User talk:Jack Phoenix/archive 1

Hello Sayuri, welcome on MediaWiki.org, and thanks for your help so far :-) --- :Bdk: 14:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

terve
juu, hauskaahan tämmöisessä on melskata kun saa tavallaan ruveta pienesta, niin kaikki on tavallaan perustyötä. -- Cimon Avaro 19:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Jobs/speedy deletion
Hi,

You have marked this page - Jobs for fast deletion (reason: not relevant). I have created this page because of a request on mediawiki-l mailing list - some ppl were looking for a place to add job offers or look for a MW-related job - similar to http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/ConsultantsForHire, but for MW. I've just started this page - if you need please update it the way you wish or discuss @ its talk page.

Thx in advance, Regards --Aretai 13:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, I've removed the speedy tag now. I'm sorry about that. Maybe other users or admins can comment on it. :) -- Sayuri 13:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Why don't you put up a site on this subject? and link to it from your user page? Jean-Lou Dupont 14:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I have added a request for comment here. --HappyDog 01:33, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Sysop
See. robchurch | talk 16:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow, thank you very much Rob! :) -- Sayuri 16:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Licensing of meta images
Hi Sayuri, I noticed that several of the images you have moved here from meta have the editing history on meta, but not the copyright status or a license tag. If you know the copyright status, could you please add the tags? Thanks. --Brian 04:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for clarfying the situation on that. Looking through the images, I noticed a few of them are screenshots of Mediawiki only ( without wikipedia or other logos).Since Mediawiki software is under the GPL license, I would think that screenshots that just show the software ( such as Image:Sample Dynamic Article List 2.png and Image:Sample Dynamic Article List 1.png would be covered by that license as well (though I`m not a lawyer). Let me know if I`m missing something obvious here? By the way, congrats on your appointment to the cabel:).--Brian 08:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with you, they're probably covered by the GPL license, but then again, I'm not a lawyer. And thanks for the thankings, though if there's a cabal, then it's either pretty quiet...or I'm not a member or it. Heh. ;) -- Sayuri 12:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I added it to those two images, though I forgot to sign in first:) I wonder if Image:Texbox1.png would fall under the same category, or do you know if extensions are licensed diffrently than the main software itself.Image:Texbox2.pngis ismlar, though the Firefox logo visable might be a problablem. The others look  more complicated, though, since they show other logos or content besifes the software. Unfournantly, I`m not very familier with copyrights to know what to do with them. You mentioned fair use earlier- good idea, but  Special:upload states that "All files uploaded to MediaWiki.org must be available under a free license (no "fair use" or "noncommercial")." I think that is  probably a matter for a wider community discussion before doing it.--Brian 05:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I guess it'd be wise to bug the original author at Meta, try to leave them a message or an e-mail. That's the only way to be 100% sure about their license. -- Sayuri 11:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)