User talk:Happy-melon

 Dear, Welcome to MediaWiki.org !

Yes, Welcome! This site is dedicated to the documentation of the MediaWiki software, the software behind many wikis, including that of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation projects.

Please, take a look at the following pages. They might prove useful to you as a newcomer here:
 * About this site
 * How does MediaWiki work?
 * Help:Editing pages
 * Help:Navigation
 * Manual:FAQ

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and find this site a beneficial documentation of the MediaWiki software. Thanks, and regards, Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt 22:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Help:Extension:ParserFunctions
Hello, imho, we should import meta:Help:ParserFunctions and merge it with Extension:ParserFunctions rather than creating one new page which seems to be a duplicate of the page currently on meta. i Alex  16:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The page on meta shouldn't be there; all help content should be here at mediawiki.org. Once we've found a place for the content here, we can soft-redirect the help pages at meta and the various wikimedia wikis to that content and have it centralised in one place.  I've posted on Project:Forum about maybe making another help namespace for content related to extensions. Also, we can't just "import" content from meta if we want it to be freely-distributable help content, as there are license issues.  Similarly, help content can't go in the Extension: namespace. Happy ‑ melon 16:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Extension: namespace is fine for help about extensions, and there's already a lot of help in extensions pages (such as Extension:InputBox). It would be a pain for extensions writers to have to split documentation in two different pages (one in Help: and the other one in Extension:). i Alex  17:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey there, I am used to using wikipedia, and was having trouble creating a few templates there because of a problem with the #time parser function when getting a 2 year date. I listed my question here, but I noticed you were the person who edited the page most, so I thought I would write on your talk page. 2 questions: 1) if the problem were fixed would it automatically apply on wikipedia too? (I am unfamiliar with the relation between mediawiki and wikipedia), and 2) would you have any suggestions on how to fix it or workarounds if not? I have an account on wikipedia if it is easier to communicate over there, but I don't have one on here, so I will just sign with an IP address, I suppose. Feel free to respond here, or on the ParserFunctions talk page link I asked on as well. (I gave more specific examples of the problem there) I'll check back later. Thanks! 24.236.101.233 07:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Request
Please can you block my old account, for me, with the edit summary "Abandoned account". --Blackline1000 21:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Why do you need it to be blocked? Wouldn't redirecting its user and talk pages to your new account suffice? If you do want this done, you'll need to confirm that you are the owner of the old account too, by making an edit with it. Happy ‑ melon 21:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I just did make an edit with it before creating this account. I wanted it blocked to prevent it being compromised. Anyway, I'll redirect user and talk pages now. --Blackline1000 21:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Enjoy! Happy ‑ melon 21:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Another minor change to #switch:
Hi, Happy-melon. Being I a bit cautious, can you please add this another minor change to Help:Extension:ParserFunctions for me? I relized that "This function compares one input value against several test cases, returning a string associated whith the first match found "
 *   &rarr; 

I supposed that it could have been Bar Baz or BarBaz. Thanks, Gustronico 04:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * No need to be cautious, go ahead and add it yourself. Please don't think from my consistent tweaks over your edits that I don't think they're valuable; they are, very much so, we just have to try very hard to avoid the bloat of "oh it does this too" that's turned meta:Help:Template into such a horrible mess.  As long as they're structured properly, pertinent functional details like this are very important. Happy ‑ melon 09:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Typo of the day
Thanks. --Ed Poor 22:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Auto-archiving on Project:Support desk/Sections/Formatting (and perhaps elsewhere ...)
Hello, Happy-melon! Nice idea, but first there are some other archives (have a look at Project:Support desk/Archives), and second there have been a lot of questions without any answers or suggestions for solutions, including mine. Possibly some of those questions have been answered by the questioners themselves, but I think the good way would be: First asking if it's answered, waiting for an answer, and then archiving if there is a positive answer or if there is not an answer after some days (and of course not archiving, if there is a negative answer and the questioner is still waiting for a solution). Best regards -- JörgM 84.156.133.80 18:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, and thanks for the comment. I'm hoping that having this autoarchiving to clear out old threads will actually encourage us to be more consistent with handling new questions in the first place.  I'd consider anything that's not answered after three weeks to be 'stale', in as much as the OP is likely to have given up and no longer cares if they get a response (either they've worked it out for themselves, worked around it, or just given up).  Of course there will be exceptions, as you've pointed out.  Feel free to restore any questions that you are still monitoring; hopefully clearing out the 'dead wood' will allow us to focus on them more effectively. Thanks, Happy ‑ melon 21:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've moved the archived threads to the proper archives. Happy ‑ melon 21:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Have still found Project:Support desk/Sections/Formatting/Archive 1 (see also ). By the way: The bot took away the second part of Project:Support_desk/Sections/Formatting, probably because of problems to recognize the pre-tag correctly and/or to recognize the correct next headline outside the pre-tags. Best regards -- JörgM 84.156.135.187 09:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)