Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Missing from "Complete": Too much information

There are some articles out there that are just chock-full of trivial information and minutia that isn't really relevant to the encyclopedia project, and there's no way to vote about that. They have comprehensive coverage, but the key information is actually lost in the sea of unimportant information. I vote it down in the completeness rating in this case, since it's the only option I have, but that doesn't really make sense.

Take, for instance, Dreyfus affair, which is 29-30 pages almost entirely copied out of the Jewish Encyclopedia, split across many entries; certainly everything is there, but it's nearly impossible to discern what is still relevant or important to modern observers, particularly since section summaries are cursory or missing entirely (which is why I gave it a very low rating). Another example I just happened upon is Peanut Corporation of America, with an inordinate amount of detail on the crisis that bankrupted them. I plan on helping out, but I find voting is an easy way to bring attention to problems when there's not enough time or interest in a topic to do so.