Core Platform Team/Initiatives/REST JobExecutor

Poll
Team members are invited to voice support or opposition, and give their reasoning. Please use the polling templates, for example:
 * This work is vital for reducing complexity in advance of k8s migration work. A few attempts have been made at unifying this config and there are WIPs that we can leverage to make this happen more easily. --HNowlan (WMF) (talk) 13:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * This doesn't only "just make sense", we also already started it. So we should go ahead and finish it. -- DKinzler (WMF) (talk) 14:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * This would reduce tech debt and since ~50% of it is already done we should finish it. CAndrew (WMF) (talk) 14:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Its ~50% done and it would make MW on K8's easier AMooney (WMF) (talk), 9 September 2020
 * If it will clear the path for moving k8s forward and its already half done i think it will be difficult to find a counter argument to this work :) NNikkhoui (WMF)
 * Important benefit for MW on k8s and should be completed WDoran (WMF)
 * Supported for all the reasons already mentioned. BPirkle (WMF)
 * Support for reasons above. CCicalese (WMF) (talk) 19:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)