Extension:Maps/Future

Future work on Maps

Feel free to add new feature requests to the new proposals section. Please review the turned down proposals first. Adding your vote or objection to proposals will help determining which ones will get the priority. If you have any comments on the already accepted or turned down proposals, please add them to the talk page, but refer from adding them to the lists themselves.

Accepted to-do's
Items that have strikethrough have been completed/fixed.

New features

 * Open Street Maps support for OpenLayers


 * Making the map type controls configurable for Google Maps and Yahoo! Maps


 * Aliasing system for map property parameters (like currently the hard-coded center which changes into centre)


 * display_points (and display_addresses) parser function(s). This will enable you to display multiple markers on one map, and will be particularly useful together with custom base layers in OpenLayers.

Refactoring

 * Geocoder base class

Bug fixes

 * Bing maps (for open layers) is not working

New features

 * Ability to define custom base layers (with images) for OpenLayers. example, example


 * Bing Maps (formerly called Virtual Earth) support


 * Display_route parser function, to auto generate routes


 * KML support for Google Earth


 * KML support for Open Layers


 * Google Maps moon/mars/skye support (2D)


 * Google Earth moon/mars/skye support (3D)


 * Street view support for Google Maps


 * Multi geocoder support: creation of a system that allows to easily add new geocoders to the extension, and allows the user to set a default one in the settings file, and also add a parameter for this selection to the geocoding functions

New proposals

 * Add some kind of custom route tool, like done by the Google Maps extension? vid - Jeroen De Dauw 01:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Add based syntaxis for the parser functions - Jeroen De Dauw 22:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * General zoom level system: one zoom level scale for all services. This would make it easier for users to get the hang of the zoom levels, and would not affect the zoom when changing the service parameter. However, this would not allow backward compatibility, by affecting the zoom of all maps using one of the current zoom scales. Even if this is a good idea, there needs to be voted for the scale system to use. - Jeroen De Dauw 01:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)