Thread:Talk:Flow Portal/Interactive Prototype/Please don't implement this/reply (7)

Well, I'm a little confused, too, that's what I wanted to make clear in my posts.

You're requesting feedback, but instead of discussing how this feedback could be implemented best in the final Flow, most of the replies by Jorm are reasons why the requested features won't get implemented. He spends time to defend his decisions instead of reconsidering his decisions based on the given feedback. This is just pointless in my opinion.

I didn't follow the discussion around LiquidThreads and I'm not completely sure what you mean by "design by committee" but in my opinion the new Flow should include the features the community wishes for, redacted and planned by the WMF but based on the ideas of the community. Instead I have the feeling WMF (or Jorm) are planning on their own and present the community with a fait accompli.