Notifications/Sorting schemes/zh

总而言之，任务是决定不同类型的通知如何排序. 比如将新用户讨论页消息、编辑被回退以及有链接至用户创建页面的页面被创建进入两组 目前的排序有以下问题 There are 2 more logical alternatives which the team is trying to decide between, and wants your feedback on (your preferences, or concerns). 一种比较推荐的做法是我们从紧急程度进行分组

Please share your feedback at the Phabricator task or here on MediaWiki.org.

需要解决的问题
目前有两种通知的浮动菜单，一种用于提醒，一种用于消息. Different notification types show up on different menus. There have been criticism over time that the scheme for dividing up the messages is unclear and/or inconsistent. 批评主要有：
 * Ideas of "urgency" and "requiring follow up" are mixed together, making it difficult to explain or predict why different items are in each flyout.
 * Currently, "Alert" items are automatically "marked as read" on opening the flyout. Yet some of these require follow-up or other action to be fully understood (e.g., Mention), so this feature's value is not always clear.
 * Because "Alerts" are perceived as "Urgent", the "Thanks" and other items seem out of place in that flyout.

Goals

 * To create a scheme that is easy to understand, learn, and predict.
 * To give editors clearer information about their new notifications.
 * To reduce unnecessary distraction from non-urgent notifications.
 * Something that works well for editors who get large (and small) quantities of notifications.
 * Something that scales well, as new (requested) notification types are created.
 * Something that scales well, once cross-wiki notifications are available.

Types
See examples of the most common notification types at File:Notifications Catalog.png.

Options
(This table has no annotations, and just shows the most common notification-types. See a more detailed version here at googledocs which also includes a 4th (more complicated) alternative.)
 * 1) Current
 * 2) Urgent versus Non-Urgent
 * 3) Follow-up versus No follow-up (is a reply needed/likely)