Thread:Talk:Article feedback/Is AFT specifically on ENWP because of temporary technical limitations?

Assuming that the following points are correct: ...then I would assume that once AFT can be made usable in non-English Wikipedias, it will be enabled on those projects which have consensus for it, AFT will continue to be improved, helped by the feedback coming from the communities, and the English Wikipedia will have AFT removed from all articles other than those under WP:USPP until such time as the community has decided to enable it across more/all articles, if there are no problems with gathering data and feedback from other language WPs, and the projects that have consensus for enabling AFT aren't too small a sample size, and there wouldn't be any other problems in doing so. So how much of the above is correct?
 * The English Wikipedia never had consensus to enable the Article Feedback Tool outside US Public Policy articles. There may have been a significant amount of support for the tool, but it never went through the process of gaining consensus and being implemented as a result of it.
 * Some other Wikipedias do have consensus for enabling AFT.
 * The WMF does not intend to rollout AFT across all language Wikipedias.
 * AFT is not yet far enough into its development to be localized and made usable for Wikipedias other than EN.
 * The current implementation is primarily to gather data.