Thread:Talk:Requests for comment/Wikitech contributors/Changes after the first round of feedback/reply

Thinking it further maybe we should change the sequence proposed here even more radically.

I believe the analysis of the problem is right, and nobody has contested it. The divergences come with the solution proposed.

I have put the attention on structural changes and the software needed for them. I believe the vision is right, and the more I read about E2 & E3 projects & roadmaps I can see that we are basically in the same path. I thought that we could take some shortcuts while those teams deliver the real thing but there seems to be a minority agreeing on this. Fair enough, and probably rightly so.

Let's look at the areas that can be improved in our current sites, then:


 * Content and design of mediawiki.org & wikitech.wikimedia.org homepages and the main venues for contributors.
 * Good templates offered for user profiles, events, projects.
 * MediaWiki / Bugzilla / Gerrit / Wikimedia Blog integration, with a common ontology and content aggregation.
 * Full use of Extension:GettingStarted.
 * Full exploit of the possibilities of Echo and Flow.