Thread:Talk:ResourceLoader/Default modules/Capitalization of module names/reply (4)

It's a work in progress, and I appreciate you continuing it.

There actually were some inconsistencies before. In this revision, I noticed (but there could have been more):


 * Some single-method scripts (mw.log) had nested headings while others did not (e.g. autoEllipsis, placeholder).
 * Some method headings had context (e.g. api.get) while others did not (e.g. addCSS).
 * Some method names weren't even headings (still true).
 * There was one random example heading, which I see you fixed.

Note that I've been adding modules and other information as well, which is part of what has been taking the time. There are still some missing modules. I may add them when I have an opportunity, but if I am able to get auto-generated documentation working, it will not be necessary.

I suggest we expand the TOC depth, perhaps to 4. I think there are some important methods (e.g. log, the loader methods) that are not shown currently. I realize this will make the TOC longer, but I think it's worth it.

Anyway, I'm glad we have been able to make it more usable.