Template talk:RFC

Categorization
When something is complete the page should be removed from Category:Proposals (A subcat "Archived proposals" as on Meta would be ok).[//www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_comment%2FReplacing_extension_distributor&diff=727478&oldid=644744] --Nemo 08:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Do we want an overall  parameter with values draft/active/archived, and then a   and colour scheme for the infoboxen, then? Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think so, though it'll likely get confused with the documentation and implementation statuses. Auto-categorization would allow us to dynamically generate the index at Requests for comment. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

"Next step" field
Could we add a "Next step" field to the RFC - to make it clearer what the next action needs to be for an RFC to continue? Jdlrobson (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm, perhaps. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Merge "status" and "state"
I don't see a need of two very close parameters. --Nemo 22:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Decision
I think this should just be called "comment", as in the Meta-Wiki RfC template, so that it can be used to explain e.g. "stalled" status as well. --Nemo 09:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)