Thread:Talk:Flow Portal/Warning levels detection/reply (14)

I added an anchor to a comment Jorm made at w:Wikipedia talk:Flow, which might help.

I don't think the conceptual workflow modules are intended to be rigid procedures; they're intended to streamline the bits that can be streamlined (that currently require multiple disjointed steps and large pages of instructions to remind us exactly what order we're meant to do things in, like AfD), whilst still allowing whatever nuanced customizations each process often requires.

And more than that, the workflows will have hooks for alerting anyone who wants to be alerted about [an afd in the medical field / an afc request that needs copyediting / an rfc that is related to MOS:QUOTE / etc], hence increasing our awareness of what's going on, but without adding to anyone's workload.

We're going to be building the workflow modules, and requesting whatever features we need. The devs are just building the lego-blocks of features, that we'll put together in whatever ways we need/desire.