Topic on Talk:Structured Discussions

Pinging people in a reply metadata instead of reply text

4
Gryllida (talkcontribs)

I clearly recall this being a bug on file. Would you please do it? It's a nice thing to avoid cluttering text with nicknames of other people.

Quiddity (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Gryllida: You'd filed that as bugzilla:59231. You wrote:

"a setting for pings to not be displayed, either

  • hidden where the pingee is a parent message author, or
  • hidden entirely."

As well as those options, perhaps pings could be:

  • A different color (eg. near-black instead of bright-blue) so that they're less eye-catching.
  • Shown as a list of "who will be pinged" for the post-author whilst they're typing, but not in the saved-post itself.
  • Made smaller, like en:Template:Tiny ping (I would disagree with this one, but listing for completism)

What else could we do, or do other sites do?

Gryllida (talkcontribs)

"Shown as a list of "who will be pinged" for the post-author whilst they're typing, but not in the saved-post itself." -- yes definitely; cluttered post text is the primary concern here.

" A different color (eg. near-black instead of bright-blue) so that they're less eye-catching." I don't really care.

"Made smaller, like en:Template:Tiny ping (I would disagree with this one, but listing for completism)" -- when you do such list, you can make them smaller if you like; I don't care.


By all means please try to keep it readable. More on this in a next message.

Gryllida (talkcontribs)

Please keep it readable.

  • The "by clicking reply, you agree to..." message is not something my elderly relatives would be able to even notice.
  • The 'cancel' and 'preview' are light grey on white background. This is hard to read.
  • The 'reply', 'edit', '25 seconds ago' are all light grey on white. They're all hard to read in the small print.
Reply to "Pinging people in a reply metadata instead of reply text"