Thread:Talk:Article feedback/The future of AFT/reply (6)

My replies were very constructive in case you followed the whole discussion page. It's the way this tool was pushed live and how it's defended by people like WhatAmIDoingWrong and others that made me (and others) lose all hope for AFT. Proof me wrong please.
 * It's misunderstood and used wrong by half of the people (by judging the object, not the article).
 * Most votes are fan/hate votes.
 * The rest are anon abusers who like this as a tool to fool around. But who can blame them... every anon and spam bot can vote without the slightest confirmation/check (and even as "highly knowledgeable") and you guys want to make us believe their votes are just as valuable as every other vote.
 * It works so bad it's even abused by WMF staff to neutrealize abuse votes. WTF?
 * It's not wanted at all by the community? I only see negative feedback. Where are the "Yay hurray, finally!" posts please by the editors who are asked to improve articles based on AFT ratings?
 * AFT has not improved anything yet.