Growth/Positive reinforcement/ar

تصف هذه الصفحة العمل على «التعزيز الإيجابي» كجزء من حُزْمَة مزايا فريق النموّ. تحتوي هذه الصفحة على الموجود والتصاميم والأسئلة المفتوحة والقرارات.

سيتم نشر معظم الأخبار الخاصة بتدرّج العمل في الصفحة العامة لـأخبار فريق النمو، مع نشر بعض الأخبار الهامّة أو المفصّلة هنا.

الوضع الحاليّ

 * 2021-03-01: إنشاء صفحة المشروع
 * 2022-02-25: انطلاق المشروع مع حوارات صُلْب الفريق
 * 2022-03-01: توسّع صفحة المشروع
 * 2022-05-11: مناقشات المجتمع

ملخّص
كان فريق النموّ مركّزاً على إنشاء «تجرية متماسكة لدى الوافدين الجدد» التي توفّر حصول الوافدين الجدد على عناصر تُساعدهم على الاندماج في تقاليد مجتمع ويكيبيديا. على سبيل المثال، مع مهام الوافدين الجدد، وفّرنا لهم فرصاً للمساهمة، ومع وحدة الإرشاد، وفّرنا لهم الحصول على إرشاد. تمكنت التعديلات المقترحة من جذب المزيد من الوافدين الجدد لإجراء تعديلاتهم الأولى. بهذا النجاح ، نريد اتخاذ إجراءات لتشجيع الوافدين الجدد على الاستمرار في إجراء المزيد من التعديلات. هذا يلفت انتباهنا إلى عنصر غير مطور يحتاج الوافدون الجدد إلى الوصول إليه: تقييم الأداء. أطلقنا على هذا المشروع اسم «التعزيز الإيجابي».

نريد أن يفهم الوافدون الجدد أن هناك تقدمًا وقيمة للمساهمات المستمرة على ويكيبيديا، مما يزيد من الاحتفاظ بهؤلاء المستخدمين الذين اتخذوا الخطوة الأولى في إجراء التعديل.

سؤالنا الكبير هنا هو: كيف يمكننا تشجيع الوافدين الجدد الذين زاروا صفحتنا الرئيسية وجربوا مزايانا لمواصلة التعديل والبناء على زخمهم؟

معلومات أساسية
عندما تم نشر لوحة المستخدم للوافد الجديد في عام 2019، كانت تحتوي على «وحدة تأثير» أساسيّة، والتي أدرجت عدد مشاهدات الصفحة للصفحات التي قام المستخدم الجديد بتحريرها. هذا هو الجزء الوحيد من مزايا النمو التي تمنح الوافد الجديد أي إحساس بتأثيره، ولم نقم بتحسينه منذ أن تم نشره أوّل مرة. With this as a starting point, we have gathered some important learnings about positive reinforcement:


 * We have heard good feedback from community members about the module, with experienced editors saying that it is interesting and valuable to them.
 * Appreciation from other users has been shown to increase retention, such as in the case of "thanks" (here and here) and in an experiment on German Wikipedia. We believe that these reinforcements from real people would be more effective than automated ones coming from the system.
 * Community members have explained that it is a high priority for newcomers to move on to more valuable tasks after starting with easy ones, as opposed to getting stuck just doing easy tasks.
 * Other platforms, such as Google, Duolingo, and Github, all utilize numerous positive reinforcement mechanisms like badges and goals.
 * Communities are wary of incentivizing unhealthy editing. We have seen that when editing contests offer cash prizes, or just when useful roles such as "extended confirmed" rely on edit counts, it can incentivize people to make many problematic edits.

User persona
There are many parts of the newcomer journey in which we could attempt to increase retention. We could focus on newcomers who have stopped editing after just one or a few edits, or we could focus farther down the journey on newcomers who have stopped editing after weeks of activity. For this project, we have decided to focus on those newcomers who have completed their first editing session, and who we want to return for a second session. The diagram illustrates these with a yellow star.

We want to focus on newcomers at this stage, as that’s the next stage of the editor funnel in which we can help improve retention. It is also where we see a very significant attrition rate currently, so if we can help retain newcomers at this point, it should have a meaningful increase in editor growth overtime.

Research and design
Research was conducted on the various mechanisms that have been employed to encourage people to contribute content to both on and off-wiki products. The following are some of the key findings from the research: To see a summary of the current design ideas for Positive Reinforcement, see this Design Brief. Our designs will evolve further through community feedback and several rounds of user testing.
 * Motivations for Wikipedia editors are multifaceted, and shift over time and experience. New editors are often driven more by curiosity and social connection than ideology.
 * Internal projects focus on intrinsic incentives, appeal to altruistic motivations, and are not systematically applied.
 * Broadening the appeal beyond ideological motivations may improve diversity of retained editors on Wikipedia.
 * Positive messages from experienced users and mentors is proven effective in short-term retention.

Ideas




We have three main ideas for positive reinforcement. We may pursue multiple ideas as we work on this project.

“Thanks received” count, to highlight the ability to receive community recognition.
 * Impact: An overhaul of the Impact module based on incorporating stats, graphs, and other contribution information. The revised impact module would provide new editors more context about their impact, as well as encourages them to continue contributing. Areas of exploration include:
 * Suggested edits milestone, to nudge users to try suggested edits.
 * Statistics on how much the user has edited over time (similar to what is in X Tools).


 * Leveling up: It is important to communities that newcomers progress to more valuable tasks. For those who do many easy tasks, we want to nudge them toward trying more difficult tasks. This could happen after they complete a certain number of easy tasks, or by encouragement on their homepage. Areas of exploration include:
 * The newcomer will see success messages post-editing that motivate them to do more edits of the same or different levels of difficulty.
 * In the Suggested Edits module, provide opportunities to do more difficult edits, so that newcomers can become more skilled editors.
 * In the Impact module, include a milestone counter or award area.
 * On the Homepage, add a new module with set challenges to attain some reward (badge/certificate).
 * Add notifications to prompt newcomers to try a more difficult task.


 * Personalized praise: research shows that praise and encouragement from other users increases newcomer retention. We want to think about how to encourage experienced users to thank and award newcomers for good contributions. Perhaps mentors could be encouraged to do this on their mentor dashboards or through notifications. We can utilize existing communication mechanisms which past studies have proven to have a degree of positive effect. Areas of exploration include:
 * A personal message from the newcomer’s mentor appearing in the homepage.
 * An echo notification from the mentor or the Wikimedia Growth team.
 * “Thanks” on a specific edit.
 * A new milestone badge awarded by the mentor or the Wikimedia Growth team relating to a specific edit.

النقاشات المجتمعية
Adding incentives to the editing experience will hopefully encourage constructive contributions, but we also know that it could cause unexpected or undesired behavior from users. Therefore, we want to discuss with communities how we could encourage newcomers while still preserving the values of the wikis.


 * What has worked well on your wiki for motivating newcomers?
 * What ideas do you think we should consider?
 * What could go wrong and what should we try to avoid?

اختبار المستخدم
Along with community discussion, we want to validate and add to our initial designs and hypothesis. We will conduct Positive Reinforcement user research aimed to better understand the project's impact on newcomer contribution across several different languages. We will share these results here.

Measurement and results
Once community discussion is complete, designs are refined, development and testing are complete, our staff Data Scientist will closely monitor the impact of the Positive Reinforcement project. We will share our initial measure plan and subsequent results here.