Architecture committee/2016-05-11

Agenda timeline

 * Intro
 * Agenda bashing and action item check 21:00 (5 minutes)
 * Last week+this week’s RfC office hour 21:05 (5 minutes)
 * RFC status update
 * RfC inbox triage 21:10 (10 minutes)
 * Shepherd assignments 21:20 (5 minutes)
 * Queue for future RfC office hours 21:25 (5 minutes)
 * Wrapup
 * Other business 21:30 (10 minutes)
 * Next week’s ArchCom agenda 21:40 (10 minutes)

Agenda details/Meeting summary

 * This section equates to the "meeting summary" section in the meeting note template. It's collaboratively edited during the meeting and serves as the official public notes of the meeting.  Attendees: Fill in the important details in this section, but try to keep this concise and NPOV (easy way: use questions).  Put any prep information in this section if appropriate

Intro section

 * 10 minutes (starting 21:00 UTC)


 * Action items
 * Last week
 * Roan to talk to Timo about ArchCom status
 * T120164 - RobLa to issue last call on last calls (done)
 * RobLa to create "last call" column on ArchCom board (called "Final comment", per T123606 )
 * Last week’s RfC office hour
 * ArchCom-RFC office hour: 2016-05-04: E169 (E66/33)
 * T130528: RFC: PSR-6 Cache interface in Mediawiki core (declined)

RFC status update
20 minutes (starting 21:10 UTC)

Spend roughly 20 minutes ensuring Architecture committee/Status is up-to-date. Checklist of the questions we should answer:
 * Who is chairing the upcoming IRC meeting?
 * Conclude last week's "final comment period"? Do we have anything that should enter "final comment"?
 * Do we have a robust queue of RFCs to discuss at future IRC discussions?
 * For each upcoming meeting, do we anticipate the RFC moving into "final comment"?
 * How does ArchCom-RfCs board look?
 * Where should anything in the inbox go?
 * What is the most important thing each ArchCom member is shepherding? Anything blocked?  Are responsibilities balanced well?

Other business/planning
20 minutes (starting 21:30 UTC)
 * ArchCom Retrospective: E177
 * Next thing to focus on: getting working groups started
 * What? (i.e. which groups)?
 * Security working group?
 * Software quality?
 * Language working group?
 * Others?
 * How?
 * Phab Conpherence room as a lightweight proto-working group mechanism (like IETF BOFs)?
 * Next week's ArchCom

generated from Architecture committee/MeetingNoteTemplate