Extension talk:NewUserMessage

Usage
This extension works very well, but ...

It might seem obvious to more experienced users, but it took me a while how to work out how to use the name parameter in the MediaWiki:NewUserMessage page (embarrassed smile here!)

I have only used named parameters before so thought adding would add the users name to the output but it has to be.

I will add an example MediaWiki:NewUserMessage page to the Usage section to show this.

BrillyuntWebby 19:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

How do you insert the user's real name.
I created a template 'NewUserWelcome' and call that template on NewUserMessage article.

But instead of seeing user's real name all I see i in the user's talk page.

Thanks!
Thanks for this extension, It really helps me out. I am... well lets just say I am a noob in the wiki world still, but this was pretty easy to install and to use. Thanks again =) --82.170.65.121 15:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Bot in Recent Changes
Hi I have set a bot as $wgNewUserMessageEditor = 'XX'; but still the change shows up in Recent Changes. All other changes by the bot do corretly not show up. Maybe cos I have changed the message to be added to UserPage? Line 42: $talk = $user->getUserPage;

Any idea? --Subfader 13:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not quite sure what you mean here? how does the bot fit in with NewUserMessage? I've added a global into the code called $wgNewUserSupressRC to allow you to supress the new user messages from showin up in recent changes. --Nad 21:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks that works fine now. --Subfader 05:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Request to enable on Wikimedia
Just an FYI: See 14311. Siebrand 14:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for keeping me in the loop :-) --Nad 21:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Why no support of insertion into User Page
Is there any reason why this extension does not support filling the User Page instead of the User Talk Page with the provided template? I just hacked the extension by replacing $user->getTalkPage by $user->getUserPage and it seems to work, but I haven't thoroughly tested it yet.

Any comments or arguments why this might be a bad idea? - LosWochos 11:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)