Translation UX/Design feedback 3

The goal of this feedback round was to test:
 * The full page prototype.
 * The current implementation of the ULS.

Test with User #40
The user was capable of speaking Tamil, French, Hindi and German but only participates as a French translator.

Network problems forced the recording to be made in two sessions that correspond to 1st and 2nd test.

Test 1: Full-page prototype

 * 01:23 - The user understands the overall structure of the UI and finds out how to edit lacking translations, but expected some input support for Hindi (asks: "is this transliteration?").
 * 5:39 - The user looks for parts of the document lacking a translation, and seems comfortable comparing original and translated paragraphs. Does not notice the progress bar at 100% as an indicator of the translation being complete.
 * 7:50 - The user actives proofreading mode and understands the options that are given to him for each section. "It is clear that when I mark each section it is correct".
 * 9:06 - The user suggest the possibility of mark as incorrect for situations when users are reviewing a document but cannot type.
 * 11:14 - When asked about general impression: "It's quite clear and simple. There is nothing to be confused about."
 * 12:12 - The user comments he is currently translating in French since he knows the language well and input in non-latin languages is inconvenient.
 * 13:55 - User is not sure about the outdated marker. No indications are given to explain the meaning.