Reading/web/Projects/Wikidata Descriptions

About
The reading team would like to push Wikidata descriptions to display underneath each article title, on mobile web view.

Why?
We are helping mobile readers skim as much information as possible, in as little time as possible. Given how our content is currently displayed on mobile web, a user either needs to scroll down to skip the non-mobile friendly info box, or they need to read 2 lines (which would take an entire mobile screen) before they can learn about the topic. Here is an image showing how the reader might not learn what the subject matter IS until they scroll past the first screen.

By adding the Wikidata descriptions as a subtitle, we are providing a quick description of what this page is about,in a few words, a web practice which is already has been long researched. Wikipedia apps already use Wikidata descriptions underneath article names for over a year now. //further research to edit? They have also been showing in search results since late 2015.

In a few Wikipedias that we have announced a similar change to, we realized that communities are welcoming adding Wikidata description to search results on desktop (similar to what already exists on mobile), we believe that the suggestion of adding descriptions to mobile web view, already aligns with welcoming the visibility of Wikidata descriptions to Wikipedia //add links

Concerns?
In an ideal world, there should be no concerns with providing users more data to digest more quickly, in a clear and readable format, however, lets break this down into small pieces: True, however, this is both a good thing, as well as something to look at from different angles, for example: The number of entries that need improvement isn't the majority of Wikidata entries. While there is currently no solution in place, for editing Wikidata through Wikipedia, we don't believe that this will be the permanent scenario, and it wouldn't be harmful for Wikipedia, meanwhile we enable editing, to add knowledge from a sister project, to help readers learn better and quicker about their topic of interest.
 * We are using content from a sister project, which we can't yet edit on Wikipedia

Moving forward
We already enabled this feature on Catalan and Polish Wikipedia since a few weeks, with no inconveniences so far. We would like to move forward on three phases: Leave top 6 Wikis aside, divide the rest into two chuncks, and enable one chunck at a time. Which means around 130 Wikis every 2 weeks, then we can push the top Wikis 2 by 2. If a community is still concerned about the suggestion, we would like to discuss in the talk page here, for example, we can discuss different methods of display, or different messaging on how each Wikipedia can announce the change to their communities including readers. //any interesting numbers to share?

It is easy to reject the suggestion and simple say "No, we don't want content that we don't have authority for and we aren't enabled to edit through Wikipedia? What if someone complained about a description on Village Pump? Why do we have to defend changes that we didn't do?" If you think so, please give it a second thought from a different perspective: What if we kept useful content hidden from readers, due to fear of small chances of inconvenience? Also lets consider, in the near future, when we are able to edit Wikidata descriptions through Wikipedia, how can we best use this integration to enrich our articles?

Imagine Wikipedia without content from Commons? Our content is a treasure, and it is our responsibility, as a movement, to find out ways to best display it to our readers, through different channels.