Project:Requests
From MediaWiki.org
Use this page for requests for:
- Renaming
- Promotion (to sysop, bot, bureaucrat, transwiki, etc.)
- Anything else bureaucrats are needed for (is there anything?)
One thing to keep in mind is that unlike most Wikimedia sites, this site presently appears to be controlled by the MediaWiki developers, not the community. Being a developer (someone with commit access who uses it to maintain code that runs on Wikimedia sites) automatically entitles you to at least sysop status, and a long-time developer won't find it hard to become a bureaucrat. If you're not a developer, you do have to give some good reason to get any privileges; you should not expect to ever be made a bureaucrat; and if you are, you might want to stick to renames and leave promotions to developers. Something like a third of sysops and a quarter of bureaucrats are non-developers, however, so it's not like you shouldn't bother asking.
That said, there aren't really any formal policies on what's required: you just have to convince a bureaucrat. Use common sense ― if you're trustworthy and your services are in need, there's no reason not to promote you to sysop at least, but don't ask for sysop without giving a concrete reason (unless you're a developer). Being personally known to a developer or having sysop or higher status on a major Wikimedia project are two ways to be deemed trustworthy.
Asking for transwiki, bot, or rename is fine without demonstrating that you're trustworthy, since those can be revoked at will and don't do much anyway.
Contents |
[edit] Requests for permissions
[edit] Pending
[edit] Completed
Request archives: Administrator • Bureaucrat
- I've added Krimpet as a temporary sysop so she can correct her transwiki work. Expires 1 October 2008. Kylu 05:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Is temporary sysopship really necessary on such a small wiki? I've been away for a while; perhaps policies have changed, but I really think that adding the new "temporary" layer of bureaucracy to a wiki such as this can only be unhealthy. Krimpet, for one, is trustworthy enough to just have full sysopship, at any rate. --AnonDiss 10:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well she hasn't really been active since 27th June..if she becomes more active again, then yup..make it permanent..if not, then I'll make sure it gets removed on October 1st...--Cometstyles 04:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Requests for renames
- Information on how renames work is available on Wikipedia.

