Talk:Requests for comment/Alternate disclosure policy

Listed services
I might consider dropping Gerrit and Bugzilla from the site list, as you'll have to remove those in a while anyway. LuisV (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, one would hope that this proposal is passed before that happens; until then, the TOU applies, even though it's technically impossible to meet its requirements. Risker (talk) 18:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It shouldn't take more than a week for this RfC to be closed. (48 or 72 hours is also fine, given the urgency and absence of any controversy; this wiki is not bureaucratic.) --Nemo 18:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, but they don't need to be explicitly listed - "like" is enough to clearly include them. LuisV (WMF) (talk) 21:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Closure
Despite wikitech-l/2014-July/077679.html I don't think the generic RfC closure rules are meant to apply in such a discussion just because of the prefix the page title happens to have; I'll close the RfC in about 48 hours if nobody does by that time. --Nemo 10:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)