Thread:Talk:Flow Portal/Interactive Prototype/Please don't implement this/reply (6)

If something contains copyrighted content it seems like precisely the kind of thing that should be marked as abusive - and as for copyediting, why is that a requisite feature? Let's be clear, here, that we're in an early design stage. Statements like "there will be a mark-as-abusive feature" are just that; statements, not explanations of the underlying workflow. If you've got an idea of how the workflow for removing problematic posts would work in an ideal world, say it and we'll see what we can do about it :). See Brandon's comment below: Ideally, clicking on that link (and the terminology there is obviously open for discussion) will start a workflow that helps a user define if a comment is abusive, vandalism, off topic, whatever. I have intentionally not spent a great deal of time on anti-vandalism workflows because I wanted to get more information about how people would like to see that work; this is my fault for showing something half-baked."