Talk:Localisation
[edit] Initial source
As noted in the edit summary, this from an exchange between Edward Z. Yang and Tim Starling from the wikitech-l mailing list, posted by User:Nickj. Nick - can you post confirmation here once you have got permission that they are happy to release this as GFDL. --HappyDog 01:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
where is the ISO 8601 bug report?
== British English? ==--Purodha Blissenbach 00:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Is there any reason why this page is Internationalisation and not Internationalization? The text of the page itself as well as the text accompanying links like the one on Developer_hub use the z version as does Wikipedia (http://www.google.com/search?q=internationalization%20site:en.wikipedia.org vs http://www.google.com/search?q=internationalisation%20site:en.wikipedia.org). Don't really care which one is used. Well that's not true, I would prefer Internationalization. But regardless we should at least be consistent. --Cneubauer 02:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- That's likeli becauze peoples automatikally type vot thei are uzed to, and mybee they don't recognise even that ther are differences ;-) --Purodha Blissenbach 00:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Article content Localisation
Greetings.
Is there any way to use Localisation to translate custom words inside an article content?
What about page title in the article content?
Thanks
Palanolho 17:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- You should check IMSLP. They use a system of templates for that. But I'm not sure if that's the standard solution. --Micru 09:18, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
-
- There isn't any standard solution, several hacks have been used in the past. Now the Extension:Translate is providing a proper (albeit not complete yet) solution. This is offtopic for this page, by the way. Nemo 09:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)