Thread:Talk:Flow/Numbered lists/reply (10)

As in other aspects, we need to maintain the fullest extent of on-wiki customizability possible. For RFA/RFBs and some RFCs, a fixed format separating !votes along choices with the possibility of entering an optional bolded opening statement (weak support, etc) different from the default may indeed make the trick. However, for others, an all-!votes together approach (no separation) would be preferable, with selection of bolded opening comment (which may be aided by a drop down menu if needs be).

So as you suggest, we'd need two types of poll workflows: one with separation (and default votes) and one without separation, both with customizable bolded opening statements. Workflow admins should be able to tweak workflows as needed for the various ever-changing processes.