Thread:Talk:Article feedback/IMDB rating: Only consider trustworthy users/reply (5)

Maybe not for well-written, sure. But if completeness was so obvious, there wouldn't need to be guidelines for writing articles. And you gently ignores teh other 2 criteria most anons have no clue about.

You're obviously a hardcore defender of the feature and ignoring my main point.
 * 1) My main point is adapting the IMDB rating system to improve the average stats and not if anon votes should count or not.
 * 2) In general there is no single abuse protection.
 * 3) If the voting system was so perfect (as you say anon votes are worth countign), then why is w:Special:ArticleFeedback so fucked up with obvious fan and hate votes?