Talk:Design/Archive/Wikimedia User Interface

Possible goal - Accessibility and usability cleanup
You asked for suggestions, so.. :-)

An ongoing/longterm/eternal battle is the forking and proliferation of documentation. It would be immensely useful if more people could help with Accessibility and usability cleanup. As I wrote at the top there, what we want to avoid is yet more pages being created, rather than the old pages being clarified and improved (and hopefully the quantity reduced, by merging information into single/central locations, where it can more easily be maintained and watchlisted). Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm completely with you here, we have the same (or even bigger) amount of different pages/locations for UI documentation all across. How could we make the progress visible for ourselves (probably adding Phabricator tasks with blocking subtasks)? It is horribly confusing to have 10.5 quite similarly labelled wiki articles on the same topics for an interested volunteer/a newcomer, even a long-term contributor. --VEckl (WMF) (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Locations to ask for input and feedback
Please add suggestions below. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 17:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Probably here:
 * Talk:ResourceLoader (plus add OOUI links to these RL docs, as applicable)
 * m:Help talk:Advanced templates
 * wikitech-l, wikitech-ambassadors mailing lists
 * local Help projects: Q10589789


 * Possibly here:
 * WP:TOOLS:
 * w:en:Wikipedia talk:Tools
 * talkpages for any of the specific tools listed at w:en:Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism/Tools and w:en:Wikipedia:Tools/Editing tools
 * w:de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Helferlein
 * some of the other local pages: Q6584911
 * w:en:Help talk:Template and w:en:Wikipedia talk:Advanced template coding
 * wikitech-ambassadors mailing list

Table
Are you sure it's really necessary and accessible to split your sections into two columns? A subsection is probably more readable. Nemo 11:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)