Translation UX/Design feedback 7

The goal of this round was to test the translation editor and search in their current state of implementation, check the effect of the introduced changes in the ULS, and try the prototypes for the advanced editing features and the homepage.

Translate workflow

 * 00:25: The user is surprised because the UI is in "Nepal Bhasa" instead of "Nepali" language.
 * 02:25: The user asks about the lack of localisation for some of the parts of the UI.
 * 02:40: The user is able to identify the current message group and use the project selector to change the message group. The user comments that it may be a bit difficult to discover. Once it is used, he considers it to be "quite usable".
 * 04:20: The user tries the ULS and considers that it has "improved a lot" since the last time he used it.
 * 05:10: The user asks to install the Nepali input method which is lacking in his machine.
 * 0523: When the user is asked to use the we-based input method, the user is able to select the input language, but the input method is not working as expected. The user is able to identify ans select the input methods offered for Nepali but the layout provided is not the usual one. He makes use of the layout from http://www.madanpuraskar.org/downloads.php
 * 10:43: The user is able to provide translations and save them.
 * 11:20: The user copies and pastes parameters such as "($2)" from the source message.
 * 13:00: The user considers the new UI to be "more easier".
 * 13: 25: The user is confused by the "secondary action menu" not showing options.