Extension talk:Workflow, Dunkley 2009

Status?
Could this Extension be "Not ready for use yet"?
 * It is currently under active development, a working example is at Workflow example --Zven 10:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Opinions just for reference
Thank for your notice on this great extension's publish. The followed opinions are just for reference. Perhaps, someone wants to pre-definition some opinions and some people doing the things in a specific phases like followed: In the page Organicdesign:Workflow:Emoticon we can see: And someone set the argument "showhistory" in a page like followed: The page will show a table like followed: The openinos are just for reference.--Roc michael 16:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Sad |sign |notice=John      |opinion=opinion1,opinion2
 * Grin |sign |notice=Mark,Jane |opinion=opinion1,opinion2,opinion3
 * Wink |sign |notice=Mary     |opinion=For,Against
 * Smile|sign |notice=Kathie   |opinion=opinion1,opinion2
 * Kiss |sign |notice=Joe      |opinion=opinion1,opinion2
 * Thanks a lot for the feedback ;-) I'm copying this to OrganicDesign:Extension talk:Workflow.php where we discuss the development. I'll definitely add the dropdown, but I think the more complex aspects can be handled by adding richer information into each of the phases templates. That's why each phase has an editable template so that they can contain links, forms or other information about that phase. --Nad 20:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * One problem with the dropdown though is that then there's no link to the template... so I'll have to think about how the content of each phase can be edited easily --Nad 20:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Little Problem
I'm having the following problem:

Fatal error: Call to undefined function wfmsg in C:\xampp\htdocs\mediawiki-1.11.0\extensions\Workflow\Workflow.php on line 55

How can I solve?

Since now ... thk you for the help.

Sorry for my bad English.

--200.180.72.114 27 August 2008
 * I've updated it to not give that error, but the fact that it was trying to execute that line means that another error will now be displayed saying that you haven't defined the NS_WORKFLOW namespace. I've updated the instructions to include this information. --Nad 10:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Bad Request
When I click to change states, the category box changes to show: Error: 400 Bad Request ( Bad Request unknown function Workflow ) Installed Extensions: Workflow (Version 0.0.13, 2008-08-28), FaviconLink, Parser hooks. CharInsert, Cite, Glossary, IconLink, ParserFunctions, Poem, Semantic Calendar. Semantic MediaWiki 1.1, SMW+ Extension 1.1, StringFunctions, Treeview5, PermissionACL.

It's possible SMW+ changes the ajax files, is there an interference there? Any suggestions?
 * SMW shouldn't be able to affect it. I'll have a look over the next few days as I'm about to do some modifications to the way the extension works. --Nad 00:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)