Thread:User talk:Chughakshay16/ConventionExtension/Ranking Proposals

The ranking procedure can be applied for proposals, and scholarship applications.The idea is really simple : First the admin assigns reviewers for the conference(Only these people will have the right to rank proposals). Secondly, each reviewer will rank a proposal on the basis of different criteria. For example, in case of scholarship applications the criterion would be :- Similarly criteria like 'affiliation', 'content','idea' can be applied for the proposals submitted by speakers. Changes in Data Storage to fit these changes :- content : criterion | rank | time page_props : +---+-++ +---+-++ +---+-++ content : empty page_props : +---+-++ +---+-++ +---+-++ So above changes imply that per application per reviewer one or more than one ranking pages can exist.
 * 'nationality' ,
 * 'validity'(meaning if the proposal is valid for even being considered),
 * 'onpresence' (the contribution towards the project hosting this conference),
 * 'outpresence' (the contribution towards projects other than this one),
 * 'future' (commitments to be fulfilled in future by this applicant),
 * 'representation'(which firm or company the applicant represents)
 * 1. Ranking page(wiki page)
 * pp_page              | pp_propname         | pp_value       |
 * ranking_id           | application_reviewer| reviewer_id    |
 * tr_reg_id            | application         | application_id |
 * 2. Reviewer page(wiki page)
 * pp_page              | pp_propname         | pp_value       |
 * reviewer_id          | reviewer-user       | user_id        |
 * reviewer_id          | reviewer-conf       | conference_id  |