Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Flawed and just useless/reply (5)

Mr WhatamIdoing, you actually sound like a politician. If the ratings tell us something useless, then the ratings are useless. The following is a description of this tool: "The Article Feedback Tool is a Wikimedia survey for article feedback to engage readers in the assessment of article quality". So, if readers give it a bad rating, that means the article is of bad quality (supposedly), and therefore should be improved. What I am suggesting is that a large portion of readers who vote are not voting on the quality of the article, but rather the subject of the article. It can't be a coincidence that Hitler, Beiber, and Gomez have all been amongst the lowest rating articles. You seem to be the only one in favour of this system, WhatamIdoing, so I suggest you just take a step back and look at it, then ask yourself, "What am I doing..." No good can come of it. It is ultimately a fail.