User talk:Technical 13



Namespace edit
Hi, thanks for the note about the reversion. Here's my thinking: * Namespace IDs used by extensions – Shows you a list of namespace IDs you should definitely avoid to prevent namespace conflicts, thus the first custom namespace may encounter conflicts even at ID 110 though 100 is theoretically possible. This basically comes down to "X shows you Y, thus the first A may do B is possible." There are a couple things going on here. First, it is a compound sentence, so the comma should be replaced by a semi-colon or a period. Second, the wording, when expanded into its full context opens up to: "X shows you Y, thus the fact that the first A may do B is possible." That's why I replaced "thus" (a preposition) with "that" (a conjunction). It doesn't make grammatical sense the other way. So how about this instead? * Namespace IDs used by extensions – Shows you a list of namespace IDs you should definitely avoid to prevent namespace conflicts. It is possible for the first custom namespace to encounter conflicts even at IDs 110 though 100. --RiverStyx23 (talk | contribs)  12:59, January 13, 2013
 * Your proposal looks fine to me. -- ShoeMaker  ( Contributions &bull; Message )   18:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Your Signature
I'm going to have to ask you to remove the blink element from it. Sorry! --Jorm (WMF) (talk) 00:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, fine. I've been getting harassed and hassled about it everywhere. I'll copy and paste the system from en.wikipedia when I have a moment. ShoeMaker  ( Contributions &bull; Message )   00:14, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. — T13  ( C • M • Click to learn how to view this signature as intended ) 00:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

GuidedTour
Here ya go. //en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org for the deployment cluster Charmlet (talk) 02:05, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Module:String
Hello. It seems that Template:Strlen and Template:git are broken on all pages, and I suspect Module:String to be the cause since it's the only page that's been recently edited. Do you have an idea of what might be going on? guillom 13:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing it has something to do with those templates being reliant on a really outdated and lacking version of the module. I've reverted the update to the module for now and I'll go through and update the templates before re-applying the updated module.  Thanks for brining it to my attention. Technical 13 (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC)