Extension talk:ReaderFeedback

From MediaWiki.org

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Download

Hi there, the download of this extension is not available throught the extension-distributor or has another name there. Who may help? Thank you --kgh 19:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Now testing

Here: http://readerfeedback.labs.wikimedia.org/ and here: http://strategy.wikimedia.org --Nemo bis 11:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Change rating

From the testing on Strategic planning wiki: you should be able to change rating, or at least add votes (e.g., if I have rated "Feasibility" and then, after some discussion or other, I want to rate "Priority", too). It would be useful also to remember what the user voted. Pages can change greatly over time... Nemo bis 11:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] LikedPages and ProblemPages should show more results

On Stratecic planning wiki, LikedPages shows just one item: this is not so useful. (I report here because I'm not sure it's a real bug and I suppose the developers already know that, but maybe they don't.) --Nemo bis 13:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Ratings for all pages in one table as output

On http://strategy.wikimedia.org/ I'm trying to use reader feedback intensively on all proposals. There are over 700 proposal pages. I would like to have the reader feedback on all 700+ proposal pages. What I imagine is one table (space or comma delimeted) with title, and number of votes per weight, per tag, for example:

' P r i o r I m p a c F e a s i D e s i r
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
A "be bold" campaign 0 0 2 4 5 0 0 4 3 4 0 1 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0
A series of videos to dissuade vandals, encourage new editors, welcome and inform newbies of key editing policies and perhaps more 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Bei Jahresrückblicken Fernsehereignisse schreiben. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brand name consolidation 7 3 3 3 3 3 0 2 7 7 6 3 1 2 4 0 1 1 0 0
Can Wikimedia Become A 300 Million People Movement By 2020? 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Directed community fundraising 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Can someone help me in retrieving these data without having to manually visit over 700 pages? Dedalus 14:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Database Error

If I want to rate a page in my wiki, a database error occures.


YPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> Internal Error

A database error has occurred
Query: SELECT rfb_ratings FROM `wikirevision` FORCE INDEX (page_timestamp),`wikireader_feedback` WHERE rev_page = '36' AND (rev_id = rfb_rev_id) AND (rfb_timestamp >= '20090920000000') AND (rev_timestamp >= '20090911123847')
Function: ReaderFeedback::getVoteAggregates
Error: 1052 Column 'rfb_ratings' in field list is ambiguous (localhost)


What does this mean?--Harmageddon 13:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Issue in the display of text for rating

After implementing it today (Nov 1, 2009), this is how the text appears in the box ...

<readerfeedback-Relevance>: <readerfeedback-Completeness>: <readerfeedback-Quality>: <readerfeedback-Presentation>:

Basically, it is showing "<readerfeedback-" at the begining of the rating tag and ">" at the end of the tag.

Does anyone else has encountered this issue? I downloaded today's development version (File Name: ReaderFeedback-trunk-r58393.tar.gz)

Also on special pages (page rating), in the dropdown box, the list has similar issue. Displaying all those extra characters with the tag.

Thanks, Neeraj

Generally that means pages in mediawiki namespace weren't created properly. (Note this is just a geuss, i don't actually know what i'm talking about). Did you run maintenance/update.php? Maybe try creating the pages mediawiki:readerfeedback-Relevance (and anything else that appears like that). Bawolff 07:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] (Resolved) What happened to Problem and Liked pages?

I see references to Special:ProblemPages and Special:LikedPages, but these are missing from my installation and from the labs wiki. What happened to them or what am I missing? Thorncrag 02:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay so I found the answer to my own question here, but yet I'm still a little unclear as to how this works. Thorncrag 02:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Okay, got it... =) Thorncrag 02:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
# What number of page votes (for the average above) is considered significant?
# (number of recent reviews to be a decent sample size)
$wgFeedbackSizeThreshhold = 1;

[edit] Sugestion

It would be nice if there was a magic word to return the ratings to be used in templates. Danilo.mac 21:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC)