Development policy/Until 2018

The MediaWiki software is developed collaboratively by hackers from all around the world. To make sure that none of WMF's hundreds of wikis breaks by an upgrade, but to also make sure that all our wikis are reasonably up to date, we have a general development policy, outlined below.

Gerrit access
Development is done using Gerrit to manage our git repositories. To gain access to Gerrit, our code review system, anyone can register at wikitech:Special:UserLogin/signup. Git with Gerrit is a lot like wiki with FlaggedRevs: Everything must be reviewed and approved, and can be reverted.

Master branch as unstable and Wikimedia deployments
Main development takes place in the master branch of Git; it is unstable, but must always be kept in a working state. See also +2. Major modifications should take place in a development branch and only be merged when ready.

Code is automatically synced from the git master branch to a staging cluster ("Beta Labs"), generally within a few minutes of being merged. This allows further testing before deployment as an additional layer of defence against bugs; it is not a substitute for testing in advance of merge.

Code is generally deployed to production in stages. The WMF git branch is made from master, and this is released to the [//test.wikipedia.org Test Wikipedia], the [//test2.wikipedia.org Test2 Wikipedia], the [//test.wikidata.org Test Wikidata], and MediaWiki.org before it goes live on other production sites. This is to ensure that everything isn't taken out by the update. It is important to remember that this is not a substitute for testing and all code should thoroughly be tested before being merged into Git master.

Releases
Every few months, the master branch is cut into a release branch of the form. If you care about release management or want to try out one of the stable versions, these are the only branches that matter. Typically there will be a testing phase when a new release is begun. There might be a few release candidates, a 1.x.0 version, and finally a few minor bugfix releases. Releases are also packaged into  files and made accessible from the   webserver.

This ensures that users of our software can easily get a reasonably stable version without messing with Git. Anyone submitting patches should preferably use the latest version of master to avoid conflicts, and of course people with commit access need to use Gerrit to be able to push stuff for review. It's inadvisable to run production wikis off of development versions unless you know what you're doing (as do, for instance, the Wikimedia tech staff, a number of whom are also MediaWiki developers).

The Release checklist provides a more comprehensive list of tasks to be done for a release.

Database policy
Per the RFC "Increase the strictness of MediaWiki SQL code" (T112637):
 * WMF will be enabling MariaDB/MySQL's strict mode (T108255), which will be the default anyway in MySQL 5.7. Prior to this, all new code must not generate any warning.
 * Code that touches the database must be compatible with the following MySQL SQL modes:
 * (equivalent to )
 * Unsupported (old) versions of databases must be compatible with code as the MediaWiki compatibility list indicates, but performance efforts should be concentrated on supported versions of databases and its default or widely recommended configuration parameters.
 * All tables must have a primary key. When a candidate for primary key could not be created (for example, if all columns can be repeated), an auto_increment or another arbitrary value, depending on the case, has to be added.
 * Non-deterministic queries and unsafe statements for binlog should be avoided as they would return/write different results in a replication environment. The latter can be detected as warnings with the text "[Warning] Unsafe statement written to the binary log using statement format since BINLOG_FORMAT = STATEMENT". Those include   when using an auto_increment key,   without an , and using non-deterministic functions like  .  https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/replication-rbr-safe-unsafe.html has more info
 * Non-deterministic queries and unsafe statements for binlog should be avoided as they would return/write different results in a replication environment. The latter can be detected as warnings with the text "[Warning] Unsafe statement written to the binary log using statement format since BINLOG_FORMAT = STATEMENT". Those include   when using an auto_increment key,   without an , and using non-deterministic functions like  .  https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/replication-rbr-safe-unsafe.html has more info

Database patches
If you change the database schema, follow these rules:


 * Update the installer – Please update includes/installer and add an appropriate SQL update file to maintenance/archives/. The naming convention, if you're adding a field, is patch-table-field.sql. If you're removing a field, it's patch-drop-table-field.sql. If you're adding a table, it's patch-table.sql. Look at the commit history of includes/installer/(||||)Updater.php to find examples of how it's done. The schema change must be done for all five database types, or the patch will be rejected. If you're adding a bunch of fields to the same table, make all those changes in one query in one patch file.
 * Get your change approved by a DB admin – MediaWiki is deployed to Wikimedia websites every week, and it takes considerable planning to apply schema changes to MySQL-based sites the size of Wikipedia. As of September 2015, Jaime Crespo (jcrespo on LDAP, jynus on irc) is the best person to add to database reviews.
 * Make your schema change optional – All schema changes must go through a period of being optional. A couple examples:
 * Instead of changing the format of a column, create a new column, make all writes happen to the old and new column (if it exists) and deprecate use of the old column.  Check if the new column exists before blindly assuming that it does. Only eliminate support for the old column after it's clear the schema migration has happened and there's no chance that we'll need to roll back to the old version of the software.  If this doesn't seem feasible, send mail to wikitech-l asking for advice.
 * You could set your new feature to only work if a config option is set to true, and set the option to false by default. Then the commit can be safely scapped before the schema change is made.  You'll then have to pester the sysadmins incessantly to get them to make the schema change, at which point you can remove the config option to enable your feature.

There might be cases where the "make your schema change optional" rule will be prohibitive from a performance or logistics perspective. However, schema changes like that should be rare to begin with, and should have prominent discussion on wikitech-l mailing list. In the case where it's impossible to make your schema change optional, it is still critical to write scripts to roll back to the pre-change state.

Once a migration has been reviewed, please update Schema changes page with all pertinent details, then get in touch for deployment scheduling. There are good and legitimate reasons to not follow the "make schema changes optional" policy but if that's the case, please provide 3–7 days of lead time, depending on the size of tables and number of affected wikis.

Primary keys, and fields that reference them, should be unsigned, in order to increase the maximum values. For more details, see http://www.percona.com/files/presentations/WEBINAR-MySQL-Indexing-Best-Practices.pdf. Database optimization practices should also be followed.

Test wiki policy
There is an official test wiki at http://test.wikipedia.org. Some developers may also have test servers deployed.

Generally, the purpose of such "fresh from Git" servers is to test the latest unstable branch of the code, not to have a testbed for demonstrating unfinished features. Features should be demonstrated with GUI mock-ups before they are implemented (these can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons (preferred) or to this wiki), and implementations should only be pushed to Gerrit if they are in a reasonably complete state. This ensures that we avoid features that are never finished. To test your own code, please make sure you have a fully working local MediaWiki installation; if you want others to test your unstable code, you can always set up your own test server.

Documentation policy
If a feature is going to be visible to end users or administrators, it's important that the developer documents the feature. Broadly speaking, you can document Just a few sentences are fine: what it does, how to use it. Others will fix your prose up – the important part is to have features documented.
 * in code comments as part of your code change that turn into generated PHP and JavaScript documentation at https://doc.wikimedia.org
 * in the file as part of your code change to MediaWiki core.
 * in the vast trove of general MediaWiki documentation on this wiki
 * in wiki pages on wikitech that describe how MediaWiki is set up on the Wikimedia sites.

For wiki pages here, there are various templates available on this wiki using which you just have to edit a few lines and the template will handle everything else. As the developer, you are the subject matter expert and therefore possibly in a better position than anyone else to document the feature accurately and thoroughly, especially if some aspects of it are not particularly self-explanatory. If you're too lazy, on the other hand, there is fortunately at least the theoretical possibility that someone will be willing and able to do it for you, since this is an open-edit wiki.