Extension talk:AutoLink

There does not seem to be lots of error checking, certainly in function getPages. &#91;user:jldupont] 16:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Finally
I've been wanting an extension like this forever, but had no idea how to do it. Thanks for tackling this, can't wait to try and implement it on my wiki.--24.250.230.243 01:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Big Bug
If for example you have the word "animal" in your wordlist AutoLinkPages and you have an images called animal.jpg in your curently edited artikel you get animal.jpg as a result. That ist bad in the "image-" Tag. I think with categories it is the same problem. Anyone here, who can change the code? 89.52.133.99 15:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thankyou very much for drawing my attention to this point.I have just started working with wikis,so as soon as i was done with this extension i put it here.But i'll definitely re-work on this extension keeping all your suggestions in mind.Please wait for some time so that i can make it perfect and then submit.--Sanjeev 08:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Sadly to say - it isn't resolved.89.52.189.171 21:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Is it too difficult to make this little change? If yes - this tool is not helpfull for me - I am sorry.89.52.164.171 23:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

one bug, one "feature"
I edited the script so that if you have "animal" in the dictionary page, it will create a link to it from either "animal" or "Animal". Also, there was a bug in the code that did not autolink text if it appeared in position 0 in the content string. It had to do with the return value of the strpos function. You have to use "!== false" to evaluate properly. Anyway -- that was kind of eliminated when I switched to using preg_replace and preg_match. Feel free to roll back if it's not appropriate. I'm currently using the script as I've edited it on my own server. I was planning to address the issue with replacing words that appear inside of square brackets.

Thanks for the idea and for putting the original code together. --Flanagana 19:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Flanagana.
 * As,I said i was re-working on this extension,even i was planning to use preg_match/replace functions.And regarding !==false condition, this bug can also be removed if instead of strpos, strstr is used.But nywayz as you said preg_match if used then no need to worry about !==false condition.So the changes made by you to the code contribute towards it's perfection.Thankyou very much for that.Please try to find out if any other problem lies in that,so that we can work together on it. :)
 * Your changes to code and suggestions encourage me to think out of the box and to develop and contribute more extensions for our people.Thanks once again.--Sanjeev 04:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Put all articles automatically into the article "AutoLinkPages"
I want to have all my article put automaticaly into AutoLinkPages. Is it possible when opening the article "AutoLinkPages" to be asked "Do you want to have all your articles put into this page?" and when I answer "yes" the script will put all of them automatically into thte page?? 89.52.189.233 10:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi!!!
 * Yes,it is very much possible to put all the Articles in AutoLink Page.
 * But when i wrote this extension, my requirement was for selective words in a page content.
 * I will definitely work on this to allow, putting all the Articles in that page
 * automatically,but can you please give some more details about your requirement.
 * For example,one case is that from now onwards any page/article you create will have an auto
 * entry in AutoLink page..,or else all the existing article names have to be added to
 * AutoLinkPage.So, Please give me some more details and time to prepare that.
 * Thankyou very much --Sanjeev 06:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It's a good idea from you to allow the alternatives: give the user the possibillity ...
 * 1. ... to put single words into AutoLinkPages (as you did before)
 * 2. ... to abandon the AutoLinkPages and automatically use all the article-names
 * Thanks for your work
 * 89.52.189.171 21:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Content is wiped out
Hi, I've tried this extension on my wiki, and I always get the content wiped out. I've just started trying editing it myself. If anybody has had the same issue, please suggest a solution. Thanks.--Cartoro 09:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)