Gerrit/Advanced usage

This page describes the workflow for how MediaWiki core and extensions developers use git and gerrit. (To come: git-review docs here provided we use it.)



The diagram on the right is an accurate description of what our git workflow will look like. (Transcription is welcome!) To understand how our gerrit workflow will work, see these pages:


 * http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritWorkflow
 * http://source.android.com/source/life-of-a-patch.html

Also useful (if you subtract away GitHub stuff):
 * http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritJenkinsGithub

The gerrit review workflow might change; Roan & Chad are investigating using git-review, a tool that would help us better use git and gerrit together. If you'd like to try it out, we're seeking test subjects! Also, John Du Hart would like for us to consider using Phabricator instead.

Easier access to commit
Everyone will be able to push to everything. There will be no distinction between core and extensions! Since code doesn't automatically make it into the "master" repo until pulled, there's no danger of bad commits unless someone pulls irresponsibly. Thus, for many of the git repositories, only a small group will be able to pull changes into the repository that the Wikimedia Foundation hosts. (This repository is the one that we assume most developers will set as their master.)
 * This is like how ops does it. Ops, core MW and deployed extensions, "gated trunk" model - needs review before merge.  For any other extensions, you get an option of doing a straight push.  ("post-commit review")

Review before merge
It's important to us to have a review-before-merge workflow, for MediaWiki core and also for any extension we deploy. We will also offer that option to any extensions author who wants it for their extension. (The default is to use the current model we've been using with Subversion -- pushed and automatically merged.) For this decision we will defer to whoever is considered the primary author on the extension.

The one exception is i18n commits, which will be able to be pushed without review.

Who can review?
Who will have the ability to do code review?

We are using gerrit to manage code review. Anyone who had a Subversion account will get a gerrit account, and anyone can get a gerrit account. Within gerrit, anyone can comment on commits and signal their criticisms and approvals. Anyone can give a nonbinding "+1" to any commit (this is like "inspection" and "signoff" in the Subversion code review interface). However, for any given repository ("project"), only a small group of people will have the ability to approve code within gerrit and merge it into the repository. (Within gerrit, this superapproval is a "+2" even though that's a misleading name, because two +1 approvals DO NOT add up to a +2.) These people are "project owners".

Even within a project, we can also specify particular branches that only specific people can pull into.

MediaWiki core
We are going to maintain a "WMF" branch of mediawiki/core.git. We will use submodules for deployed extensions, and can pull from master as regularly as we want for deployments. At the start of the migration to git, the people with code review access to this branch are going to be the people who have the ability to deploy code to Wikimedia Foundation servers. See this list in gerrit and look for the lists of people under the headings "admins::mortals" or "admins::roots". Once we have the groups properly set up, gerrit will offer a list of the "project owners" for this branch. Every member of the Wikimedia Foundation operations (systems administration) team will also be in the project owners group insofar as they have code review rights globally, but in practice will rarely review code. We may add some existing code reviewers to this project owners group; we will figure out that final group by 7 March 2012.

At the start of the migration, we anticipate that this list of project owners for the WMF branch will also be the list of project owners for the master branch. However, eventually, we will add to the list of project owners for master, using as criteria the number and quality of developers' previous commits and code reviews.

No procedure has yet been defined for adding and removing people from the project owners groups. There will be a procedure by 7 March 2012.

MediaWiki extensions that the Wikimedia Foundation deploys
Same procedure as for MediaWiki core, and the same project owner groups.

Other MediaWiki extensions
Every extension author can choose between two choices here: the gated-trunk/push-for-review model, and a straight push model. For any given extension, we will honor the wishes of the person/s listed as the main author on the extension's mediawiki.org page.


 * The gated-trunk/push-for-review is the model that we are using for MediaWiki core, as mentioned above. A project owners group (plus the abovementioned project owners group for MediaWiki core) will be able to "+2" (approve and merge) changes to their extensions.  The extension author(s) will be able to define a project owners group and add others to it.


 * The straight push model is similar to how we did things in Subversion; anyone can suggest a change and submit a pull request, and it will automatically be approved and merged.

We could define groups to make this easier for batches of extensions (e.g. SMW developers). Chad will offer your community a choice. Please let Chad what you would like.

Other projects
Same procedure as for "other MediaWiki extensions" above.

Clone the repository
Step 1 is to clone the repository in question that you're wanting to make a change on. Do this in your command line by typing (replacing mediawiki/core.git with mediawiki/extensions/FooBar.git for an extension or any other part of the repository) git clone ssh:// @gerrit.wikimedia.org:29418/mediawiki/core.git

Go have a sip of coffee while you wait for a minute :)

Prepare to work with gerrit
In order to properly work with gerrit, you need to have a pre-commit hook that adds a "change id" to your commit summary so gerrit understands how to work with it.

Git-review
The easiest way to use gerrit is to install git-review. If you've done that, you can run: git review -s In your cloned copy to setup to work with gerrit. It will probably ask you for your username. The pre-commit hook will be automatically installed.

Manual setup
If installing git-review is not feasible for you, you'll need to download the commit-msg hook and place it in .git/hooks/ (should be in your cloned copy of the repository). cd .git/hooks wget https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/tools/hooks/commit-msg The hook also needs to be executable, for example: chmod u+x .git/hooks/commit-msg

You may also find it useful to add an alias to simplify the command to push changes to gerrit for review. You can do this by executing the following from your repository clone: git config alias.push-for-review "push origin HEAD:refs/for/master" (The refs/for/ is gerrit magic and must not be omitted. However, you may adapt master to point to the remote branch that you want to commit to. E.g.: When trying to push to the remote branch Foo use refs/for/Foo.)

Finally, you will need to tell git your username and e-mail address so gerrit can attach it to your accounts git config --global user.email "foo@example.com" git config --global user.name "mrfoo"

Commit a change
Make some changes in your working directory like you usually would, have fun! Commit them to your clone by doing a git commit -a (don't forget to git add any new files).

Push your change to gerrit
If you installed git review, the command to push changes to gerrit is very simple: git review

If you had to install the hook manually, you can push your changes by doing: git push-for-review

Note: Some extensions do not require review, in which case you can just git push origin master to push your changes past gerrit straight into the repository.

How to create a repository ("project")
See "Request a new Git repository". There's a form to fill out. It should get processed very quickly (within a couple of days).