Talk:Design/Archive/Wikimedia Foundation Design

This is very interesting and seems aligned with the principles exposed in many of this project's subpages: http://www.wikipediaredefined.com --Waldir (talk) 17:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I guess there are more bad ideas than good ones after all: Quora: What does the Wikipedia community think of "The Wikipedia Redefined" concept?, Wikipedia:Unsolicited redesigns --Waldir (talk) 00:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

"It is not a style guide for the MediaWiki software."
How is this possible? Short of making an entirely new skin, there is no detaching skin and general interface style from specific style, and the way MediaWiki handles skins, is there really any good way to make many things match in any particular skin without affecting how it appears on others? -— Isarra ༆ 23:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

What is Agora?
What is it? Are all the new Beta modules part of Agora? Is the Typography Update/Typography Refresh part of Agora or a separate project?

Will the Ivory Tower ever respond to the grovelling masses? I have been following and trying to provide feedback on this Beta stuff, but it is very frustrating. The documentation provided is confusing and incomplete, and no questions are ever answered. —Michael Z. 2013-11-22 16:17 z