Wikimedia Mobile engineering/Brainstorm

This page is intended to be a whiteboard for requests, feature ideas, and thoughts that eventually may become product requirements.

Social Features

not just mobile, but maybe easier to get started on mobile

Here is actual user commentary culled by Sue Gardner in her blog. http://suegardner.org/2011/02/19/nine-reasons-why-women-dont-edit-wikipedia-in-their-own-words/

Both quotes are from Metafilter:

Not everyone feels self-doubting, though: ”It’s not that it intimidates me. It’s more that, well, if I spend three hours carefully composing a concise article on something, complete with blasted citations and attention to formatting consistency, the chances of it being poof!gone the next day are still high, and on top of all my work I don’t get anything back apart from the ineffable sensation of contributing to humanity’s knowledge base. I want friends who will excitedly inform me how pleased they were by my penultimate paragraph, dammit. I want a way to team up with someone who knows the markup and can help iron out problems before stuff gets published. I want a social backbone to keep me contributing and caring, one that doesn’t depend on the frequency of my contributions. Contests for “best article about birds in November”. Basically, give me a LJ-flavored wikipedia editors fan community.” [6]

[6] Source: From a discussion at Metafilter titled Wikipedia, Snips & Snails, Sugar & Spice?

The few times I’ve touched wikipedia, I’ve been struck by how isolating it can feel. It’s a very fend for yourself kind of place for me. Anywhere else online, my first impulse is to put out feelers. I make friends, ask for links to FAQs and guides, and inevitably someone takes me under their wing and shows me the ropes of whatever niche culture I’m obsessed with that month. It’s very collaborative, and prioritizes friendships and enjoyment of pre-existing work over results. Wikipedia isn’t like that, as far as I’ve experienced. There’s no reciprocal culture; to just plunge oneself into the thick of things and start adding information can be highly intimidating, and there’s no structure set up to find like-minded people to assist one’s first attempts. Instead I just find lots and lots of links to lots of information-dense pages.” [27]

[27] Source: From a discussion at Metafilter titled Wikipedia, Snips & Snails, Sugar & Spice?

Please consider these general comments that could just as easily apply to anyone new to editing Wikipedia, as to women in particular.

While these are general issues, some aspects could be addressed in a natural way with mobile functionality.

For example, could there be a way to browse a discussion forum on mobile and start chatting with participants who may be in particular discussions?

Could we surface users who are online and near the inquiring user, or users who have edited topics related to a search?

Imminent:


 * Search suggestions (19956) – developed by a user, will be released soon
 * Inter-wiki language links – main request from new mobile gateway feedback

India and Brazil research:


 * Summaries
 * More media
 * Editing
 * Language detection
 * Handset detection (already implemented)

Internal grab bag:


 * Article rating
 * Articles near me missing photos, and photo upload
 * Curating photos
 * Enlarge/reduce text easily (such as by number keys), with reflow
 * Voice input search, aka Apple demo (possibly no work required)

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Mobile_site_rewrite/Testing


 * Move “Mobile View” to top
 * Reduce line-height
 * Keys for navigation
 * Content lists non-touch
 * Thumbnail to screen width, ot inline if screen is more than 300 pixels wide
 * Mobile editing UI
 * Change table.metadata to metadata

Bugzilla

Summary coming soon...