User talk:Adamtheclown/LQT Archive 1

Adam, now it's going to seem like I am picking on everything you do, and telling you it's wrong. But that is not the case, believe me. The example that you changed in this edit of Help:Extension:ParserFunctions is:
 *  

and it has three line breaks in it:
 * 



Right? These three line breaks were then replicated in the code of the example, so that it is ensured that the actual code reflects the exact statement of the example. The logic behind this is that if you STATE that the example is with THREE line breaks, then it is imperative that the example code itself MUST ALWAYS have the same exact, precise, THREE line breaks that you stated that it has. Right?

Otherwise, you are fooling the reader, I believe. It is irrelevant whether the result is the same with or without them. The example statement says that there are three line breaks, the code MUST have them! Would you agree?

So, why did you remove the three line breaks from the example code, if the example statement has three line breaks in it?

Hamilton Abreu 00:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your suggestion
I'm on IRC as Emufarmers. You can send me a message there and I'll respond when I can. —Emufarmers(T 15:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)