Requests for comment/Migrate code review and management to Phabricator from Gerrit

This is an RFC to migrate code-review from Gerrit to Phabricator's Differential.

Background
We have used Gerrit for code review since the migration from Subversion to Git, circa early 2012. In 2015, we migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator for our bug tracking. Phabricator also includes code management and review tools, and in fact these tools were a large part of the reason we chose Phabricator for our development platform.

Problem
Gerrit has a very high learning curve for new developers (cf: ), is difficult to maintain and does not integrate well with Phabricator. Continued maintenance of Gerrit has a very high cost and is yet another software tool to maintain by a small team.

Proposal
The general outline of steps is:
 * 1) Deprecate Gitblit (ie: git.wikimedia.org) and host all repositories in Phabricator ("Diffusion")
 * 2) * This is in-progress already, tracked via #gitblit-deprecate
 * 3) Migrate repositories that both 1) want to and 2) don't have CI requirements to code-review in Phabricator ("Differential")
 * 4) * This is in-progress already with scap and composer-merge-plugin
 * 5) * Doing this will give us real-world examples of code-review in Phabricator
 * 6) ** e.g. D46, D51
 * 7) Create this RFC
 * 8) Setup our Continuous Integration/testing infrastructure to work with Phabricator code-review
 * 9) Stop taking in new projects to Gerrit
 * 10) Continue migration of other repositories to Phabricator, leading to core repositories (MW, deployed extensions, puppet, config) on **date TBD**.
 * 11) Migrate remaining projects
 * 12) Make Gerrit read-only

Workflow proposals (NB: TO BE CREATED):
 * General code review workflow
 * WMF / SWAT deploy workflow (aka wmf branches / the cherry-pick button in Gerrit)
 * Post commit review workflow
 * Siebrand's workflow? ;) ;)

Pros and Cons of migrating to Phabricator/Differential
see also the original Phabricator RFC

Pros

 * Everything would be in one place
 * This benefit can not be understated
 * Single login for everything (it uses your Wikimedia SUL account)
 * Built in integration of subsystems like bug tracker, code-review, etc
 * Single interface across subsystems (reduced cognitive load/confusion)
 * Integrates design and designers (via Pholio)
 * Conversations allowed to stay in one place (instead of spread across multiple platforms)
 * Reduce technical-debt maintained by our community by no longer maintaining a family of home-grown integration bots (see: [| grrrit-wm] and potentially wikibugs2) and instead use/extend the Phabricator Bot.
 * Reducing the technical debt maintained by the WMF by:
 * Decommissioning Gitblit
 * Decommissioning Gerrit
 * Mobile-friendly
 * Login from any mobile device and see what you can read and do. Now, open Bugzilla or Gerrit...
 * Support for code auditing, with automatic notification based on herald rules and conditions
 * Audit cowboy commits triggered automatically and appropriate teams can be notified.
 * Raise concern about a commit that is already past code review.
 * Similar UI to differential but simplified and with different states for a commit:
 * "Needs audit" for commits that bypassed code review
 * "Concern raised" for manually flagged commits
 * Must be accept by someone with "ownership" of the code in question.
 * Faster and much more enjoyable code review experience (especially large diffs), and improved commit/review procedures
 * arc patch D123 vs git review -d 239028
 * differential comments are actually readable. vs gerrit is completely illegible, and if that weren't bad enough, no amount of css can fix it because the markup is pathological. Gerrit code review: Intentionally 99% css-resistant in the 21st century.
 * Multi-commit single-branch review support instead of the approach in Gerrit where each change is a single commit that is amended for each new patch set
 * But phabricator supports the single amended commit workflow for those that prefer it.
 * Better visibility of requested reviews - patches awaiting review are easier to notice thanks to dashboards, an outstanding review counter on the phabricator main menu, and phabricator notifications.
 * Possibility to let users create their own repositories
 * ease of creating feature branches?

Cons

 * arcanist required
 * not for much longer
 * Transition learning curve (inherent to any migration)
 * Can be partly addressed via trainings and documentation (which mostly already exists)
 * Single Point of Failure
 * isn't gerrit a single point of failure now?
 * phabricator supports repo mirroring and high availability clustering
 * Can be mitigated
 * Repository callsigns. This is being addressed with
 * Rewrite a bunch of bots relating to Gerrit
 * Gerritbot is no more needed (Phabricator has a built-in IRC notifier)
 * wikibugs needs to be updated, maybe? (see pros)
 * Impact on CI, needs the middleware glue to Jenkins/Nodepool

Investigate

 * Replication to GitHub
 * Yes, it does support it. Working on small scale already.
 * access lists inheritance (eg: operations/*   analytics/*   mediawiki/* ..)
 * this would use the acl*projects in phabricator
 * review dashboards
 * https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/differential/query/active/ for the default
 * search queries (ex: all changes I am a reviewer on and which I haven't voted CR yet: is:open reviewer:self label:code-review=0,self ie: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/is:open+reviewer:self+label:code-review%253D0%252Cself,n,z )
 * https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/differential/query/advanced/
 * Set "reviewers" to you, and status "needs review"
 * see also "blocking reviewers" vs "reviewers" in Differential
 * dependencies between changes across repos
 * private repos / patches
 * Bad feature of Gerrit, will not be re-doing.