Extension management 2018 feedback/Other

Configuring an extension should be possible from a special page
Almost all extensions have various configurations that require us to edit LocalSettings.php file. I think this could be better done using a Special Page where we would have a form for all the configuration options available and the values can be set from there. Nischayn22 (talk) 06:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Endorsements

 * Nischayn22 (talk) 06:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Comments

 * Is there a specific requirement that this be a special page, or would any web frontend (e.g. as a part of the web installer) meet your needs? Legoktm (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Any web frontend should be fine. But it should be accessible after installing as well. Nischayn22 (talk) 16:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Revisit extension compatibility policies
The current compatibility policies are "master" and "rel".

It would be good to revisit the compatibility policies or the supporting environment to try to address some of the issues. Cindy.cicalese (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Endorsements

 * Cindy.cicalese (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Sam Wilson 03:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Include help documentation within extensions
At the moment we link to pages on MediaWiki.org (prefixed with ) to provide end-user help/documentation for extensions. The problems with this are a) that the version in use may not be the latest, and so the docs may not apply; and b) the user is sent away from their wiki and so gets confused. It'd be cool to be able to include help pages within extensions' code, so that the user always sees docs that are applicable to the version they're actually using, and in their own wiki. —Sam Wilson 02:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Edit: I meant to add that the docs could also be available on MediaWiki.org (via some magic), perhaps even for multiple versions. Sam Wilson 00:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Endorsements

 * Sam Wilson 02:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments

 * If the docs have a meaning-changing typo or something, user will be stuck with incorrect docs. Edward Chernenko (talk) 23:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That's true, but also that situation would be viewed as a bug and fixed accordingly. It would make it harder to make informal corrections and updates to the docs, but also mean that everything would be reviewed prior to publishing (which could make make sure things are correct). Sam Wilson 00:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)