Extension talk:AutoLink

There does not seem to be lots of error checking, certainly in function getPages. &#91;user:jldupont] 16:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Finally
I've been wanting an extension like this forever, but had no idea how to do it. Thanks for tackling this, can't wait to try and implement it on my wiki.--24.250.230.243 01:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Big Bug (Resolved)
If for example you have the word "animal" in your wordlist AutoLinkPages and you have an images called animal.jpg in your curently edited artikel you get animal.jpg as a result. That ist bad in the "image-" Tag. I think with categories it is the same problem. Anyone here, who can change the code? 89.52.133.99 15:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thankyou very much for drawing my attention to this point.I have just started working with wikis,so as soon as i was done with this extension i put it here.But i'll definitely re-work on this extension keeping all your suggestions in mind.Please wait for some time so that i can make it perfect and then submit.--Sanjeev 08:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

one bug, one "feature"
I edited the script so that if you have "animal" in the dictionary page, it will create a link to it from either "animal" or "Animal". Also, there was a bug in the code that did not autolink text if it appeared in position 0 in the content string. It had to do with the return value of the strpos function. You have to use "!== false" to evaluate properly. Anyway -- that was kind of eliminated when I switched to using preg_replace and preg_match. Feel free to roll back if it's not appropriate. I'm currently using the script as I've edited it on my own server. I was planning to address the issue with replacing words that appear inside of square brackets.

Thanks for the idea and for putting the original code together. --Flanagana 19:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Flanagana.
 * As,I said i was re-working on this extension,even i was planning to use preg_match/replace functions.And regarding !==false condition, this bug can also be removed if instead of strpos, strstr is used.But nywayz as you said preg_match if used then no need to worry about !==false condition.So the changes made by you to the code contribute towards it's perfection.Thankyou very much for that.Please try to find out if any other problem lies in that,so that we can work together on it. :)
 * Your changes to code and suggestions encourage me to think out of the box and to develop and contribute more extensions for our people.Thanks once again.--Sanjeev 04:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)