User talk:Anonymous Dissident

Hi :) Spebi 01:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Sysop
OK, you now have your own mop and bucket. Just be careful with the flamethrower ;). Aaron 00:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yap, welcome aboard :-) -- :Bdk: 14:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcoming Template
Can you please create a welcoming template?(76.247.222.101 07:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC))
 * Sure, -- Anon  Diss  07:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * And done. -- Anon  Diss  07:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Yeah, I monitor the mediawiki RC and I saw it happen and the person I report vandalism to on this wiki (on IRC) (Sayuri) wasn't online yet, so I got a temp sysop to clean it up..No Problems..Love to help..-- Cometstyles 11:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Bah, you should request atemproal sysop access. Good job once again. -- Anon  Diss  11:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:Welcome
Feel like revamping the template? It should probably look something like commons:Template:Welcome, with ability to change the language on the page.  Mønobi 06:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * K. Anon  Diss  09:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Mail
Replied.  Mønobi 15:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * & again.  Mønobi 02:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Didn't get it. Please re-send. -- Anon  Diss  02:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

moving a category and keeping the history

 * User Anonymous Dissident (talk) deleted this page after you started editing with reason:


 * The question belongs on a talk page. The other content is available on relevant pages, such as the one regarding moving and categories themselves, here and on Meta

Help:Moving a page and Help:Categories - no such information.

Move and Categories: this technique of keeping the revision history is not found. They state "To change the name of a category, one needs to change all category tags, and copy the editable part" and "The editable first part of a category can be moved like any other page..." This last claim is at best incomplete, and also either incorrect, or does not apply to every version (certainly doesn't apply to Appropedia, which has very recently been upgraded).

I searched to see if the information was available before posting it, and it wasn't. Thus I don't understand - why did you delete this page? --Chriswaterguy 06:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I recreated the page - I would have waited longer for your response, in case I'm in error, but I had expanded the article and the only way I could see to recover that from cache was to proceed and recreate. Didn't think of previewing till later. --Chriswaterguy 07:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Please retrieve the information, and relevantly add to the aforementioned pages; in any case, this does not warrant its own page. Cheers, -- Anon  Diss  10:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Happy for it to be moved, or to move it myself, but please be more careful before deleting content. --Chriswaterguy 03:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And in turn please be sure to create pages as policy permits. This was a fair deletion, no matter how you argue. I'll make the merge myself. -- Anon  Diss  05:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Your comment on deletion demonstrated was factually incorrect and fundamentally different from the reason you're giving now. If I made an error (not an unusual thing for a user to do on a wiki) then moving it was the reasonable and civil thing to do. --Chriswaterguy 12:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I care not to argue. You made the error by creating an inappropriate page by policy. Do not blame me. My reason is different now because I am more informed; my stance remains that you were at fault for creating the page. Anon  Diss  13:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I pressed the point because I'm concerned at seeing admins with this kind of approach to civility, not biting newbies etc (assuming that applies here too). I won't press it further.


 * Thanks for moving the content to a suitable spot. --Chriswaterguy 13:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Localization checks
About your question at my user talk page: If you had read my edit summary for that edit you would have seen that I wrote "all nn: errors corrected". In other words: The nn: section was removed because all the problematic issues for that language has been fixed. Please restore my version. Cheers, Eirik 15:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I apologise for my mis-interpretation. Restored. Anon  Diss  00:18, 12 January 2008 (UTC)