Thread:Talk:Requests for comment/Decorify into extensions/Too vague, not actionable/reply

I'm really glad we're on the same page brion, with at the (somewhat limited) interactions with the community so far, I've seen exacly the opposite being the philosophy, and I hear a lot of people clamoring to corify all kinds of things that they consider basic to providing a fully featured product (parser functions, renameuser, deleteuser, reports, etc). While I completely agree 100% on delivering a fully features product like you I'd love to see this happen with wikimedia recognizing standout extensions out there and making them part of the distribution (like your suggestion about 1.19). I could be wrong, but it sounds like people are on a different page than this. Hence why I brought this up, as really this is a great opportunity to say "yeah, we can do this!" and it be a positive thing.

You're right I did keep things vague, I wouldn't mind if we fleshed it out, but I'm not even certain people are for this at all.