ef prefix
I've seen some extension use the 'ef' prefix for global function names (presumably standing for 'extension function'). Is this a proper coding convention or some unholy bastardization? Is 'wf' or 'ef' preferred for global function names in extensions?
Kaldari 23:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
ef has been used since ancient times, but it's not super common now. In most cases modern style puts hook functions as static methods on a class, leaving few or no raw top-level functions to be so named.
--brion 23:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)