Thread:Talk:Article feedback/IMDB rating: Only consider trustworthy users/reply (26)

The principles outlined by the anon still apply. The opinions of the elite (like you) do not tell us anything about our audience's view of the product. They give us a specialist's view, which is useful for identifying (for example) whether it complies with certain, specific, technical standards, but they do not tell us what our audience thinks.

John Smith doesn't need to read "the WP guideline for the completeness of articles" (which, BTW, is a poor example, because no such guideline exists) to provide useful and accurate information to us about his opinion of whether the article is complete according to a real-world, dictionary-definition kind of completeness.

You seem to be stuck in the wikibubble. The tool is trying to use plain English to get normal-person, real-world responses. It is not trying to correlate perfectly to wikijargon and the quirky details of official policies and guidelines.