Thread:Talk:New Page Triage/Editor retention

The draft surprised me a bit because it's very focused on the "crowdsourcing" of patrolling, which as noted increases total workload but is supposed to reduce the per-user workload while involving also less experienced patrollers whose sole judgement couldn't be trusted normally; and it doesn't say much about what the articles' authors will see. The main flaw in the current system is IMHO that for instance the many speedy deleted pages can't be corrected by the author, both because they were deleted and because he doesn't know how to ask clarifications, receive feedback or challenge the decision (and has to use OTRS, which is very inefficient and obscure); at least if the page is not deleted the author is able to edit it and remove the tag, but the draft doesn't say what would happen here.