VisualEditor/Portal/Why/zh

数值
上面的图表表示基于时间的新用户保留率及活跃编辑的数目. 如图所示，是让人失望的. 维基百科到了必须关注编者数的关键时刻. 我们迎来了很多新用户，同时也正失去协作项目的血液：贡献者.

这显然意味着我们许多需要进行的事务没人去做. 随着维护 Special:NewPages 和生者传记（BLP）人员的减少，积压的事务越来越多.

由于缺乏足够的人编写条目且进行检查和维护，所以特色和优良条目的提升进入停滞状态. <>

原因分析
We've got a problem, and there are many reasons why. Some people go away because they don't want to contribute productively, which is fine. Others go away because they find the community too hostile, or because they can't work out where to find help.

But ultimately, a lot of people leave because editing is just too complex. Back in 2001, when Wikipedia was founded, a lot of big sites expected users to write in markup of various forms, and we were one of them. Writing markup was a common skill in people who worked on the internet, whether that was BBCode, wikimarkup or even straight HTML.

The problem is that it's now 2013, and we are, if not the only major site still using markup, definitely the only one using markup of this complexity.

Moving away from markup
In 2013, people don't expect to have to learn markup to write something on a website. They're surprised when they come here and do, and most are not enthused by the experience. (We received some confirmation of that in a user test we conducted prior to the launch of VE.)

Many new users don't start off trying to make big changes; they start off trying to make small ones, and yet have to learn markup anyway just to be able to read the editing panel. They get intimidated, and they leave, as our user tests demonstrate.

This need for a better way to edit is something the community has recognized again and again, as early as 2004. We're building the VisualEditor in response; because people have asked for it, and more importantly because people need it.

Wikimarkup is already intimidating to newcomers, and the level of intimidation will only increase as other websites move forward. We're building it because if we don't, that graph is going to look a lot worse in five years.

We're not expecting everyone to use it (the source editor will still be around), and we're not expecting everyone to be convinced. But we're determined to do a good job and determined to demonstrate the impact this software can have.