Thread:Project:Current issues/Replace full protection with FlaggedRevs/reply (8)

I thing this is a very good idea.

Countless times, I have wanted to improve - most often correct - a page or a template, and I gave up, because it was locked. &rarr; The wiki gets no gain.

Countless times also, I have edited a page, or a part of the home page, with flagged revisions, and my edit went live after a few hours or days. &rarr; The wiki gets improved.

However, in the proposal by Waldir, there is one thing I don't like : the part "except Reviewers". If we place a barrier in front of content editing, why would reviewers have a passe-droit ? Admins behaving "above the law" are a chronic disease in Wikipedia communities. If there is a good reason to allow reviewers to edit directly, then there is a good reason to allow everyone to edit directly.