User:ImPacific/GSoC proposal 2014

A system for reviewing funding requests

 * Public URL: (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:ImPacific/GSoC_proposal_2014)
 * Bugzilla report: (link to the related report at http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org )
 * Announcement: (link to the announcement of your proposal at the wikitech-l mailing list.

Name and contact information

 * Name: Prashant Gurumukhi
 * Email:psg.1992@gmail.com
 * Location: Nagpur, India.
 * Typical working hours:10:00 AM to 2 PM (IST) and 8:00 PM to 2:00 AM (IST)

Synopsis
Wikimedia foundations has several programs such as IEG, conference scholarship and several other similar programs. IEG i.e. "Individual Engagement Grants" support Wikimedians to complete projects that benefit the Wikimedia movement. IEG fund individuals or small teams to organize, build, create, research or facilitate something that enhances the work of Wikimedia’s volunteers. Individuals or teams submit their proposals which are then assessed by the grantmakers on multiple dimensions and are then considered for funding.

The goal of this project is to either create or adapt a free and open source review system for funding requests, applicable to Individual Engagement Grants and similar programs. The system will allow the administrator to specify the criteria by which the grants will be judged. A defined set of reviewers will score and comment on each application. After this process the system will average the score of all reviewers and apply relative importance values specified by the administrator. Report showing how each application has been assessed will be generated. The system will hence make the work of grantmakers easy and succinct.
 * Possible mentors: Siko Bouterse, Bryan Davis, Dan Garry

Approach
Upon analysis of existing FOSS applications if the core requirements are not met, a new application would be made from scratch. Application will be used by following users
 * Project would encompass three phases:
 * First a list of core requirements would be made.
 * Second phase would involve analysis of existing FOSS applications that could satisfy the core requirements chalked out in phase 1
 * Third phase would be to study the FOSS application if found any and make necessary changes or build a new application from scratch.

1) Administrator of grant review system

2) Reviewer

3) Grant Providers


 * 1) Administrator:
 * Sets the campaigns (Eg. IEG, wikimania scholarships, conference scholarship)
 * Defines the rules that should be used by reviewing committee for the campaign selected above.


 * 2) Reviewer:
 * Based on core requirements and the rules set by administrators, applications will be ruled out as relevant/irrelevant.
 * Relevant applications will go ahead for further scrutiny where they will be scored on multiple dimensions on a some scale. All the dimensions will be in a drop down list and each one of them will have 5 radio buttons(or more depending upon the scale). A comment box will be provided here.
 * Average score(final score) for each application(in a campaign) will be generated on the basis of which they will be prioritized and submitted to grant providers. A report will be generated showing how each application has been assessed.


 * 3) Grant Providers:
 * Calls for reports on average scores by reviewers(prioritized list) and recommend applications to fund.

Participation
Email, Gtalk and google groups has been very simple way of communicating for me. I'm subscribed to mailing list wikitech-I which I find very informative and helpful. Communicating over emails or Gtalk would be easy and I'll be mailing the progress related to project regularly. I would also make a wiki page for the project where I will be posting all the updates regarding the project. I would prefer Git Hub for maintaining the source code.

About you
I'm Prashant Gurumukhi, a junior at Shri Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management Nagpur, currently pursuing my Bachelor of Engineering program under the Department of Electronics Engineering. Building websites and web applications has been very interesting for me. Looking at Opensource work going on everywhere I feel the need to contribute something myself and that's why I'm here.
 * How did you hear about this program?
 * I read about the program browsing joomla's developer page.
 * Will you have any other time commitments, such as school work, another job, planned vacation, etc., during the duration of the program?
 * I have end semester examination between May 12 & May 26, during this time I won't be able to work much. Other than this I dont have any Obligation and will be Committed to work.

Past experience
I've used Joomla CMS to make website and that's the only experience I've had so far. As a contributor this will be my first experience.
 * Please describe your experience with any other FOSS projects as a user and as a contributor:

Any other info
Reviewer's Dashboard