure how effective this would be as an attack vector, but it could be done.


 * Regarding a more robust solution to the current dilemma: since you're requiring file-system level access in the first place (to put the scripts in the jsscripts dir), you could have a mapping of short-hand strings to full paths. For example, instead of this: &lt;addscript src="path/to/whatever.js" /&gt; You could have the user provide this: &lt;addscript name="whatever" /&gt;  Then, in the configuration for the extension, you'd have a mapping of names to paths.  Continuing with this example, you'd use this: $wgAddScriptMappings = array( 'whatever' => 'path/to/whatever.js' );


 * Implementation of any or all of the above recommendations is left as an exercise for the reader :) --Jimbojw 20:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

What Jimbojw suggests is quite simmilar to the precautions i took with Extension:HTMLets. It's actually quite simmilar to this, only that it reads HTML from files and inserts it into pages directly, instead of referencing scripts via URL. But the code would look simmilar, I guess. -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 23:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I have uploaded v1.2, please check it out. I have tested it on my home windows system as well as on my 1and1 Linux hosted site. Jean-Lou Dupont 01:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Script doesn't work on bluehost.com...
...but with a small mod it can do. Instead of return file_exists( $bpath."/{$spath}" ); if you use return file_exists( self::$base.$uri.".js" ); then things seem to work. I haven't had time to figure out which PHP settings cause this, maybe will come back to this later. - all the best, Adam

Which version of PHP are you running on bluehost.com ? There isn't much code behing the code line you are pointing in your snippet... only 'dirname' based statements... Jean-Lou Dupont 19:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The code snippets were regarding the CheckURI function in your code. My PHP version is 5.1.6 (although bluehost's default PHP is 4.something - I just asked to be upgraded so that MediaWiki would install).  Do you want me to send you phpinfo? --Amacieli 09:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Another question: Just noticed that headscripts are only loaded if I use &action=purge in the URL. I don't think this is a cache setting problem as my other wiki pages update just fine.  What I'm doing that's not working is using as the first line in my wiki page.  Any ideas?  --Adam 12:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is probably 'parser cache' related. Please use Parser Cache Control extension. Alternatively, give a try to version 1.3 of the extension. Jean-Lou Dupont 15:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What Adam is describing (with regards to the  statment) is still the case with 1.3.  The problem is that any modifications to   that a parser extension makes (even a hook to ParserBeforeTidy) will expire as soon as the output is cached.
 * The good news is that there are ways around this without forcing a purge on ever page view. I discuss one such method in my article Doing more with MediaWiki parser extensions. Hope this helps :) --Jimbojw 18:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I went too fast in modifying the code for releasing v1.3 (release 1.3 still works OK but wasn't really necessary): I had analysed the problem and came to the conclusion that the answer was Extension:ParserCacheControl *if* one wants to retain all the power of the 'parser cache' functionality without going through additional hoops (thanks anyways Jimbojw ) Jean-Lou Dupont 18:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. Another option would be to just expire the cache yourself. I believe this is possible to do from the parser tag code. In fact there used to be an extension - called PurgePage? - that added a tag called   which would do just that.  I'm not sure if PurgePage is still around or not.
 * For what it's worth, I strongly encourage you to find a way to not force the user to constantly purge/bypass the cache. For large, popular pages on wikis with appreciable amounts of traffic, it may not be feasible to disable caching due to performance losses. --Jimbojw 22:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I gave Jimbojw's code a whirl, and it works as advertised, you can just refresh your browser without purging, and the head script stays. I just replaced the addMeta line with addScript so that I got what I needed.  Thanks for all your help, Jimbojw and JLD!  --Adam 02:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Multiple Instances
I'm finding that in some cases the  function is called multiple times due to another extension. When this happens the link is added multiple times. My solution is to add  to the end of the   function just before the return call. --Hypercubed 08:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)