Thread:Talk:Hosting services/Candidate for deletion/reply (9)

I still don't see the value of such a list when pretty much every shared hosting provider out there can run MediaWiki without any issues. It's kinda like if WordPress maintained a list of all hosting providers that can run WordPress (read: every host out there). MediaWiki doesn't have any unique requirements and one can safely assume that the vast majority of hosting providers can run it perfectly fine. If MediaWiki indeed needed technologies that aren't normally provided by hosting providers (e.g. Ruby) then I'd fully support having such a list, but that's simply not the case. I guess if people insisted on keeping this page, a redirect to the relevant Wikipedia page seems to be a fair compromise?