Content translation/Section translation

Content translation's Boost initiative is aimed at expanding the use of translation to help more communities to grow. By enabling new and more visible ways to contribute by using translation, we expect communities to attract new editors, and expand the knowledge available in their languages. Content translation has been successful in supporting the translation process on many Wikipedia communities. It has already helped to create thousands of new articles while encouraging the creation of good quality translations. However, we identified potential for expanding its use to more contexts that can benefit from translation:


 * Translation can be used by more wikis. The adoption of Content translation varies significantly from wiki to wiki, and there are wikis with potential to benefit from using translation more.
 * Translation can be used in more ways. Currently, Content translation focuses on creating new articles on desktop. Supporting new kinds of contribution such as expanding existing articles with new sections, or mobile translation enable more opportunities to contribute.

Please, provide any feedback about this initiative in the discussion page.

This initiative is aligned with the Wikimedia Foundation plans to "Grow participation globally, focusing on emerging markets" and increasing "Worldwide readership". More details and updates are provided below.

Goals and impact
These are the main goals for the project and metrics to measure them:


 * Grow the community of translators. Attract more users to translate (using different devices) that remain active over time and help recruit new translators.
 * Metric: Increase the percentage of new editors that completed their second translation in a month.
 * Grow the content available. Increase the coverage in both the topics available and their depth (information they contain).
 * Metric: Double the number of weekly translations on selected wikis (to create new content or extend existing one).

Communities involved
We want to focus on Wikipedias with potential to grow by using translation. Wikipedias with less than 100K articles, a significant editing activity for the size of their wiki (more than 70 active editors), and making little use of translation currently (less than 100 translations per month).

Given the above, we initially selected the following Wikipedias:


 * Malayalam
 * Bengali
 * Tagalog
 * Javanese
 * Mongolian

This small group of wikis represents a much larger group of communities that can grow with the proposed improvements. Selecting a small set allows us to focus and collaborate more closely with them. Nevertheless, we expect the improvements to benefit a larger number of wikis, and users form all wikis are definitely welcome to participate.

This list is considered a preliminary selection. Once we complete the initial communication we'll get a better understanding of the interest of those communities to get involved in the project, and the final list may change.

Provide your feedback
Please, provide any feedback about this initiative in the discussion page.

Scope
We want knowledge to propagate across languages more fluently. These are the initial work areas considered:


 * Make Content translation more visible. This involves making the tool available by default, expose the tool more visibly at relevant places, surface relevant content gaps, and customize the process to meet the needs of the community. In this way, more editors will be able to find relevant content to translate.
 * Increase the coverage of content for existing articles. Explore ideas to expand existing articles by translating new sections. This will enable users to expand existing articles with new aspects to cover the topic in more detail.
 * Support translation on more devices. Support translation from mobile devices to provide more opportunities for contribution on any device, enabling new editors to participate.

These areas are based on our experience working on Content translation, the user feedback received and previous research. However, specific research for this project will inform the specific work areas to consider.


 * Better support for exposing the tool as default by supporting settings to disable the entry points for wikis where the tool is out of beta.
 * Better guidance for users by showing an invite to try the main entry point to those users that discovered the tool through a non-persistent invite so that they learn how to find the tool the next time.