Help:Extension:Translate/Quality assurance/hi

उच्च गुणवत्ता ही हर कोई अपने हिस्से करता है जब पहुंचा जा सकता है: हम कुछ सार है [: MyLanguage / सहायता: [विशेष विस्तार: / अनुवाद सर्वोत्तम प्रथाओं अनुवाद | अनुवाद सर्वोत्तम प्रथाओं]] का पालन किया जाना चाहिए। आप एक अनुवादक या एक अनुवाद व्यवस्थापक हैं, विस्तार उच्च गुणवत्ता के अनुवाद का उत्पादन करने के लिए उपकरण प्रदान करता है अनुवाद। में | हम उनके प्रयास प्रगति की निगरानी करने की जरूरत है और अनुवाद प्रशासकों है जहां अनुवादकों खोजने के लिए अनुमति कई उपकरण है जो वर्णन किया है [: MyLanguage / सहायता: [विशेष: एक्सटेंशन सांख्यिकी और] रिपोर्टिंग के आंकड़े और रिपोर्टिंग / अनुवाद]। इस पेज में हम  'गुणवत्ता आश्वासन'  उनके अनुवाद में सुधार करने के लिए एक साथ काम करने के लिए अनुवादकों प्रोत्साहित करते हैं कि तकनीकी उपकरणों की व्याख्या। अनुवाद की समीक्षा के लिए एक बहुत ही महत्वपूर्ण कार्य है और उपकरण उपलब्ध कराई है कि यह संभव बढ़ाने के लिए और अनुवाद की गुणवत्ता का आकलन करने के लिए बनाते हैं।

अनुवाद समीक्षा
सुविधाएँ समीक्षा उपकरणों के लिए उपयोग उपयोगकर्ता अधिकार के द्वारा नियंत्रित किया जाता है। डिफ़ॉल्ट रूप से अनुवाद एक्सटेंशन 'अनुवाद' समीक्षक '' नामक एक उपयोगकर्ता समूह कहते हैं। समीक्षा ध्यान में रखते हुए दर्शकों को वे अनुवाद एक बटन क्लिक करके सही और अच्छा लगता है कि संकेत मिलता है कि कर सकते हैं। समीक्षक फिर से एक ही अनुवाद की समीक्षा करने की जरूरत नहीं है कि इतनी सॉफ्टवेयर की समीक्षा की अनुवाद का ट्रैक रखता है। उपयोगकर्ताओं को केवल वे खुद को नहीं बनाया है अनुवाद की समीक्षा कर सकते हैं। कई लोगों के लिए किसी भी अनुवाद की समीक्षा कर सकते हैं।

संदेश प्रलेखन के रूप में अच्छी तरह से यहां एक महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाता है। समीक्षक अनुवाद सही वर्तनी और शब्दावली है कि न केवल यह सुनिश्चित करने की जरूरत है, लेकिन यह भी संदर्भ के लिए उपयुक्त है।

For translators
The number of people who have reviewed a translation is shown near the review action for each message.

Of more interest, translators see in their watchlist when any of their translation has been reviewed. This is useful because they can see that someone is looking at their work and appreciating it, and that they're not left alone or ignored, so they can be more confident about translating.

It's (currently) not possible to exclude translation review log entries from the watchlist, watchlist email notifications or recent changes.

For reviewers
Translation review is performed on Special:Translate: the "mark as reviewed" check-mark is shown in the review view. Reviewers can review translations for any message group or choose the Recent translations message group to review latest translations.

Translations made by yourself can be hidden by clicking the hide button in the action bar at the bottom of the view. If not hidden, they have a small person icon. Filled (black) check-mark means that you have already marked the translation as reviewed. Empty check-mark (white on gray background) means that you will be the first reviewer of the translation. Gray check-mark means that the translation has been already reviewed by others, but not by you.

For other reviewers
Other reviewers benefit from knowing that some messages have already been reviewed, and by how many users. In fact, they can choose to focus review efforts on unreviewed translations in the group, using the relevant selector. Such translations might also have been left unreviewed by an unsure reviewer and require more attention because there is no way for the translator to report an uncertain translation.

Reviewing recent translations
The "recent translations" group is perhaps the most useful translation review feature. It can replace Special:RecentChanges and Special:WatchList for some uses.

In this page you can immediately see all translations you can review (and only them, if you use the filter for own translations). Most of the needed information is there and more is shown when you open the translation editor.

The initial review of message groups is better done one group at a time rather than in chronological order. The next section provides you a divide and conquer solution to decrease the review backlog.

Systematic review
Translation review makes into a real joy the hard job of proofreading a whole message group to keep it at an high level of quality and consistency.

If you know a message group well, you can open it for review and choose all translated messages and go through it all at once. Now you can check that messages have been correctly interpreted and improve their documentation; and ensure that source terms have been translated in the same way everywhere, with the help of the translation memory and the searchbar keyword-filter.

The next time, you'll only have to open the group again and skim it for the icons indicating new translations which need review; you won't need to closely follow recent changes nor to watchlist all messages, which are respectively too crowded and not practical.

Translation memory can help a little to keep the wording of similar messages consistent. It cannot enforce consistent use of terms in different kinds of messages. There is no technical solution for this problem yet, but you now have a handy tool to impose consistency piece by piece. It's a good achievement to have consistent translations at least across a whole message group, especially if it uses special terms which are hard to understand. In such cases more than usual, different translators might translate the messages, using different terms and resulting in a confusing overall translation. Moreover, if consistency is improved, the suggestions given by translation memory are more consistent and this should improve consistency among all message groups.

Workflows
The Translate extension is designed for publishing translations as soon as possible to show translators the impact of their work. If you want to be sure that translations are of good quality before using them, you can use a more formal process. You can implement a workflow through message group states.

Reviewing of translation does not have any effect on the appearance or usage of translations, so it's a quite different tool than the Flagged revisions extension: the scope of translation reviewing is not to find and provide to its readers the best translation among those available, but to encourage quality work on translations.

Reviewing of translation can be combined with message group workflow states by having a proofreading state to be used by proofreaders to coordinate. As explained in more detail in the relevant page, the two features do not interact with each other: they are controlled separately by the users.