Manual talk:$wgNonincludableNamespaces

Transclusion from within the same namespace
I think that this would be more useful (for my purposes, at least) if it did not block transclusion from within the same namespace...or possibly from within the same namespace+talk pair. --216.86.81.31 04:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure how this is useful if you want to allow transclusion/inclusion but prevent access to the data via those mechanisms. If I understand this concept correctly, the transclusion act should determine if the page is protected and then not transclude it or not. If all the pages must be in the same namespace, then I cannot use tranclusion at all on those pages, which seems like an incomplete solution. --134.134.136.5 17:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

We are using a lot of extra namespaces and it would be very useful to allow inclusion/transclusion within a namespace but disallow inclusion/transclusion from one namespace to the other. So, if someone has an idea how to implement such a feature... I would be more than glad to know how to do this... --84.60.31.246 12:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)