User talk:Anomie

Central auth talk page
Hi on centralauth talk page you undid my edit I made it because LiquidThread is easer to do and shows more recents posts at the top. I would like to undo the edit I have created an archive for that page so it is saved on another page. 90.192.240.127 14:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

You abuse your authority
You are refusing any documentation of essential features of Scribunto that are DIFFERENT from base Lua, and by forcing thing to remain undocumented. I had not added any verbosity in the doc and this doc is NOT intended to be just a copy of Lua but if the way it is used within MediaWiki. And the MediaWiki library has sever limitations that ARE important to document (even if some of these may be lifted later, but in fact we see MORE limitations being added without documenting them.

This is really insulting for Wikimedia users to reject blindly these edits that are absolutely not 10K text like you affirmed (with a lie) in your edit comment. I did not add a lot of things, just a single sentence for functions in the mw.language library that are effectively limited and that will return errors (and notably on international wikis, very visited like Commons).

I contest your decision and your abuse of authority for something that was absolutely not badly intended. Even if developers don't have the time to update this documentation, it does not mean that other people cannot complete these missing details. In fact you have not read anything, and just used blind revert. I even wonder if you really know the subject and really know that these limits exist, simply because you have never experienced them.

But if you know them and don't want to have them documented, this is really insulting for Wikimedia users that spend hours wondering why things are not working as documented and have difficulties to locate the problems they experience. And notably when they are caused by change in the library or in the Lua integration that have caused many modules to stop working without any notification or documentation.

Many people had thnaked me about documenting such things and taking them into account to fix problems or find workarounds, on various wikis. But here you are "playing alone" in a very unfair way.

Note that you acted here with your personal account, but wanted to use your staff authority for your threat. This is a hidden personal attack that you don't want Wikimedia to monitor. But visibly I will have to contact Wikimedia for commenting your action here. They must be informed about your selfish attitude. Verdy p (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Visibly you continue abusing by refusing to reply for your own actions. This is serious discussion and not "trolling"! If you don't want to reply, then you accept my arguments and you don't care about the issue and you don't need to send threats like you did, it just means that you're not interested in the subject (but this is visibly not the case).
 * On all other wikis, users are complaining that Lua changes things without notice, and does not document essential features. And users are loosing precious time because of that. Your selfish action is irresponsable if you can't acknowledge that and you also don't want any one else to contribute to this needed documentation.
 * Given the way you manage this documentation only for your own personal convenience on this wiki and not for the Wikimedians, we'll have to create a separate documentation, outside this unmaintained junk where you want to keep things undocumented with your own secrets. Sorry to say that, but this doc, the way you want it, is fuill of lies and junk, we'll create another one that actually reflects what is working... or not working ! Verdy p (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)