Talk:VERP/LQT Archive 1

Hi all. This is Tony. Should I submit the entire project schedule when I submit the proposal by March 10 ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 01tonythomas (talk • contribs)
 * Sure, go ahead! --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 16:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * At least a stub would be advisable. --Nemo 16:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I will try to add a rough sketch, also, should the Mentors name be added ? I dont see any of the other templates with that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 01tonythomas (talk • contribs)
 * As long as you have all the minimum information and you follow more or less the same structure (sections), you can add all you want. :) --Nemo 18:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Using HMAC
As per the current discussions (with my mentors, Chris Steipp and Bugzilla bug#46640) the decision to use HMAC is proposed. An HMAC, with a secret key, over a string containing the user's email address, timestamp, and the list name can generate the VERP address. The advantage is that php has a built in function for it-- http://us1.php.net/hash_hmac We need developer consensus on the same.