Template talk:Tracked

Making the Phabricator part work
What is missing to make this template work? First real use: Phabricator/Permissions. And now here. :)--Qgil-WMF (talk) 20:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, interwiki map entry requested at m:Talk:Interwiki_map.--Qgil-WMF (talk) 22:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

The interwiki part is now done, and both phabricator: and phab: are enabled. The link in the template does point to valid Phabricator pages, but it looks red and it appends "?action=edit&redlink=1" to the URL.--Qgil-WMF (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Saw the redlink, purged and now is a blue link. See this anywhere still? --Jeremyb-phone (talk) 19:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * First look: blue link, don't forget the Parser cache ;) --Florianschmidtwelzow (talk) 20:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * P.S.: The first page i saw the redlink: Phabricator/Permissions. Did a null edit, which caused a re-rendering of the page. Now there is a blue link, like expected :) Best, --Florianschmidtwelzow (talk) 11:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Added mw Interwiki
Tested on, where no Phabricator page exists, now using Phabricator. Let's see if that also works locally... –Be..anyone (talk) 01:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Now also available on Meta with a -subpage from commons. The  -subpages can be replaced by the version here when  is closed. –Be..anyone (talk) 02:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Stalled
Apparently  was replaced by , cf. T212, I'll try a SoFixIt. –Be..anyone (talk) 23:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

How to link to a Phab project workboard
How do we link from a project page like Frontend standards group to its Phab project workboard (project/board/24/) ? It feels like another use for tracked, but doesn't work and needs different link text. Is there a better template (we need a [Category:Phabricator templates]). -- SPage (WMF) (talk) 17:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * tracked is for tasks/bugs. I think we need a separate generic template for linking to phab boards/diffusion and such.  20:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Alignment
Suddenly this is left-aligned everywhere. Probably because template:pagelang doesn't exist ? --Nemo 13:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. I have removed whitespaces. --Shirayuki (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, of course. Thanks! --Nemo 14:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Easy to miss
On LQT boards, having the template at the right, grey on grey, doesn't exactly look nice to me (I keep ignoring it). --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 06:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmm, that's correct, but the most visible LQT Boards will be migrated to Flow in the near future, so does this need to be fixed asap? :) --Florianschmidtwelzow (talk) 07:59, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yup, but what's wrong with changing now and then reverting later in case? :) --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Was Flow tested for compatibility with this template? --Nemo 08:24, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, scientifically. Lonely question mark on the second line is lonely. --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The versions of tracked with 13em instead of 12em would solve the issue on your test page. I tested it with Chrome's "inspect element" feature, "edit attribute", 13 instead of 12, close div details, and at that point the question mark hopped back to where it belongs. OTOH the 13em suggestion tried to solve a Firefox issue, now we're looking at LQT and (in my case) Chrome, so I'm not sure if thats's a real "solution". Other idea(s), smaller font in the first line, and/or &amp;nbsp; instead of a space between text + (?). Another scientific result, neither 13em nor &amp;nbsp; solve the issue on the test page. –Be..anyone (talk) 13:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)