Extension talk:Word2MediaWikiPlus


 * For bug reports use the Bug Tracker.
 * For feature requests use the Feature Requests Tracker.

The old talk page has been archived for reference while the project is restructured.

This project is active again
The author of this project, Gunter Schmidt, kindly granted permission for the community to continue working on this project:

-- Forwarded message -- From: Gunter Schmidt Date: 08/02/2007 18:31 Subject: Re: Project Word2MediaWikiPlus To: Fernando Correia

Dear Mr. Correia,

I have noticed, you do a lot of contributing work to the community and seem to have the same issues as I do. I am implementing a MediaWiki as the primary documentation system for our SAP-System.

For getting a better acceptance (and for the fun of it) I completly rewrote the Word2wiki-converter, and yes, I did put it under the GPL license, so feel free to use it.

I was thinking on going commercial with it, but keeping it GPL for non-commercial usage, as I found, I had some completly new approches to some problems (and it took me some reseach time to develop it).

Right now my real job needs too much attention for continuing the project.

best, Gunter Schmidt

Need of starting Word2MediaWikiPlus on sourceforge.net
Currently the only place I found a download of Word2MediaWikiPlus.zip is from a forum post attachment. This however was version 0.6b. It would be great if Word2MediaWikiPlus was on CVS since it has undergone a lot of modifications/enhancements/bug-fixes. The *.bas files could be extracted and stored under version-control. This would help a lot in storing/logging history of changes.

If Gunter Schmidt is happy with us continuing development on Word2MediaWikiPlus and the community agrees to store it under version control, then which version should we put in? I have version 0.6b. Who was 0.7b?

--Kevingpo 11:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear about your interest. I've got version 0.7b and I have it packaged and ready to publish. Gunter says it is the latest usable version. I already requested a project on SourceForge where we can keep version history. The answer should come in a few days. I think this tool is very useful and I hope some members of the community will join forces to maintain it. For instance, it needs to be adjusted to support Word 2007. --Fernando Correia 11:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Lol. I tried creating a 'word2mediawikip' project on sf.net (limited to 15 characters). But sf.net says there's already a request in. Anyway, so you will you be extracting all the *.frm & *.bas files from the Word document. The frm & bas files are plain text and when stored in sf.net CVS, we can use their web tools such as diff/compare/merge. Whenever we create a version release, we just create a "Label" or "Tag" which maps/notes all the specific version numbers of each file. I think we'll manually update the frm & bas modules inside Word document then zip it up and put it as release. We need to make sure it is still compatible with 2000 through to 2007 (when we make adjustments for it to work under 2007). --Kevingpo 13:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * It sounds like a good plan. We can publish the source as separate text files and a binary (Word Document) release. If you would like to help in this I'd be glad to give you write access on the sourceforge project. --Fernando Correia 15:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * That would be cool yeah. My sf.net account is same name as this mediawiki one. I use Office 2000 so that would help maintaining compatibility. And am sure many other people would participate too. --Kevingpo 15:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Tips on how to write Word document for use in W2MW+
Guidelines:


 * By default, the Word filename will be used for the main title of the wiki page (however this can be changed during conversion).
 * Use 'Heading 1', 'Heading 2', etc styles for headings of main sections. 'Heading 2', etc. being a sub-section, etc. A *table-of-contents get automatically generated for top of the wiki page, with appropriate indentation of the menu.
 * Create 'Hyperlink's or 'email address links' in Word and it will get converted.
 * Spaces prefixing a line will be ignored. Use tabs instead.
 * Page Breaks will create a horizontal line in wiki page.
 * If numeric or dot-bullet-points are used (without 'Heading' style), then it's treated as a normal list.

Things will not work:


 * Coloured-in text background.
 * Indented text using the left-border stopper.
 * Different font types.

--Kevingpo 14:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The title should be the document title (File->Properties), not the filename. Platonides 20:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree, but only the default title. It would be good to have an editable combo box where the first option were the document title, the second the file name and the user could type another title. The reason is that many users don't change the document title and it is meaningless. --Fernando Correia 22:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment
Why was Word2MediaWikiPlus originally on meta.wikimedia.org then transferred over here to www.mediawiki.org? Also, will we create a nice front page on the 'Extension'?


 * The Wikimedia project administrators are moving content related to the MediaWiki software from the Meta website to the MediaWiki website. This was a planned move that will be applied for all other extensions. And yes, we'll surely create a very good documentation. As soon as the sourceforge project is up I plan to revert to the previous documentation, link to the last released version, and we can continue from there. --Fernando Correia 15:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Release plan
When the sourceforge project is activated, I intend to follow this release plan:


 * 1) Upload version 0.6e (installer and source code).
 * 2) Upload version 0.7.0.10-Beta (installer and source code).
 * 3) If we can locate it, upload version 0.7.0.11.
 * 4) Repackage version 0.7 into version 1.0. No source code change, just adding standard comments to all source files.

Version 1.0 will be the starting point for the community contributions. --Fernando Correia 18:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * This plan has been executed. Version 0.7.0.11 was not located, though. Version 1.0.0-Beta1 was released for beta test. --Fernando Correia 17:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Release identification scheme
The releases of this project will by identified according to the following scheme:


 * The identification will be composed of three levels, where each level is an integer number, and of an optional suffix. E.g. Word2MediaWikiPlus-1.2.3-RC1.
 * The starting identification will be 1.0.0.
 * The first level will be incremented when new features are added that are significant relatively to the entire set of features.
 * The second level will be incremented when there are new functionalities or changes that are minor relatively to the entire set of features.
 * The third level will be incremented in case of error corrections or very small changes like UI positioning or message wording.
 * The Alpha{N} suffix will identify alpha releases, that is, releases that are not ready for production and are being submitted to the developers to demonstrate the current state of development and for early testing.
 * The Beta{N} suffix will identify beta test releases, that is, releases that are not ready for production and are being submitted to tests.
 * The RC{N} suffix will identify release candidates, that is, releases that are supposed to be ready for production and are being submitted to final acceptance test.

For more information see Software release life cycle and Software versioning.

Status of SourceForge project
Good news! The project on SourceForge has been created.

I have uploaded the old versions I had here. Next steps are to upload the source code to CVS and to create version 1.0.0.

When this is done the project will be released for community collaboration. --Fernando Correia 10:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Update: The project has been created, files have been uploaded and 1.0.0-Beta1 was released. --Fernando Correia 19:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

1.0.0-Beta1 released
The release 1.0.0-Beta1 is out! This is 0.7.0.10 repackaged. Please test this and report the result here so we can release it as stable and use it as a starting point. Thanks! --Fernando Correia 17:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Upload with IE 7
The image upload at any version of the Word2MediawikiPlus doesn't work with the new IE 7. It's only possible to upload images with version 6 of the Internet Explorer or with the Mozilla FireFox 2.0. The text field in which u normally type ur url, Word2Mediawikiplus use this textfield to type in the location\name of the pic which should be uploaded !!! so the Upload doesn't work !! please gimme a solution ! Or tell me, am i Stupid or is it a bug ;-) ! -- 84.147.41.5


 * I was able to make it work in IE 7 by changing the "Tab steps to filename" configuration to 8. I think this number may vary according to the number of toobars that are open. I suggest trying all numbers from 1 onward and using the Simulate upload button to check if they work. --Fernando Correia 10:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank u very much for ur help, but i have still problems with IE 7 and Word2mediawiki plus! It's right that u can perfectly simulate the Upload when u Use the "8" and take the "simulate Upload" button, but when u try to convert a document ( only one pic ) the converter looses the first letter of each name and location of the file. My Question to u: U tried to convert a document with IE7 or only simulate the Upload ?? Thanks very much for ur time u have for my problems... Regards Matthew


 * [[image:example123.png]]


 * I have reopened the request at SourceForge. Please attach there a sample Word document that causes this problem and I'll try to reproduce. Thanks. --Fernando Correia 10:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Version 1.0.0 released
Thanks to testing by Kevin, we have reached a milestone by releasing version 1.0.0. It is the same source code as version 0.7.0.10 Beta. The Subversion repository is organized and this will be the base for future development. --Fernando Correia 11:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Lots of downloads
Interesting... there are about 50 daily downloads of this project. I really didn't expect that much, given that I hardly hear from any user. It seems most people can use it without problems. Or can't even start to figure it out... --Fernando Correia 17:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I counted about 1000/month, quite steady. --GunterS 21:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)